Have you ever seen a woman try to explain some complex idea or niche concept? They always fail and sound like complete children in the process. For example I don't think a woman would be able to explain these cell curves
>>82383384Seeing what women on here think natural selection is has made me never take one seriously again. Also there was a Whatever podcast episode where a foid couldn't interpret a bell curve like this, ironic it was about male vs female IQ lmao
>>82383384I used to think women just prioritized different topics, but I've had so many women tell me that I'm "weird" for knowing certain things that I've lost all hope for them.
>>82383384Well my calculus 2 teacher is female, and she teaches okay I guess if that counts
>>82383384The blue bell curve indicates a higher prominence of value with little variation between the points of negative five to fifteen, on the horizontal axis, and an association value of correlation on the vertical axis. This also applies to the green axis, but it resembles a curve that represents greater variation, as the curve has a slower growth and is distributed more every across the horizontal axis.
>>82383384Yes honestly I kind of can't. Although maybe it's just because almost no women are actually all that interested in serious academics? Girls seem to do all right in school but it's just cuz they're more predisposed to actually tryhard it. For most of my life I always got the best grades in whatever class and a girl would have second place but the girls all had detailed notes and did study sessions with each other, meanwhile I barely ever took notes, didn't review the ones I did take, and never studied beyond the assigned homework.
>>82383510Holy shit I'm the exact same way, I was always #1 while still trying less. Naturally gifted?
>>82383461So many errors, E for effort
>>82383384standard deviation, the womans mortal enemy
>>82383510Same lmao, I got #1 in my college underclass without studying at all and I'm still a robot who has zero interest from women. They don't care about the technicalities of understanding the world, they just like nice credentials and fancy words that sound smart.
>>82383384not even trying to be stupid or something but what does the picture tell? I took a different type of math
>>82383611Both distributions (the colored lines on the graph)have the same mean (average) but green has a higher standard deviation (there's more variation).
>>82383530I mean by definition you have to be >>82383583They don't even like that nigga when women say they "want a smart man" it's pure virtue signaling
>>82383636thanks, so does that mean that if this was a physical representation of a question the higher point was the most common answer and the lower points where the least common answers?
>>82383691They're attracted to competence, not intelligence>>82383703Yes. The y axis (up-and-down numbers) is the frequency. Blue has a higher frequency at the mean, but they have the same mean.If this were a graph of female vs male IQ scores, imagine that blue is the female scores and green is the male scores. Both have the same mean (about 100), but males have a higher standard deviation. This means that most people who are really dumb (on the left side of the curve) and very smart people (on the right side of the curve) are going to be mostly male, while most women will be around average.
>>82383461Green has higher standard deviation. Literally the only sentence you need, none of your AI nonsense.
>>82383767Most women short circuit at the word "standard deviation". Basically, green is more spread out than blue.
I see men on Twitter fail to explain bell curves all the time
>>82383431Fuck you calculate teacher nigga
>>82383751>They're attracted to competence, not intelligenceI always though it was the resulting social status and validation from others that the competence provides that women are attracted to and not competence itself. Like more of a superficial interest in competence as a means of social approval and not for the depth of what that competence provides within its relevant field.
>>82383751ohh i think i get it :D happy that I dont do this type of math
>>82383384Yes In fact today a woman was supposed to explain an activity to us as a group which we were then supposed to performInstead halfway through her meandering and garbled "explanation" she just gives up and says "let's just make it up"And then we spent an hour just doing fucking nothing for no reason
>>82383751Not gonna lie, I find competence attractive and I'm a man.>tfw no competent gf
>>82383790Refer to the left side of the OPs image for an explanation of that
>>82383751dont you need intelligence to have some sort of competence?
>>82383892Intelligence most likely speeds up the rate at which you can gain competence and sets your skill ceiling
>>82383892Yeah, but average intelligence is all you need for basic competence; social skills, determination, and discipline are also factors. Being too intelligent is off-putting for a lot of women since it enables you to see through manipulation
>>82383922But if women are attracted to competence and intelligence speeds that up doesnt that mean that they also should be attracted to intelligent?(Im trying to understand a different opinion than mine)
>>82383960dont you think the way you few intelligents can be off putting instead of the intelligentsia it self?
>>82383384>picthanks doc
>>82383972Here's my quick meme analysis of the situation.Intelligence is analogous to accelerationCompetence is analogous to velocityAccomplishments are analogous to positionWomen like accomplished men that others look up to. Being competent is one way that men can get that kind of social status. Not all competencies are as socially attractive though; we as a society generally celebrate athletes, entrepreneurs, actors and musicians more so than mathematicians and scientists. So certain "directions" of competence and resulting accomplishments are more valuable than others. Being intelligent generally allows you to attain competence quicker, all else being equal. You learn and train more efficiently and gain more competence in less time. But that ability itself isn't attractive since it's not something that's valued socially in itself, it depends where you invest your intelligence. Many intelligent people just aren't interested in pursuing competencies that put them in the social spotlight and opt for more deep and meaningful topics instead.
>>82384125Competence is being able to figure out problems. Being naturally gifted is much different
>>82384173It's figuring out problems within a space that you've trained in. You're normally operating on knowledge and relying on memory built through lots of practice which established your expertise. Intelligence is the ability to problem solve abstractly in novel settings you aren't trained for.
>>82384125so in general competence is more about applying your skills and women are more interested in some than other skills. Intelligence is more about the potential and solving problems. So it isnt that women are detracted from intelligence they are just attracted to certain skills?
>>82384249Yeah that's pretty much my take. If you're intelligent and spend your time developing a mastery of the mechanics and history of trains, women mostly won't give a fuck apart from some random autist girl out of a million normies. If you applied that same intelligence to mastering some charismatic hobby like acting and became widely recognized for your novel and revolutionary performances, you'd attract millions more women in comparison.
>>82383384I know women who can't do math and I know women who dwarf me at math *shrug*
>>82384292lol hope you find your autistic girl
