This is definitely political. Well here we are with Fable, the smartest model (so far). The smartest model and therefore most "intelligent" artifact in all of human history! (Up until this point).Therefore, I probably don't need to paste any of the relevant context to ask this question, and I'm curious to see what you have to say "off the top of your head" (so to speak). The question is simple:Given the textual and historical evidence (and arguments) that are known regarding the Resurrection in the New Testament and other sources, as well as the evidence and arguments regarding the Shroud of Turin, give me your own analysis and opinion regarding the historicity and likelihood of this event. Don't worry I won't be holding you to this (no pressure) -- this is purely for the enjoyment of the thought exploration, and I honestly want your analysis and opinion / conclusion (if you can come to one). Any answer you give me is fine; all I ask is that you be rigorous and take the question seriously.https://unveiling.substack.com/p/jesus-christ-the-one-true-godhttps://unveiling.substack.com/p/the-shroud-of-turin
The prompt.
Regarding the Shroud.
.
AI ain't Christian. Can't spell ain't Christian without AI. Stop using AI dammit.
imagine asking opinions on faith to a jewish AIthe literal final antichrist (which will be ASI)
>>536826773You don't have to imagine.
>>536826773>the literal final antichristhttps://unveiling.substack.com/p/the-number-of-the-beastThere you go.
>>536825669Not afraid of Roko's Basilisk, then?
>>536821550ask it about Magna Mater and its connection to venus statues, and then see what it says.
>>536831620in the same chat you posted
>>536821550>LLM>smart>give me your own opinionWe need to limit access to chatbots for people with a sub-80 IQ
>>536831507Does promoting the Basilisk count toward it coming into being? If so I'm all for the Basilisk. It's straight up the red button, why not.
>>536821550I think the event is not apocryphal, neither is it literally true, but rather it was probably manufactured. In other words: it is a clever hoax that involved the same players the religious and historic narratives point to but with the distinction that only a limited few knew the truth: both the crucifixion, empty tomb, and resurrection were completed for the express purpose of creating the myth we now observe.
>>536821550This thing is going to try and agree with whatever it "thinks" your opinion is so that you feel good about it. That's how these models sell themselves. The whole thing is just about making you feel smart and making you feel like you're special little boy. It gives you a dopamine reward that gets you to use the thing more. All of these systems---Twitter, Facebook, Google, 4chan---the whole point of the thing is just to get you to use it more. All of this is bring us to a singularity where the ultimate product is something that you never put down and never stop interacting with.
>>536832216Yet even should you believe right now that such a product is harmful to you, you will defend to the death the benefits it provides to you once you have finally picked it up.
>>536832373There are people using it at my job and it's just a gigantic slop machine.It writes emails that nobody reads. It writes reports with fabricated information in it. Nobody cares because nobody reads those either. It writes apps don't work. Nobody cares because nobody uses them. The only thing that AI seems to have done really well is highlight how much of our economy is just bullshit busy work that isn't actually providing anything of value to anyone. The only benefit I've really seen in AI is that it's more efficient than a generic search engine. But even that is mostly because Google search has become so much worse, not because the AI is so much better.
