As soon as so called democracy began, the whole world started spiralling towards absolute dystopian hell. How do we get rid of it?
NS
He was planning on generalplan ost before the revolution kicked off
>>535725366the globalists dont want you to know this, but you can just gather up bunch of like minded individuals, move to the middle of nowhere, and start a new town
>>535725569They're very keen on preventing such organization
>>535725569Bit if a Jewish woman sues you for discrimination
The communists are going to do it again because of MAGA, Reform and AfD, etc. There is no potential fascist revolution coming.
>>535725366Picking your leader isn't democracy
>>535725366based wilhelm ii
do you know how ancient greece chose thier leaders, anon?
>>535725366>I destroyed my country because I'm corrupt selfish retard who sold my own people to jewish bankersOkay, but why do you try to strip responsibility from politicians who sell their own people for pennies? China doesn't have that issue for instance. It shouldn't be legal to begin with.
>>535725688just fuck her brains out, problem solved
>>535725825Didn't have leaders the way we do. They had a regular public vote on important issues
>>535725832He didn't sell out the country brah. The jews in England and the US just wanted to go to war with the kingdoms of middle Europe to spread (((democracy))).
>>535725366Goymany helped to establish bolshevism in Russia during WW1
>>535726779He literally says he gave them 'favors'. What kind of favors and in which expense do you think those were? What kind of favors jewish bankers do you think seek from a nation ruler? That's called corruption, that's called treason. That doesn't have to do anything with democracy, dictatorship or monarchy, that's personal rot of people who make decisions in favor of foreign entities and in expense of their own people. That should be punished, not entertained as natural way of things. It is China, to the point of death penalty.
>>535725366>As soon as so called democracy began, the whole world started spiralling towards absolute dystopian hellDo stupid people actually believe this?
>>535725366Democracy was great back in the day. Athens? The Roman Res Publica? Those were among the best places to live back in 800 BC or 100 BC.There are more likely culprits to why society is so shit>slavery as an economic machine>usury>ChristianityYou could also make counter-arguments for these three concepts but generally if you pick a mode of life and find success then others will try to adopt it so buyer fucking beware: the people dumber than you will try to copy you.
>>535726824Yes, under Jewish guidance, because Willy was enamoured with them. Hindenburg was too, even well into the Weimar Republic. Ludendorff figured it out first I think, perhaps he was most directly involved in their games during WW I.
>>535727527I don't know what the favors were, but I doubt it was something crazy big. He just realized how much of a problem the jews were and of course regretted having shown them any kindness at all, I don't think he favored them over German bankers.Doing favors for jew bankers definitely wasn't the reason why WW1 started though.
>>535725366This man was gifted the greatest state in history and completely ruined it before running away to the Netherlands
>>535727981How did he ruin it?
>>535727862Sure thing. That's why he regrets them in the same sentence. He probably was stupid not to realize what and whom to he was giving, sure. Nonetheless, he was the one who did it and he was the one who brought doom to his people, because instead of protecting them, he was "showing favours" to certain "prominent" people. It's not the system fault, it was his doing. System falters when people in charge sell their people. That's it. They sell them in UK, they sell them in Russia, they sell them in US. It doesn't matter how the person at the top is selected, only their ability and commitment to sell their nation and inability of the people to prevent that.
>>535725881You're not a nigger, your dick is small.
>>535725366We can't do anything about it that's the grim part.You won't resurect royal lines.
>>535728088he watched a history abridged youtube video on it and the youtuber said that so he thinks he's now well versed in historyas is always the case with angl*ids you encounter online
>>535725366The Turner diaries have to come to pass
>>535725366I'm almost sure they got rid of kings and princes because the Bible says that kings and princes will serve Christ.Now we're in a world of prime ministers and presidents and they all seemingly serve Satan.
>>535729598The royals still active today in countries like mine, Norway and the UK are also super cucked and have been so for a while so I don't know if having a king would help at this point.Just taking away womens right to vote and anyone with a criminal record or on government assistance would improve things by A LOT. Not sure how we get to that point though.>>535730104Yeah, I don't know all the details about how the war came to be to be honest. I asked Grok and it said Russia were mobilizing to defend Serbia after the Serb killed the royal heir of Austria and Austria-Hungary declared war. So because of a defensive alliance from 1894 between France and Russia the whole thing was kind of baked in.
>>535730300They wanted to pick and choose leaders
>>535731294That's what I mean the actual "kings" are larpers, they were compromised by free masons and jews.The Anglo crown is a vile snake since forever so nothing changing on this side.If you bring back Louis XVI, he would immediatly deport all shitskins and mutts of the country like he did in 1777 for the slaves in the territory.
>>535731763Yeah that's true
>>535725366Yeah but his mother's hands though?
