Watching porn should be a humiliation ritual. You should have to upload a photo, log in, and verify your address and personal ID to watch it. This would easily deter the average porn watcher and cause great harm to the porn jew.
>>526233414AND you have to create a pornhub account? Wew lad
>>526233414why?
>>52623347050–70% of porn users are casual/impulsive users. The average normie is not desperate enough to upload their face and ID to wack off
>>526233414>This would easily deter the average porn watcherWhen pornhub got hacked the accounts of 200 million people were leaked.The average porn watcher is so fucking stupid they will gladly make an account for this shit with zero fucking concept of the implications of it effectively being a giant epstein island blackmail ring waiting to happen.Even if you don't have an account they'd have a file on you.
why do you wish to humiliate other people OP?
>>526233414I'd say watching porn itself is a humiliation ritual. Pornographers should be jailed and have all of their assets confiscated.
>>526233414>You should have to upload a photo, log in, and verify your address and personal ID to watch it.No you need need to learn how to use your computer better or go old school.
>>526233595kek no lie. think about what that entails. going on a government database to whack off
>>526233810absurd levels of reasoningif humans cannot access sex, they will seek gratificationof a frustrated biological urgewhich in nature would naturally resolveits only in domesticated society we endure this shitits not "the pornographers" they actually facilitate comfortmuch like someone who makes alcoholfix society if you care about the issuedont pathologize the individual copingwhy isnt everyone pair bonded for life?why are we doing freemason crypto harems?
>>526233414>You should have to upload a photo, log in, and verify your address and personal ID to watch it. post your tax return + dna report
>>526233753>>526233483Sorry fag, we aren't free-love nihilists anymore. That movement failed. We’re restoring civic responsibility. If you want porn, you can have but you don’t get frictionless, consequence-free access, just like with gambling and cigarettes
>>526234027Who's "we" exactly faggot?
>>526233835>No you need need to learn how to use your computer better or go old school.This won't deter hardcore users, they are already lost. This is mostly to deter normies.
>>526234027restore society nerdmaking a citizen responsible for orienting themselvesis just shifting the burden from the system to the individuala sleight of hand to prevent addressing the structureand keep those at the top's position intacteg freemason crypto harems
>>526233950>if white people can't jork it to interracial sex how will I make my shekels? There could even be an increase in white birth rates!
>>526233950>if humans cannot access SEX, POWER, WEALTH, MURDER, SPACE TRAVEL etc., they will seek gratification of a frustrated biological urge>which in nature would naturally resolveits only in domesticated society we endure this shitso you've figured out the reason for why theatre (and in its modern version hollywood + porntubes) has been existed for as long as human history has been recorded
>>526234104I doubt it would stop most horny teenagers.
>>526233414>Watching porn should be a humiliation ritual.So I should find a femdom camthot?
>We're going to protect children by giving their personal details to shady porn sitesHuh?
>>526234183>the politicians facilitating replacement are now trying to fix birth rates>trust the plan
Can a UK lad respond and explain how easy it is to find material? Isn’t it as simple as just googling paizuru or whatever? There has to be tons of sites that don’t care about UK regulations.
>>526233414You should need your wife's permission too.
>>526233414You're right also white people shouldn't want to have babies either because they're not anyway right so..
Porn is cringe desu
>>526234191yeah, good point, it seems most of society is orientedtowards managing thisand relocating blame onto the individualit's literally the entire basis of psychologysomehow, the individual is pathological the system is really amazingand how dare you complain you should be sedated
>>526234080I'm not falling into this semantic rabbit hole. If you are this out of touch with the current political discourse, you aren't worth talking to. If you do, then you're just doing pic related and can fuck off.
>>526233414If you can't fap to your imagination, you're brown.Porn bans aren't necessary at all but they don't hurt either.
>>526234404>i refuse to even present a semblance of coherence
>>526234404That sounds like a nobody. You are trying to create the impression of support without actually possessing it.
>>526234440>the govt is just here to protect you
>>526234277>>526234143I do agree with you that the structure needs to be changed. Realistically nothing theyre doing here is for our benefit and it's just another vector of control. Porn is just one aspect of the wide range of problems.
>>526234293You go outside, see a pretty chick, then when you're home you're imagining you're fucking her.If you can't do that, gtfo of white countries.
>>526234293There's still a bunch yeah. Some just want an account login to get past the ID shit. You can also still use VPNs and Tor but they want to try and ban them next.
>>526233753Because porn is a degenerate jewish brain weapon
>>526233414Anyone notice that when a leftist country does this they are all happy to talk about how compliant they are. But the one they put out in America is talking about how it is "literally Nazism" and has some video with some bitch spewing random bullshit. What could cause this difference?
>>526234484The government should be here to humiliate browns.
>>526234477>>526234452You guys should form a discord and talk about how much you hate me and love gooning
They passed similar ID requirements in Alabama and Louisiana. Any retard can google a picture of a photo ID and upload it. It proves that these half measures are all bullshit and accomplish nothing.Ban the sale of online pornography. If you want to be a pervert you’ll have to grow some balls, go to the local pornography store, and buy some DVD’s like your moms ex-boyfriend (your “dad”) used to do.
