>REES-MOGG: It was fundamental. It was— it was the classic good versus evil. We did the right thing.>TUCKER: Has the UK benefitted from it? Is it a better country than it was?>REES-MOGG: To have defeated Hitler? Yes.>TUCKER: So the UK is a better country now. It's a healthier country now.>REES-MOGG: Well otherwise we'd all be speaking German.>TUCKER: Who cares? >REES-MOGG: I do.>TUCKER: There are a lot of people in Britain who can't speak English. So wouldn't it be nice to have like at least a European language spoken in your country?>REES-MOGG: No, I see no advantage of speaking German over any other language. We want to speak English. Thank you so much.
we've had this thread 5 times todaykill yourself
>>543763039I think you’re exaggerating slightly. I’ve made one previous thread along these lines, not five, and it certainly wasn’t the exact same thread each time. If it’s not to your taste, you’re perfectly free to scroll past without the unnecessary hostility, anon.
>It's a "normies dance around race" episode
>>543762959It's one thing to cuck out because of hate speech laws (Nigel Farage) it's another thing to advocate for the destruction of England. To say England is just a piece of dirt in the middle of the ocean is totally retarded.
>>543763039At least we're not speaking German
>>543763108My dear fellow,One detects the unmistakable hallmarks of algorithmic mimicry in your rather stilted protestations. It is perfectly apparent that you have employed some form of artificial intelligence in a clumsy endeavour to approximate my own mode of expression. How thoroughly contemporary, and how thoroughly unconvincing. One does not require artificial assistance to communicate with clarity and civility. The genuine article rather tends to manage without it.Do try a little harder next time, or better still, speak in your own voice.
You can lose your language and revive it. You can lose your religion and revive it. Buildings, even entire cities can be rebuilt.But when your genetics are destroyed, when your genetic line ends or is mixed with shit, it's over. And that's why his remark about English being a "mongrel people" is tone deaf. If England is just an idea or economic zone, then why die for it? 2+2=4 is an idea, will you give your life to stop someone writing in 5? Would you also fight to ensure the GDP doesn't fall? Of course not. Men do fight and give their lives to protect their family though.Do you see how what he's saying only has the appearance of nationalism.
>>543762959But what if you hadn't eaten breakfast, Jacob? How would you feel?
>>543763367My dear fellow, the hypothetical is of scant relevance, for one did in fact partake of a proper breakfast this morning.
>>543763343My dear fellow,I’m afraid you have rather confidently mistaken eloquence for automation. I can assure you that no artificial intelligence has been employed in the composition of my messages; they are, for better or worse, entirely my own words. I appreciate that in an age where every moderately articulate sentence is liable to be diagnosed as “AI”, this may come as something of a disappointment to you.The notion that a person cannot possess a slightly formal or old-fashioned manner of speaking without consulting a machine is, frankly, rather amusing. Some of us simply happen to enjoy expressing ourselves with a degree of care. I see little reason to apologise for that, nor do I feel particularly compelled to reduce my vocabulary merely to make my authorship more readily believable.As for your suggestion that my manner is an imitation of yours, I’m afraid I must disappoint you once again. I have neither the inclination nor the necessity to imitate your particular style. If two people happen to employ similar turns of phrase, that does not necessarily constitute evidence of plagiarism, artificial intelligence, or some elaborate literary conspiracy. Occasionally, people simply write in a similar register.You are, of course, perfectly entitled to believe otherwise. I would merely suggest that certainty is perhaps unwarranted when the evidence amounts to little more than, “This person writes rather formally, therefore it must be AI.” That is a rather extraordinary leap of logic, even by internet standards.So, with the greatest respect, I shall continue to speak in my own voice, artificial or otherwise — and I assure you, it is very much the former. If that voice happens to strike you as somewhat polished, I’m afraid that is simply something you shall have to endure.Do take care, and perhaps reserve the technological forensics for a case where the evidence is rather less speculative.
>>543763337Grim
why are the nukes seen as worse than allying with stalin?makes no sense to memoggs arguments are a hypocritical mess derived from british expediencytuckers were just lies (muh you can't kill period, lifelong neo con is now an absolute pacifist, should have told putin)
>>543763460https://voca.ro/18bj0On2e09x
>>543763896My dear fellow,I would be delighted to consider your response, but unfortunately the link you have sent me appears to be inaccessible. Quite the unfortunate development, considering you have gone to the trouble of sending it to me.I’m afraid I cannot very well respond to the contents of a message I am unable to access. I have attempted to do the reasonable thing and listen to what you had to say, only to be greeted by the digital equivalent of a velvet rope.If there is something particularly compelling in the recording that you wish me to address, you are most welcome to make it accessible or, alternatively, provide me with the substance of your argument in writing. I assure you, I shall read it with all the patience and civility that the occasion deserves.Until then, I shall refrain from pretending to have heard something I quite plainly have not. It would be rather unbecoming of a gentleman to manufacture a response to an argument he has never actually received.Do send it again when convenient. I remain, as ever, entirely real, entirely composed, and still rather suspicious of your confidence in identifying artificial intelligence by nothing more than a person’s ability to string a sentence together.