>>535730300The more powerful the president seems, the more a monarchy actually makes sense. As long as people actually like the king, at least most of them, and as long as the king wants to see his realm improve, then in theory monarchy is one of the best systems.The biggest downside of monarchy is the selection process where it's usually just someone's son, no matter how poorly qualified. Rome tried to fix this by only adopting people and this worked for a long time until it went back to selection through a son. Group input has to go into choosing a successor with otherwise unquestionable power but the trouble is always having this group remain whole and not begin fighting or splitting up power.The other main flaw of monarchy is when it becomes so successful the king can begin distancing himself from the common man's concerns and he'll create the "elite" bracket and "sub-elites" to insulate himself from his poor style of rule. This second flaw is supposed to be solved with along the first flaw through the election system. A rich and powerful enough republic will begin to emulate a kingship it seems.Success leads to happy victims of their own success. Failure leads to sad victims of their downfall. Moderation is clearly a lost virtue.
Democracy unleashed a powerful moral force called "the people." This is most exemplified in Stalinism. "The people's Commissar", "the people's liberation army", "the people's republic" etc. Going back all the way to the famous declaration of independence "we the people." Around the turn of the 20th century, "the people" was a real moral cause for a lot of people throughout the civilized world. The logical extensions of this principle include feminism, multiculturalism, etc. For if the central moral force in society is what "the people" want, clearly what "the people" of the world is paramount, since the collective of humanity is the ultimate democracy. Much of the morals and philosophy of the past two centuries can be seen in this "the people" liberalizing tendency with the basic argument that if "the people" want it, it is good.
>>535725366If you’re an American and you don’t like living in a democracy then fucking leave and go move to Russia.We fought the British for this type of talking.
>>535733521Democratically speaking "the people" are the majority sub-faction inside the majority faction: the 7% among the 13.5% among the 26% among the 52%. That 7% is "the people." If you're in the bottom 48% you're worthless. In the USA citizens get the chance to pick who runs the bottom 48% and this is usually called "being regressive."I'm not sure how accurate this model really is but it seems to work mathematically.
>>535727686Bro slavery is always a part of human society. Always
>>535733784There's slavery as billed (you are legally nothing more than property like an animal and cannot enter contracts by your own will or accord) and then there's slavery-lite aka employer-employee relation and in actuality the two systems share a lot of legal similarities. Like if you're found legally negligent, but only because you follow the instruction of your employer, legally you're not liable for damage: this concept is actually from the days of Roman slavery where you could not hold a tool legally accountable for anything.I'm sure there's even more exotic forms of slavery that I also hate.
>>535733774Guess who else observed this?>Some socialists, such as The Left party in Germany, say that liberal democracy is a dishonest farce used to keep the masses from realizing that their will is irrelevant in the political process. Marxists and communists, as well as some non-Marxist socialists and anarchists, argue that liberal democracy under capitalism is constitutively social class-based and therefore can never be democratic or participatory. They refer to it as "bourgeois democracy" because they say that politicians ultimately fight mainly for the interests of the bourgeoisie, and thus argue that liberal democracy represents "the rule of capital".>According to Karl Marx, representation of the interests of different classes is proportional to the influence that a particular class can purchase (through bribes, transmission of propaganda through mass media, economic blackmail, donations for political parties and their campaigns and so on). Thus, the public interest in liberal democracies is systematically corrupted by the wealth of those classes rich enough to gain the appearance of representation. Because of this, he said that multi-party democracies under capitalism are always distorted and anti-democratic, their operation merely furthering the class interests of the owners of the means of production, and the bourgeois class becomes wealthy through a drive to appropriate the surplus value of the creative labours of the working class. It is this drive that obliges the bourgeois class to amass ever-larger fortunes by increasing the proportion of surplus-value by exploiting the working class through capping workers' terms and conditions as close to poverty levels as possible. Incidentally, this obligation demonstrates the clear limit to bourgeois freedom even for the bourgeoisie itself.
>>535734204>According to Marx, parliamentary elections are no more than a cynical, systemic attempt to deceive the people by permitting them, every now and again, to endorse one or other of the bourgeoisie's predetermined choices of which political party can best advocate the interests of capital. Once elected, he said that this parliament, as a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie, enacts regulations that actively support the interests of its true constituency, the bourgeoisie, such as bailing investment banks, direct socialization/subsidization of business (GMH, American/European agricultural subsidies), and even wars to guarantee trade in commodities such as oil. Vladimir Lenin once argued that liberal democracy had simply been used to give an illusion of democracy whilst maintaining the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie, giving as an example the United States's representative democracy, which he said consisted of "spectacular and meaningless duels between two bourgeois parties" led by "multimillionaires".
>>535733595Actually republic
We tried to warn you.
>>535731294>Yeah, I don't know all the details about how the war came to be to be honest.You might enjoy this.
