We all know dating apps don't work. I wonder why we don't see more class action lawsuits, or why the women who use them to waste men's time are not subject to more public ridicule.
>>543566512shut up jew
>>543566512Oy vey but how else will I rape and traffick shiksas
>>543566512>We all know dating apps don't workidk what you're talking aboutI've had plenty of success on Grindr :^)
>>543566512Someone’s going to come along eventually and make a functional dating app and everyone’s going to pretend like he did some profound genius thing
>>543566555>>543566588checked
Because life is better without womenThey need men. You do not need them.
>>543566512they work for women
>>543566624But how? The incentives and economics are already skewed. No one will try it because they don't expect it to work. Women want access to high value men, high value men don't need dating apps.
>>543566624But how though? Kick women off who are time wasters? That would basically be all the majority of women.I'd rather see some law passed that mandates a certain threshold of success or metrics or it gets shut down by an attorney general as a scam or gets sued out of existence.
>>543566512
>>543566730You're asking the same question as me.I mean, if we're gonna be realistic the same principle that allows night clubs to work could be employed. Have a "bodyguard" (webmaster of some sort) screen women based on looks and make men pay for access.But even then, we'd need some mechanism to kick women off who are not given some form of positive feedback score by at least one verified male user. And that goes back to your original question: How though? How to enforce?I'd rather just see these apps sued or the users ridiculed. Seems like the easiest solution.
>>543566775Lol, basically the epitome of all dating apps. Even top tier men are getting a terrible deal from using them.
>>543566968OK, let's game out the features a good dating app would have to have. Your suggestions?
>>543567833>OK, let's game out the features a good dating app would have to have. Your suggestions?Whites only, or white hispanics.All overseas IPs and vpn's banned/blockedNo upselling of features. Free, get your goybucks from minimal advertising. No wokisms and no age restrictions and everyone has to list their weight. A.I. can take images to calculate and verify full body images and weight/bodyfat%.
>>543567961Define a wokism
Dating apps work but I don’t got 8 dollars to buy the bitch a subway sandwich
>>543566512>why the women who use them to waste men's time are not subject to more public ridiculeIt's because men are the tortured clowns as long as women have rights. It's a totally unnatural relationship. Of course it is abominable in fruit.
>>543566676Incorrect
>>543566512remember the weekend tinder rolled out paid features and changed the algorithm?you used to be able to swipe for 5 minutes and get your dick sucked by a local college girl. then they completely nerfed it overnight when the paid features came out. in the tech industry its known as crippleware: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cripplewaremake the product very good and free, build an audience, then gradually make it worse while charging money for what you used to get for free.i have a friend whos a 6'6 chad with a good face and a net worth over 100 million dollars and even he says the max subscription on tinder was a rip off and he just fucks high end escorts and girls he meets irl now.
>>543566512Because sometimes it works. I’m the .01%. I used a dating app and got reconnected with an old coworker who secretly had a crush on me but was too shy to say something. We reconnected, dated, now married. However, dating apps don’t work when you’re a massive neet.
>>543566624They won't. Match group owns most of them and basically buys or sues every competitor without money out of existence.
>>543566512I stopped using them
>>543568242was this before or after tinder became crippleware?tinder was actually good until they got the federal government to shut down all their competition like backpage and craigslist. >>543568301and if they can't do that they lobby the federal government to get your app banned.
>>543568331It was late 2018. Probably not the worse it’s been, but it was full of hoes and mid sharks.
>>543568361that's just slightly after it went to shit but it wasn't as shit as it is today.
You legally can't sue most of them, at least directly. You have to go through arbitrators. Even class action wise.
>>543566624There's already too many apps on the market. That ship has sailed
>>543568422I can imagine. I get a lot of random ads for the mega Indian scam AI driven dating apps. I can’t imagine how toxic and scammy it is now. I’m sure 90% of dating app users are bots and catfish accounts to siphon personal data.
>>543566512I designed a novel dating model. However, I refuse to build it using google or apple and let them take a rake, and there is no other viable market platform. You peel the onion and you find out the problems in this world aren't the superficial ones, it's foundational.
