do robots like INTP personality type girls
>>82567783>like>>82567783>girls
>>82567783stfu artificial intelligence model
>>82567783>INTPwtf is that?
>>82567783I'm INTP and I hate myself so I'm inclined to say no.
No, because that's what I am. I need someone to balance out my retard not amplify it.
>>82567814I Never Take Penis, it's a feminist movement where they don't permit their bf to do any penetrative sex acts
im instantly dropping anybody that describes themselves using mbti or dsm5
>>82567783You're alright.t. Intj
>>82567783i dunno anything about mbti other than a test told me i'm an intj sometime in the past and that it's not entirely accurate, kinda like horoscopesso it all depends on if i click well with them, which i wouldn't know
>>82567783They're high IQ and so less likely to be normalfag NPC trash, but the IQ must be balanced with a degree of humility. Foids with IQ can get out of control and difficult to lead really quickly if they start using those IQ points to pick apart the way you lead. Never be stupider than your wife.
>>82567783>do robots like INTP personality type girlsi cannot speak for all here but I personally love them you could even say they are 'my type' as long as you have a bit of kindness and warmth like idk tsundere or kurudere
>>82567815what so im a retard if im INTP, not nice anon im pretty friendly id be the more outgoing gf if i had a bf who was worse socially than i was i think but to a certain degree so i see your pointid want a more outgoing and not socially stumped partner too
>>82567783>INTPim similar so i would love a female version of me
>>82567879>I'm a retard if I'm INTPYes. It takes one to know one. I'm sorry.
>>82567853my humility is being mid looking and having zero freinds and working a 9-5, im quite balanced out id say sso
>>82567783INFJ here and INTP girls are very qt but also I'm a 19 yr old hispanic skinny manlet irl
>>82567783I always get Intp with those online tests. I've never met an intp woman
mbti is tranny shit
>>82568021maybe just my case but maybe they would come off as quiet and weird cus i feel like i definitely come off as that to people
>>82568066So the male version of an intp? Fantastic. Too much of the same thing might get in the way. Just a personal theory of mine
>>82567783I don't subscribe to MBTI. I think there's more to a person than a label.
>>82567783I don't like retards that obsess over Meyer Briggs retarded shit.
>>82567783What would that mean? It's meaningless. Try be more specific without using a meaningless model. Such as "do robots like women who joke and laugh?"I don't fucking know just prepare your chute and grease nipples for my grease gun and prepare to get clanked.
>>82567783Why does it matter if you'd never date us anyway?
do robots like girls with a penis?
>>82567953prepare yourself for the baked bean plapping of a lifetime
>>82568126i would actually except im kind of stupid when it comes to men so it kinda just would never come to that
>>82567783idk what the fuck that means, just lower your standards and settle for incels, stop being so picky
>>82568092yea sometimes i actually feel so ugly because of the way i am, but it is what it is, maybe im lonley forever
>>82568158you wouldn't know if you're stupid. try knowing first then talk about how you feel about something you know
The only personality I care about in girls is if they are consistently nice to me. If so then I like them. If not then I don't like them. It really that simple. Like god damn, do girls understand how much power they have over men just by showing a bit of sweetness or being pleasant. Men would literally move mountains for a woman who is consistently nice to them.
>>82567783I had an INTP and an ENTJ. The INTP was not fucking insane, just depressed, so she was obviously superior. Now that I've given most people a chance, learned a lot about sensors and feelers, and grown more mature, I've come to realize INTPs truly are the best type and I hate everyone else. (I'm INTP of course)
Once you think you know you can tell us what you think you know you think, but not what you know you think you know.
>>82567820As long as there's chastity and BDSM involved I'm fucking gamefuck asexual whores who don't even collect gay porn
>>82568195i do know everytime i have a guy interested in me and i like him alot i always distance because i feel like i wouldnt be a good partner because i suck at socializing and acting normal
>>82568158>i would actually except im kind of stupid when it comes to men so it kinda just would never come to thatIf you live somewhere in Europe, I can make it easy for you. Boom, you're my gf.
>>82568145Sounds hot desu where can I start
>>82568238>because i feel like i wouldnt be a good partnerYou don't get to decide that, only the other person gets to. If they're stupid and think you're great, that's on them.