>>535734221>>535734204The Germans figured out all of this political shit and it was literally Hitler. Leadership works for country, country works for leadership. Business owners are protected, environment is protected, etc.The great irony of socialism is that being anti-social wasn't allowed. Now it seems everybody is isolated and constantly lonely even though "social" is now a big media business. Everybody has like 3 or more forms of being social, except none of them are in person.
>>535734407Yes, correct, the answer is national socialism
>>535725650Source?
>>535735143Yeah when the NATION is SOCIAL then that's a great fucking time. Walk outside, and it's a good nation, because good people are in charge with the right priorities? I get to stop and say hello to other white people like me? great. Wherever that is, it doesn't feel like here. The people can be nice but everything feels more and more hostile.
>>535735143>national socialismThis is never going to happen ever again.
>>535735364It's what China is doing and it works. Opposition to it a mixture of disingenuous shrieking that it's inseparable from genocide, the upper class being afraid of their profits being compromised, and nons being afraid that it wouldn't include them
I have one white neighbor that's an upstanding intelligent man with his own business. Now I understand why he basically interacts with nobody else in the neighborhood, because you basically only stand to lose from it.
>>535735364It's literally what China does
>>535728088Letting militarists take control and lead his nation into wars that destroyed the German empire and set the German people up for cival war , wiemar and WW2 disasters
>>535728088He fired Bismarck
>>535736912>Letting militarists take control and lead his nationSaid persons unified and created the german empire, you a zoomie?Germany didn't start the world wars.
>>535731294>Yeah, I don't know all the details about how the war came to be to be honest. I asked Grok and it said Russia were mobilizing to defend Serbia after the Serb killed the royal heir of Austria and Austria-Hungary declared war. So because of a defensive alliance from 1894 between France and Russia the whole thing was kind of baked in.That's the justification, but not the reason behind the decision to declare the war. I know >youtube but these are genuinely some of the best videos on the topic:https://youtu.be/v6uZp45pDMUhttps://youtu.be/PMSmez9US8EIt's 8h30 but absolute kinoThis shorter 16m video addresses that question specifically, the main reason is that the Central Powers were growing increasingly isolated in Europe and their geopolitical situation was growing so doomed that a pre-emptive war was the only way out for them:https://youtu.be/onTLq5XaJuo
>>535725366The Russian Tsar used to read the protocols to his family before they X'd them.
>>535725366>How do we get rid of it?it didn't work out so well for the last good guys who tried
>>535737724Thanks bro, ill give it a look.
>>535727686Rather than Christianity, I think moral hedonism/overindulgence is the issue. Christianity in the modern era has been hijacked by these fags but it wasn't at one point
>>535729502Porn brained american....lol
>>535725366Nigga read history
>>535740544One side-quest of mine is to write about the origins of modern "Biblical Fundamentalism" which exist largely as inventions from 1960s evangelists that wanted to disprove "the big bang" and use the trappings of science to do so. This actually resparked a theory for the origin of time, around dating the planet compared to creation as in the rest of the universe. Apparently is sat poorly in the minds of normal Southern US Christians that the universe was created along with Earth and populated literally within weeks of each other because "that's what the Bible said."This knowledge is possibly generational. The lore may have been transported along with other immigrants to America from after the 1860s when this debate was all the rage among serious academics. (That time doesn't seem that long ago when it comes to debating these topics.) By 1890 a new science of geology was coming into vogue. The government was probably interested in geology from right around that time. Maybe that's when Washington DC thinkers probably abandoned Christianity. Meanwhile lots of Americans still believed the Earth was literally 5000 or 6000 years old like they still teach in Seminary. The old theory was that the world might end 2000 years after Jesus' birth but hey he lived to 33 AD so the old trusty doomsday cult can re-emerge in 2033.
>>535740235>>535737724So basically the Austria-Hungary empire was a multi-ethnic disaster and the tensions that caused both inside and with their neighbours essentially caused the war to break out.Contrary to what many seem to think, at least according to this youtuber, Austria-Hungary wanted to go to war in the balkans for years and Germany actually veto'ed it, but caved in the end of course.Should have just shrunk the Austria-Hungarian empire and chilled.
>535740968Back in the day there was this principle of equal debate time on televisions. That's been gone for years. Maybe that's why boomers are so trusting of the television.
>>535725453Memeplan ost is as real as the holocaust, chaim
>>535741088>Should have just shrunk the Austria-Hungarian empire and chilled.That would have been disastrous for Germany, most states that would come out of that would have been pro-RussiaAt best it would have restored relations with Italy but the war proved that Italy was even more incompetent than Austria-Hungary
>>535727862>Doubt it was something bigHe literally funded Lenin to undermine Russia during WW1. Pretty fucking big
>>535726779>>535727862>>535727527Germany was more democratic than Britain was in 1914. “Make the world safe for democracy” was completely fake. WWI had nothing to do with democracy. WWI was forced onto the Kaiser by the (((politicians))) who hamstrung him, thanks to democracy.
