[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pw/ - Professional Wrestling


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Undertaker-Sting.jpg (99 KB, 1159x828)
99 KB
99 KB JPG
Who has had the better career?
>>
bill goldberg
>>
File: 1724303596230.webm (1.23 MB, 480x360)
1.23 MB
1.23 MB WEBM
>>16287517
>goldbotch
>>
>>16287512
Me
>>
>>16287512
Taker had the better career because he got paid more. But Sting had more years as a good wrestler, his influence on later wrestlers is more profoundly felt (Cody especially) and his gimmick reinventions (other than the TNA Joker era) were a lot better than Taker's.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.