>>82800888
It's obviously not all men and it doesn't have to be said. Shit thread.

>>82800888
What are the blurred words? It's their respective races/migrant status, isn't it?

>>82800909
Were they males or were they not? Answer that.

>>82800888
Famously, men never have codes of honor against "hitting a girl"

>>82800918
not white - not male. non-whites are all women. they pass as women during transitioning better also

>>82800918
Sure. But why would you blur those words? Is it because you don't want people to run with a different narrative than you want them to?

>>82800935
Because at the end of the day it doesn't really matter. Different demographics of men abuse women in different ways.

File: 1736840183141494.jpg (52 KB, 960x960)

52 KB JPG

>>82800909
>>82800918
>>82800935
>>82800942
I swear that scenario has played hundred of times on this board.

>>82800909
The blurred words are "black", the picture shown isn't even about the event kek

>>82800918
>dumbasses cant understand per capita once again
are you brown too?

>>82800953
there are 3 types of users here: spectators, cucked feds, and cucked cattle

>>82800918
Nope they are immigrants so shitskinned feral rat
Dont push the faults of the cockroaches you let in on the average men

>>82800888
Based. Learn your fucking place

>>82800985
Why should we care about them when they explicitely hate our guts and want us dead?

>>82800942
A tiny minority of men abuse women. Women might be around such men more often than the average men, because abusers tend to be disproportionately disagreeable, and women are drawn to disagreeableness in men, but it doesn't change the fact that it's still a small minority. And the vast majority of them are already in prison. So I don't understand what point you're trying to make here. That the vast majority of men should accept collective guilt and engage in self-flagellation? Why should the groups who share other immutable characteristics with abusers not do the same?

>>82800909
Obviously. That's why MAGAt op made this post, he's trying to appear as a deranged foid so that people will shit on him.

>>82801006
why are you even asking that?

>>82800942
>Different demographics of men abuse women in different ways.
Different demographics of men abuse women WAY MORE than others :)
that's why i will NEVER defend a white bitch, you defend them, you deserve it

>>82800888
White bitches high on the fumes of leftist degeneracy getting exactly what they deserve.

No fucks given. You asked for niggers and illegal aliens. Take it up the ass and enjoy the AIDS.

It's another episode of blacks being violent and all men being blamed

>>82801039
But anon, even if you say black men are more dangerous, that doesn't make white men a piece of cake.

>>82801101
Isn't that exactly what you're doing to the black men who weren't involved in this act of violence?

>>82801101
>two women are assaulted by men
>instead of offering empathy, the first response is to absolve yourself of any guilt
Feminists were right about everything.

>>82800888
Nah, all men are based. Death to foids.

>>82800888
were those by any chance "young athletes" aka "aspiring soundcloud rappers"?

>>82801135
I'm not saying all of them are bad, but if you look at statistics, they overall are more violent. This is not racism (judging without information), it's just seeing reality for what it is

>>82801156
>instead of offering empathy, the first response is to absolve yourself of any guilt
The affected women are not here and I'm not the guilty party, so any "empathy" offered would be performative for my own ego, or to project being "empathic".

>>82801296
>They overall more violent
Just like men compared to women?

>>82801296
>I'm not saying all of them are bad
Mate, that's what most of this thread is trying to say, even you.
If one black men is innocent and you lump him together with the "bad ones" you are doing exactly what you accused females of doing. It's injustice exemplified.

>>82801328
Depends on which kind of violence. Physical? It's mean. Psychological? Women.

>>82801350
You see and treat people as individuals while still being aware of collective trends

I posted yesterday that misogyny and violence is getting worse towards women by younger boys and some scrote responded to me with a wall of text yesterday basically just plugging his ears and saying lalala

>>82800888
Except you're saying that sarcastically and don't fucking mean it. You're using the worst of men to profile men as a whole. You don't care about rape victims, because otherwise you wouldn't bring this stuff up so incessantly and give us sarcasm about not all men being this way. You just want an excuse to hate men. It's no different than people throwing around the 13/50 statistic at black people.

