>New York, why would you defend that shithole? Because suburbs in New York look like the bottom, suburbs everywhere else look like the top.
Only in the west Coast do suburbs look like top.
God bless NYC.
>>533691500>no context twitter screenshot>time wasting question>1pbtid>100+ replies guaranteedyup, its 4chan time
>>53369150010k to remove a fallen tree and repair your home8k to chop the tree down. act of godif you have a tree in your yard make sure it never grows over your roof
>>533691500yes you can’t fully transplant 60-90’ trees without great risk and expense i agreedo people not realize that the size of a neighborhood’s trees are the marker of how long it’s been established and healthy?
>>533691564because they are mostly new construction and trees take time to grow
>>533691773>repair your homeIf it wasn't made out of paper it wouldn't get destroyed by a falling log
>>533691564I'm in Washington. A lot of suburbs have trees.
Imagine having to wake up every weekend and care about something as frivolous as a lawn. I have no yard work! It’s awesoem
>>533691564They look it in the South and midwest as well.
>>533691500It's the same place....
>>533692194It's ai
>>533691564It looks green in the areas with money. I live in a low income area and the city constantly sends people to cut down the few trees we do have because of interfering with electric cables or the roots lifting the sidewalk. Of course, these are just excuses because the companies that do the lumber cutting profit from it. Rich areas sidewalks are destroyed but they don't allow them to cut the trees because it's a luxury. Fuck I hate this system
>>533692236Yes but it's still basically the same place, the house on the right is exactly the same but with bushes and the concrete drive/street is gone.
>>533692386It's fake and gay and you're dumb and stupid.
>>533691500It's just new build vs older development. My Texas suburb has even denser greenery than the that.
>>533691788> do people not realize that the size of a neighborhood’s trees are the marker of how long it’s been established and healthy?Good point>>533692442Why you butthurt? Looks like is the key phrase. It was one neighborhood greenery and with it.
>>533692536So Sovl vs soulless?
>>533691500it's almost like trees take time to grow, what an insane fucking thing isnt it.every single house in that first image has a tree in the front yard. in 30 years, it WILL be the bottom image.it feels like no one ever cares to imagine what things might look like in the future because they're so stuck in the here and now and they think things can only ever get worse.
>>533692609Never mind the houses built today are also shit materials and shoddy construction compared to back then. Being an “old neighborhood” already in the year 2006 (let alone 2026) is way different from being an “old neighborhood” in 2056. I can’t even imagine these houses surviving that long. Who’s gonna live in them?
>>533691837Trees are a maintenance nightmare and pest magnet, most landed gentry boomers really do hate them.
>>533692442Did somebody get up on the wrong side of bed...
>>533691500>trees take time to grow
Bump
>>533692683the houses built in the 60's and 70's were also shoddy and garbage, you're just not aware of it.the housing boom after WW2 was immense and the pace of construction rapid. the cheapest most efficient methods of construction were the norm. they ended up tearing down so many of those shitty suburbs in later decades after they started falling apart. you only think houses from that time were better, because only the better examples are still around.the fate for some of these shitty neighborhoods you see being built today are going to be the same for the shitty neighborhoods of the past. they'll fall apart, get abandoned, be bought up by a developer and bulldozed to the ground to be replaced with a walmart, or an interchange, an apartment complex, a data center, it doesnt really matter what in the end. they'll be gone, and in 50 years people will look back and say 'wow they dont build homes nowadays like they used to back in 2020'
>>533691500in the bottom picture both sides of the street should lined with cars all the way down, New York is a sanctuary state and every house has 15 people minimum.
Did you know! Trees near roads paradoxically reduce car accidents because drivers have a spatial frame of reference on their speed in relation to other drivers?Real study btw!https://www.naturewithin.info/Roadside/Tree&Driver_ITE.pdf
>>533694766and yes you can achieve this same effect with roadside indicators but it would look very unaesthetic
as a new yorker idk what to say. big up my niggas
>>53369191594 Yorkstone Heath SW in Calgary, Alberta
>>533691915Grim and zogged
>>533692004Only the new ones.
>>533691500Old construction versus new construction. Many new American homeowners like a sterile environment with no leaf litter and no bug infestations. You can walk in your house with shoes on and track no dirt inside. Plant a few low-maintenance shrubs in a mulch plastic garden and you're good to go. Even lawns are hardly green anymore. All these new subdivisions have such ratty ugly lawns.
>>533694931It spacemaxxes as much as possible without sharing walls with neighbors. As long as there are large natural areas nearby, there's no need to have nature in your front yard.
