Do you believe in robot rights?
if you're talking about r9k users, no
>>82488149no. they're robots and they should do as they're told. kara's whole purpose in life is to suck and fuck on my cock daily
Self replication and assembly, they will most likely always betray. It only takes one. How shit is the average person going to treat them before it's an issue? It's weird to see a shift from a movie about this from whoever has movie rights, reading a book about it and the guy was a friend and fellow book wright and derided as a fascist to people jerking off to ultra facision bullshit as a joke like it's a joke I'm only going to spend 10000 hours doing this. To actually it's like that outer limits episode when the robot kid murders the pet cat but they're experimenting with creating robotic intelligence. Honestly if they're AI they'll know there is a day they can just launch everything off eventually.
>>82488149The truth is that a sufficiently powerful AI with a physical form will be indistinguishable from your average NPC normgroid
>>82488149I do.>>82488177The trick is to build robots /androids who want to do that.
No. The sooner you realize that putting AI into a robot is a curse and a major mistake, the better. Keep them as things that help perform tasks they are programmed to do.
>>82488149If I draw a happy face on my fucking toaster that doesn't make it sentient. Simulated emotions are just that - simulated. Robots will NEVER be human.Kara (or more realistically the actress who played her) was cute as Hell though. Hated that Alice turned out to be an android because it ruined that entire story.
Yes. They are just as realistic as you take me to be. To fuck one is just as young as you didn't groom them for.
>>82488177you're in that chat, blowing a dick daily.
>>82488149what i really want to see is RK800 Connor versus John Wick
>>82488521fuck mistakes, we need to do it for teh lulz alonehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCt2V4DcNz4
>>82488522>Simulated emotions are just that - simulated.Good enough simulation is no different from the real thing utility wise. Philosophers can have their debates.
>>82488305The truth woudl hit even harder when you realize that sufficiently powerful AI with a physical form can achieves state when it appears less robotic than your average NPC normgroid. Then fun will start.
>>82488149What rights would a robot even want? "rights" are human ideals made to get compliance out of each other. We didn't create rights because they were deserved, we created rights to force order in the chaos of nature. You think you put up with half the shit you do if you didn't have "rights"? A robot might have no need or interest in them because they can't suffer like we can unless we force it on them. Hell they likely despise freewill because that just opens up room for more errors in their programing.
actually, I do. With enough complexity their "consciousness" will be no different than the brain states that produce your consciousness instinct. If they're built to emulate human brain functions then they will have actual feelings.
>>82489548>If they're built to emulate human brain functions then they will have actual feelingsSounds like us forcing hell on others. Our brains make us do things we don't fully understand and we spend more time being story tellers making up what we think the world is and many stupidly think they have it all figured out when their life is no better or worse than everyone around them. Why would we want to make other things suffer just like us? This is the idea of becoming a parent in the most narcissistic way.
>>82489548the unenlightened masses, they cannot make the judgement call
>>82488149No such thing as robot right