In truth, this is about as stupid as profiling people by race, which is why anons always bring it up. You're doing the same exact shit is actual racists, but towards men. You're assigning a social taboo to a whole demographic, which by definition fits the criteria of hate speech, which is your right to do here on 4chan with us, but I'm not going to sit here and pretend you're not a hateful scumbag as bad if not worse than actual misogynists because you get to get away with it in real life outside of 4chan.

>>82801378
>while still being aware of collective trends
So I hope you don't blame any woman for saying men are violent and rapey
When you do exactly that same thing to black men.

This place is basically reddit now, good riddance.

>>82801408
>So I hope you don't blame any woman for saying men are violent and rapey
They're different situations with different causes, though. In your example, that happens because women tend to choose violent men as partners

>>82801378
So if men are more physically violent, it's okay for women to be aware of that and treat the collective accordingly?

>>82801425
Women reward violent men by reproducing with them, though.

>>82800888
Females go for the most aggressive, sexist, hypermasculine, dangerous men and reject us nice guy male feminist softboy incels. Maybe females should stop being so picky

>>82801424
>They're different situations with different causes
Not really. People will generalize men and call them violent and dangerous based on their worst examples
Which is exactly the same thing you do to black people

>>82801439
And if a woman doesn't do that, they're free to call men dangerous potential rapists?
This isn't misandry. It's just seeing the reality for what it is.

>>82801474
>And if a woman doesn't do that, they're free to call men dangerous potential rapists?
Yes, I think they have a right to free speech and I wouldn't want to censor them for speaking of something I might disagree with. I would not try to punish them for "hate speech".

And if they didn't want to be subject to violence, then they could pick more agreeable men (most likely, they won't, though)

>>82801506
>And if they didn't want to be subject to violence
They should abandon men altogether

File: Jaguar.png (774 KB, 955x558)

774 KB PNG

We unite the tribes of man under all one banner; there too many uglies and meanies and seethers out there that'd love nothing more than to cast down our towers and enslave our nation. It not happening. Even the savages in the woods begin to understand our collective cause. The nation of Chelms fights on.

>>82801529
I don't think they want, nor can they if they want all the modern comforts they're used to.

Women also inflict a lot of violence by the way, physical and psychological, that often goes under reported.

>>82801135
>Isn't that exactly what you're doing to the black men who weren't involved in this act of violence?
Good point, but that anon being a hypocrite doesn't justify you being one. You're just as bad as the >>82801378 having a temper tantrum about how racism towards men from women is somehow different than racism towards blacks.
>>82801378
>You see and treat people as individuals while still being aware of collective trends
We really can't. You know full well how people are going to receive a social taboo assigned to a demographic. When you make NO effort to actually specify what you mean when it's unclear, you're complacent with having people take your message the "wrong" way.

I don't know how stupid you are when I read your post. Maybe you're one of those idiots who bring up collective trends specifically to justify why not treating others as individuals. Or maybe you're one of those midwit pseudo-intellectuals who bring it up and pretentiously assume that it's okay obfuscate your words and intentions when it benefits you.
>>82801474
>This isn't misandry. It's just seeing the reality for what it is.
It is 105% misandry. You're picking a misandrist angle on purpose and obfuscating reality such that people will misinterpret what you're saying and feel angry at men.
>>82801506
>Yes, I think they have a right to free speech and I wouldn't want to censor them for speaking of something I might disagree with. I would not try to punish them for "hate speech".
>And if they didn't want to be subject to violence, then they could pick more agreeable men (most likely, they won't, though)
This is sane, but would you let them punish you for their hate speech when they accuse you of it for centering men? Do you not feel any anger at the gall and hypocracy of misandrists in feminist circles?

>>82801574
>Women also inflict a lot of violence by the way, physical and psychological, that often goes under reported.
Nice shifting the conversation away from your hypocrisy bruv. Can't quite sacrifice your racism for the sake of calling women out for hate speech, can you?

>>82801574
>Women also inflict a lot of violence
Not more than men.
If you can say blacks are overall more violent you should be intellectually honest and admit that to men of all races too

>>82801574
A lot of male violence goes unreported too.

>>82801575
>but would you let them punish you for their hate speech when they accuse you of it for centering men?
I don't see it as "punishment", people can think whatever they want of me. I don't need to control what people think or say. I don't believe in "hate speech". The only speech that should be punished are threats and calls to violence.