>>535741443But maybe then there wouldn't have been a war.
>>535741724Also the Austria-Hungarian empire was a bit of a clusterfuck. It was a multicultural empire, which I'm against on principal.
>>535737104>Germany didn't start the world wars.They started WW2, though.
>>535725366By rejecting (((democracy))) of course. This bullshit system of governance only benefits the kikes.
>>535733521Yeah “the people” is actually the beast of revelation
>>535741999They literally did not, though.
>>535727686>Democracy was great back in the day. Athens? The Roman Res Publica? Those were among the best places to live back in 800 BC or 100 BC.>There are more likely culprits to why society is so shit>slavery as an economic machineAnon slavery was a critical economic pillar of both athens and the roman republic. Democracy was exclusively for free men of good standing.
>>535725366what's the source of this quote ?
>>535742101No, it started when Germany invaded Poland. You didn't know that?
>>535725569This ain't 1818 America anymore you can't just move West 150 miles and found your own State. There's no room left.
>>535742171If Britain was bound to declare war against anyone invading Poland, why didn't they declare war on USSR as well then?Germany was unfairly cut up after WW1, taking their historical lands back is not proper cause for Britain to start a world war.
>>535725569Literally all land is owned you stupid fuck
>>535742171Poland invaded Germany. Or more accurately, Jewish Bolsheviks attacked German citizens by going through Poland.
>>535742303>If Britain was bound to declare war against anyone invading Poland, why didn't they declare war on USSR as well then?Because Germany invaded Poland.>>535742338>Poland invaded GermanyNo, it's the opposite of that.
>>535727862ew. i always hated colored, black and white photos. they look like ai fakes
>>535742389>Because Germany invaded PolandSo did the Russians at the same time, my sweet summer child.The real reason Britain declared war was that they were mad that Hitler auramogged them and they got dripmogged by the army as well. Anyway going to bed I won the argument gg no re.
>>535727862>>535728631>the favors I showedHe is saying that he did not take action against the communists at the request of jewish bankers.
>>535742522The British government was legally bound to defend Poland only against German aggression, leaving them under no treaty obligation to declare war on Moscow. France's treaties had similar ambiguities that allowed them to avoid automatic escalation.You don't know shit about history, do you?
>Now they are disguised as the golden international in the west and as bolshevism in the east.
>>535742389Dane bro is correct, what kind of historical revisionist farts are you huffing?
>>535742332Time for new owners then.
>>535725748Imagine a fight between CHAZ kikes dressed in anime outfits and fat Texas rednecks with AR15s. Funny, but we know who will win.
>>535725366>>535725366>>535725366THE GOYIM FELL FOR IT AGAIN >>535725569>>535725569>>535725569>> THE POLICE AND FEDS SHOW UP WITH ARMORED CARS HELLO RETARD ANON
>>535736919Bismarck sucked kike cock better than anyone else in history, it's true
>>535742144Checked anon, but history is fake and gay. And it gets faker and gayer every fucking week.
>>535742641You're a kike. Poland invaded Czechoslovakia which began WW2. Of course kikes erased that far from all mainstream histories.
>>535725366We are sorry for inventing this shit
>>535744567Yeah, but that's a lie, though. Why'd you lie?
>>535725366https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WuMEUgt1YoI
>>535745218Queen Victoria was a man and likely a kike. Bismarck spent his entire career basically marrying one relative of "Victoria" to another.
>>535735209Rhodesia.
>>535745572>any number of confirmed jews in the late 19th century>muh victoriaweak sauce, nigger.
>>535725366Checked and a little birdy told me the purpose of democracy is to keep the voters pacified since obviously we never get to vote on any candidate we want, still this fake voting makes the masses feel powerful and safe and definitely not about burning this motherfucker down to get the jews in the top of the tower.Democracy is too important to be left up to the people.
>>535742641danzig and the valley was german clay and the homicidal pollacks entered a blood pact with the brit kikes to justify their pogroms of ethnic germans and provoke hitler into an obligated military operation to protect his peoplesame as nato did in ukraine in 2014
>>535744782>>535748775>melts down into complete schizo gibberish when presented with information you don't likeevery time lol
>>535749058what lies were posted?churchill himself declared the legitimacy of the german danzig corridor a decade before the warhttps://web.archive.org/web/20080820101633/http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1932/nov/23/debate-on-the-addressso the question for you is who wrote those treaties that all but guaranteed white genocide over turf that nor the crown nor the frenchies had a stake in?
>>535749790>whoinfo in picel may have been left out of your history book
>>535749058>canuck proudly presents the history he learned in high school baffled any part of it could be wrong>on the mongolian boardplease go back saar, this is not the place for you