>>543566624>>543568576
Can't most dating apps now be one shotted with AI? Whats stopping someone from making an actual good dating app. I know theres inherent problems with them all, but surely theres a concept out there that would get you acquired by match group for a couple milly.
>>543566624It's not possible.The existing apps exacerbate the issues a bit due to the incentives they have but even if they did none of that the situation would be marginally better at best.
>>543568494Apps yes, models no. That's your problem. You think like a low IQ faggot who can't differentiate between apps and models. That's just sad to have such shit imagination and creativity.
What are the actual ways to get a worthy girlfirend in this age? Not metaphorical, actual question. I have never in my life made a dating app profile or even tried those apps because to me it feels dehumanizing as if im looking at a product or swiping reels. Something about it pains my soul and i refuse to touch it. I want a woman for the intimacy and the future it brings, but i cant justify what I loose if i choose the wrong one, and the selection process is simply too draining, let alone the effort id need to spend on maintaining the relationship.
>>543568676Also completely wrong. Do you people think you're actually intelligent? From my perspective you all sound like literal special ed students.
>>543566764They should also remove the gamifying elements like swiping from the apps. Deincentivize judging profiles solely by their picture. Also remove all filters except age filters (both sexes seem to weigh age equally.)
>>543568331Yah it's really bad. Maybe if someone like Elon buys out Match Group and un-fucks them because he cares a lot about low birth rates in the west it could happen, but I'm not too sure other ways Match Group could be fixed or taken down to actually make the apps properly match people instead of being a single person money milking scam.
>>543568576>I designed a novel dating modeIs this model you speak of in the room with us right now?
>>543568302Same. Thanks to AI, you can't tell what's real and what's fake anymore and they also don't check verified profiles. Dating apps are dying and that's a good thing.
>>543568642AI slop is killing dating apps. That’s why there is a surge of IRL “dating” apps (they don’t call themselves dating apps but they are) that pair you with strangers in real life for dinner/brunch/etc based on age/interests/etc. Women low key hate them though.
>>543568753You're barely scratching the snowflake on the surface of the iceberg of a good dating model requires. You know the irony of it all? I didn't even set out to design one, it just so happens to be spin off application from another solution.
>>543566512>or why the women who use them to waste men's time are not subject to more public ridiculeModern whores will show you their asshole for free or, at most, the price of a can of soda. You can't shame the shameless. The jews are getting their way. You cuckolds will never admit that Islam is right about everything.
>>543568242As a neet I have better luck walking around than using a dating app
>>543566624The best one is where users can message anyone they want and the user can reject or accept that message. The problem is, everyone messages the few people they find attractive, stop and are then done with the site / app.The matching function creates a loop where every day you login for a few matches. You can also dump tons of bota into the profile queue to make your site seem huge.
>>543568816I live in a cave, please explain. I have never heard of this. How is this not just regular dating?
>>543568797It's in my encrypted repository. No code, just the system model, processes/flows, rough wireframes, all the R&D working, the encoding etc..I mean it's ready for development right now, but I refuse to use google or apple.
>>543566555thisfuck all judecels that try to stick it to the white man by depraved means
>>543568816I have seen a bunch of those IRL dating apps pop up, but tinder was pretty revolutionary for its time before they gutted it. Bumble had a good run too because it also wasnt throttled.Part of me thinks its the financial incentives that destroyed these apps, but the other part of me knows that its just the women who are absolutely fucking horrible. FB dating is free and they actively try to match people and is as close to early tinder, but its still rough. Whatever is changed needs to be on the womans end.
>>543568938Basically the apps arrange a meet up where you have dinner or whatever with random strangers who are also on the app. The app decides who you will be dining with based on your age and interests. You then meet up with the strangers and have dinner. It’s basically a more cultured form of speed dating I guess even though it’s not dating. I used those kinds of apps to find a gf when I moved to a new city.
>>543568938Its like a group setting. They take applications of like 6 guys and 6 girls and make them meet at a nearby restaurant.
>>543568909I agree. If you’re a neet you need to hunt in neet territory>anime conventions >craft stores >table top game stores >discord pages >Barnes and nobles For the chance of finding a slightly overweight unshowered weeb girl
>>543568955OK, impressive work if true as I have designed my own inventions from the ground up (using fusion 360) and coded them myself (using android sDK with Java, fuck Kotlin) Care to share any specific attributes or is it all hush hush?
