[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: English_map_5_bh-edit.jpg (304 KB, 600x535)
304 KB
304 KB JPG
*spergs out at the Soviet Union for no reason*
>>
Japan also did for some reasons
>>
>>532522162
Finland really should have taken leningrad
>>
>>532522162
>no reason
The Soviet Union broke the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact by invading and annexing parts of Romania and Hitler was convinced that they were going to attack Germany soon too.
>>
>>532522162
>The Nazi raised his tail and stung USSR
>"But why did you do that? Now we will both die!", said the USSR astonished
>"I cannot help it. Its in my nature. This is who I am.", replied Germany.

Never trust a German. Even if you make a pact with them, you still lose.
>>
>>532522197
The soviets stole shikotan, habomai, etorofu, kunashiri, and nemuro prefecture.
I think it is perfectly reasonable to hate them.
>>
>>532522162
This and the night of the long knives type of deal is why nobody worth a dime trusts a Nazi. It’s not even considering anything like aktion t4 or other drama.
>>
>>532522162

I wish Finland was their allied. We just let the Amero-jew help to get to the soviet union and just heckled the railway and didnt fully surround (((Lenin)))grad.
>>
>>532522162
>April 1944
>was already capitulating to Soviet Union and Allies
>OP is a dumb nigger
>>
>>532522162
It was the other way around. They sperged at us. We invaded them back.
>>
>>532522364
Yes, this is the reason.
Thank you Hans!
Hitler knew Stalin was not to be trusted after he breached the Molotov Ribbentrop pact by occupying Bucovina and East bank Moldova.
>>
>>532522507
Russia started it all by invading parts of Romania.
Romania invaded the soviet union killing millions of soviets and 30 000 jews in odessa in a single day.
>>
File: 1775195128233909m.jpg (43 KB, 519x1024)
43 KB
43 KB JPG
>>532523600
>>
>>532523686
Kek
>>
>>532522162
Yep. WW2 had literally no cause.
Same for the holocaust.
Well. The goyim were jealous of jewish success.
Same reason the Nazi Germans attacked the successful jewish Soviet Union.
Jealousy.
>>
>>532522507
>we are the victims of history
>t. Murderous russian devils
>>
>>532523819
World war 2 was a continuation of the first world war which was a continuation of the 2nd Balkan War which was a continuation of the 1st balkan war which was a continuation of the Russo-Ottoman war of 1877-1878.
>>
File: 1768335814085245.jpg (257 KB, 1294x991)
257 KB
257 KB JPG
>>532523600
>Russia started it all by invading parts of Romania.
>schizoid shitskin subhuman gypsy kike sees the word "Russia" in the "USSR" abbreviation out of nowhere
kill yourself, Cyganescu
>>
>>532524073
The soviet union was the russian empire with a different name.
>>
>>532524138
>The soviet union was the russian empire with a different name.
>source: my ass
kill yourself again, gypsy nigger

