Why don't the jannies start cracking down on the nude sharing, deepfakes, and edit threads on /r/ and /b/? The Take It Down act brought new regulations against this.
>>20060040its only 48 hours AFTER a victim's report. Most threads dont even last 48 hours
yeah jannies and mods.....remove all porn from the interwebs, you have 48hours, thanks
>>20060040start reporting threads I guess, see what the janitors decide
>>20060047Are they just too lazy to do anything proactively in this case?They did ban Kik threads in /b/. There used to be a sticky there.Some anons theorized that this was because a politician was arrested for CP and was found browsing those threads.>Just prior to logging out of his Facebook account (Robert May), he was on 4chan searching for Kik groups on his personal laptop.https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.scd.305804/gov.uscourts.scd.305804.11.0_1.pdfhttps://apnews.com/article/sex-crimes-south-carolina-lawmaker-rj-may-81901be6f700f24a99ba3346086f8b61
>>20060047So how does it impact the archive tho?
>>20060056I put tinfoil on and thought since session threads took you off the site alphabet agencies couldn't monitor, so as long as it happens on the board it is better than private servers
>>20060057file a victim report, prove your identity, etc... with those site owners.
>>20060061I think he's talking about the on-site archives.>>20060057Some boards like /b/ don't have an archive.
>>200600532D > 3D
>>20060055janitor decides fuck-o but mods might give the op couple weeks ban for report spamming>sees porn in nsfw board>oh humanity!>better report this
>>20060056>>20060058It was because people in loli threads on /b/ were sharing session/kik contacts to share "STUFF" outside of the site. Admins noticed this.
>>20060055Pretty sure you'll still need to prove that youre the person within the image. At which point it still gives 48 hours for them to remove it. Most likely the thread would be dead anyway.
>>20060058>I put tinfoil on and thought since session threads took you off the site alphabet agencies couldn't monitor, so as long as it happens on the board it is better than private servers>>20060067Session codes were already banned before this incident. IIRC they had some filter in place to ban the ids, which is why people would split apart the codes to multiple lines to get arround the filter.The kik thread ban happened in july of this year: https://archived.moe/b/thread/936630382
>>20060066IIRC when 4chan got hacked they discovered that mods dont really ban people for misusing reports.
>>20060073Yea, I dont think the incident has anything to do with the mods decisions.
>>20060071What information could 4chan provide about the poster should the individual want to pursue the poster for harm?Would 4chan be liable if i deleted the image within the timeframe?Is 4chan required to share poster information?
>>20060079>What information could 4chan provide about the poster should the individual want to pursue the poster for harm?Your IP, and all other posts that were made from said IP. >Would 4chan be liable if i deleted the image within the timeframe?If I understand correctly the bill only requires that the site A) Take the image down within 48 hours of it being reported and B) Put reasonable safeguards to stop that image/video from being posted again (checking file hashes which they already do for CP)>Is 4chan required to share poster information?If ordered by a court. Then yes.
>>20060078The politician was arrested and charged in june, the month before that announcement on /b/ happened. It's not impossible, but It would be a little strange for that to be a coincidence. It could also be multiple factors that caused the ban.
>>20060090Most likely they were just getting court subpoenas for users who post in those threads. I wouldnt be surprised if LA was setting up honeypots for retarded fucking pedos.
The next question is, 4chan logs IPs, but does my foreign internet provider need to disclose my identity?Will a Canadian or Mexican Internet Service prodied reveal my identity?
>>20060112they usually cooperate with the usa
Wouldn't the same rules of kazaa days apply?Just because a post came from my IP, they can't actually prove it was any one person in the household, so any chance of conviction is poor?
lol anyone actually reporting to the FBI about fake edits about themselves are desperate for attention and are a waste of fucking sperm because they've got nothing better to do for themselves. Just like with the loli argument "its not real, its art" lol fuck outta here. no one fucking cares around here.
>>20060131the act also covers nudes being shared without permission
>>20060131The thing is that sometimes people use edits for blackmail or harassment. Loli is fine, but this is more comparable to drawing loli based on real kids which is creepy as fuck.
>>20060040How about if /r/ becomes usable again? Seriously, what the fuck? Over half the threads are slop requests. How many months now?
>>20060139I think those 2 things are connected. A lot of the slop requests are for deepfakes or shops that are subject to the take it down act.