I love it when women will give you their number, send you nudes, hype you up to meet and fuck, and then ghost you because "reasons". Amazing.
>>543569058>>543569059Do these apps have names lol
>>543568955its the cost of doing business. You can have 50% of something or 100% of nothing. Shit or get off the pot.
>>543569218This has also happened to me, specifically on bumble.
>>543569227just scrolled right past one on fb. comebelong meetups is the ad name
Just learn to filter women>coffee dates ONLY for first date>or late night cafe or cheap bar>if she doesn't want to kiss on the first date, she's not that into youI'm dead serious, the only girls who were seriously into me who I fucked, I at least kissed on the first date. Only 2 girls I fucked I did not kiss on the first date. One of them went from me having to ASK her to kiss her on the SECOND date, and even then only on the CHEEK, to full-on fucking by date #4. So that was an outlier. But for the most part, if the girl isn't putting out some after some coffee or a cheap cafe, at least letting me makeout a bit, I'm not gonna bother. >ummm well then you'll only meet slutsThey're ALL sluts. They are ALL sluts for Chad. Stop fuckign psyopping yourself.
>>543569178I hate fusion, I use inventor, and I've done the same including all the way to patent. No, I'm just going to keep it locked away until such a point comes it might become viable. I'm not going to use android or ios, so there's no other viable path for the solution at scale with existing stacks.I also solved the foundational problem, but I couldn't raise capital. In all likelihood I'll end up taking them with me to the grave, which is kinda cool because people today deserve to suffer.
>>543569059That sounds interesting. Are the people on there actually worthwhile? Do you at least know who will be at the table or no? I do not want to get matched with a woman thats outside my race or dont find attractive. >>543569227Seconded>>543569337And how many of those did you end up marrying?
>>543569233I reject that, simple as. You see the problem is I don't solve problems to become wealthy, I solve problems to help people. Well, I used to think like that anyway. I still don't give a shit about wealth, but I have changed my belief that people deserve help.
>>543569227>>543569413I’ve used 222 and groupvibe. There are tons of other ones. They aren’t specialized for dating though.
>>543569413If you are 30 years old they will probably match you with some ethnic 30 year old women. The concept for the app seems ok, but you really need to match men on some non negotiables like age, ethnicity, looksmatch, religion. Everything else is secondary and a guy is not going to remain a paying memory if you keep sending him out to dinner with frumpy middle aged women hes not attracted to.
dating apps would work if women actually cared about average menthe premise is this>present your authentic self and someone will be into you for youbut in practice, as others have statedits just digital harems for the tallest strongest and highest earning menbecause those are the only menwomen actually wantwomen want a top guy who defeats a bunch of “weaker men”this primitive view is not compatible with civilizationand there should be “institutional guardrails”to account for this, like we have guard railsfor drugs alcohol weapons etcetera
>>543569764and to be clear, those women dont actually want those menfor themthey want the status conferredthey want other women jealousand other men intimidatedsimple aslets just return to nature and duke it outand get this over with lol
>>543568733You have to find some hobby or activity that involves a goal, usually physical, meets at least once a week but preferably twice a week, never one that meets once a month, that is majority women, and that is considered too gay or feminine by most Chads and hypercompetitive males who rob all the attention.I've honed this down to a scientific formula. Even if you're ugly and short like me, you can have success this way. You are essentially utilizing proximity attraction the way coworkers do, and you are eliminating Chad variables who will fuck all the women because they don't go to these things.Examples:>volleyball meetup Most males think it's gay, all the women are fit blonde stacies or beckys trying to tone their bodies>jumprope meetup All the males are usually effeminate, all the females are fit or trying to get fit>some kind of hispanic dancingBachata, salsa, merengue, the key is make sure it's HISPANIC, no country or line dancing, because your competition will be short, out of shape spics and your sexual targets are 9/10 latinas who go bonkers for white men moving rhythmically>group painting/paint by numbersMake sure it involves alcohol, your competition will be beta "artists" or guys who already have girlfriends, your sexual targets will be arthoes. Some of these events have alcohol and it makes it even easierAvoid yoga/pilates unless you're severely injured as you'll be seen as a creep, and avoid running/hiking/rockclimbing groups as there's too many sportschadst.have done all of these and gotten laid
>>543569149wtf I didn’t do any of this I just smoked a cigarette outside my door
>>543569337Interesting. I used to be a wine and dine guy to great success in the past, but now I am adopting the coffee or drinks only first date (if even) I limit myself to three dates with any woman then if they don't put out I ask them to come over and if its a no on to the next. Don't have time or resources to waste on these hoes. Funny thing is I am well off and the women know it, so it's not like I'm cheap but if they don't put out they are useless.
