>>18799599
Long winded way of saying her whole act makes no sense but yes

>>18799614
Why doesn't it make sense? It seems like a simple gimmick to me. Borderline attractive woman who is way hotter than what makes sense from a facial bone structure analysis. But why don't demon horns work? Isn't she supposed to fight Iyo Sky?

>>18799599
Sorry to break it to you anon but The Undertaker is also not an undead mortician who can summon lightning

Ah sweet another Indian simp thread

>>18799624
Yeah, you lost all credibility with that statement.

Iyo Sky (angelic) vs Stephanie "the semen demon" Vaquer. This is good booking. Did I miss that match I haven't watched in weeks.

>>18799621
>She's super likeable
>She has a friendly demeanor
>She wrestles well without cheating or doing anything underhanded
>Yet she's a "demon" just because she spent $10 at Spirit Halloween
Her entire presentation is about her being a demon yet there's nothing actually about her apart from the cheap ass Halloween costume accessory that has anything to do with it. It'd be like saying Finn Balor was a cop just because he started carrying around a plastic toy badge

>>18799654
Well. It's still real to me.

>>18799664
I like her. I just wish she had more depth or reason to the aesthetic. Make it a bigger part of her act you know? If she's a demon then make people afraid of her. Give them a reason to be. Maybe be less smiles all the time. Make it all cohesive

>>18799654
She's a succubus

>>18799599
>Is this Stephanie Vaquer?
yes, when she was like 17

>>18799676
Yeah it really is sort of disjointed, nothing but a hat she wears to the ring. Maybe she needs to take over the Wyatt Sicks and start cutting scathing promos on everyone about going to hell and the afterlife. You're correct I agree l. I just honestly cannot pinpoint what makes her hot and that's my biggest issue, bc it is frustrating.

>>18799654
>>18799700
It's not that superficial, she started wearing the horns when she was a heel and the rationale behind it is to symbolize the pain she had to endure to get to the top, which she will now proceed to inflict on her opponents with a deadpan face
Except she also sells like death because shit still hurts
Now she's a mega over babyface so she can smile a bit sometimes, ain't nothing wrong with any of that
You sound like WWE'S marketing department looking at something that's mega over and they had nothing to do with it so they need to fuck it up to justify their continued employment

>>18799753
>It's not that superficial
Except to anyone who's only seen her in WWE, which you have to consider is most, it's 100% superficial

>>18799676
that's definitely one critique I've heard a lot about Vaquer, is that she shouldn't be all smiles all the time

>>18799763
to them it’s just a slutty demon, you see them all the damn place around halloween

>>18799763
lol no because it works, her whole aesthetic and presentation are top tier
Sure autistic plotfags will bitch and moan because they didn't get their two hours of community theater to explain every detail yet, but really, nobody else gives a fuck because they don't got autism and they can enjoy it
It doesn't become superficial because you don't want to understand it, the rationale and reasoning are still there
Really she even mentioned it on an interview in NXT, not mentioning the horns but basically giving you the gist of the logic
The only problem is that they don't give her enough screentime. Not that anything is superficial lol

>>18799788
It's not that she 'shouldn't' be. It's more that it clashes with her image. So either go one or the other. Clearly what she's doing is working regardless but I get the idea of the two sides butting heads. It's like if Kane walked around all happy
>>18799792
Yup. Not to say that's all it is or that there never was more significance to it but to their audience that's all that the majority know it as. Which in itself is based anwyay. But it wouldn't kill them to run through her history better or better yet do a speed run of it in WWE so you have that foundation built directly with the audience that's watching. Like what they're doing with Blake Monroe in NXT for example

>>18799788
>I've heard A LOT
lol
sure
Where are all these people lmao

>>18799805
I'm not denying any of the points you've mentioned. I'm just pointing out that the majority of people who are watching her each week have no clue about her history so while they may have meaning established before she got to WWE they may as well not have because most people don't know it. That's all

>>18799806
>It's more that it clashes with her image
I'm afraid it really doesn't lol
She can work as a stone faced wrestler because she can make anything work but she's far too expressive not to smile as a babyface when that shit literally kills
Have you people ever watched wrestling

>>18799812
sorry bud I'll throw in a /s next time, I should have known to redditize my post for the tourists

>>18799817
Yeah sure I agree. Only thing is that it requires one segment to explain, and even then I think a lot of people are kinda subconsciously understanding the implications cause it's not rocket science either, or actually interested in the "gimmick" and her backstory and seek it out
It's just not superficial or artificial is my point

>>18799805
>>18799812
>>18799821
you say lol a lot

>>18799827
Ah shit you were only pretending to be retarded I should have known, damn this place is usually so smart, I'm sorry for being a tourist

>>18799830
so what lol