also -- Romania is next

your artificial faggotlandia shouldn't exist
>>
>>532522688
What the fuck are you talking about?
>>
>>532524073
And about your cope:
"AI Overview +6 Based on 2023 Eurostat data, approximately 15.4% of people in Romania do not have a flushing toilet inside their home. While this indicates that nearly 85% of the population now has indoor plumbing, Romania still holds the highest share in the European Union for households lacking basic indoor sanitary facilities.Key Facts on Romanian Household SanitationProgress: The percentage of people without an indoor toilet has dropped significantly from nearly 30% in 2017 to roughly 15.4% in 2023.Regional Disparities: The lack of indoor toilets is primarily concentrated in rural areas, where many older houses are not connected to water and sewage networks.Comparison: Romania's lack of indoor facilities is the highest in the EU, significantly higher than the next highest, Bulgaria (13.7%).Other Data: Older reports (circa 2018) indicated that up to 41% of the population lacked proper bathing facilities (shower or bathtub) in their homes.The improvement is steady, driven by modernization of rural infrastructure, but rural areas still lag behind urban areas, where indoor plumbing is standard.Still too many Europeans have no toilet at home26 May 2004 — According to Eurostat, 15.4% of people in Romania do not have a flushing toilet in their home. This figure has fallen by almost seven points since 2020
>>
>>532524073
You're right, the Romanians are part of the Butthurt belt anyway. But I do not believe your map is accurate.
>>
>>532522688
>digits
The absolute state of Kek
>>
>>532524185
On what reasons? Just curious.
>>
>>532522162
Albania and Yugoslavia was part of the communist block you dumb shit
>>
Nobody sperged at it. Russian big empire lasted 50 years because it's the lifespan of one russian generation and they simply can't do anything that lasts longer (pre soviet russian empire lasted longer because their royal line was much more german than russian)
>>
>>532522162
>Allied
That's... Cute.
>>
>>532524073
Not surised really. They even look like jeets
>>
>>532524185
Thank you! Croatio is nonsense too. Hungary should have an admiral again.
>>
>>532522248
Probably wouldn't have succeeded realistically.
>>
File: 1581017457962.jpg (121 KB, 499x612)
121 KB
121 KB JPG
>>532524387
>On what reasons?
cuz Gypsymania became a thing only in 1877, however you cope with your schizoid handy revisonism, that "we wuz Dacians, Wallachians, LE ROMANZ" or whatever

not to mention that you, gypsy faggots, suply jewkraine with logistics
>>
>>532522162
Soviet Union were commies shit but it was not really about it, that ideology was about stealing the lands of the slavshit and replacing them on their own countries. This site sucks so much that shitty ideology who ruined nationalism and fascism for good because americans believe it's some kind of powerful move against niggers and jews, they don't realize that you not need it to find racial solution, average people from 70 years ago were already against non-whites without any support for nazizm.
>>
>>532522688
Well if you looked at the XXth century and saw burger and russian tech science development but stupidly favored burger science and ignored russian science you will end here

When half the world science make no sense to you like 4chan russian spambots
>>
File: Guenrikh Iagoda.jpg (39 KB, 465x659)
39 KB
39 KB JPG
>>532522162
>for no reason
>>
>>532524073
You're not talking to a romanian
>>
>>532524496
Ivan, out of all people, you shouldn't talk about indoor plumbing
"Approximately 77% to 90% of Russian households have indoor plumbing and toilets, with significant disparities between urban and rural areas. While over 95% of urban homes have indoor sanitation, only about 50-67% of rural households do, leaving roughly 10%–20% of the total population relying on outdoor pit latrines.Key Statistics on Russian Indoor Toilets:Overall Coverage: Roughly 89-92% of households are reported to have indoor toilets as of recent years, though older data often cited 75-80%.Urban Areas: Roughly 90-95% have indoor toilets, though some older, smaller buildings may have shared, poor-quality facilities.Rural Areas: Estimates vary, but as of 2022, around 67.1% of rural households have indoor toilets. A significant number still use traditional wooden outhouses.Sewage System: According to 2019 reports, approximately 22.6% of households are not connected to a centralized sewage system, relying instead on septic tanks or pit toilets.Regional Differences: Data often shows higher levels of sanitation in large cities like Moscow compared to remote villages.Indoor Plumbing Still a Pipe Dream for 20% of Russian Households, Reports Say - The Moscow Times2 Apr 2019 — Here are some statistics on indoor plumbing in Russia: * **Rural Russia** Almost two-thirds have no access to indoor toilets. * **Overall** 77.4 percent of Russ...The Moscow TimesPercentage of households without indoor plumbing in Russia (2021 data)12 Apr 2025 — Overall Access to Indoor Plumbing in Russia * ~80-85% of the total population has basic indoor plumbing (piped water + toilet inside the dwelling).
>>
>>532524592
Germany and Italy became a thing in the same period or later
Not an argument
Any other bullshit arguments?
>>
>>532524323
How the fuck did you have a third of your population without toilets in 2017?
And don't say communism because the same apparently did not happen in Poland or Bulgaria.
>>
>>532524655
Sa moara mata in pula de urs schiop
>>
>>532524773
>Germany and Italy became a thing in the same period or later
>changes the topic like a typical backpedaling dodging gypsy
nice red herring logical fallacy you've got there