>>543569804>and to be clear, those women dont actually want those men>for them>they want the status conferred>they want other women jealous>and other men intimidatedWOW, you actually seem to understand women, which most men do not. I would add, sex is something they use as a currency to pay for said access to status and usually they don't enjoy sex in and of itself like men do. This is why men using Grindr have no complaints lol.
>>543569914they are putting out for someoneand if its not youcontinuing to engage is naivety at bestwillful self harm at worst
>>543569990i would agree that women view sex transactionallyi do think they enjoy itbut their ability to weaponize intimacy betrays themthis often manifests when women use guilt to control a manmaking him feel bad for initiating sex
>>543569860Neet
>>543566730>Women want access to high value menwomen aren't qualified to determine what that means
>>543566512You're just ugly + no swag.
>>543570151high value to women means>he has drugs or money and can beat up and intimidate other menthats literally itif we were in nature all the women would just gather aroundsome ultra violent war lord
>>543570057They enjoy it, just not in the capacity that men do. If they really enjoyed sex as much as men, there would be tons of male prostitutes and porn that catered towards women, and they would constantly engage in groupsex. This stuff still happens, just not at the levels would happen if overnight every man switched bodies with women.Sex for them is more validation than the actual act.
>>543570213If we were in nature all the other men would just kill the warlord and take the women back. The whole purpose of civilization is a compromise between the two, all the other men have ownership over 1 pussy, and the warlord gets to keep his intestines inside his body.
>>543570224There is a lot of porn that caters towards women but you probably don't realise it because what women want is different from what men want.
>>543570278>If we were in nature all the other men would just kill the warlord and take the women back.That's wishful thinking.
>>543569413>And how many of those did you end up marrying?None? The ones who want to marry you are the ones who don't respect you.
>>543566624I'm just going to lay my billion dollar idea out here. Forget dating app and think matchmaker service. Profiles of users are generated and AI analytics matches people based on highest probabilistic compatibilities. The problem is resting the responsibility of choice on women. That's not going to work. Women can't choice date plans, let alone dating partners. Let the matchmaking service take care of all that work, and feedback given by users will help fine tune the service.There. I fixed the problem of dating apps. Whoever has the capital can now be a billionaire. Minority Report predictive technology already exists. It can be used to predict compatibility between people and match people by maximum compatibility across the world if given the right data and feedback. Screenshot this post when it eventually is actualized. You've heard it here first.
>>543570278yeah, this ends up being the case,because the war lord has to sleepso eventually would succumb to attacks from betas
>>543570278this lolmonogamy wasn't made to protect women. It was created to keep men from killing kings or chimping out and taking war brides. If we went "back to nature" there is probably some dumbass retard who is 6'8" 280lbs who would get absolutely smoked by 5'7" me with a spear after he has been drained of his essence by his 15 women. I would just bang on his tent every three hours for weeks until he was delirious and then just kill him the second his brain goes into a micro sleep.
>>543569375>but I couldn't raise capitalSame, The invention worked, prototypes it with a 3d printing company, printed the circuit boards soldered all the components, tested it worked like a charm. Could not get more than 13 emails on IndieGoGo over 6 months lol. Couldn't even afford a patent, did the provisional. Seems like software is much lower overhead.
>>543570386Impressively jewish data mining. My solution solves the entire problem and I could probably turn a profit charging $5/month flat rate, and it eliminates jewry in the design.Tough luck rabbi.