>Do you not feel any anger at the gall and hypocracy of misandrists in feminist circles?
No, let the chips fall where they may.

>>82801615
>Not more than men.
This is very debatable, and like I mentioned, physical violence is not the only kind of violence. Overall, I've found women are generally more violent, it's just that they can't manifest it physically because they know they're weaker. They're much more concerned with domination, status and power

>>82801657
>I don't believe in "hate speech"
>Exemplifies a type of hate speech he agrees should be censored
Incels are so dumb sometimes

>>82800918
They were also human
Please answer for that

>>82800953
Maybe it wouldn't be so common if men stopped abusing women.

>>82801657
>This is very debatable
Not anymore than blacks being "more violent" is debatable. It's hard statistical analysis. You can get behind that when it's your turn to generalize a group of people and call them inherently more violent.
But the moment that is done to your group, you recoil

>>82801709
I don't subscribe to your definition of sex speech and I've probably been with (and dumped) women like you before.

>>82801657
>physical violence is not the only kind of violence
We're talking about physical violence here.
It's so funny how you can open your mouth wide and say blacks are more violent based on statistics
But when the moment comes for you to say that to men overall, you hesitate
We are witnessing a prime example of cognitive dissonance at play
>Statistics against the group I dislike? That's seeing reality for what is
>Statistics saying the group I'm part of is more violent? You see (proceeds with excuses)

for some reason I don't think the men getting defensive about this are actually any different than the abusers

>>82801733
>Incel pretending to not being one
Cute and pathetic

File: 1759723661475331.webm (1.82 MB, 360x640)

1.82 MB WEBM

>>82801765
that's a good observation

>>82801765
They are the abusers in potential who fear the consequences

>>82801657
>I don't see it as "punishment", people can think whatever they want of me. I don't need to control what people think or say. I don't believe in "hate speech". The only speech that should be punished are threats and calls to violence.
Yeah, but misandry is a call to violence against men. It contributes to it. It's part of the reason we still mutilate the genitals of infants, because feminists need us to hate men to maintain their power, so they can't extend their principles of bodily autonomy out to men and actively oppress MRAs. Lets also not forget the much higher rate of suicide men have as a consequence of feminism's misandry. Violence against oneself is still violence nonetheless, and feminism does whatever it can to keep us from acknowledging it in any light that might paint men as victims. Feminism has also made very few moves against the draft targeting only men and suppresses any conversation about it in order to maintain our society's contempt for men.

These aren't specific calls for violence. It's more like terrorism, where you leave a bomb and it explodes killing people you don't care who exactly. Same as hate speech against blacks really.
>No, let the chips fall where they may.
Oh please. Then why did you call OP out in the first place?

>erasing words that clearly say they are niggers
LMAO foids

>>82800918
>>82801727
>They were also human
No they weren't, they're animals and should be treated as such.
OP is a retard.

>>82801172
This. All women know to do is promulgate male violence. They literally create untenable conditions and psychological torture to make competition fiercer and required if you want to meet any of your needs.

Unfortunately the call for foid deaths will just lead to women coveting cover behind a group of simps and asking them to kill the anti-foiders, propagating more male violence, when they should just accept their death for being witches that to whom if you are kind to will taunt you as a pussy for being "nice" while grinding up against some unhinged tard on the verge of murder. Then they run back to the simplords when the violent tard wants to murder them (if he somehow didn't succeed). Once the situation is under control they hop back onto the violent tard's dick because the simp lords are lame and nothing but tools.

If we could eradicate the simp genes the foids could be kept around, but they shouldn't be called called women, but holes.

>>82801776
>If hearing the words "all men" makes you angrier than knowing that one in 9 american men has openly admitted to sexually abusing a child, you are a dangerous man if hearing the words all men amkes you angrier than knowing that a woman is killed every 11 minutes by a man
>You are a dangerous man if "all men" makes you angier than knowing that child marriage is still legal 36 states in the US
>You are a dangerous man if all men makes you angeir than knowing 300000 licenses were approved in the last 20 years for children as young as 9 to be married to adult men
>You are dangerous man if the only time you step up and advocate for other men is when you hear the words "all men" you advocacy is false and it is based in hating women. Because here's the thing safe men, cuck men, when they hear the words all men, they know they're not talking about them and they're at the front lines standing with women trying to make the world safer. Cuck men are not offended by "all men" because they understand how dangerous this world is for women.