also no, Germany exists since 843
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_monarchs_of_Germany
>>
>>532524785
Cause Romania does not have a lot of railways or trains. The absence of the gypsy's natural predator gives him freedom to shit where he pleases. Like in this thread right now.
>>
>>532524785
From 1990 to 2005 we had stagnation and decay because the old commies didn't had the balls or the interest to cut the money losing state factories or sell them and we all paid for it.
If you look on a GDP or GDP/capita chart of romania between 1990 and 2005 you'll see a descending or flat line that shoots up logaritmically after 2005, despite the local variation due to world crisis
Romania grew 30x from 1990 and 95% of that growth happens after 2005.
We started at the very bottom so it took a while to get going
>>
>>532523819
this
>>532523600
Hands down Romania was our most based ally in WW2 and it's not even close.
>>
>>532522162
The Soviet Union is gone. They are just Russia now. NATO shouldn't even exist anymore
>>
Is this possible to have fascist movements or nationalism strongly influenced by fascism removed from any national-socialism influences?
Unlike what most believe they were different ideologies even if they share similarities. Nazis are extremely embarassing because they were the blueprint for Israel zionist madness we see in these days, notice the two flags of these countries share weird esoteric symbols coming from nowhere (svatiska and david's star). Nazis are race-obsessed extremists who believe that even proper germans were not all whites for exemple, and they are anti-whites and anti-europeans in the sense that they want to conquers other europeans and exterminate them after enslaving them, stealing their lands. They worship jeet mystical garbage because they cannot handle that their ancestors were living in mud huts for a long time.
Anti-semitism in fascism was never about genocide, it was about not trusting the kikes and don't give them protagonism in politicial power and economic positions. Concerning racism it was the classic racism of common people back then who not liked foreigners and even less ethnic foreigners too different from them, but again if they are not in the country who cares?
Another last thing, Fascism was about catholic or christian values, no matter if you are a believer or not, the important thing are the values. Nazis reject it and adopt their lame pagan bullshit influenced by icelandic fairytales mythos and exotic jeet garbage again.
Lot of people do not see these subtle differences and adopt natsoc garbage without questioning anything, I invite you to look at different types of fascism who existed in Europe or somewhere else and you will see that those ideologies have nothing to do with nazis for the most part. Even inside Germany and Austria.
>>
>>532524892
Germany doesn't exist as a state from the 9th century nigger it was named Austrasia and Neurasia under the successors of the Merovingians and later Charles Martel, and Charlemagne.
Are you pretending that the Holy Roman empire existed and that Hesse and Brandenberg and All the german STATES former no Germany?
Or if you like to go this route, Tara Romaneasca exists since the 13th century again striking down your stupid argument.
>>
>>532525049
Do you really think "Romania grew 30x"?
GDP is fake. It measures only the velocity or amount of money that exchanges hands. I say the velocity or amount because one can be used to pretend to be the other, both are accounted.

Anyway, GDP is fake. That is not the reason, the reasonn must be deeper obviously, like cultural or a priority thing.

I heard Ceausescu was based to some extent: He made Romanians reach 20 million (one of the top 10 countries in Europe by population) and sort of disliked Gypsies (like all Romanians do).
>>
>>532522162
Kys jew.
>>
File: 1644696232991.jpg (158 KB, 798x870)
158 KB
158 KB JPG
>>532525221
not reading all that, gypsy faggot, cuz i already BTFO'ed you on the topic of Germany with the existance of "king of Germany" title since the early medieval

and, pidor, the topic is romania, not Germany, you dodging animal!!! told you before
>Tara Romaneasca
made up revisionist coping gypsy term, that had never existed in the past
>>
>>532525372
I can give you an example
In 1989 my father and mother combined earned $100/month (5000 lei in local currency)
I spend more than $100/day. That's 30x
>>
>>532525221
>If it has a different name it didn't exist!