What are you talking about? They work just fine. Met my boyfriend of 5 years on tinder. I’m a tranny living in a deep red state, and I still found love in a dating app.If you can’t find a girl who wants to date you then you’re just doing something wrong
>>543568733> worthy gfThere aren’t any. You can get a gf. You can get a hot gf. You can’t get a slutty gf. You can get a fun gf. You can get all kinds of gfs. You can’t get a worthy gf.
>>543569375Yeah nah your problem is bringing a project to completion. Every idea seems great and never done before but the small details of finally getting everything completed often take a whole lot of time. Essentially if you go half way and say that’s it and show it to people nobody is buying it. Even when you do complete something you will be surprised at how nobody cares. It could be done and perfect but you have no advertising or promotion and it gets lost in the sea of other great things people shit out.Right off the bat refusing to acquiesce to dare putting something on google or apples stores means you are never going to do this not out of some spite cop out. But because you fundamentally lack the social skills to navigate dealing with the playing field. You don’t have to like the pitch itself because of the owners but if it’s the only fields available then your going to have to deal with it.I have heard so many I have genius ideas people spew shit at me over the years I just had to dish it out on you. Because I generally believe you might have some capability because you’re here and not on tiktok or reddit or whatever
>>543566622based shitpusher.
>>543570575My prototype has been sitting on my desk working 18 hours a day for the last 10 years and never had a problem. I did 100% of the work myself.I ran into a problem with patent on this one that would have required contesting another patent that was granted that was overly broad in the claims. The company that has the patent is a big one, and they're so fucking retarded they didn't even realize the extent to which the patent office fucked up granting their patent.I'm just tired of all now.
>>543566512I may be desperate enough to use some of these apps, but at least I’m not desperate enough to incel rant on 4chan
>>543569829No, you haven’t. This shit doesn’t work. All the young women live in cities and for those women things like run clubs are the new dating apps. They go there to prowl for hot fit guys they can fuck and tall investment bankers they can divorce rape. Those are 2 of the only 4 types of guys that get girls now. They are absolutely not looking for an average guy who shows up to their volleyball league unless he’s hot.
>>543569218Those reasons? Being a loose deranged BPD whore
>>543570739can you walk me through your thought process?
>>543570575>Seems like software is much lower overhead.Oh my background is engineering btw, so I mainly did hardware and firmware. The seed capital is much lower on software, sure, but I needed a different stack backend than what exists. Front is all shit no matter what you choose. I find it absolutely amazing people just accept this world as it is because for me it's basically hell.
>>543568733doesnt existeven if you find “the one” the state still gives her all the tools to destroy you on a whim
>>543570418Any good warlord is going to surround himself with bodyguards who, themselves, get a nice share of the treasure and pussy.
literallynever used emjust walk up to women and start talking to them 'its honestly that easycan pull multiple a day if you wantedbetter have your own place though no roomates or parents kiddos thats why all the young pussy comes to us 30 somethings
>>543569638>match you with some ethnic 30 year old women>if you keep sending him out to dinner with frumpy middle aged women hes not attracted toThat's to keep the White birth rate down. Remember these companies are run by jews.
>>543566968That's the niche eharmony and the league fill. They use some cover story about "screening" applicants (eharmony with the christian angle the league with the "curated" angle), but the reality is they're just filtering for the top 20% of men in both looks and success. At the end of the day, it's about peer review, but they can't outright articulate their reasoning because that would be blatant discrimination on [insert protected status + short + bald + "gives me the ick" for women seeking men and "hot" or "not" for men seeking women. I don't know what the faggots do and don't think it merits discussion because faggotry is a mortal sin.
>>543570768As simply as I can put it;Misogyny makes you look like an asshole who doesn’t deserve to lose his virginity.