>>82567783yes absolutelythey are the best without a doubt. also the raresti think if i had robowaifu harems they'd be that kind of personality i think
>>82567783>INTP girlAccording to AI, Frieren is the most INTP anime character and people here HATE frieren so my logical conclusion is:No robots do not like INTP girls. But /sci/ and /lit/ fags like them.
>>82568238try to think about your own actions based in reverse, by using "i want".> i have a guy interested and i like him i distance>+because i want to avoid being hurtSometimes you have to take risks to earn rewards.
>>82568245Start with several cans of beans. You can use dried but you should probably soak them overnight and it'll take much longer to cook. Use a big pot and a large wooden spoon.Stir once in a while as they simmer until they're soft. After they're ready, turn off the heat, move the pot and use the wooden spoon to take a big heaping mound of beans then slam it on your plate with an ear shattering PLAP!
>>82567783nice try troon.There are no INTP females
>>82568369>intp game is a religion and "conways game of life"?huhit should be world of warcraft or dota or starcraft or something like that
>>82568498>conways game of lifeit's a programming thingreal intp heads have taken compsci 101
If you are satisfied with the PLAP! then pour the beans through a strainer to remove most of the fluid and mix the parboiled beans in with some tomato paste or whatever other sauces you'd like. Maple syrup was a common addition along with pork albeit this is more difficult to cook and requires lower temperatures and longer baking times.Use a low temperature just enough to get a light simmer, and bake for one or more hours (up to six.)
>>82568514Game of life isn't so much "programming" it's not about programming. It's about emergent fractal chaos from simple rule-sets lacking predefined structure. It's one of the most simple to program and can effectively run on ancient low grade hardware from the 1980s.
>>82567783I don't like mbti. It's yet another excuse for people to categorize and hate each other. There's already enough prejudice because of race, religion, country, language, politics, etc. I don't need to add mbti to the list.
>>82568550MBTI is a "model" which is used to create generalizations. All functional generalizations are inaccurate "loose" generalizations. This is an absolute requirement, because once you over-specify a generalization despite having billions of potential matches it will inevitably match zero actual objects within that set.For example a functional generalization says:>between 0.5 and 25.5 units in lengthAn overspecification:>precisely 0.56419649525952246848123547682935 units in length (impossible to measure to this precision, making it impossible to find a match even with a set of infinite candidates or samples.)
hot, spunky sex with biological females
>>82568583>MBTI is a "model" which is used to create generalizations.Exactly. I hate generalizations. They always create conflict and hate. I want to be treated as an individual.
>>82567783>INTP girlhow?
>>82568623All symbols we use "words" are loose generalizations for "concepts" or "ideas" which exist purely as wholly abstract notions within our subjective perspective and interpretation of reality.
>>82568514i did take computer science 101 at college but i dropped out. i know what it is, its some thing game thingie that looks cool and is done under very little instructions and goes for a long timebut its not a game or a religion, its some stupid visual effect. the game should of been world of warcraft or fallout for INTP
>>82568623>I want to be treated as an individual.That's probably impossible. Most individuals below approximately ~130 IQ have a tendency and bias toward concrete thinking. They're uncomfortable in dealing with pure abstract concepts, and they argue instead that a word like "male" is emergent from an innate property of objective reality and not subjective.In reality we don't call you XY, we call you "male" and the reason is because "male" is abstract while "XY" is a looser scientific abstraction which more accurately corresponds to the majority of objective measurements.XY however does not exist, because the particular state of a sex chromosome is not precise. DNA is not precisely duplicated and breaks down through processes and over time. Therefore there is no living human anywhere in the universe with PRECISELY "XY" sex chromosomes UNTIL you generalize loosely via abstraction.
>>82568623>I hate generalizations. They always (...)heh
>>82568632ask me why my personality is the way it is, depression maybe, being forced to deal with it all internally by myself for years, or im just born this way
Abstractions are great. Without abstraction, language and communication does not exist.
>>82568673>hehIt's humorous, yes but I put a bit more effort into my posts as an educator rather than somewhat ironically mocking or satirical commentary. In cases where someone doesn't want to learn, mocking saves you time. In cases where they rarely DO want to learn WHY they're making a mistake though, it's crucial to point out clearly how so they can understand on their own terms.
