What an odd thing to suddenly rule on.
>>542058698>it's so ODD that the supreme court is upholding the 1st amendmentStupid rightoids always anti 1st amendment, only caring about the useless 2nd one.
Humiliation ritual
So how does this extend to creating an AI franchise around a woman that goes from farm to farm letting various farm animals fuck her?
1. Only in that district2. Only until the SC says otherwise3. Only to possess and not to procure, generate, or distribute
The west is collapsing, niggers are flooding Europe, trannies are still pushing everyone around and women are genuinely becoming unlovable monsters but if I jerk my dick to an ai image that depicts a 15 year olds cunt that's the big issue.It's posts like this that make me sad I don't have any Epstein flex memes because holy shit antipedos are impotent faggots.
>Are you ok, literal child?
>>542058942Then we've got effeminate zoomers who have to ask if a girl in a picture is 18 because they're not sure if it's ok to be attracted to her>see picture of girl>you find her attractiveAM I ALLOWED TO FIND HER ATTRACTIVE? HOW OLD IS SHE?
>>542058942People thought I was unironically dissing Trump over picrel, but they couldn't understand the subtext. >>542058946Lmao
>>542058793check his hard drive everyone
>>542058698Nothing is ruled on until it is either decided by the Supreme Court or the appeal is declined.>>542058912How can you possess something without having generated it unless you are a part of the distribution process?
>>542058793How is possessing CP a speech issue?
>>542059616In the same way that possessing writing that offends the state is a speech issue.
>>542059616>how is it a free speech issue?How is it not?
>>542059616pornography/obscenity in the wider sense is a speech issue
>>542059430If you were to find a flash drive on the ground with contraband material, you have neither generated it nor "procured it" (you didn't go out of your way to obtain it), so there is at least one legal way to come into possession. If the state wants to prosecute you, they have to prove that you didn't just find it on the ground in the park.
>>542058698GoodI hope they use it as a way to pick the first rounds of the draft. The ole legalize but regulate routine. You're still on a list, you just made it a lot easier to make the list. I hope pedos get gutted by iranian shaheds ngl
>>542058946Lol
>>542058942>>542059098>she's not 18??? PEDO!
>>542058698
>>542059999Don't be so antisemetic
>>542059999Real Americans will be shooting draft officers from their bedroom windows when they try to draft their neighbors.
>>542059999So you're saying that the millions of Jews and Jeets who have been downloading CP for decades should be shoved into military service? Yeah, I like that idea.
>>542059999Digits of confirmationBurn in hell pedosBut you'll beg for your life on shitty 640x480 resolution video right before that
One one hand:Pedophiles will be emboldened to nurture their sickness until it eventually causes harm to real children.On the other:Glowies have a harder framing people.(They still can it's just annoying for them)Overall I can summarize the scenario with Nothing Ever Happens.
How did the AI model train to be able to produce such images?I guess chalk that up to another thing that is legal for AI companies to have just like violating copyright law
Well yeah, it's also legal to own media that depicts fictional murder, fictional drugs and all other forms of crime. Nobody has gone to jail for having an iPhone game about committing tax evasion. Why would we suddenly outlaw depictions of all criminal activities? Roughly 99.5% of media would be criminalized overnight. Explain your position again while also acknowledging that we're not throwing people in jail for owning murder mystery novels.
>>542060064>ARE THOSE BIG JUICY TITS AND A POPPIN' PLUMP ASS WITH SWOLLEN PUSSY MOUNDS IN SKIN TIGHT CLOTHING!?!?!>PEDOPHILE!!!!!!!
>>542058698>suddenlyPretty sure the guy involved was arrested like 2 years ago and this is the result of his appeal.
>>542060355Conflating fictional murder stories and jerking off to image depictions of children getting fucked as two similar things is jusy funny and I will cite the Jared Fogle case for how things go when you pedophiles try these mental gymnastics in public.You're a parody and not worth arguing with. Now gloat like the vermin you are.
>>542058698What is the crime exactly? It may be unsavory but I don't see how it's a crime.
>>542060594It's icky.
Ashcroft v Free Speech Foundation.Which is also cited in this case. It's long been settled that fictional porn is legal.
>>542058698If they legalize it, they won't have to go through the legal effort of reporting all of the h1b's that predominantly use AI to generate young hindu girl porn
>>542058698MIGA
>>542059999>hey lets make the first wave of humans our whole plan>>Iran: hey you know its legal here, right? you just need to marry first and your 5yo wife is now yourssuddenly america needs a new frontline, and you know the feminine office drones will be next
>>542061425THAT IS OUR WORD NOT YOURS
>>542058698Why is it odd? US courts don't rule on things haphazardly. They rule on cases, overwhelmingly, someone else bringing some sort of contest before them.This is clearly related to some sort of legal concern over some sort of already active execution of law.And the ruling is 100% the correct rule.It is victimless. Stipulating it explicitly not be based on a real person is also fine - because that starts to fall into some sort of defamation territory. I'm sure older Deep Fake rulings might have more to say on the matter, but same difference, and arguably 100% reasonable, if grey. It WOULD cause harm to distribute en masse AI generated images explicitly mirroring the likes of a minor in any sort of compromising position. Think of it like your mom doing porn getting found out in school. Would suck. Now think it's your likeness.Very gray, but fuck off retards. Keep your Potter era Watson gens to yourself. I think this is also mentioned, that literally keeping it to yourself is part of the ruling. So for example, generating based on the likeness of a minor, but for example those generations being uncovered in investigation of (another) crime would still fall under protected speech... even though you're apparently only talking to yourself. I don't know what the judges ruled in that case (or if they even did), but I imagine it's simply a matter of victimless 'crimes'. Which is right, and good judgement, even if the underlying perversion is... well, perverse.
>>542058698>The kids in the videos and the images from the documents? Just AI your honorThey cant keep getting away with this
>>542064040Epstein was a Jew who ruined 4chan
>>542064127>Epstein was a Jew who built 4chanFixed that for you. In a way, we are his creation. We are his sons.
>>542064354Ruined
>>542058698well yeah, retard. do you think ai births real people or something? are you a braindead nigger?
>>542058698The government brought the stupid case. What odd charges for something any lawyer could have told you was legal in the first place. Judge just applied the constitutional precedent.
>>542064040let's be real, they'd need to arrest 90% of men if they went hardcore on anti-ai porn legislation
>>542060533they're both fictional and you can jack off to murder. what's the difference, retard?
>>542058698I am guessing they have a reliable way to tell them apart and publicly deceminate that information to the public?
