[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pw/ - Professional Wrestling

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: img73.jpg (420 KB, 960x2029)
420 KB
420 KB JPG
Another smark narrative crushed? Must be day that ending in a Y.
>>
killshot
>>
>>19672314
Dave estimates buyrates with Google searches
>>
>>19672314
I’m glad someone’s finally calling out these unrealistic ppv buy numbers aew claims they get
I’ve been saying for a while now the numbers don’t make sense
>>
>>19672314
>Collision does like 200k viewers
>PPV magically does 140k buys

The math isn't mathing
>>
>>19672314
>>19672485
>I-it's not possible!
>why?
>it just isn't, ok?
>>
>>19672314
The PPVs have always been excellent and TV fell off. It's not rocket science.
>>
Wow, it's almost like in The Attitude Era there were casual fans who watched the TV but didn't care enough to pay real money for PPVs, whereas AEW's much smaller audience is comprised of hardcores who are much more likely to spend money on the product, giving them a higher conversion rate

t. high level mathematician
>>
this is retarded and sounds like someone who has no idea what he is talking about, nor even remembers the attitude era. or the 90s.

and the fact he's using the "uncle dave" thing sounds like hes an autist who spends all day listening to jim cornette
>>
>>19672609
Great argument, you totally proved everything he said wrong with hard facts and data
>>
>>19672541
>it just isn't
Because of basically every historical precedent
>>
File: 1759180384970290.jpg (37 KB, 828x708)
37 KB
37 KB JPG
>I'm a bit of a stat nerd
>>
>>19672314
The PPV numbers being mostly static despite the TV audience shrinking has always just been fabrication
It makes no sense and no other TV-PPV in history has managed to retain like that, it goes beyond a statistically anomalous retention to a completely unique outlier that defies all logic.
>>
>>19672588
i was the only kid at my school (and the 3-4 friends that would come over to watch) that saw any PPVs from the attitude era/Monday night wars
only know a few people that still watch wrestling as an adult but they all buy most PPVs, even though most of them don't watch the week to week tv
>>
>>19672745
you sound stressed
>>
>>19672785
Yeah your mom keeps begging for my BBC
>>
>>19672785
The tag team of trev and projection is undefeated in the /pw/ fed
>>
>>19672588
There's also the fact that piracy and illegal means of real-time viewership were non-existent back then and incredibly easy now which is another factor that would swing PPV buys historically upward and modern downward
>>
>>19672541
It's not possible because the numbers are nonsensical. AEW lost 290k fans between 2023 and 2025, but Dave wants us to think they only lost 7k PPV buys? Complete bullshit.
>>
>>19672785
You sound like you're trying to damage control Dave's blatantly fabricated numbers but you can't actually defend them so you're struggling to think of anything to say and coming up empty.
>>
>>19672992
Dave has the marks believing that AEW has some of the best PPV conversion rates in the history of PPV wrestling but somehow Tony Khan isnt bragging about it on twitter.
>>
>>19672697
>>
>>19672314

The TV numbers are for the US, the PPV numbers are worldwide.
>>
>>19672565
>The PPVs have always been excellent
They used to be. They've fallen off so badly in the past year though starting around All In
>>
>>19672697
Aw sweet another porkroll Family Guy meme post
>>19673200
Kek glad someone else has caught on
>>
Worlds End went magically up from 115k to over 140k buys in the span of a year. That's an almost 30% increase while every other AEW metric is down.

Totally legit, guys.
>>
I can believe there's some who might be buying the PPVs but not bothering with the weekly show anymore in the same way some people watch Wrestle Kingdom but nothing else from NJPW but I doubt it's at the numbers Dave claims.
>>
>>19673371
They added Amazon and Max as carriers since then
all of tv is down, especially wrestling after the Nielson fix
Also, their PPV attendance has been pretty much steady for years
And for me personally, their PPVs are pretty much the only thing must see for me in wrestling right now along with WK, WM and RR.
>>
>>19673333
Checked
>>
>>19672745
It's like AEW getting 500k on Max, but no drop in the TV ratings. 500k new AEW fans just appeared out of thin air. It's fucking retarded
>>
PPV buys are worldwide
>>
>>19673839
This, OP's post is some amerimutt idiot who lives a in bubble and forget the rest of the world exists, you can buy PPVs worldwide
>>
>>19673885
they’re also much cheaper internationally
>>
>>19673839
>>19673885
>>19673917
These are numbers Dave makes up based on Google searches. They don't represent PPV buys international or otherwise.
>>
>>19674142
Correct. All Meltzer math is based on crap. The supposed Max numbers are based on Dave polling his subscribers.
>>
>>19672485
It’s like when China reported that their GDP grew by the same exact percentage every quarter
>>
>>19673839
>>19673885
nobody worldwide watches this shit so thats horrible logic
>>
>>19672314
>TV to PPV
Include streaming, YouTube, etc, and it adds up to about the same probably.
>>
>>19672314
What doesn't he get?
>Streaming didn't exist in 1998
>Either did social media or YouTube
>The TV numbers reported are USA only
>Even accounting for all that they're still nowhere near the PPV rates of the 90s
It's like he's refusing to acknowledge things have changed dramatically
>>
I don't see what's wrong with that given they're not counting coverage from other markers and streaming, YouTube, twitter, all that other shit. And 140k PPV buys isn't that insurmountable when you consider it's never been easier to order a PPV.
>>
>>19672686
thats like saying a working class obese person cant travel faster than 20mph because of historic precedent (before cars)
>>
>>19675974
>>19675983
>>19676001
wtf? blatant coordinated bot raid
>>
>>19672314
I’ve bought AEW PPVs and I don’t even watch the weekly shows or follow AEW particularly
>>
>>19676011
>No arguments detected
I accept your concession
>>
>>19676018
You have bought a total of 0 AEW PPVS



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.