>>526233414It's fine, I can just watch porn in my mind. I don't care. Doesn't affect me
>>526234596It's not, you're just a faggot with no self control. If porn is banned you still will find something to ruin yourself with.
>>526234610It's a freedom of expression issue for me. If you don't like it don't look at it.
>>526234541i could even extend an olive branch to youi would say banning all illicit substance and materialcould be for the benefit of the population, plato argues as much in republicin fact saying censorship is necessary to the managementof a successful city state as some art forms lead to degenerated body politiqueshowever, our society has no coherent structureor form or guiding vision, therefore all of these bansare just degenerate above the law decadent elitesabusing their power over an impotent alienated mass of fleshtherefore, prohibition in this context is a meansto extract from the economic slave his only means of comfortsubstances and stealing away private moments in quietudeso context is really importantif we had natural noble leadersi would be the biggest advocate of that govt
>>526234610rent free
>>526234545>go outside and see a pretty girl>in CanadalolLMAO
>>526233414Whatever, I’d just watch it on Telegram, 4chan or some other site that isn’t blocked and doesn’t do the ID thing. They’re trying that in my country and it’s uselessI don’t give a fuck about the government or its laws. I hate the state and want it to stop existing
>>526234787What happens to the sites that host all of that data when they can no longer have paying customers? Do you think xHamster will co to us to host homemade tranny videos as a type of charity?
>>526234766My bad, didn't look at his flag.
>>526234720This conversation isn't about a porn ban. You’re still free to make it. That doesn’t mean you’re entitled to push it everywhere without access controls.
>>526234926i find it dubious that this person was "pushing" itagain, the charges all stem from "distribution"but what exactly happened? we have no context no information at allwe are just supposed to believe the "authorities" behind a one way mirror
>>526234293In general it's easy enough to find however you just have to take what you can get rather than have infinite choice.
>>526233414Why stop there?Every online post should be tied to a verifiable biometric digital ID so we can tell the poster's race, sex, age, and intent through browsing his publicly available post history across every corner on the internet.Anonymity is brownoid-coded. Whites have nothing to hide, therefore nothing to fear.
>>526233414They are cracking down on porn End porn and legalizing prostitution We already know women are whores
>>526233414Bet yandex sites arent blocked
>>526234926You are trying to restrict people's access to information on the internet depending on uploading your ID to it. It's a very slippery and easily abused slope, and you should easily see the problem "anon".
>>526233414Don't do unto others what you would have them do unto you, they might not like it.
>>526233414No, I am a Conservative right wing patriot and I want my daughters to have free unrestricted access to BBC porn. But I also want a police state where citizens can be killed for not following orders from Government employees. Did I tell you that I never took the vaccine because I'm not a goy salve sheep cattle for the Government?
>>526234904I don’t know and I don’t care. They’d probably find a way to sell what they have anyway since there’s always high demand for porn
>>526234723You writeLike an absolute fucktardPlato would smack you over the head with a bludgeonStop using drugsSincerely,Anon
>>526234627I tried a bunch and it didn't work.
France also requires Age Verification for pornsites (unless you go to websites hosted incountries that don't care about that shit), I don't care about porn but I knew they wouldn't stop there, it's gonna become mandatory for basically everything classified as "social media".Even Substack is applying Age Verification in the UK and Australia already, maybe other countries i don't know, apparently they're not even required by law to do it but they still do, a lot of writers are already leaving
>>526235186I'm trying to regulate a harmful vice, like gambling, alcohol, and cigarettes, not access to information. It just so happens that this one is mostly distributed en masse online.
>>526235343You're here to be the Nanny State. Everything controlled by the government and covered in bubble wrap.
>>526233595>The average normie is not desperate enoughwrong
>>526234596Watching other dudes fuck chicks is gay Looking at dicks is gay
>>526235479Do you think 8-year-olds should be allowed to go to adult movie theaters? Most people don't. Why are websites different?
>>526235295>mandatory for basically everything classified as "social media".It’s like that in my country, lol. They want to make you register with your ID just to use any app store or operating system. I really wish there were a global anarchist revolution to put an end to this shit
>>526235605They want a global digital panopticon, like they don't already know what we're doing constantly.
>>526235604If you don't want your 8 year old on the internet then don't give your 8 year old internet access, or if you do then on your end you can choose to have your own connection restricted in various ways. Imposing this on the whole of society has nothing to do with protecting children really. It's just Big Brother shite.
>>526235604helen lovejoy over here
>>526235785Completely retarded argument.We don’t say, “If you don’t want your kid drinking, don’t let them leave the house.” The internet is a public space, and like most public spaces, you can’t just do whatever you want.
>>526235953How is your 8 year old getting drunk?
>>526236021He isn't, because they aren't allowed to walk into liquor stores and buy alcohol, and it's a crime to sell them alcohol.
>>526236145Because if an 8 year old is getting drunk then it's not like they've walked into a shop and bought it. They can't afford it for a start. So it's more like they're drinking the booze in the house, so if you don't want your 8 year old getting drunk either lock it up or simply don't have alcohol in your house. Same as my argument regarding the internet. The parent is responsible for their own child in the end, not the government.
