>>18800583
And I mean, folx? Where's the ding-dong diddly lie?

>>18800583
Dave always says retard shit like this while refusing to tell the full story. Nobody is mad at a station paying $100K/show to draw a .08, it's massively different when you're paying $1M/show to get a .10

a station is only going to pay $1M for so long before they switch to paying 2/3 less to only get 1/3 lower rating

>>18800624
Right, but isn't AEW highly profitable? WBD owns a chunk of AEW right? So surely it makes a ton of financial sense to keep AEW going.

>>18800583
Dave would literally funnel his fellow jews into gas chambers if it meant defending AEW. There is no way he does it for free.

>random twitter user says Dave would dickride AEW regardless
>Dave quotes him so he can dickride AEW, and acts like its a big own

>>18800645
Dave is a top tier wrestling reporter and expert business analyst. He also regularly talks to a variety of high level mathmaticians and TV rating experts on his message boards so yeah I think he knows more about this shit than some random Twitter fag.

>>18800583
>.10 is good actually

this faggot has no morals as he said anything below .18 was terrible