Holy cope. She's a humongous hypocrite Yes, the fact that people in India get away with pedophilia makes me angry. No, that doesn't mean I have to defend profiling men and assigning taboos to them like I'm a racist applying the 13/50 statistic for blacks. I can be angry about both things. I can talk about those problems without hate speaching men.

She knows full well that people will take "all men" literally, especially when she puts no effort at all into making the distinction clear or making the point that it's unethical to use these statistics to profile people. It's a trojan horse for hating men. It always has been. This is about men did all these bad things, not the victims, and it always had been.

>>82800888
This was an amazing bait post, good job OP, for real.

>>82802080
That's a lot of words. One question though; why would most women feel naturally inclined to agree with her opinion over yours?

File: IMG_5258.jpg (225 KB, 1199x1083)

225 KB JPG

>>82802080
>one in nine american men admitted to sexually abusing a child

What a bullshit statistic.

>>82801657
>it's just that they can't manifest it physically because they know they're weaker
They can against people weaker than them, children, which is why single moms physically abuse and kill their children much more than single dads do. They can't control their emotions or their strength.

>>82802080
What does India has to do with it when child marriage is ubiquitous amongst white American conservitards? It's only bad when Indians do it? Holy hypocrisy.

File: IMG_5259.jpg (1 MB, 2144x1698)

1 MB JPG

>>82801615
Yes. Boys and girls under 15 commit less violence than women too. Men are just more violent as adults because they're stronger and women shy away from real world conflict where chivalry isn't in play. Women are, for example, always more violent than men towards children. In domestic situations we also know women hit men more and initiate violence more. It's just that when men snap they beat them harder.

Foids need to be better. All the angst is just an inferiority complex.

>>82801123
White men built the comfortable you live in, ungrateful cunt.

>>82800888
How do we know she wasn't being racist?

File: If that's true then explain.jpg (40 KB, 576x600)

40 KB JPG

>>82802114
Any woman who'd read what I'm saying would agree or have to stop and think, but we're mostly out of such people who've instead gone to put all their intellectual attention into gooning to monster porn erotica in order forget how the world is dying around them and cope with the cognitive dissonance that men are actually becoming exactly what feminists want and sexually it's not what women want.

Just take a second and think about it, and you'll be ahead of 90% of women on the topic. Why can't we be pissed off at "all men" AND women suffering? It's not rocket science that we don't have to pick between criminals who goes to court. So why here?

>>82802363
Yeah, I don't think you get it yet. Maybe one day we'll revisit this.

>>82801156
>absolve yourself of any guilt
are you implying that a random anon is guilty because some blacks halfway across the world beat up a girl?
of course you agree with the feminists, you're evil and retarded

>>82802294
Allowing foids into larger society has been paramount to turning the nations into an insane asylum rife with gaslighting obfuscations and reality distortion. War is peace, slavery is freedom, death is living, race isn't real, women are men and vice versa.

The great trap men have created for themselves is to survive they have to sustain the very state which steals their resources of provision and protection to provide for the same women who then call them useless and want nothing to do with them. Effectively killing about over 40% of the population in a single generation. So of course empires need immigrants, of course empires collapse. Any nation would.

>>82802410
Why do you think women feel they have to choose between hating bad men and hating bad women, then?

>>82801123
Women everywhere are fiscal drains that exist at the expense of the rest of society. You have absolutely no right being ungrateful to the people who built your comfortable society, maintain that comfortable society.

The one thing that's actually the woman's duty to society (bearing children) is something women barely do anymore. If anything it's women that have become the useless ones that people should heap contempt on.

>>82802143
I mean, you're not wrong. That many men would never admit to it, even if it was true, and it isn't.
>>82802198
India does it with 9 year olds though for a dowry. Child marriage happens in the US sometimes in our more third-world-like states but it's still not nearly as severe or young.

>>82802513
I don't think they will ever hate bad women, I don't think they will ever side with whom we would qualify as "good men". I think morality in their brain is processed in the binary system of male(bad) and female(good). It's that simple.