>>526233414Timmy won't be able to see a naked female breast until he flees the UK at age 43 and gets married to a Thai ladyboy. Meanwhile, he has to watch mandatory hardcore gay porn as part of 'sexual education' classes in school. Right wingers applaud this.
>>526236145It's probably just as easy for a minor to buy alcohol in the US as it is in Brazil. I used to buy alcohol and cigarettes every week and they never asked for my ID. I bet it’s the same in America too. Just because it’s the law doesn’t mean people actually follow it
>>526236349>>526236779>OI YOU THINK IT SHOULD BE ILLEGAL TO SHOW YOUR SON A VIDEO OF ME FUCKING A TRANNY IN THAILAND?>WHAT ARE YOU A FOOKIN' NUN
>>526235494joke content page you dumb retard
>>526233414imagine being pro digital ID and thinking you're rightwing
>>526236779Here in France you could easily buy cigarettes if you were a kid in the 90s, most of the time you just told it was for your mom or dad, most would sell it to you, especially if your parents were smokers, but now they will card you almost everywhere, unless you look older than you are.You used to be able to buy beer when you reached 16 but all other alcohols were 18 only, I never got carded because I had a beard and looked far older, nowadays a bar or supermarket will definitely asks for your ID and it's 18 even for beer.
>>526237161Having to login into a website is not digital ID
>>526233414>Download Tor browserIt just werks
>>526233414ANYTHING except fixing modern women
>>526233414Okay but >pornhub gets hacked >now all your personal information is right next to whatever videos you watches Who the fuck would want this? Do you trust porn sites to handle your personal data well? Do you think hackers will not aggressively start targeting pornsites due to the huge potential for blackmail, scams and extortion of the sites themselves?
>>526236349>just don't let your child have any access to internet and don't let him have a smartphone, making him a social pariah!>you can't just use the government to crack down on kike degeneracy.get into the oven
>>526233595Normalfags got the vax my nigger of course they'd do the humiliation ritual to jack off
>>526237373That's covered in the terms and conditions mein nigga and a risk you as a grown adult will have to take
>>526237209Over here you get carded for alcohol as well even if you look a bit older. I dno what age they stop I still get carded every time I buy cheap priced supermarket liquor and I'm 30 (still look early 20s, but no fkn way 18 or below lmao). I never got carded when buying expensive wines or whisky's though, even when I was 18-20. I don't really think all of the stuff being accessible to teens or 16 yo's was all that bad. They've got to learn how to take risks and wrong from right and its better learned at 16-17 with a parent in the picture than at a later age.
>>526234080Jews, anon. Kikes that want your data to have AI monitor you constantly.
>>526234787Just get a VPN. They will walk back this dumb legislation once some of their own politician's porn history gets leaked alongside their IDs. >>526234293They just get a VPN. Even public ones through browsers addons will work.>>526233737It's also prob pretty valuable to intel agencies. Knowing what a target is into sexually and romantically means you can easily force an affair / romance with someone highly placed.
>>526237209Here by law you’re only supposed to buy alcohol and cigarettes if you’re over 18, but basically no one cares. If they say anything, you can just say it’s for your mom or dad and they’ll sell it to you. I was 12 when I used to buy beer and cigarettes, but it really was for my relatives. I only tried beer when I was 15 and didn’t like it, and I haven’t had alcohol since. I don’t like cigarettes because they smell bad, so I never tried them either. It’s insanely easy to get that stuff lmao. Even if a place won’t sell to minors, all you have to do is ask an older friend to buy it for you or pay an adult to do it. I’m gen z but I’ve heard that back in the 90s guys used to ask older friends to buy playboy magazines for them, my dad told me that
>>526237529Everyone who looks angry bobs and vagine should be blackmailed
>>526237578I frankly wished they'd have carded me when i really started smoking at 15, I knew I'd get addicted (after all I was smoking almost daily from 8 to 10 but only a few cigs or cigarillos a day, 2 or 3 at most, still seems completely retarded now that i think about it), maybe by the time i was 18 I wouldn't have started, I doubt it though. When they really started carding other people roughly my age would often ask me to buy it for them like right in front of the cashier, problem was I wasn't 18 either and now the cashier wanted to see my card too so I got fucked like that quite a few times xD
>>526233414>Digital id is good goyOffcourse for the children
>>526238296I mean other teenagers asking me to buy alcoho. for them in the early 2000s, for tobacco they almost all still didn't care at all.
>>526235494please name.
>>526233414Or just use tor
>>526233414All you need to do is use your vpn, it's too easy this law doesn't change anything. This law is about controlling speech.
>oh no, your benis got hard, guess you’re going to hell nowWhy are puritan niggers like this?
>>526233595the other 30% are well aware of how to avoid such measures. Unless they make VPNs illegal this doesnt really accomplish anything except normalize having to use your identity to access the internet. Which is the purpose.
>>526240919VPNs will get banned in 5 years
>>526241407China banned them and you can get and use them easily over there. You can't really ban things like this.
>>526241487>>526234590>>526237993>>526234590>>526240919>>526240919>>526237252>>526234590You guys are talking about edge cases. The average person isn't downlaoding Tor and VPNs to watch porn. You're just exposing yourselves as degenerates, although that's not surprising.