Come on, anon, Germany as a state was created during the Frankish times, in the VI century I think, just like France.
If anything France is the one with the least rights to claim they were Franks.
>>
>>532525499
100 dollars a day would be 3 thousand dollars a month. That's too much for the average Romanian.

But truly the question is do you think the average Romanian saw its purchasing power or ability increase 30 times in the last 30 years?

The numbers might even look pretty but believing that is probably beyond retarded anon.
>>
>>532525478
Not your business, Ranjesh.
>>
>>532525478
>>532525536
What's even the point to make here? We have political continuation? The political power rests in completely different hands today then it did back then. The stuctures of the systems are entirely different. We have ethnic continuation? So do Romanians.
>>
>>532525478
Yeah its all made up
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wallachia
>>
File: 1741040077794890.png (27 KB, 430x400)
27 KB
27 KB PNG
>>532525838
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wallachia
no way, gypsy, but it has nothing to do with "Romania"
>>
>>532525826
You have political and ethnic continuation despite being under occupation and in the process of being ethnically replaced. Yes.
>>
>>532525905
We don't have political continuation with the Merowingers since the Merowingers aren't in power anymore and neither is the system of power that the Merowingers set up still in use. The state back then and the state right now are two entirely different entities. Obviously we still have ethnic continuity and obviously we have some form of heritage from the state back then but the Romanians can claim the same so I don't see the point about their country being so incredibly much younger.
>>
>>532525610
Average Romanian family make $3000/month, thats why I brought it up.
7500 RON/month is €1500 and thats the average country wide.
I make way more money that that but I used my family example to give you a concrete example of what changed.
I know it sounds ludicrous but its true. Funny it happened in romania to the dismay of haters lmao
>>
>>532525826
Exactly my friend. The idiot is arguing for me and he thinks he's advancing his argument
>>
File: 1691105184168334.jpg (125 KB, 869x1024)
125 KB
125 KB JPG
>>532526310
>Average Romanian family make $3000/month
lmao, if that was the case, you gypsy subhuman wouldn't inflood western EU en masse, commiting crime
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdSA8D9c4TU
>>
>>532522162
did "butthurt belt" expand? Are you fags seething impotently at entire continent now? KEK
>>
>>532525897
Principality of Wallachia
Țara Românească (Romanian)
Цѣpa Pꙋмѫнѣcкъ
Țeara Rumânească (Old Romanian)
1330–1862
Yeah has nothing to do with romania
Hahahahahahahaha you illiterate you
>>
>>532522507
Now I have no ill feeling towards white russians, but the Soviet Union sought to force radical change upon all nations it could; just look at former soviet states. And that change would not have been for the better - not that the change the postwar jewish hegemony was good, but I wouldn't change piss for shit - that's useless - I'd try to work towards getting shit and/or piss removed.
>>
File: 1691494854625124.png (776 KB, 720x741)
776 KB
776 KB PNG
>>532526466
>Țara Românească
>our revisionist subtituation of concepts as if Wallachia=Romania is le truth, trust me, bros!!!
utter dumbfucked gypsoid
>>
File: 1752817308105755.jpg (69 KB, 1024x722)
69 KB
69 KB JPG
He seems a bit upset.
>>
>>532526402
As of late 2025/early 2026, the average net income (in-hand salary) in Romania is approximately 5,400–5,600 RON per month (roughly EUR 1,070–1,120). Salaries are heavily influenced by region and sector, with significantly higher earnings in major cities like Bucharest and Cluj-Napoca, particularly in IT, where net pay can exceed 10,000+ RON.Key Details on Net Income in RomaniaAverage Net Earnings: The average monthly net salary was approximately 5,615 RON in November 2025, according to the National Institute of Statistics (INS).Urban vs. Rural Disparity: In major urban centers like Bucharest, Cluj-Napoca, and Timișoara, net salaries often exceed 6,000 RON, whereas rural areas have lower averages.Top Paying Sectors: IT and technology services offer the highest incomes, often over 12,000 RON, while hospitality and manufacturing (garments) are among the lowest, often below 3,500 RON.Minimum Wage (2026): The minimum net salary is 2,574 RON (\(€506\)) as of January 2026, scheduled to rise to 2,699 RON (\(€530\)) by July 1, 2026.Regional Variation: Workers in Bucharest generally earn the highest wages, often experiencing higher costs of living compared to smaller cities.
Mind you this is after paying 43% tax. If we're talking gross wages we're surely above what's being paid in your country
>>
>>532526599
Romanian history crash course for illiterate niggers
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Principalities_of_Moldavia_and_Wallachia
Enters the chat
>>
>>532522162
The seething memeflagot gives of strong asian vibes...
>>
>>532526833
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Principalities_of_Moldavia_and_Wallachia
>still posts links that has nothing to do with romaina
your coping is immense

