>Meltzer: It was a bad number. I know Netflix expected at least 10 million in the US. There's pressure on HHH now that wasn't there before for sure!
Sad fanfic
>>16708071You used to get permabanned on /wooo/ for doing this.
>>16708084The aew fan has been really low energy lately. Raw on Netflix being a massive unrelenting success has completely broken his spirit
>>16708088Where?!
>>16708071>RAW ONLY GOT 664K VIEWERS!!!Actually it got 4.9 million households>NETFLIX WANTED 10 MILLION!!!Why are you such a crippled faggot?
>>16708376>Actually it got 4.9 million householdsIn the entire world. These absolutely did not watch even most of the episode.
>664Kkek
4.9 is pretty grim considering netflix has 282.7 million subs.
>>16708088/wooo/ sucked fed cock that hard? fuck that shithole
>>16708409Like every Dynamite when 200,000 Shelton fans leave after 2 minutes of flippy bruvs?
>>16708088why are trannies so obsessed with their ded boards?
>>16708443DELETE THISMODS!!!!
>>16708465Trevor here, 1.4% of Netflix viewers watched. Nothing to brag about, bitchtits. Not to mention the 664k thing. Yikes.
>>16708071It's on par to a FotM seasonal anime numbers which cost 150k-200 per episode. The reality is, WWE hasn't made real star since 2018 which is why there is no reason to watch the premiere.
>>16708630AEW hasnt gotten 664k in months
>>16708503they miss their hugbox
What a dysgenic thread.I shoot do not see the point in arguing if 4.9 milly is a good or bad number, when either way it makes WWE the undisputed biggest wrestling promotion on this planet by a mile.There is nothing else even close to it, especially considering how AEW fell off a cliff these last few weeks.And you know, that's actually [sad news] for every fan. WWE reigns supreme and can afford to air mediocrity week after week, while everyone else airs unmitigated garbage.Khan needs to sell AEW to an actual carny who understands the business.
>>16708409Minus the nearly 100 countries that don't have Netflix and/or WWE on Netflix, yes. If you subtract those billions of people, that is accurate.
>>167081034.9 globally is an abject failure
>>16709241is this the cope edrones are going with? Uzbekistan doesn't have Netflix so that means 4.9 is a big success? lmao
>>16709362Tell that to Netflix lil bro, they’re happy with it
>>16709379The 2 most populated countries on earth, each with nearly 1.5 billion people and over 4x the US population, don't have WWE on Netflix
>>16709461lmao they aren't, they spent a shitload getting WWE and random Korean shows are blowing it out of the water
>>16709554>VPNs don't exist brocope
>>16709950Squid Games cost 100 billion to make, retard
>>16708465It's not available to all subs
>>16708071
>>16708475they hated the fed, but they hated liars moreso
>>16708071kirdblt. raw on netflix was a complete failure. based lachlan tried to warn em!!
>>16709950Until the series is over. Then Raw creeps up and slowly takes over as always happens. A new season of Raw doesn't take 2 years to produce.
>>16708481>heh, WWE only got 1.4% of their potential audience watching, but a few 100K boomers don't want to watch Dynamitegottem
>>16710771kek keep crying dawg
>>16709063No other promotion streams live globally in this fashion.>an actual carnyName 5.>>16709954>he thinks that the average streetshitter could use a VPN
>>16710764>man i sure am glad we spent 2.5 billion dollars on a show that will, eventually, slowly creep up on our cheap korean shows in views
>>16710778A never-ending supply of new content multiple times per week vs a show that will be binge watched at release and then will dwindle down to nothing. Okay, it does big numbers this month and next month, what about the next 35 months before season 3 comes out? That's a lot of Raw, NXT, Smack Down, and PPVs
>>16710798>netflix gave WWE 2.5 billion so that (maybe) a random episode of smackdown from 2003 could get 12,000 "views" with no advertisements
>>16710816Yes, Netflix gave WWE billions so that people will pay Netflix to watch WWE content on its platform
>>16710798People are still watching Squid Game 1 lol
>>16710918So that people will pay to watch LIVE*** WWE content on it's platform (because they want to start cramming ads into everything like traditional TV)And their debut effort was a colossal fucking failure
>>16710941Day 1 I watched a good chunk of old content. It's literally a "best of" compilation at your fingertips. Almost every match you could care to watch is on there, with more being added.
>>16708409>In the entire worldNorth America + UK only. So yes.
>>16710961yeah i'm sure they're paying 2.5 billion dollars so that NEETs can watch ad free matches from the sultry summer of 1992, netflix must be thrilled
>>16710744And yet they believed that men could become women. Curious.
>>16710777so you're admitting WWE fans are street shitters?
>number 1 show on the service>it underperformedWhat the fuck were they expecting
We need breakdowns of what other people were watching on Netflix at the time. If we can make a correlation between network ratings and Netflix ratings, the shitposting can last forever.>tfw big dimes Waterboy grabs more viewers during an Oinko Sty segment