>>20060040Jannies have shown themselves complicit in this for a while now, moderating deepfake threads and approving obvious IP spoofing ban reports.Like when /aco/ (a board meant for cartoon porn) got attention over a year ago because posters were spamming celeb pornography and exploiting M$ image gen services by swapping scripts and API keys.
>>20060040you do realize that this is American federal law, and the victims have to report the content, right? /r/tards get dumber and dumber these days
>>20060135any underaged is creepy af, and you are a subhuman piece of literal shit if you consume it
>>20060169And retards like you keep deflecting that regardless of what is written in any law, this board is drowned in shit by lack of moderation.
>>20060174> drowned in shit IDK desu I've been having fun gooning
>>20060174>And retards like you keep deflecting that regardless of what is written in any lawdeflecting? no champ. i just answered why the threads exist. also, what kinda of pussy ass pedo gets upset that there are full grown nude women on the adult request board lmao. get a life. ps: see pic. my erome, where i used to get and post all my requests, has been down (by my own accord) since the law actually passed, ya know months ago. stay mad, faggotjannies do suck tho. you got a point there.
>>20060171>>20060179sharing revenge porn is way worse on a moral level than jerking off to fictional lolis.AI gens aren't a bad thing, but when it looks like a real person it can be used for defamation.x
>>20060179i don't care how many brown men you made cum, they're a bunch of brainless spamming retards and so are you.imagine being proud of the kind of dogshit that permeates every social media website.
>>20060302>sharing revenge porn is way worse on a moral level than jerking off to fictional lolisincorrect. jerking off to fucking children will always be disgusting and immoral. frankly, i don't understand why someone would even try to remotely justify it. jerking off to a sex tape you made or had made with an ex, doesn't compare. don't conflate 1 morally grey happening, with an evil, downright satanic act of ruining the innocence of a child. i mean sex tapes or would be revenge porn are only a bad thing if you share them without consent. wanting to fuck kids will eternally always evil, and you deserve a bullet in the skull for wanting to do so. no 2 ways about it, champ. i also would wager most of the faggots on this board, like yourself, begging for fakes aren't doing it for revenge. not to mention, they obvious fakes - mine included. i do things to make sure that they do not appear to be real. >>20060309bro what are you talking about? get a life. also, if you dislike ai fakes soooo much, why would you subject yourself to them? literally fucking brain dead imbecile. no one is making you be here. you choose to be, fucking mongoloid. proud? no. did I amass those views and still have an inbox full of requests that I'll probably never complete? yes.>brown men you made cumwhy are you even thinking about that? imagine that being part of your comeback lmao. bro, yall weird af. i forgot the type of fucking basement dwellers frequent this board lmao. oof sorry for the novel. incels got me worked tonight
>>20060345>this unquestionably morally bad thing is bad only if...ah, yes the "every consumer of totally not revenge porn is assumed responsible" disclaimer line of defense.lmao. but keep droning on about children like someone pulled the cord on your back, browncel./r/ didn't have AI spam before you stupid fucking retarded tourist. that's the whole point of this thread.
>>20060363bud, go take ya meds.>ah, yes the "every consumer of totally not revenge porn is assumed responsible" disclaimer line of defense.the fuck are you talking about? porn in general is not inherently wrong or bad. what people do with it and their intent behind what they do can be. people who produce porn or sexual content cannot be held responsible for what morons like yourself choose to do with it.>keep droning on about childrenbro literally defends cp, and gets upset when someone calls the shit out. if only homie knew what deflection actually was. > before you stupid fucking retarded tourist. that's the whole point of this threadah, the old goal posts moving retort, classic.i am definitely a tourist that has been faking on this board for literal years. yep. anyways, why are you still here? you lost this one bud, and you hate ai fakes, so...
>>20060139I mean you always have the option to filter them out. Threads normally stay up for a reasonable amount of time. Before this it was mostly coomer x-ray, "bubbles", nude shop, trib ,requests. It wasnt much better.
>>20060040>how does one end up imagining that they can defeat the Streisand Effect?
>>20060388big si. that bubble shit was the most retarded horseshit.
>>20060401People were desperate man
>>20060040>take it down act>implying we care what a bunch of jewish pedophiles make up to take the heat off themselves
>>200601234chan can possibly can see device ID?