where do you see the word "romania" in Wallachia and Moldova, you untermensch?
>>
>>532526950
In the first paragraph:
"The United Principalities of Moldavia and Wallachia (Romanian: Principatele Unite ale Moldovei și Țării Românești),[2] commonly called United Principalities or Wallachia and Moldavia, was the personal union of the Principality of Moldavia and the Principality of Wallachia. The union was formed on 5 February [O.S. 24 January] 1859 when Alexandru Ioan Cuza was elected as the Domnitor (Ruling Prince) of both principalities. Their separate autonomous vassalage in the Ottoman Empire continued with the unification of both principalities. On 3 February [O.S. 22 January] 1862, Moldavia and Wallachia formally united to create the Romanian United Principalities or Romania the core of the Romanian nation state.[3][4]"
>>
>>532527044
>Țării Românești
there again, you gypsy shitskin, if you subtituate Wallachia for romania, that still won't make it true

there's no word "romania" in Wallachia, however you cope with subtituation

not to mention that Wallachia was ruled by Bulgarians

https://grokipedia.com/page/Slavic_influence_on_Romanian
>>
>>532526950
Word-concept fallacy.
Butthurt Hungarian, assmad Russian or seething jeet? Your call!
>>
>>532527281
>Butthurt Hungarian, assmad Russian
you gotta fuck off back to Romania, cygan car-stealer
>>
>>532527206
Hahaha
Walachia is the name of the state to the foreigners you nigger, in our language the country was called Tara (Terra) Romaneasca (Roman)esque the country of the Romans
Now fuck off you fucking pleb, be gone
SPQR
P
Q
R
>>
>>532527343
>Walachia is the name of the state to the foreigners
no, bydlo, it's merely the original term, in the HISTORIOGRAPHY
>in our language the country was called Tara (Terra) Romaneasca (Roman)esque
no way, faggot, as if i didn't know that you be coping with subtitution :O
>>
>>532526279
It's your take. You consider any sort of evolution a death of the state. Funny how we have sort of the same borders (certainly the same cores) and the same peoples, religion, genetic integrity, etc. But yeah. it's not all exactly the same so I accept your take. Although I find it retarded and autistic.
>>
>>532527342
Looks like seething jeet it is then
>>
>>532526310
Dude, my family used to make 50 cents (100 escudos) a month in the 1960s but they lived much better than I do today.
>>
>>532527465
The name walachia means the country of the Latin speakers you nigger
You're arguing that the country of the Latin speakers is not The country of the Romans
Fuck right off to your slavic/hindu/whatever-the-fuck-shithole You're from
S P Q R
P
Q
R
In the words of Edgar Allen Poe
On desperate seas long wont to roam,
Thy hyacinth hair, thy classic face,
Thy Naiad airs have brought me home
To the glory that was Greece.
And the grandeur that was Rome.
Pleb from a pleb country
>>
>>532527474
I don't consider it the death of state. I'm just pointing out that there are things about the people and their political entity that continued and things about it that discontinued. Why I'm pointing that out is, because insisting on one interpretation to determine the German country is hundreds of years old but denying the same interpretation to grant Romania is hundreds of years old, is retarded. The Romanians also have ethnicity, religion and borders that go back that far.
>>
>>532526569
>but the Soviet Union sought to force radical change upon all nations it could

