It is incredibly weird to me that Impact will continue to air live on TNA+ even after the AMC deal starts. You don't even need AMC to watch the show. If you're a TNA fan who's already been subscribed to TNA+ nothing will change, you can keep watching the way you always have. And you need TNA+ to watch their PLEs anyway, so I don't see what's in this for AMC. It would've made sense if they bought the rights to TNA's PPV events and you streamed them on AMC+, but no. You can continue to be a big TNA fan and watch every episode of Impact without ever watching AMC.
Stop noticing things
>>19606701Are you having a manic episode or something?
>>19606701the tna/amc is an adshare deal that will fail miserably
>>19606731I just don't know why AMC is paying for the show when you don't even need to watch it on AMC.
>>19606701AMC looked at the numbers and was fine with missing out on the 10 TNA+ subscribers.
>>19606701Is it really?
>>19606701Same thing will happen to aew once netflix finalises the WB deal
>>19608188Yes, it will simulcast on TNA+, which every current TNA fan already subscribes to.
>be amc>strike gold during the basic cable renaissance>fumble everything that came after>have to broadcast an outlaw mudshow now
>>19606701Some companies actually want to bring in new fans.
They're getting 10 milly a year. I doubt AMC gives much of a fuck. They're probably just doing someone a favour.
>>19606701Not everyone get's AMC so they could be trying to attract people who watch wrestling, get AMC, but do not subscribe to TNA+Pretty much boils down to money, they have a business incentive