>>526233414Ironically it's now easier to find troon porn due to those sites not having the restriction in place
>>526233414Hell yeah brother that shit will fuck a young boy's head up and there absolutely should be barriers to entry.t. knower
>>526233753Because dealing with modern women is a humiliation ritual; and so any other alternative avenue to get off must be made to be even more humiliating so that men keep participating.
>>526243305>You're just exposing yourselves as degenerates, although that's not surprising>the kike nigger says while posting and browsing 4chan of all places
>>526233414As of January 2026, 25 U.S. states have passed laws requiring age verification to access adult websites. >Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Wyoming>Arizona, Missouri, and Ohio are next
>>526233414>live your life how i want not how you wantlive your life how i want not how you want
>>526243971>Swede acting like 4chan isn't an obviously biased subset of the population when it comes to porn use
>>526233950>absurd levels of reasoning>if humans cannot access sex, they will seek gratification>of a frustrated biological urge>which in nature would naturally resolve>its only in domesticated society we endure this shit>its not "the pornographers" they actually facilitate comfort>much like someone who makes alcohol>fix society if you care about the issue>dont pathologize the individual coping>why isnt everyone pair bonded for life?>why are we doing freemason crypto harems?
How long until the state starts clamping down on OF? Never?
>>526233414Ultimately the people who make porn should receive capital punishment
>>526244704I considered this, but ironically, not even medieval societies agreed with it. Prostitution was ultimately seen as an inevitable vice that had to be regulated.
Anyone who has ever jerked off should have a giant cock branded on their forehead.
>>526235785>>526235873>they put miscegenation and faggot propaganda in your kids hands at school What now, faggot? Are you prepared to control that? Or is it important infooo
>>526233414I agree. If you need anything more than a blurry pic of a cute girl in a bikini to have an occasional wank, you've fried your brain. Full on pornography? What is the usecase for this?
>>526247852Wanking will be illegal in the UK soon
>>526248406British Empire 2.0 when
>>526234545>You go outside, see a pretty chick
Honestly it being made more inconvenient is a great deterrent. It is easy enough to get around for anyone who wants to, but being even slightly inconvenient makes it much easier to resist.I doubt our government had good intentions with this, but I approve of it. From my perspective porn was a tempting evil that was all too easy to fall into. People with a different perspective will obviously disagree with me.
>does know you can get anything on bt4gtorrentNigger I haven't bought a textbook, piece of entertainment, or vidya in a decade you think people are gonna pay or go through any hoops for porn?
>>526233414porn is for savagesblue blood patricians only consume erotic content
>>526249097Pornhub was also a repository of white nationalist videos for a time, its lack of moderation or control is likely the real issue. Slowpoke kike-government is slooooow.
>>526234027>>526234080"we" refers to zoomers/gen alpha who aren't putting up with millenial nihilism anymore
>>526233414All it will do is boost business for VPN providers, by several orders of magnitude.Think of all the jeets in the UK, anon.
>>526233414Yes, porn is the problem, not the pedo-satanists that enslave you in your government
>>526251176Yes but also no: Ofcom said in its annual Online Nation report that, overall, visitor numbers to the 10 most-visited pornography services in the UK have now settled at a “lower level” than before 25 July.Figures given to the Guardian by Similarweb, the US data firm that provided the Ofcom figures, shows that the slump in pornography viewing appears to have continued beyond August. The number of unique visitors to Pornhub was 7.2 million last month, a decline of 36% since August 2024. Visits to Xvideos and Chaturbate – the next two biggest sites – fell by 27% and 18% respectively over the same period.https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/dec/10/uk-porn-traffic-down-age-checks-vpn-use-up-ofcom
>>526233414Unenforceable laws are great, it let's the government continue eroding freedoms with the justification that they need to enforce the law.
>>526233918OI OI OI YOU GOT YOU WANKING LOISENCE!?
>>526251506We don't make crimes legal because criminals still commit them. Fining or shutting down porn websites that don't comply is 100% enforceable.
>>526251645Smartest retard on the planet, pray tell, how do you enforce this?
>>526251796Shut down the websites that don't comply? It's not hard dago Same for VPNs
>>526233414>The UK ironically got this rightjust got to uk and there is still PLENTY of sites for the knowledgeable coomer to go to without even doing vpn
>>526241487>China banned them and you can get and use them easily over there. You can't really ban things like this.This is ignorance. You think you're some kind of expert, but you're a stooge. There must be 40 or 50 different commercial VPN services right now, serving hundreds of thousands or millions of customers. If they outlaw those, and shut down those services, 1-in-5000 of those former customers will be able to improvise a VPN on their own. I'm not entirely sure I could (and I couldn't do it cheap). Finding some seedbox in another country, arranging payments for it, setting up all the software myself. And what happens when some heuristics software flags that IP address as an illicit VPN, and I'm cut off from it at my ISP? I have to do it all over again.So that I can watch whores and jungle spooks? (Really, what would hurt is when I can no longer download books and music, which is what I use the VPN for... prior to that, my ISP was threatening to cancel my service.)The bans are coming, and they will not be trivially evaded. Saying otherwise reveals how imbecilic you are.