Is tis why Eastern Europe now almost 100% native? You know, the place that was under Soviets and that they supposedly wanted to change radically.
>>
>>532527690
>S P Q R
ahahahahahah here goes that "we wuz romans" larp again

kys, zoomeroid, really
>>
>>532527545
Its exactly opposite for us.
My father bought his 1st car at the ripe age of 43.
At his age I owned over 10 cars.
Our food was meager and never enough, never plentiful.
I probably throw away more food that we had back then.
Maybe It went backwards for you but it went the right way for us.
Im not saying its perfect, far from it, but its order of magnitude better.
Ill give you an example, I bought a 4x4 car last month on a whim, paid off on the spot. That'd be unthinkable and impossible for anyone in 1988, 78, 68, 58, etc
>>
>>532527954
We speak the language of the Romans and you're seething mad your gobblygook tongue is inferior to our majestic Latin
Hahahahahahahaha
You fucking pleb from a country of barbarians
S P Q R
P
Q
R
>>
>>532522162
This has nothing to do with the communist revolution I presume
>>
what's so hard about staying within your borders and not invading neighbors ? humans are fascinating
>>
>>532522364
finally someone else saying this
>>
>>532522507
the USSR was going to do the same thing to germany lmao
>>
>>532526310
>>532526402
A man and woman working can probably pull $3000 a month even in Romania I mean thats only like 2000 of real money euros €€€.
>>
>>532526833
Nobody cares. Keep supplying thin whores for German brothels.
>>
>>532527992
Well your basic point is everyone is better off post Soviet Union and communism which is obviously correct and true. Even the Russians are better off today.
>>
>>532527992
I absolutely agree it's the opposite for you. It's just the scale 30x I think that is heavily inflated in real terms.
That is all.
Best luck for you Romanian buddy.

T. Angolan.
Everybody had at least three nigger servants: To clean the clothes, to cook and to look after the children and do errands (I think the Americans call them the main house nigger).
>>
>>532528339
Borders are rarely if ever impenetrable physical walls. Financial, political, cultural and human capital passes through them, sometimes with a bit of a hinderence but often quite freely. We speak of spheres of influence but that doesn't always quite capture the extent of it. Naturally your country can have interests outside of your borders and subsequently if those interests clash with other countries then you might be percieved as a threat to them that has to be dealt with in one way or another. Similarly, other countries might have interests within your borders and if those interests clash with yours you might percieve them as a threat that needs to be dealt with. It's easy to say "Why don't we all just hold hands and sing kumbaya? It's fascinating why we don't." and it is fascinating but it's also less mysterious than that makes it sound like it is.
>>
>>532527992
By the way, up to the war in 1961, whenever some nig or mutt got to do a "white job" that required a high school diploma or more (10 to 20% of the population) they had to pay 25% extra in taxes so he would not have a white "salary".
>>
>>532528960
We were just so poor once we got rid of communism we got better, 30x better actually
Love me some Cesaria Evora, although she's Cabo Verde she's very close to Angola as a soul, Saudade
>>
>>532529066
Based! Salazar, just like Franco, took care of the people well
>>
>>532525056
>Hands down Romania was our most based ally in WW2 and it's not even close.
wow ok. so i guess these guys meant nothing to you? the last battle in WW2 fought in europe even after the big homie died.
>>
>>532528982
We live in an artificial jew led satanic sort of society. Otherwise it would have been much easier to hold hands and sing kumbaya. Whatever crimes you actually look upon in the past... the lolocaust, slavery, etc... they were nowhere near as bad as they want us to believe. And why? Because only by believing the past was worse than the present can we endure our present servitude.

I don't think so about Cesária Évora and Angola. I am obviously not Angolan I just expressed myself wrong, probably. I descend from settlers in Angola.

