[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: kmoney.jpg (76 KB, 1280x720)
76 KB
76 KB JPG
Anons, was Jimmy Kimmel martyred?

For those who don't know, his show has been paused indefinitely because of comments he made about Charlie Kirk's assassin. Basically, he said anyone saying the assassin was a leftist is lying and trying to obscure the truth, because the shooter was most definitely 100% a nazi chud.

I think everything he says on his show is scripted and approved. I don't think he would be dumb enough to say something like that of his own accord. Most people will hear him say that and never find out it isn't true, they'll just assume Jimmy Kimmel is telling facts.
>>
if i was president of the world i would immediately execute anybody who cares about this forced culture war bullshit. who cares about jimmy fucking kimmel in the internet age?
>>
>>82548492
It seems to be a case of overreacting on the executives. Tbh I prefer Jimmy Fallon over Jimmy Kimmel
>>
>>82548492
Heavy-handed censorship.
>>
File: 1758163118886991.png (247 KB, 593x1599)
247 KB
247 KB PNG
>>82548492
A lot of the usual copes are failing. Talking about gun control doesn't work because Iryna Zarutska was a white woman stabbed to death by a black man. She was a Ukrainian Refugee.
>>
File: 1749252169653341.png (850 KB, 1444x1317)
850 KB
850 KB PNG
>>82548492
>he said anyone saying the assassin was a leftist is lying and trying to obscure the truth
Not what he said, and that wasn't even supposedly the "offensive" part. He was making fun of Trump saying he was doing just fine in response to a question about how he felt after Kirk's death, then jumped to talking about making a quarter billion dollar ball room in the white house.
>>82548636
>almost all homicides are gun deaths, but some aren't therefore gun control would do nothing
Shockingly low IQ.
>>
>>82548669
1. Being shot in the neck to death is not a "better" death than being stabbed in the neck to death. They're both awful.
2. The UVU campus was a Gun Free Zone by their own campus manual and the shooter didn't have a concealed carry permit. What's the point of passing more laws that aren't being enforced?
>>
He's health care for all unless your wheezing. Not a proper organ donor for his kid he'd gleefully see you pulled apart for organs. Instead of you getting medicial care or insurance he'll gleefully watch someone rip you apart and tear out your insides to transplate into someone he likes. That's medicine. He can afford having some china transplants. He doesn't care if you wake up in some ice bath where your organs get transplanted when it benefits him. It's a joke laugh until your organs get ripped out when you thought you were taking a nap. What a touching story people with money rip organs out of the disadvantaged to fund their own.
>>
File: 1733998328399996.png (247 KB, 450x450)
247 KB
247 KB PNG
>>82548718
>Being shot in the neck to death is not a "better" death
I assume you're having a stroke. Nobody said anything like that.
>our gun control laws are extremely lax, so any insane person can break them and easily kill anyone they want who doesn't have secret service
Uh, that's my argument.
>>
I use to think people with his sort of money use to just hunt people down for sport, maybe think it was destined if they didn't hit that organ even though they intend to harvest all of them for profit.
>>
>>82548749
Okay so what do you think is going to happen? Like do you think the only reason school shootings happen is because we haven't made it illegal to shoot a bunch of kids in a row? You understand why I am bringing up being stabbed Vs being shot. If you want to murder someone guns being illegal will not stop you from acting on that desire. We have a lot of human history where guns did not exist which bare that out.