>>526251345If they were using a VPN they wouldn't show up as "UK traffic" in the stats because the VPN isn't based in the UK.
>>526252713Presumably they aren't that stupid. VPN use isn't actually invisible. VPN use spiked in the UK on mobile after the ban but then dropped continuously.
>>526234293They're posting to a porn site right now and this is just one of the many sites haven't been touched by UK's strict censorship rules. New websites or new domains from the same websites enter the market every week too.
>>526243305This site also has some "degenerate" content and it's based on anonymity. You're using the website to try and destroy its core principles and spread it to the rest of the internet.
This didn't change anything because UKfags can still just go down the street to /gif/ and see all the deranged porn they want.
>>526235533Try VR
>>526251645And when that fails we should just monitor everyone's internet access to make sure they don't go to bad sites.
im sure a town of simps could link you to bunkers of porn
>>526251923The server is in a different country
>>526234404>>526250918When do you guys plan to ban smut? Or are you to pussy-whipped to do that?
>>526233414No.Porn should be like drugs, gambling, alcohol, all-you-can-eat, and any other vice.You should be required to go to a physical location to purchase it.The majority of people will want nothing to do with a vice after seeing the people addicted to said vice.
>>526233414I agree with the UK on this, but they have to take it further specifically for the bongs. You have to have a webcam, and record yourself as you're watching and cooming to porn.
>>526255315Also a good question. Women consume some real freaky stuff through literature or in movies yet no one tries to stop the rise of the Goonette.
>>526233595This is true. I don't give a fuck about porn enough to upload an ID
can someone please post that old pasta about the brit who wants to have a wank but needs to get his loicense first so he has to call Her Majesty's Masturbation Offices? kek, the memes really become reality!
>>526255299>>526255198>>526254934I don't give a fuck about your hand-wringing. Porn verification has been proven to create enough friction to deter porn use in places like China. And your slippery slope fallacy is laughable in the era of the NSA and Palantir. They already monitor and document porn use and other shit.
>>526255760Mobile users are already doing that if they dont cover their cameras
>>526256232Like I was saying, erosion of freedoms.
>>526257088Yeah well that's a slippery slope argument. Purely speculative.Fact is it is a successful deterrant. Multiple us states already have age verification laws and Pornhub traffic dropped 80% after compliance in states like Louisiana.>Ummmm source?Here you go: https://www.foxnews.com/us/pornhub-blocks-access-users-utah-age-verification-law.print
>>526233753He only wants to humiliate men while ignoring the woman problem, notice how he'll never want to do anything that affects women, only men. Family courts and divorce rape are a far more urgent problem that needs to be immediately addressed but simps will never go there, they'll only want to fuck with things men use.
>>526256232>things are bad so lets make it worse!>and lets double down on my hypocrisy!Isn't the greatest argument anon>>526257435That pic also debunks your argument
>>526233414VPNs also you get the most degenerate fetish porn on the planet on Deviantart, Tumblr, Discord and they are often excluded specifically from social media bans lmfao. If they made a porn sight that only showed hot attractive women with no fetish shit it would be banned so fast.
>>526257435>They already monitor everything you do>Purely speculative
>>526257750No, because I never said it would vanish from the face of the earth. The link shows it's effective as a deterrent and barrier. Pornhub has taken profit and traffic hits. Sounds like a win to me.Go back to R eddit. Or better yet, just kys.
>>526233810cool it with the antisemitism, buddy.
>>526233414>bongs are so moral
>>526258057Other porn sites exist
Nobody here has pointed out the fact that the porn sites have removed amateur-submitted PIV shit from their collections, despite high customer demand. The videos have zero production cost, they're popular, and yet the site curators removed them, or buried the content behind mountains of professionally-made fetish crap, leaving a pornscape denuded of anything resembling natural intercourse. It's a puzzling development.
>>526258334DUDE YOU ARE REPEATING THE SAME ARGUMENTS OVER AND OVER I DON'T CARE ABOUT THE HARDCORE USERS WHO WILL SEEK IT OUT. I WANT TO DETER CASUAL/UNDERRAGE USE. >>526257963Go live in Somalia if you want your lawless paradise. Oh wait your country is already trying that. Have fun! Borders are fake anyways amiright
>>526233414Shit has already failed. Most people in the UK are going to shadier sites which don't comply, the darkweb, or are using vpns. Either way this just ends up getting people to see worse shit than they otherwise would have on a normie porn site like the hub
>>526255198You're talking to a simp who only wants to take things way from men. There is a major epidemic of these subhumans who are really hyper fixated on making sure women have all the power and leverage and men have zero. You're never going to hear them talk about actual problems like divorce rape or social media because these are things that give women power and leverage. They'll twist themselves into pretzels to ignore the astronomical amount of undeserved power women have over everything. But men who choose to watch porn and jack off rather than participate in the humiliation ritual women have turned everything into, you'll see that rocket to the top of the list of "problems" we need to solve.We can talk about banning porn after women have been had all their power and resources taken away and men are given a guarantee that when they marry them they will have complete authority over them.
>>526258530I Google big boob, 4 trillion results.
>>526258749It will still successfully reduce the profit pipeline and make it harder to find. Try to find those girls' porn videos now, they have largely been removed from most mainstream websites. Hurting the industry is a win in my book.