Cesária Évora came from Cape Verde, some islands to the West of Senegal South of the Sahara desert of Morocco and Mauritania which we discovered in the mid XV century, when the spirit of Reconquista was fresh. We settled those islands with whites. And then we decided to deport jews and moors there. Then we had the idea to bring in niggers as slaves. Whites had always been a good portion of Cape Verde. But if you count whites + the children of whites and their nigger slaves you had an almost permanent "White-descendend" majority for 500 years in Cape Verde. Rebellion was not a thing the niggers tought about there because they had no culture but our own plus whatever they took with their nigger mothers. Plus they were isolated in islands and often attacked by other Euro powers and even moslems.

Angola was deeply African with just a small and recent European elite. Sure, Luanda and Benguela started as white Portuguese cities in the XV or XVI century but they were always small and not really cities until we lost Brazil, more like forts where lots of civilians lived, but all those civilians were tied with the military in order to support them.

Cesaria Évora was truly a mutt who reveberated with the Cape Verdean peasant (although she was a drunk degenrate whore for most Cape Verdeans of her time), in Angola we never had anything like that, just countless small nigger tribes beating their drums in the bush on the distance.
>>
>>532522162
they attacked first
>>
>>532529463
I didn't say that. I've much gratitude to all our former allies, that includes the Croatians obviously. Maybe I'm a bit bitter towards Italy but everyone else I'm thankful that we had on our side. The case for singeling out Romania is their contributions in crucial supplies and how well they hold up their portion of the front line despite being stretched thin in material and the German command not sending too much support in light of the situation of other sections of the front line being deemed more dire.
But yeah of course the Croatians have also been remarkable.
>>
>>532529733
>Because only by believing the past was worse than the present can we endure our present servitude.
Wise words. People are nostalgic for the immediate past but they feel inclined to condemn the further past to more easily justify the present status quo.

I believe you forgot to tag >>532529165
for the remainder of your response.
>>
>>532528982
okay but at what cost ? poltards will say russia is "winning" in ukraine but it's really a massive drain for both sides. are hundreds of thousands of deaths acceptable, just for 15-20% of ukraine's territory ?

now they act like they want to fight nuclear powers like france, they also vastly underestimatethe rest of europe, which is one of the most basic mistakes. that’s how you die when you don’t take your enemy seriously
>>
File: 1766757456480248.png (500 KB, 850x529)
500 KB
500 KB PNG
>>532522162
It was a special military operation to stop the genocide of Wolga Germans by the hands of communists and the decommunisation of Russia.
Lasted longer as planned (Russians should know about a SMO lasting longer than expected) but 100% success was finally achieved in 1990s.
>>
>>532530626
You have to ask a Russian to justify that exact war. I don't know enough about the specific numbers and their trustworthyness to give my opinion.
>>
>>532522491
It will never cease to be hilarious to me that Poles and Russians are two of the most genetically similar groups on the planet.
>>
>>532531047
Stop shitposting, we are not and even if we were both nations mentalities are almost opposite to each other.
>>
>>532531047
Poles are mentally jeets. That's the difference.
>>
>>532531047
Same shit with Croatia and Serbia
Oh our sausage is made with paprika, no our sausage is made with paprika AND garlic, we're more distant than italians and Maori
>>
>>532531303
>>532531379
>>532531403
Fucking kek.
>>
>>532522162
You need to go back Hivan.
>>
>>532528360
>>532522364
>>532523545
Except it wasn't invaded
Nice try though
>>
>>532527852
Your argument is incincere and you know it.
These nations were poor, with little to no industry. The campaign of demographically changing Europe came about AFTER the fall of the Soviet Union.
And it is a campaign spearheaded by many of the same people involved with that Union, or tangentially aligned with it.
Poland is now full of jeets and niggers, you see those vermin filth in all three baltic nations, and the balkans are full of jeets despite what any balkanoid might claim. Hungary is a melting pot of every ungodly shitskin filth you can imagine.

