Specifically decent looking women as well. Any man would love to fight alongside a woman, watch the conscription rates rise then.
>>533305275>Any man would love to fight alongside a womanwhy are you being retarded? stop it
>>533305275If men can be drafted for war, why cant women be drafted for childbirths?
>>533305275Because if you're actually fighting for your life the last thing you want watching your back is a woman. They can't even carry you to safety if you're incapacitated
>>533305275When you're bleeding out in the street and only a female soldier is nearby to drag you to safety, you're going to get pretty fucking against conscripting women for combat roles then lol
>>533305306Yeah, you don't think about how attractive your squad mate is when you are all getting hit with arty, drones, and need to start blasting or running.
>>533305332Even that aside, as important as it is, they could absolutely be drafted into logistical roles. Rosie the riveter type stuff
>>533305351It's not about safety it's about standing for true equality and that means women dying in equal numbers.
>>533305306>>533305332>>533305332>>533305349>>533305351Retards it’s supposed to be psychological, the prospect of being alongside a cute girl and fighting with her. Morale booster.
>>533305275
>>533305275>Any man would love to fight alongside a womanthey would all die, all the men would be simping for her, saving her, etc. and it would endanger whole squad...they can do some support roles in the rear.. or drone operators.. tho
>>533305661The cute girl will be cowering in a ditch and you want a bunch of soldiers simping over her
>>533305661This dude says "m'lady".Guaranteed.
>>533305275It’s already been proven that men die more if there’s women in their unit.
Because then the rest of women would immediately feel the imminent danger and could snap them out of their feminist power fantasy, you don't want that.
>>533305275For the same reason we don’t enlist diabetics and people with heart conditions.
>>533308409Can't they be drafted into non combatant roles? Or does drafting only involve cannon fodder? Force them into manufacturing, general logistics and care behind front lines
>>533308549Doesn't matter, that'd still be way more troublesome than falling into traditional roles and pretending to be a demure housewife.
>>533308549Enlistment is different than conscription, I doubt Ukrainians or Russians are being securitized for past medical records before being scooped up and they definitely won't be screened for disqualify factors
>>533305275Newsflash: this is a gynocentric society.
>>533305275Because women are slow and incompetent. Going to war with women is a death sentence.
>>533305332very based
How about we say that women are by law required to remain virgins until married. Any and all whores will be publicly burned alive in the town square where it will be live streamed to women’s smart phones with constant shaming language.
>>533305430Fuck you simp. I want to be drafted for the logistical role. I want to be the cook or the warehouse dude filling trucks with a fork lift, don’t give the only safe jobs to whore women. Make them stfu and get married and produce babies.
>>533305275That will be the new white feather, the will send some dumb roasties on a suicide mission then wave it in mens faces.Unfortunately after 100 years of mass media and the cat and mouse game of manufacturing social outcomes it will only work in people that don't make good soldiers. As in retards.
>>533305275Women have higher political rank. Lower ranks have to die in wars. That is how it always was. Elites don't fight in wars.
>>533305275probably get more sexual harassment, sexual assault, and rape cases
>>533305275Men who do thungs just because they want to increase their measly chances of fucking women are cattle who deserve dying for Israel or for the ambitions of the military industrial complex, so I support the idea
>>533305275I work in an office and women regularly attempt to throw me under the bus or ask for my free labor in an air-conditioned office environment with lunch breaks. They would betray me in an instant and fuck the enemy over my corpse if there was even the hint of “losing”.I’m good. I’d rather have an 80 iq retard man watching my back
>>533305275Yeah that's not a serious question
>>533305332because gynocentrism
>>533311467kek
>>533305661you have no idea how psychology works which is to be expected of an autistic incel nerd hiding under a memeflag
>>533305275You would never say this out loud in public, only from the safety of your keyboard. You are not a man.
>>533311467sauce? Can't see the artist name bcs of that fucking stupid watermark,
