The closest portrayal of a wrestling smark in literature
take this gay shit over to /lit/
reading is for libtards and trannies
>>19646973But i thought all the /pw/ posters were intellectuals who read every worthwhile book in existence or so the AEW cult would have me believe
>>19646982who hurt ya lil dronie?
>>19646982reading fiction is for women
>>19646982kamala lost
>>19646990Imagine being too stupid to read a book like crime and punishment and coping by acting like it's cuz you are too manly to read. You are all kinds of fucked up, brother
>>19646999Politics rotted your already feeble brain
>>19647003i'd rather read antoine-henri jomini, you nancy
>>19646969Read about this book, sounds like litkinoDef gonna read it eventually
>>19646969>Constantly frames his opinions as structural and moral necessities, not preferences.>Claims he’s above capitalism, popular culture, and modern norms, yet his entire life revolves around reacting to it.>Claims to not watch or care about the current product yet always has 2000 word manifesto about it>Curates his suffering with his misery being proof that he is correct (Hate-watching/Obligation)>Devises grand plans that don't actually work and only exist to validate his intellect (fantasy booking)>Believes he is a misunderstood genius in a world of foolsSounds about right. Could go for a Lucky Dog now.
>>19647052That's fine but acting like fiction doesn't have its merit and can't also be used to be educated on historical events is fucking stupid. Yea there is fiction slop, no shit, but the best allegories of life are fiction. East of Eden? Come on man, you are missing out on great shit
>>19646990If you shoot think this you are insecure in your masculinity and likely have a microdick too
>>19647075maybe i'll take a peak at alice in wonderland after wrapping up libido domanadi.
>>19646969>antismarkftfy
>>19647087would you say you are a booksmark?