>>82568665intp dropout supremacyidk where you're getting wow from thoughi can maybe see fallout 1 but why not just gary grigsby's war in the pacific admirals edition
You'll realize (perhaps) whether "male" is a subjective abstraction rooted in perception, or an objective inert property of reality itself by attempting to define it.What is a man?
What is hot?>hot is a relative measure of the thermal energy and entropic density of a bounded volume in both space and time where in comparison that bound is "greater than" another reference volume.
>>82568746it's a beetle in a boxwho are you talking to, who cares
What's a hot dog?
>>82568675i would like youi am also a catatonic depressive dropout but i had to grow and force to deal with it all internallyi just didn't know you existed, honestly
>>82567783As long as you're I, I'll like you. Back when I was taking these tests I was always ending up as INTJ or ISTJ depending on day because I had like near 0% to either N or S
Are these all beef hot dogs? I'm Jewish so they need to be kosher.>yeah sure whatevs that's hot babe
>>82567783I'm an intp and hsp. Wanna get married?
>>82567783>INTP personality type girls
As INTP male, I prefer CMNFBtw I used to be INTJ at school, but then the hardships of phd in physics buckbroke me into INTP. From now on I dont held strong beliefs about anything, its all relativism, fatalism and nihilism. INTJs are inferior as they have just world fallacy and believe in free will.
>>82568094>mike>Theres less to a person than their entire personality Every post you make shows us how fucking dumb you truly are
>>82568848Nah these things are strongly biased towards the dumb. Like horoscopes or celebrity/entertainment news.
>>82568833>CMNFClothed male naked? Sometimes female?
>>82568877Show us on the doll where the Myers Briggs touched you
>>82568637>>82568670>>82568673>>82568696What I'm talking about is prejudice. This is why I enjoy 4chan, it's completely anonymous and there's nothing attached to my posts, only the words I write. Since you don't know me you can only judge what I say. You can't be like "ah yes you're XXXX and I've met XXXX before, I hate them". I'm just a unique anon in a sea of anons.
>>82567783>intp believing in personality testsIf you were really INTP you'd view it as just a fun test and not as a fact.
>>82568997it is a fun test. not like im holding myself to the constraints of what an INTP is, id rather not really be described as that i think, it kinda sucks desu
>>82568997You're obviously not a deep thinker
>>82568890DURRRRRR *points to head*
>>82569022>points to head*Said the narrow minded narcissist*
>>82569065I'm retarded not a narcisshush
https://vocaroo.com/1m2HKgY5UitI
>>82568742>idk where you're getting wow from thoughim over 12 thats where
>>82568369INTJ here; chart is accurate.And yes I would date an INTP.>>82568670>XY does not existLol
>>82569121Can you precisely specify sub-atomic particle by sub-atomic particle? No because we're unable to atomize and measure discretely. We end up with a distributed result, the Gaussian function via the Fourier transform in determining particle states.
While hypothetically a discretization of finite particles MAY exist, we have no way to discretely measure from sampling. This is the absolute limit in terms of concrete science. Thinking in concrete terms about anything is worthless, as none of it can be proven. We must utilize abstractions and probabilities. At the meta-level of reality as perceived by a child we're forced to do so, but, a child may indeed vehemently deny it given that they are unaware of the true holistic structure and function of reality itself.
In other words we might say "this (unit) particle has a value of 1." That is impossible to prove. What in fact has a value of "1" (an abstract symbol, not sourced from reality itself) is our discretization and sample of reality. In choosing what and how to sample we've innately projected our bias and subjectivity upon reality. We sample by atomization and discretization which is innately a subjective process. In so choosing which particular atom and mode by which to sample its subjective properties, we synthesize from a holistic context inclusive of the subjective self.Only in so assuming that the self MUST BE emergent from reality might we very loosely assert that our discretizations are valid observations of reality and not wholly synthetic. Nonetheless reality itself bears NO EVIDENCE for atomization whatsoever. There is absolutely no discreteness anywhere within objective reality.
"1" is not real.