>>543570584>My solution solves the entire problem and I could probably turn a profit charging $5/month flat rate, and it eliminates jewry in the design.Explain in layman's terms or you're not going to convince anyone
I had an idea for an anti dating app to bankrupt the nefarious partner company known as match group. Just think, these companies thrive on an infinite supply that automatically floods +8/10s with sub 5s and the sub 5s don't get any choice. They force you to post a bio that everyone will supersede with your pictures, you have a high number of kikes per day to keep you hooked and naively hopeful, but this turns detrimental when facing countless rejections. If you match with someone, you get ghosted. All of this comes down from nigh-unlimited supply. So instead of abundance, do scarcity. There, if you understood the message you literally can build the next $1B, next generation (anti) dating app and retire. Scarcity and value, remember these words for the future of dating.
>>543570057>i do think they enjoy it>>543570224>They enjoy it, just not in the capacity that men do. If they really enjoyed sex as much as men, there would be tons of male prostitutes and porn that catered towards women, and they would constantly engage in groupsex.This is exactly my point. I am not saying they do not get sexually aroused or can't orgasm or whatever, I am saying they don't have a sex drive per se, and they don't enjoy the act itself for the sake of the act despite being able to cum or whatever. Think about it. As one of you outlined, you wouldn't have to pull teeth or pay for sex if they just liked it. Noone has to ask me twice to do things I enjoy doing, and I do them for free whenever I get free time.I think what many men see is women are promiscuous, and have lot's of sex and many partners therefore they like sex. This is a mistake. When you see a man working two jobs busting his ass, it would be asinine to say "man he must really love work" No, obviously he needs extra money. Sex is a means for them to get what they actualy want, social status and resources, they do it often with the right people and like any job, feign enthusiasm. It's a performance. Same error many men make (not you two but the men who swear women have the same or higher libido as men)
>>543571134>deservecategory error
>>543568235When I was in grad school, I scraped a significant number OkCupid profile data primarily in the New York City and Orlando areas (literally every female profile within 50 miles). I had the script running for years; it tracked changes to the questions (OkCupid's single most valuable dataset) and tests. Later, OkCupid phased out tests and merged the two. I was able to see roughly when users lost their virginity, for example. More significantly, I scraped all of the users' photos and trained a machine learning algorithm to filter out the fatties and blacks. Based on the slutty score and hot score and weighting the two based on my mood, I had *massive* success. This was circa 2013-2016
>>543570386Problem is that this just kills human connection and serendipity. It's GWs speech in MGS 2 distilled into a matchmaking service where not even humans make a choice, just a model deciding on who it "thinks" might be good for you. Also it's quite expensive when you need to sustain millions of users. Go simple with this: scarcity, value. Those two keywords. Deconstruct the current dating apps modus operandi, flip it over and release it
>>543571406Like noone had to pay me to play a game of seige. A friend who wants to take our bike sout on the trail doens't have to woo me, say the right words, buy me diner, etc etc we just take our bikes and go because we actually enjoy it. If women actually enjoyed sex none of us would be having this discussion lol We could literally walk up to any woman ask for sex and 9/10 be fucking in minutes vs being escorted into a police car in handcuffs.Now let's say you know a woman who is a pothead. Offer her some weed and there's no payment, no date, no games, she just says yes and smokes because she actually enjoys the drug.
>>543566512They do work. You just have to be not ugly. Obviously it's way easier for women than men, but you can still get easy low quality sex.
>>543570602i have an idea for a radically new gun designshould i draw every detail before i pitch it to my inventor boss?
>>543571406i get what you are saying but what about when they are ovulating?
>>543571576age of the gun is over pal, its all about grenade drones now.
>>543570224Men just don't know how to fuck. And women get aroused differently than men. 99% of men don't understand that
>>543571716Well I would say they would FEEL hornier, for that short window (the egg is only viable for a 24 hr period, it's actually a lot harder to get a woman pregnant than most ppl believe) but hat FEELING does not necessarily and often does not translate into the action of seeking sex and is therefore not a drive. They would probably just masturbate. It's not like women, who any given time millions of them ovulate, just go outside and ask the first guy that isn't fat for sex, which would work 95% of the time. I mean they have experiments where women go out and ask randoms for sex and most men predictable agree. This would be happening if they actually liked it.
>>543571950Women get turned on most by "scenarios". The majority of those BDSM videos are aimed at women.