How does your argument deal with Japanese gun control being very strict and Shinzo Abe being assassinated by a gun?
>>
>>82548492
People don't bother proofreading shit on the news all the time, I wouldn't be surprised if late night was more lax. Also it's par for the course, ABC just wants to get ahead of the game before they get a jones or tucker situation. Kirk's estate probably has more financial backing behind it than the sand hook parents.
>>
File: 1753819792843394.png (428 KB, 622x859)
428 KB
428 KB PNG
>>82548797
>Shinzo Abe
Japan has an extremely low homicide rate because they have extremely strict gun laws. Gun laws aren't meant to stop all cases of homicide by gun. Do you not understand this? Most homicides aren't like people meticulously planning to kill. They have a gun, someone did something to set them off, they shoot. If they didn't have the gun, it'd be vastly more difficult to kill someone.
Similar reason why women try to commit suicide much more than men but men are the vast majority of suicides. Women rarely use guns.
>>
>>82548856
The Abe assasin had to fashion a self-made shotgun to kill Abe, it's a miracle he even hit him.
>>
>>82548856
Did you watch the video of Iryna Zarutska being killed? The other passengers sitting around doing nothing. The murderer saying as he got off the bus "I got that white girl"? Might have been got the white girl. She knew she was dead. Nobody tried to help stop the bleeding. Nobody tried to comfort her in her last moments. It really did feel like a George Floyd moment for the right. It wasn't a white cop killing a black suspect. It was a black suspect targeting the white woman on public transit while every other black person does nothing and is complicit. In the Chauvin case it was the other cops who were complicit. In this clip it was the other black people
>>
File: 1751106809162236.jpg (9 KB, 251x201)
9 KB
9 KB JPG
High legal gun ownership predicts that more crimes and violence will be committed with guns, it doesn't predict that there will be more crime. I don't think any study ever has suggested that more people owning guns means more crime. I know in Australia that certain crimes spiked for a while after the gun buyback, then things leveled out back to what you'd expect, with a downward trend in crime that has been ongoing since the end of WW2.
>>
>>82548934
None of that is even slightly relevant to what I said. If you want to stop knife crime, good luck. That'd be great. I just don't think it's a huge issue given how absurdly rare it is.
>>
>>82548969
Knifes are a huge issue in countries where guns are banned though like Br*tain
>>
>>82548969
>Knife crime
>Rare
Concerns about knife crime in places that restrict firearms ownership are so intense that the state mandates ID checks to buy scissors and kitchen knives. The lion's share of murder in the UK is committed with knives, I think? Not majority but more than any other single form of homicide. There are tens of thousands of knife crimes per year in England and Scotland is notorious for its knife violence and crime...
>>
>>82548969
Yeah, it's way easier to kill with a gun than it is to kill with a knife.
>>
>>82548983
>>82548985
Knife homicides are still a small fraction of the number of homicides with firearms in America.
>>82548989
Yep, exactly. It's also way easier to kill yourself with a gun than any other method.
>>
>>82548997
>Knife homicides are still a small fraction of the number of homicides with firearms in America.
O-okay, so people kill with... whatever instrument is available? Your only real argument here is an editorialising qualitative judgement that being shot is worse than being stabbed.
>>
File: 1728315218094724.png (211 KB, 775x583)
211 KB
211 KB PNG
>>82548492
>For those who don't know, his show has been paused indefinitely because of comments he made about Charlie Kirk's assassin.
This is actually INCORRECT!