>>526258964How does that help young men?
>>526233414yeah but then they expanded it to everything and have a database exception in their privacy laws for wrong think. Also inappropriate sexual content is still allowed if it's faggots kissing or on a government approved show.
>>526258685About 47% of users said they had reduced the amount of pornography they watch since the age verification rules came into force. Thats a solid chunk. https://www.the-independent.com/news/uk/home-news/unregulated-sites-porn-uk-age-verification-b2895231.html>>526258724How is actively reducing traffic to porn sites good for women? Less viewers means less money for whores.
>>526233414The only people who complain about naked women are coom addicts.
>>526234027>cigarettesFound the candida infected.
>>526259243It doesn't help young men. You're talking to a faggot who wants young men to work 60 hours per week with no outlet, so they get pent up with frustration and submit to gay sex with faggots like OP
>>526259273>How is actively reducing traffic to porn sites good for women? Less viewers means less money for whoresWhat's good or bad for them isn't relevant, it's the power. Feminism and female power is why porn came to prominence in the first place and it's the same reason we're having a serious discussion about banning it.The underlying problem is we're being subjected to the twisted sociopathic contradicting whims of what women want all the fucking time.
>>526259599>Feminism and female power is why porn came to prominence in the first placeNo it's because men wanted to see naked women.
>>526241148>>526241407>VPNs>ever being illegal>ever being able to be stoppedYou'd genuinely need to rethink every single internet protocol to be able to accomplish this. Its a distributed network and changes that would ever be capable of banning an intrinsic part of network communications would unironically end the information age. It absolutely cannot be done without banning encryption completely, user owned hardware and the owning of any device capable of running code locally.
>>526233414broken clock etc. the UK is still a totalitarian hellhole worse than North Korea
>>526259750And women wanted to show them their naked bodies because they thought it was empowering. Now they want to cover up and punish men for wanting to see naked women. See the problem? Women are constantly contradicting and making 180 degree changes in what they want all the time and they have the power to force this insanity onto men as a collective. Women have too much fucking power and this discussion even taking place at all is a result of it.
>>526259860>It absolutely cannot be done without banning encryption completely, user owned hardware and the owning of any device capable of running code locally.And what makes you think this isn't exactly what they're working towards?>everything becomes a subscription fee>your OS is now backdoored and gatekept a la Apple and Windows>pass laws that force encryption services and protocol developers to give backdoors to governmentsThis is already happening. Slowly but surely.
>>526233414nah lolitll prolly just lead more normalfags hereto be avoided imo
>>526259273attention now diverted to other ventures, can influence their culture, seen as positive by most. enough joke questions.
>>526260157>Now they want to cover up and punish men for wanting to see naked women.This isn't happening. Your entire frame of refrencd is twitter screencaps that incel cultists post.
>>526260023This.In a decent society it wouldn't necessary, as kids would be adequately educated to understand just how much porn messes you up.
>>526260506I don't see what lying so blatantly is supposed to accomplish other than making me want to club you over the head
>>526260621Bro, the incel community exists to make men hate women and stay single. As soon as you get a girlfriend or wife, they seethe and kick you out. They are not your friends. All groups are bs.
>>526260205They can work towards it as much as they like. The problem is that restricting digital devices to such a degree that you can't run code locally or only government approved only, inevitably results in low user uptake which in turn causes a massive skills shortage. No government on earth is going to be willing to sacrifice entire generations of engineers to keep 1-2% of people in check. It makes literally no sense to do this for any competitive nation because it impacts your entire economy, from small to large business and kills your ability to innovate in every single sector. Even if you believe that every single government is completely zogged and willing to tank everything to stay on top or out of the gas chamber, they will inevitably lose control with the subsequent generations that decide they aren't participating.Its genuinely the equivalent of trying to ban screwdrivers.
porn is great, seethers itt are probably porn addicts or masturbation addicts and hate themselves for it
>>526260798You ignoring reality(that women subjecting their own men and boys to 50 years of horrific cruelty and abuse being 100% of the reason why men are starting to hate them) and being dumb enough to believe that isn't really my problem though.You being hyper fixated on excusing women and blaming men is exactly what I'm talking about, you being one of the simp subhumans who will never address the problem women have become and will never ever talk about taking anything away from them, only men.
>>526261044Only alcoholics want to ban alcohol.
>>526261044Whats so great about it?
>>526261163>BrainwashedCome back again after you reach the lowest point.
>>526233414
>>526261250its nice to look at
>>526261320>simp reality denier calls other people brainwashednews at 11
>>526261354Whonthe fuck just looks. The orgasms are inferior and it is designed to make you a compulsive drooling neanderthal. Whats so nice about that.
>>526233414These laws are arriving 20 years too late. Two or three generations of boys have been raised with free access to unlimited hardcore pornography.
>>526261547The nice part is not participating in a judeomatriarchal nightmare where women can call simps with guns to put you in a cage for expressing your evil male sexuality
>>526261644This is true, but that issue should be resolved by other means name pornography
>>526261579Notice how there are zero memes like this of women who have had their brains fried 1000x worse by social media, you only see memes designed to shame men
>>526233414They impose all of the restrictions on the viewers and nothing on the producers of such content
>>526261856theye made by nofappers who are themselves goon addicts you wouldnt need to do nofap if youre arent jacking off multiple times a day
>>526261934And more importantly no restrictions on any kind of power women have over this arrangement
you guys ban porn but prostitution is legal. how does that make sense?