>>543566624This. They are ownes by scum of the earth juden.Look into the backstories of the founders of Match company and Tinder/Bumble.Tinder founder also just did a celebration in israel lmao went to the wall
>>543572666Imagination and scenarios correct
>>543566512>We all know dating apps don't workFor you.
>>543572027fair pointbut what about the choice saturation?perhaps thats affecting female behaviorshe doesnt need to make effortbecause there are always so many lower status menaround her at any given time or on her phonethis embarrasment of riches leads to choice paralysisand no choice being madei would just suggest in different environmentswomen would behave differentlythis world caters to women at evey turn
>>543566555Checked It's all human trafficking in the end
>>543573248height only really matters on a gynocentricworld due to the potential for short bursts of unarmed conflictin otherwise peaceful placesin nature, every man would have access to technologyand would use it freelythis in itself would act as an equalizermuch like height size and threats of potential violencefunction in domesticated modernity
>>543566512Worked great for me. Or sometimes it did. But really it’s a fuck tool for top 1% of men and has destroyed birth rates trough hypergamy
>>543570509This kekAlso majority of men that never reproduced in history is literally Jewish propaganda from tel Aviv and eglin It's fake and gay, literally
Man this board has gone down the gutter
>>543573415Birth rates naturally plummet and are cyclical. The boomer generation was anormality. On top of that, late stage capitalism/neo-feudalism kills the birthrates.
>>543573386tl;dr manlet
>>543573686height obviated by tech/violence on natureappealing to height as natural advantageon an unnatural system is a category errorlike saying a DEI hirewon a meritocracy
>>543573432Tel aviv and Eglin fear the tent banger or the sleepy NEET. Nothing scares them more than the guy who refuses to do their hard work or the guy who will kill them while they are micro sleeping.All im asking for is a cute gf. Is too much ask?
>>543573947having the ability to pass on your genetic material is not a meritocracy, incel
>>543574066yet people claim daily it isthey use pejoratives to attack anyone describing these conditions accuratelyyou yourself made this errorappealing to shaming rhetoricwhen i showed that height as an advantageis only circumstantial based on the confines of modernityand the sexual liberation of femalesin that same contextrelative to indifference or hostility towards male sexuality
go date my dick, nigguh!
>>543566512I don't date or have sex. Or masturbate.Simple as.
>>543566512It's called international chatting sites. Skip Western White women and look to the East instead. You'll be happier.
>>543566512I started arguing with my gf in the comments section of a fb unvax dating group so that's what worked for me
match group unironically ruined the world
>>543576005they dont have a global pull. Theres something else at hand.
>>543574058Until every single one of them is skinned alive and their bones are used to make temples to a new eraYes, it's too much to ask unfortunately, there's no solution but total annihilation if these demons, the traitors and their shitskin pets Every single one of them
they dont work for me and im a decent looking white dude thats not short and i've pulled some baddies in the past yet get no attention on apps except from trannies or fat girls.
>>543566512what app does /pol/ use for dating? didnt 4chan advertise one?
>>543566624You retarded zoomer fucking faggotDating apps worked SO WELL decades ago, that the companies made 0 profit, because people would instantly find their PERFECT match and never use the app againIn this retarded white man's monopoly money world, that's not very profitable. You need repeat, returning, desperate, gambling customers to farm for their monopoly money
>>543578839>Dating apps worked SO WELL decades ago, that the companies made 0 profit, because people would instantly find their PERFECT match and never use the app again>In this retarded white man's monopoly money world, that's not very profitableThat's actually a good pitch for a state controlled dating app.
>>543566512Unironically have to go outside to meet women. The dating apps fucking suck and I don't think anyone could fix that. There's no replacement for actually meeting a chick irl. I've met a few recently by going to bars, which sucks, but the only other alternative is Church. I feel like you can still meet them at Church too. I had some chick today when I was shopping say she recognized me from a Karaoke bar. It's annoying having to spend money on drinks but it beats these stupid apps. It really turns you into an object, and keep in mind that people got together fine without them. If everyone stops using them they die. that's what I did. IRL now or nothing
>>543578340>what app does /pol/ use for dating?I use an old school app called going out on friday, saturday and sunday nights. It seems to work decent but modern women are difficult no matter what you do. We can thank (((feminism))) for that