The only reason the Soviet Union didn't do aggressive demographic change is because the idea was not fully formed, and means in which to pull it off was not in place yet. But you can be certain that it would have loved to partake. Just look at Russia today. You're not a white country, you're a federation of various non-white states or oblasts that juuuuust somehow manage to stick together by the hand of the few white people still around.
>>
>>532531681
But it was. The Romanian government decided to not resist. Zhukov was in charge of the invasion, maybe we should have fought instead. It was a 7 to 5 vote in the Regency Council to not fight.
>>
>>532531791
>You're not a white country

Thank God! Being associated with the timmy race would be embarassing
>>
>>532532084
You might still be a white russian, in which case you're just larping in the same fashion shitskin are larping as white. You're being silly for no reason, like a girl
>>
>>532532084
Yes, raping each other and your women all being prostitutes is so much better, god I wish someday I'll get myself a Russian twink who I can adopt a child with, then raise that child to suck cocks on street corners for loaves of bread.
>>
>>532531791
>And it is a campaign spearheaded by many of the same people involved with that Union, or tangentially aligned with it.
Yes? Name some.
>>
>>532522162
We did YUGE business.
>>
>>532522162
Its because they needed oil after they lost the North African theatre, which meant their highly mechanized army that had since served them well was now running on a finite resources. They thought Russia would be an easy grab, but it wasnt for no reason. By all measures they were expected to fall and just didnt because Nazis underestimated the capcity for communism to throw men at a problem to resolve it, they didnt need high tech or resources, just a will to fight that the Germans came to lack. This is always what decides war, casualties dont mean shit if you still own the land.

>>532522197
During WW1 there was an anglo-japan alliance and they were allies, however during the communist revoloution the Russians siezed Japanese land, and in response Japan started siezing everything around them, very violently, this put strain on the alliance till it was severed as Britian as they didnt want an escalation on the other side of the world it would have to commit resources to when its already at war on its doorstep, and Japan didnt like this and kept going but tried to keep the alliance in tact and failed, they voiced they were going to build their own Empire resulting in them turning to America instead who were also against this but kept trying to come up with a soloution, which would eventually lead to them jumping into China without recourse and then WW2 happens, and then Japan loses.

WW1 really did ruin everything, WW2 made it all worse.
>>
>>532536372
>however during the communist revoloution the Russians siezed Japanese land

Huh? When did that happen?
>>
>>532536887
Kuril Islands dispute. They never actually stopped fighting about this by the way, Russia claims its their historically, Japan claims otherwise, even now.
>During talks leading to the joint declaration, the Soviet Union offered Japan the two smaller islands of Shikotan and the Habomai Islands in exchange for Japan renouncing all claims to the two larger islands of Iturup and Kunashir, but Japan declined the offer. This disagreement between the two-island offer made by the Soviet Union and Japan's demand of regaining two larger islands as well became the cornerstone for continuation of the dispute into the present day.
>though they agreed to end conflict, they never signed a peace treaty.
Theyve been going back and forth on this forever, it was when the Whites were overthrown that they declared the islands are just the Soviets territory now and kicked out all the Japanese, Japan didnt really like that.
>>
>>532537659
>Kuril Islands dispute.
That was after WW II, I think, not during the revolution.
>>
>>532537910
Maybe Im messing it up. Russo-Japanese war was 1905(prior to ww1), Russia had been expanding into China prior to WW1, China was getting fucked on all sides at all times and Russia was one of the ones doing it, Japan was the other. They both argued over who owned what when they were doing this. Japan claimed it was theirs and not Chinas to take from them, and Russia claimed Japan was just trying to expand where China could not put its foot down(which it absoloutely was doing, it was also doing the same in Korea).

The dispute carried on AFTER WW2 and during the conquest of Manchuria and they outright siezed the islands as part of that which is what caused the disputes over the islands.Theyve just gone back and forth on who it belongs to, Russia claims its part of their conquest of China, Japan claims its theirs by proximity. Today the claim is still made by both sides, but noone acts on it.
>>
>>532525056
>Cost Germany the battle of Stalingrad with your gross incompetence
>whoops!
>switch sides and pretend Germany tricked you

Most based ally?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.