>>526233414remember if you are in favor of this, you should read their scheme first
>>526260565Also ideally parents wouldn't be illiterate morons and would know how to filter porn from their home networks and from the data on their kids phone, and don't need a nanny state to do their job as parents for them.
Hard core was illegal. Soft porn was available at newsagents. Labour under Blair made hard core porn legal under cover of complete media silence, nobody had asked for it. The same pedo ring labour party later said>we have to spy on you now incase you see any hard core porn. Its overdue time they were thrown in prison forever. The abuse from fake politics and fake media cannot be endured it is endless.
>>526261934Because it's hard to argue constitutionally that producers should be banned. It falls under freedom of expression. Unless you want to push obscenity laws...
>>526262059That makes perfect sense, men should have access to real sexual release.
>>526233414>Right Click>Select Open in new private window with Tor.Bypassed. lol.
>>526233414just use pirate siteswho the fuck still uses tube porn sites?
>>526233414Problem is it doesn't work. It just taught normie and underrage kids how to use vpns which is even more dangerous than the problem it was trying to solve. The system is far too easy to bypass.
Almost nobody will want to have their ID connected to porn sites. Maybe porn on Bluray and DVD will have its great comeback.
>>526262470>It falls under freedom of expression. Unless you want to push obscenity laws...easy, just say it's to flatten the curve
>>526262797You don't even need a VPN. Just two clicks in Brave>>526262614
>>526262470It's classified under freedom of expression because of jewish semantics and replacing judges for the case that made porn production freedom of expression. For the longest time everyone simply knew better and said no to porn production protections
>>526262797If I produced porn I'd never subject users to the kind of invasive shit these boomer laws are trying to set up. I'd just have my site redirect to instructions on how to use a VPN or a proxy in states where it's been enacted.
>>526262897You can even use nextdns which doesn't even require tunnelling your connection.
>>526262797It does work. Most people aren't gonna bother with VPNs, they will just go to Russian porn sites and the hollyjew porn industry loses their cut.
>>526262991Their whole premise was "to protect kids" I'm guessing from online predators which has nothing to do with porn sites but a lot of these experts don't have a fucking clue what they're even doing and now they've just made it a lot more difficult to even monitor and potentially prosecute genuine cases of it. Like shooting themselves in the foot.
>>526262970I'm not hearing any alternative solutions that don't involve some impotent violent fantasy you'll never act on
The sad fact is everyone would jump at a chance to sign in on a porn tracker database
>>526263236Plus the whole premise of protecting kids is extremely laughable because these are the same people who don't want the Epstein files out.If the state were serious about protecting your kids from porn they would offer courses on basic IT networking to teach parents how to filter it from their home network and devices.
Imagine if they did this to Tinder?
>>526233595ThisEveryone under 40 has been trained since birth never to give out personal information online under any circumstance.
You only had like.......5 years to build up a porn stash to avoid the compliance state of porn. if you need internet connection to goon. you already lost.
>>526234027All this babble and yet you make excuses for women, inflation, and browns.
>>526233414i google boobs 10 trillion results
>>526237122Bad joke they should be killed over.
>>526261773Take women's rights away then faggot
>>526264321Not a realistic solution. Please explain how would you actually implement that in America today though the legal system>>526263877Not a realistic solution either.
>>526264621Ok so I'll just shoot and kill you
Most professionally made porn is shit anyway. I prefer solo amateur whores and 2D women.
>>526233470>requires you to create an account so you are forced to comment on porn videosJeets won.
>>526265025Ok but you won't faggot. You'll just rot and seethe on 4chan for the rest of your days. Or you'll implode and go to jail for the rest of your life
>>526263571They do retard. You have to be over 18 to use Tinder.
>>526263449All porn should be illegal for commercial purposes. It's flooded the entire internet ONLY because the kikes who produce and distribute it want 9 year olds viewing acts which will permanently alter their psychology.
>>526258057You're misinterpreting your own data. Reporting a decrease in UK traffic doesn't mean the same number of people aren't accessing other porn sites or masking their country through a vpn.
>>526234027enjoy your divorce rape
>>526261773>but that issue should be resolved by other meansIt won't and instead people here are arguing for an increase of that issue. Maybe without knowing it.Prostitution won't get legalized if porn gets cracked down upon. Women won't change their ways if porn gets cracked down upon. The political situation won't change. You're going after the wrong targets.
>>526263449The funny thing is. For the past 10 years or so every single isp in the UK has to have family filters turned on by default (which cover way more than an age gate) and it's up to the customer to disable it. So in the end, it's the parents that only have themselves to blame if their kids are accessing things they shouldn't.
>>526266052Porn should be legal if the woman is Jewish.
>>526235494Kek the last one must have hurt most of all.
>>526233414I’m glad you cut your dick off.
