[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: gettyimages-2232847359.jpg (1.91 MB, 6192x4128)
1.91 MB
1.91 MB JPG
What are the political implications of chinese laser weapons?

>The LY-1 (Chinese: 燎原-1; pinyin: liaoyuan-1; lit. 'prairie fire 1'[1]) is a Chinese shipborne or ground-based high-energy laser weapon designed to intercept drones, cruise missiles, helicopters, and fixed-wing aircraft. The laser weapon system was unveiled at the 2025 China Victory Day Parade.
>>
>>519922825
We should reverse engineer them after they get them perfected.
>>
File: smirko.png (16 KB, 206x161)
16 KB
16 KB PNG
>make a thread on warthunder forums being wrong about how laser weapons work
>some assmad chink posts the blueprints to own me
they call me James Bondi
>>
>>519922825
What are the political implications of
China stealing our decades old tech?
>>
>>519922825
Lasers are overhyped. They are good for ballistic projectiles and slow drones only. Anything that's fast and actively maneuvering can't be intercepted by a laser.
>>
File: 1761550582066022.png (294 KB, 748x665)
294 KB
294 KB PNG
>>519922947
Really?
>>
>>519922947
>Lasers are overhyped. They are good for ballistic projectiles and slow drones only. Anything that's fast and actively maneuvering can't be intercepted by a laser.
stupid jew, you need something that is able to intercept massive amounts of cheap Aliexpress drones without using up ammunition. they already have normal missile interceptors for other kinds of stuff.
>>
Saudis are not happy with the performance
https://defence-blog.com/saudi-military-slams-chinese-laser-weapon/
>>
>>519926252
>Saudi Arabia procured the SkyShield as part of its broader effort to counter the rising threat of unmanned aerial attacks on critical infrastructure. The system was fielded with assistance from Chinese specialists, and its initial demonstrations showed strong results.

>Dust and sand disrupted optical tracking and weakened the laser beam. Continuous exposure also caused abrasion to the optical systems, while the high desert heat forced much of the system’s power into cooling rather than firing.

>Saudi officials have asked Beijing to refine the SkyShield for use in hot and dusty climates. Until those improvements are made, the Silent Hunter laser remains limited for sustained deployment.

Works fine, just lack of maintenance, what do you expect from sandniggers.
>>
>>519923464
We all know china didn't shoot them down retard.
>>
they need to make the laser effect more like it is in the movies
right now it's not very satisfying
>>
>>519926710
>doesn't work
>"works fine"
Typical chinese salesman
>>
File: 1756460974960464.png (197 KB, 873x600)
197 KB
197 KB PNG
>What are the political implications of chinese laser weapons?
It will be difficult for anglotards to invade China.

They might just have to settle for honest work and griitty grind for once to improve their own hellscapes.
>>
>>519930165
You having sand in your pussy is not anybody else's fault but yours Bruce.
>>
File: 111551~2.jpg (138 KB, 1080x880)
138 KB
138 KB JPG
>>519928687
We all know they did. Cope more.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.