>>82567783Yes and no. My only female friend is INTP and I really like her as a friend but I'm not attracted to her in the slightest. I'm also INTP, maybe they cancel each other out.
>>82569015>not believing in a test that lacks scientific validity, reliability, and foundation means you can't think criticallybait used to be believable
>>82569088>I'm retarded not a narcisshushIt's all the same>>82569258Like I said. Ur not a deep thinker. Ur not part of the 3%
>>82569238is it because you dont find her personality attractive? how about her looks? or is it just that intp personality isnt attractive in women at all and looks cant even save it, if thats the case then that sucks
>>82569274>It's all the sameYou're such a narcishushed.
>>82569274>It's all the sameshh it
>>82569285I'm not sure. She's not ugly or anything and I obviously like her personality enough to be her friend, but my brain just never made the jump from "I like her and we get along" to "I'm attracted to her". Also she doesn't shave anywhere and she has hairy arms and very hairy legs, I think that's gross to the point where I want to look away lol.For what it's worth I don't think it's because we're both the same myers briggs type I just thought that was funny. Our personalities are very different, so even if myers briggs was a good way to categorise people which I'm not sure it is, you would at least have to take into account that it probably presents differently in men and women. I like talking to her because she understands my analogies and the way I explain things, and she has a very similar way of conceptualising things like God, consciousness, reality, love, being human, things like that.
Yeah. Ssshhhush it. Need to foster the proper environment for the secret I have
>>82569425The main issue with MBTI and similar shit models are that they rely upon self-reported subjective criteria. As soon as you rely on that, your accuracy goes into the negative from all sorts of new biases. It's hard enough just measuring what the damn temperature of a thermometer says, forget about what some retarded people high on exhaust fumes say while drunk.
What you're actually measuring is rather than their personality, you're sampling their biased interpretations of the questions asked. MBTI is primarily a measure of what the subject thinks they want to look like they are, not what they actually are.
>Your personality type is:>Commander>ENTJ-AThe thing is this is based upon three questions I don't answer neutral to (0) so I can just swap my answers to produce any result I want. In around 19/20 of the questions the answer depends entirely upon context and subjective interpretation. For example I could opt for -5 to +5 by picking a particular situation in my life from memory. I can pick a situation in which any choice would be valid within that particular singular context. The average however is zero, so I pick zero most of the time in those cases.Some questions are loaded questions such as:>I often feel overwhelmed.I could answer anything to this, what the fuck is that supposed to mean? I would say I never feel overwhelmed, only, again this is entirely context dependent. So I could choose -5 to +5 arbitrarily based upon the context I SUBJECTIVELY SELECT FOR MYSELF.The harsh truth is in most cases I would prefer if they provided a (N/A) answer so I could vote that my view is the question itself is subjective and not possible to validly objectively assess. Yet, as I previously stated the entirety of the purpose of MBTI is to sample the subjective biases according to interpretation of the subject, NOT to make an objective, repeatable scientific measurement of a well defined and valid property.
>>82567783I think I still do have my biases with MBTI but at some point I realized im not too picky. But as a ISTJ, I like INTP, ISTP, ISFJ, ENFP, ESFP, and ENTP in no particular order.
>>82567783yes, i used to hang out with intp type girls and used to have an intj friend :/
mbti is like zodiac signs
>>82567783woah, we're twins
>>82570713No that's Gemini.
>>82570287>>82570670Ahem.>*clears throat*>*dusts waistcoat*Yes, now then. My. *AhemHEM*>*AHEM most throat clearily*Read Jung. Or whatever will get you to understand that these systems are descriptive, not prescriptive.Additionally, "Prescriptive usage of typology is retarded" *is* an argument. "This identity system itself is inherently prescriptive" is *not* an argument... when the system is not inherently prescriptive. You have to have the intellectual honesty and/or the moral capacity to admit when you're so stuck on establishing shared meaning that you'll never make it to any actual application of agreed upon core in pursuit of productive cultivation. Yes is always yes if you want to get anywhere. Yes is still always yes even if you're up to wizardry and chaos hijinks. There are far, far too many people with a shaky foundation in binary playing at trichotomies and Transcendent territory. I'm the *opposite* of a gatekeeper. Truly. But if you want to refuse what's necessary to progress and blame it on a matter of my opinion or perspective, business as usual.