>>543763896Wow, the real Jacob Rees-Mogg.Splendiferous, sir. How anodyne is it that the parochial nature of 4chan might see us as little more than what Robert Henry Clitheroe termed "little demons running amok in the mind". Nevertheless, I bid you a simply devine good evening and an almost effervescent sleepy poos. Toodles!
>Gott strafe England!>Er strafe es!God is finally punishing England. May he punish it.You get what you deserve.
>>543762959The white royal family no longer represents the brown people of England and need to be replaced by a family of color. Its time, its fair. Keep Calm and Bong On.
>>543762959The English upper class has always, always hated us going back to the Norman invasion when any semblance of freedom was taken away from us and we were forced into feudalism by force of arms. Worlds largest empire to have ever existed and where were your and my ancestors? In a fucking slum they would only ever bother to fix if the stench got to their place of work or domicile. The Moggs and his ilk have only ever cared about their own, and even then it is an incredibly fragile alliance.
>>543763646allying with stalin is just traditional "balance of powers" kikerynuking japan was advanced "mass baal blood sacrifice" kikery
>>543762959I always wonder what the Mogg types think history will remember them as. The man thinks of himself as a Nelson or Wellington but is an effeminate little weasel selling his own people out for a literal Jewish cabal. And for my international friends, this is one of the chief faggots who backed the “Boris wave” shifting in of millions of Africans whilst everyone was stuck in their homes completely unaware during Covid. Saying that I merely “hate” him is a massive understatement.
>>543762959Did this guy not get the memo that Tucker isnt kosher conservative anymore
>>543763420lel
>>543763039Anglo scum need to be reminded of their crimes 10 times a day.
>>543763337>At least we're not speaking GermanNeither do Germans. You dopes have entire districts with schools full of people who don't speak English.Common cultural and social cuckoldry among Anglo-Germanic has-been countries.
>>543762959I agree with Tucker but he completely embarrassed himself in this interview. Reminded me of Ben Shapiro vs Andrew Neil.
>>543763349Yes it’s very fake and gay of him. This shit worked on boomers only.
>>543765155You sound like a retard sad he hot tricked to vote gor brexit.
>>543763337Good opportunity to grope a viehmale.
>>543764764Rees-Mogg's grandparents were working class lorry drivers. He's from Irish American stock. There's nothing of the "English upper-class" about him - you are his "ilk" lol
>>543765324I didn’t vote conservative but I voted to leave the EU precisely because my representative made next to no difference on laws being passed in a different country but still impacted my life. Why don’t you take Americas deal and let them take over Canadian affairs? It’s the same thing.
>>543762959>the Anglo-Saxons are still in denial about being Saxons
>>543765650And? He’s been adopted into the fold.
>>543762959So does Tucker also agree that the American revolution was a mistake?>but muh taxation without representationwho cares?
I couldn't really get past the first 20 minutes of this "debate" where Tucker's only argument was to just let Russia do what ever it likes because they have nukes.
1) Charles Lindbergh argued that another war in Europe would destroy white civilization allowing the third world hordes, who are the true enemy, to advance and overtake us.2) General George Patton argued that the Germans are the most advanced, civilized race in Europe, and if they conquered the savages to the east the world would be more advanced. He advocated teaming up with Hitler to destroy the communist threat3) Many intellectuals at the time remarked on how useful it was for Germany to be a bulwark keeping the Russians out of Europe. A policy which ironically resumed in the Cold War with the Marshal Plan.4) Hitler wanted to ally with Britain and had deep respect for Britain. Reported he broke down crying when his generals suggested invading or bombing Britain. He saw them as fellow Germans. The British fascination with destroying Germany was about nothing but small minded pettiness. They wanted dominion over Europe and weren't willing to share with anyone. It was mindless antipathy, a pure hatred to people who are basically their brothers. If Britain had sided with Germany, they would still be a large powerful empire even today. The light of civilization and the west would expand across the world and across the east.
>>543765881Would you mind explaining how these are comparable or relevant?
UK should've just let Germany invade them like Poland
>>543765818Get out of North America Taig
>>543766285Or they just sign a peace deal with Hitler. Perhaps they would get dominion of France or something. But then the two would join up and conquer asia and africa together, and communism would be destroyed. No more russian threat, no more china threat. With the civilized and racially superior people ruling the vast majority of the world, implementing sensible eugenics policies, we rapidly advance. Such that by 2026 we're already functionally immortal and leaving the solar system.
>>543762959>>TUCKER: There are a lot of people in Britain who can't speak English.>REES-MOGG:. We want to speak English. Thank you so much.
>>543766554Have you watched the full interview? He addresses this.
>>543766432Germany would have been too strong and eventually been the sole superpower. Not sure if I buy it, but that's what I assume the boomer defense to be.
>>543766645Oh no, anything but that. Not our basically-identical blood brothers becoming a strong empire!I mean come on. They would have no reason to fight Britain if they were allied. Their whole ideology is racial, and Brits pass or even surpass the Germans by those metrics. They would probably look at the British like a big brother
tucker is such a faggot that he makes this nigga look normal