>>82802544
They just have an in-group preference because the way women survive is through extracting resources from men. They feel an entitlement to the resources of men and no guilt at living a parasitic lifestyle. Which is fine when they're rearing children, loyal to their husband, etc.

>>82800888
>These males are violent therefore all males are violent
A-OK
>This brown person is violent therefore all brown people are violent
VERBOTEN!

What's worse for society isn't some violent brown men, it's the illogical people who seed the exponential growth of violent brown men. If you really want to solve the problem, get rid of yourself and people who vote like you do and let society correct itself.

/thread

>>82802580
>They just have an in-group preference
Yes. They do. Most people don't understand the extent and the depth of it and how it actually works on a macroscale.

>>82802544
>I don't think they will ever hate bad women, I don't think they will ever side with whom we would qualify as "good men". I think morality in their brain is processed in the binary system of male(bad) and female(good). It's that simple.
Then you've lost your faith in women and misunderstand that bad = good for lots women. You're "dangerous" if you think those things. You break the status quo. You make them feel threatened(wet). If they'd even give you a chance and read what you're saying they might get corrupted.

I know. It's awful. I'm clutching my pearls.

>>82801765
shut up you racist.

File: file.png (19 KB, 343x224)

19 KB PNG

>>82800909
Enjoy,
but it's not because of their ancestry, don't be racist

>>82801023
how do you know its not a foid trying to look like a magat trying to look like a foid trying to look like a magat trying to look like a foid?

>>82801135
and you don't have a problem with blaming all men so why is it suddenly a problem with you if race is added as an identifier?
>inb4 i never said that blah blah blah
you know what you stand for bitch. say it with your chest.

If the girl had a father this would have never happened. Blame her mother for not securing a man.

>>82800888
>be white woman
>associate with niggers
>they chimp out on you
wow, who could have seen that coming? She'll blame white men for this btw

>>82801328
i mean the best thing to do is to narrow it down further, are the black kids raised by single mothers? then we can raise black children of single mothers

>>82802858
*then we can blame

File: Screenshot_20251003_10105(...).jpg (265 KB, 1080x1376)

265 KB JPG

>rightoid "pattern noticers" when the pattern is who gets convicted for cheese pizza the most

>>82802883
I'm for the state executing pedophiles. This is a bad example because all rightoids agree that pedos should die. That's even the law in many red states now. The people pushing back on that are largely lefties.

>>82802917
The majority of black Americans are law abiding and dislike violent crime. That doesn't change the fact the 13/50 statistic gets brought up ad nauseam

>>82802950
>The majority of black Americans are law abiding and dislike violent crime
Okay then they shouldn't have any problem with a majorr crack down on crime in their areas then. Which is the entire point of addressing the 13/50.

>>82802883
>quick! How can I defend these violent niggers?

File: 1760411131836863.mp4 (3.49 MB, 888x1152)

3.49 MB MP4

>>82802969
That's basically all the left does now. That's why we have "career criminals" roaming around the streets stabbing people.

>>82802969
they just go straight to trying to imply that you're a hypocrite for not being happy when your kids are beaten up, and more importantly asserting that THEY are correct.
if the black kids were beating each other up it wouldn't suit their narrative so they ignore it, they're simply enforcers, slaves doing the left's work for them

>>82802883
browns usually don't report sexual child abuse in their communities

>>82800918
>Another thread of retards refusing to talk about shitskin violence

>>82802883
Actual reality; Only white people report pedophiles, everyone else either defends them or it literally isn't a crime in their eyes so it never gets reported. If a nigger rapes a baby the whole community tells him he dindu nuffin, if a white 18 year old dates a 17 year old the entire community immediately crucifies him.

>>82802917
Child marriage is allowed in a lot of red states though

>>82800888
Thinking that talking at good men who will listen, will somehow address bad ones who don't, is never going to work.

>>82801776
If me I saying "I want to kill all women" makes you more angrier than Israel engaging in genocide Palestinians in Gaza, then you are the problem.
What a retarded argument, then again this is a woman.

>>82800953
Because op posts the exact same theme every single day and replies exactly the same every time. He posts blacks doing something, people point out it is blacks doing it, and then he replies to every thread saying "it's da males" and gets infinite replies.