>>82570796Jung is a gnostic heretic burning in hell. He's a Swiss jew who sold out Hitler and fucked his own patients who were vulnerable and needed him while he was married.'Father of Psychology' more like babylonian whore
>>82570796You are a vain empty chaos magician with no grounding in reality because you're lost in your occult books. You might as well be trans because the only thing real about you is that dysphoria.
>>82567783i am intp myself, so probably
>>82570824You're literally describing Freud. Jung was a christian
>>82570854If you believe this you never read Jung and are exposing yourself as a fraud.You probably think Jordan Peterson is a christian too despite the fact that he denies Jesus Christ
>Jung was a christian >raped Sabina his first psychoanalytic patient The only thing Jung teaches is if you listen to the dreams of mentally ill girls they'll fall in love and have sex with you
>chaos magician >occult books>chaos magician >books>implying
>>82570873>You probably think Jordan PetersonI don't think about internet celebrities. You've just outed yourself as an npc by bringing him up
>>82570796word salad. what does your autistic ass even try to say jesus christ.
As an INTP chad yes, but I might question our compatibility as I am a hot avoidant mess who works better with partners who take the lead in relationships.
turbie enjoyer present new perhaps even decent points instead of rehashing his same old blind spots and learning nothing no matter how many times his tainted ethos is btfo challenge
>>82571060Jung is the equivalent of ecelebs
>>82571078I just want my wife to hold my hand already T_T
>>82567783Yes, be my gf. I'm the most sane and normal person who's ever lived, I have a job, God favours me and on our first date we will take lsd and look at flowers
>>82571097town's only big enough for one dream to come true probably so I'm going to have to fight you for my right to see MY wife come btfo you
>>82571068They don't sound autistic they sound emotional and defensive.
>>82571068>what does your autistic ass even try to sayhttps://youtu.be/6DrRE1LDY_UI can attempt to translate.>Hi.>You should read philosophy texts authored by Carl Jung to understand the philosophical difference between a descriptive versus prescriptive model in primitive psychology.Now obviously we might argue that's not relevant because we're not discussing that, but, this person appears to be emotional and chooses to change the subject to something they feel they have more credibility in arguing. Most importantly, they suspect we will lack a rebuttal such as quoting where Jung argued against the very point they're making or similar.>I am defensively rambling about what I think is honest (self) versus what I think is dishonest (other.) I touch on establishing agreement or arbitrarily sufficient consensus. I then make an appeal to dualism and unfounded dismissal of objection to dualism by calling into question the authority of the objectors.He seems very interested in this sort of hand-waving to distract from the fact he's unable to acknowledge the objectivity/subjectivity aspect of the prior arguments.>I'm not an authority, but neither are you. You are dumb.Here he tries to attack the person again rather than the argument's premises while making it patently obvious we've offended him by arguing out of his scope.
my niece is INTP and is a fucking massive slut
Why are INFJ girls so sexy
>>82567783I'm inclined to say yes, I test INTP everytime I take that test and the girl I've met whose personality is most like mine I fell madly in love with
>>82571319Your niece is IN The Pussy!?
>>82571209Not true life is good and everyone deserves love
>>82567783Idk, I'm INFP and am overly sensitive to the point it debilitates my life, would that work? Would you want to fix me?
>>82567783Sure. When do I get to lick your asshole?
MBTI is retarded self-fulfilling pseudoscience.
>>82567783yes i'll subscribe to whatever zodiac sign nonsense you like I don't care any more
>>82572106Hi fren, I'm INFJ, I know how you feel. I cry all the time
>>82567783I'm an INFJ man so my opinions on women do not matter since women and people in general don't like me.
>>82567783i dont know what intp means desu. but the girls like that are probably something guy here would be attracted to,. same as for most girls
>>82572111Firrthhht, you mutht tholve for meTTHHHHHREEEE RIDDLLTTTHHHH
>>82572118Pretty much yeah. At least OCEAN has some merit to it. But MBTI is a joke to any academic worth their salt. And I've never been a fan of ""soft sciences"" like psychology anyway, they lack reproducibility.
