[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1769155362628949.jpg (110 KB, 976x850)
110 KB
110 KB JPG
What will /pol/tards do when leftists throw away their support for emasculated men, gay rights, trans rights, women's rights and goes back about being focused solely on workers owning private property instead of billionaires/large capitalists?

What appeal will their ideology hold then? Also don't forget Marx was a massive jew and immigration hater.
>>
>>526724821
By that point everyone we are calling 'leftists' will already be dead
>>
>>526724821
This one is tricky.

In Spain at least, there is one political party that actually still remembers about seizing property. However, trans style stuff is taking over it, and it's also being displaced by a "friendship is magic" type left wing party.

On another comment I'll explain how I think this could play out.
>>
>>526724821
Leftists will never believe in private property.
>>
>>526724932
>>526724821
My take on this. I'll write this out and then leave 4chan for today, because I'm supposed to be working remotely and have just been shitposting all day.

I think that this replacement is a symptom of the free market working, first off, because no one would be interested in those things if they struggled to eat. Leftists are still against private property, but don't feel as strongly about it, and it just lost traction. It may also be an deliberate distraction, to an extent.

If for some reason they changed this, that would leave a void, because many people actually are interested in fake childish causes like that, and someone could create a movement based on that, as the demand would be there.

Many leftists, on the other hand, would move on to demand seizing the means of production for real, and they could become a problem. Everyone would starve if they did. But if there's even someone powerful who understand this and doesn't want the economy to be destroyed, they can be distracted, because they can't grasp complicated concepts very well, so if they were told "we will dismantle capitalism by removing central banks, monopolies and taxes" I think they could very well buy it and become beneficial instead of a threat.
>>
File: IMG_3540.jpg (94 KB, 707x1024)
94 KB
94 KB JPG
>>526724821
It won’t happen because social justice is the only defining feature of the western left

The western left is a psyop to STOP workers rights, and it has been since the 1960’s with civil rights. This is why they gleefully say it’s gonna be dark woke, you aren’t getting Marxist-Leninism in the west



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.