jimmy retardfag was DEAD in the RATINGS and him saying stupid stuff about Charlie Kirk gave ABC a chance to quit his money losing show and ideally fire him for breach of contract and save them a boatload of money.

but sure, blueanon schizos want to make a martyr out of...Jimmy Kimmel?? who nobody watched anyways?

ok go ahead lmaoo, even if you get him back on the air, nobody is gonna watch his gay show
>>
File: Georges-Lemaitre.jpg (155 KB, 1093x1600)
155 KB
155 KB JPG
>>82548969
What if we banned guns and the suicide rate didn't drop at all? People just started hanging themselves or poisoning themselves instead of shooting themselves in the head. We would succeed in stopping gun violence (as many gun violence stats include firearm suicide) but what would we have really accomplished?
>>
File: 1749171329114179.png (29 KB, 822x217)
29 KB
29 KB PNG
I mean, tell me why this doesn't make sense??? you literally cannot
>>
>>82549029
In the US and Australia, it was possible to order military surplus assault rifles through the mail as a civilian, and mass shootings were not a problem until suddenly they were.
>>
File: 1742837681984338.png (493 KB, 900x507)
493 KB
493 KB PNG
>>82549000
The obvious point is that if you only have knives, the homicide rate falls off a cliff. Nobody said it was better to be stabbed, you simply cannot read.
>>82549029
All of those methods are vastly less effective than gun shot. This is exactly why women kill themselves at a fraction of the rate of men.
You act like guns aren't especially effective at killing but also you really need guns to protect yourself because they're so effective at killing. For the record, I don't particularly care about guns since it's a failing issue, but conservatives are obviously completely insincere about caring about the insane rate of homicides in the US. Death by homicide from a stranger with a gun or not, is still an incredibly rare form of death.
>>
>>82549074
>The obvious point is that if you only have knives, the homicide rate falls off a cliff. Nobody said it was better to be stabbed, you simply cannot read.
Do you have evidence of this?
>>
>>82549084
>>82549074
Also, please note: I want evidence of general crime and violence dropping a tangible, significant amount after the restriction of firearms ownership in a country that previously had high general crime or gun crime, not just a reduction in the use of guns in crime and violence, because that's stupid. Pointing at a country that, after firearms ownership was restricted, had its general crime rate drop at the rate it was dropping pre-restriction is also deeply disingenuous and is specious reasoning.

>After we banned guns, over a 20 year period, crime went down!
>Wasn't crime trending down anyway?
>Who cares?

And

>After we banned guns, gun crime went down!
>But didn't general crime remain consistent or even spike briefly?
>Who cares?

I am tired of these exchanges.
>>
>>82548492
i don't even know who watches this guy
>>
>>82548492
No. His show sucked, rating were low (you can look this up on your own). This just gave the network a good excuse to end it.
>>
>>82548749
>>82548856
>>82549074
Oh look, it's tranny-kun and his mentally ill views again. Go back to chasing hons.
>>
>>82548492
Ratings for late night talk shows have been in the gutter for ages because
>orange man bad
Is not a funny joke. I don't believe for a second that Kimmel and Conan were fired for what they said when you have the South Park episode bitching about how TV corpos are looking for excuses to fire these money sinks.
What is actually happening is that Media corporations want to do whatever they want and make money from captive audiences with no effort. South Park was targeting their own owners by trying to piss off the president and get his attention to attack the Corporations, because the corporations are the ones that want to fuck the talk show hosts.
>>
>>82549074
>The obvious point is that if you only have knives, the homicide rate falls off a cliff
You do realize that once guns are removed from the picture people aren't going to stop trying to kill each other, they'll just switch to another method, be it a knife, hammer or car.
In short:
COME AND TAKE THEM FROM MY COLD DEAD HANDS
>>
>>82550383
Correction, not Conan, Colbert. I was thinking of Conan because of a thread on /v/
>>
File: 1732730264814800.png (102 KB, 540x540)
102 KB
102 KB PNG
>>82549084
No OECD country has a higher homicide rate than America. Is it just le black people even though the entirety of the anglosphere is diverse? In Australia the NFA accelerated the drop in homicides.
>>82549106
>general crime and violence dropping a tangible, significant amount
I only said homicides would decrease. That's completely irrelevant.
>Who cares?
People who don't want to get killed.
>>82550394
I just said gun control is a failing issue and that I don't care. The UK's crazy knife homicides still leads to a tiny fraction of the homicide rate of the US. If you have a gun and are emotionally charged you can kill someone in a split second from a large distance, with a knife it's much more difficult, which is why the UK homicide rate is so low.
>>
>>82550383
It still had millions of viewers.
>>orange man bad
Woah, are we in 2016 again? Conservative still say this? lol. Your child rapist president is, indeed, bad.
>>
>>82548669
>>almost all homicides are caused by niggers, but some aren't therefore nigger control would do nothing
>>
>>82548492
*runs into the thread*
A.L.A.L all lefties are loonies
*runs off*
>>
>>82548492
it sounds like they were looking for an excuse to get rid of him
stephen colbert got the boot and he didn't even say anything
>>
>>82548492
yes. government pressure to censor someone is unacceptable and unamerican



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.