>>526266110Why don't you provide some actual counter-data instead of just nitpicking? There's consistent evidence from Ofcom, Similarweb, and user surveys showing traffic to major porn sites dropped significantly in the UK and in US states.You haven't provided a single piece of real evidence that the policy does literally NOTHING or that every single lost visitor is perfectly replaced by VPNs/other sites. It's just endless "UMM ACTUALLY YOU'RE MISINTERPRETING THE DATA" and hand-waving with zero numbers or sources.If the displacement is total and the deterrence is fake, show the receipts. Otherwise you're just evading.
>>526265046Right, but hentai is classed as porn all the same, and we shouldn't need people to present ID for it either. Hell, I was 13 when my best friend (also 13 at the time) showed me some hentai on his laptop.
>>526260506enjoy your divorce rapeI hope you remarry 10x at least and get divorce raped each time
>>526234293it's the same shit hereyou just look for site on yandex and voilaalso some time those forced id verification are shit, on spankbang you can just block the overlay with ublock and boom, the video is here, the player is still working
>>526266926It's not easy to measure i'm just pointing out the flaws in your data and errors in your premise that you use to argue for censorship and digital ID. Something that also could end up affecting a free speech, privacy oriented message board like this.There's brits all over this website. There's brits all over social media in general which is flooded with hardcore or softcore pornography despite what their tyrannical government is trying to do. You do see that right? These measures may have a marginal impact but they're used by nefarious people for nefarious reasons. Porn is used as a scapegoat by shills trying to shoehorn a trojan horse of governmental overreach. That you choose China (a one party anti western communist state) as an example of success also reveals your motive. I don't know if that assertion is true but it's still highly suspect. You're also at the same time ignoring the countries that ban/restrict/stigmatize sex including porn without seeing any positive outcomes at all.
>>526233595>The average normie is not desperate enough to upload their face and ID to wack offDisagree. Not only do normies love wacking off just as much as us elite hackers, but they also wouldn't know how to bypass the age check by using VPN, torrents or even simply going to a different porn site that hasn't been targeted for compliance.
>>526233414They didn't, porn is a problem, but this is just them trying to regulate the internet more.
>>5262354942nd and 3rd would absolutely get it
>using kike pr0n sites>thereby, literally, giving the Knesset your data, as well as funding the rise of the Synagogue of SatanKY[s], goy cunts.
>>526268489I meantI don't think this is significantly worse than anything we already have. Not sure how verification on adult sites leads to further rights violations. Not sure how it's different from requiring verification on Amazon or Bank of America. when no new category of personal data is required. Porn is already a controlled vice with age restrictions in producing and purchasing. Where is alleged mission creep going to happen?
>>526233414lmao this nigger uses pornhub
>>526233950pajeet detected
>>526234244pajeet detected
>>526234545pajeet detected
>>526235033pajeet detected
>>526235139pajeet detected
>>526235217pajeet detected
>>526233414The vast majority of people just get horny, jack off for 10 minutes, and move on with their lives. But addicts and obsessive retards on 4chan project their mental illness on the entire concept
>>526236655pajeet detected
>>526269062Again, this is an adult site. There's controversial content on most websites, from nudity to graphic movie scenes or contentious speech. What makes you think that won't be the next target for strict ID verification and self doxxing?Do you trust those in power to impose the perfect tailor made restrictions on the websites you specifically think should be restricted...or that it might be abused? There are very few governments or authorities around the world if any i'd grant that trust towards.And i really don't think porn is a big of an issue for most people. Some adults may get stuck on it, perhaps they shouldn't watch then and get some help if needed. I think it's rare. The solution to that isn't to shutdown the internet for every adult. As for kids, parents should be encouraged to be proper parents. A government can't step in to solve that without turning into an abusive parent with too much power.
>>526233414this wont stop kids with unmonitored internet access from accessing any porn they desire and that is just an obvious fact for anyone who has ever used the internet, this is to try and keep AI from doing to jews what the internet already did times 100 but that is also inevitable raise your own fucking kids
>>526233414What is vpn?
>>526234404>REEE IF YOU DON'T USE THE WORDS MY JEWISH MASTERS PROGRAMMED ME WITH I WILL BURY MY HEAD IN THE SANDKys you absolute worthless belly
>>526258724pajeet detected
>>5262354942 and 4 plz
>>526234720What do you think happens when you legalize a vice with more opaque and material consequences? Something like heroin? Your “if you don’t like it don’t use it” argument falls very quickly and the places that have eased the use of narcotics have seen that even if their policies (and hubris) don’t show it
>>526233414it's a nothing burger because one can just use a vpn
The world shifted right because it was tired of nigger riots and trannies. It originally shifted left because it was tired of faggot bible thumpers. So of course at the slightest shift right, immediately the faggot bible thumpers emerge to fuck it up. We can't have even one year of people just being normal.
>>526233414Agreed porn is for losers
>>526271008Alot of them in this thread lol
>>526271053Yea, not surprising the average person is one step above a mindless beast
You should have to upload a full body shot of you completely naked with your tongue hanging out.
>>526271314And dont forget a friendly smile
>>526271053im one of them, sadly.
>>526271314I would be horrified and disgusted to see myself like that
you retarded nigger, it's about digital ID cyber panopticon dystopia