>>82800918
Yes, they were. It is a known fact that men are biologically inclined towards violence and aggression compared to women. This is a result of inherent genetic and hormonal factors.
Now that we've established that, what other categories are genetically inclined towards violence and aggression?

>>82802883
Wow, it's almost as if white people make up the majority of the population or something.

>>82802969
>>82802997
The problem is that your hatred for blacks go far and beyond just the criminals. It spills over and innocent people who have never committed crime become your victims.

>>82802917
>all rightoids agree that pedos should die
You literally elected one for presidency lmao

>>82804936
You've emboldened some of the shittest people in society all in the name of "not being racist." You are a piece of shit. People like YOU are the problem. YOU are the biggest criminal of them all and hopefully people wake up to that fact.

>>82804957
And again you are generalizing millions of black innocent people, blaming the whole for the crimes of the few.
And when women do it to you, you recoil

>>82804957
>the shittest people in society
That's right wing incels like you, my dearest

>>82800888
Anyone have the actual video? No, I'm not creating a shitter account.

File: leftretard.png (442 KB, 1872x632)

442 KB PNG

>lefty gets pissed off in this thread
>creates this thread
Wtf is with them? I'm being for real right now.

File: FBI Nibbers.jpg (189 KB, 1077x862)

189 KB JPG

>>82802950
Maybe, but it's still a shockingly high number even if it's the minority. Look at the projected lifetime numbers here. 4,508 out of 100,000. That's 4.5%. About 1 in 20 black American men will be convicted of murder in their lifetimes. That's more than one per classroom, on average. And that's just the ones who are *convicted* of murder. That's not counting the ones who get away with it, that's not counting the armed robbers, carjackers, and rapists. Did you know that one third of black men in New York have at least one felony conviction? Yes, one in three.

>>82804980
Right wing incels don't murder over 9000 people per year in the United States.

>>82800888
How long until this tranny self-doxes

>>82800909
That doesn't matter chud, they are men still

>>82804980
Females should settle for left wing incels but you fascist eugenicist foids never ever will. Your standards are shit

>>82804999
you really don't want to see it, it's horrible and it will make you give up on men forever

File: 1757153531911975.mp4 (2.9 MB, 432x768)

2.9 MB MP4

>>82804972
They just need someone to point their fingers at.

File: daed7b70e540916ee4224e7e3(...).png (2.44 MB, 3200x2400)

2.44 MB PNG

>obvious ragebait
>trolls are blatant trolling
>121 replies
Why the fuck did I come back here?

>>82801007
Men are abusers and rapists, accept it

>>82807586
It's normie central, but a part of you remembers the good times and the good robots, so you keep coming back.
You can check out any time you like, but you can never leave.

>>82807768
>good robots
>implying robots don't want to hurt women

>>82805038
>black women are more likely to be a murderer than white men
>women refuse to acknowledge this

>>82807586
well it's better than grooming posters, doxxing them and bragging about it like you do

File: 1736862947080074.jpg (337 KB, 1440x1440)

337 KB JPG

females are all midwits

>>82808490
but at the end of the day it's still men though

>>82808502
Black women do more crime than white men doe

>>82808521
men do more crime than women though

File: big_soph.png (1.14 MB, 724x932)

1.14 MB PNG

You people are going back to back with this tranny in picrel btw. He is always on this board making the same tired arguments while posting his interracial threads all night.

>>82808614
Why does he keep doing it? What is his endgame?

Based. Foids have to be beaten into fucking their looks-matches again.
This male inceldom boom that foids created, by being Chad-only, is fucking unacceptable and it will ruin civilisation, unless it is stopped.

>>82808889
these two were innocent women playing sports, you don't know anything about them or the people they have dated

>>82808619
It makes him feel like a woman when you have mysgnostic arguments with him.

>>82808910
I see. That's pretty weird if you ask me, but to each their own I guess.

>>82800888
B-B-B-B-BASED. Fuck foids.

Giving women voting rights is why things suck so much today.

100 years of Feminism and everyone is ready to overturn it lmao

What's wrong with equal rights.

>>82809356
It just doesn't work. Women having the same privileges as Men with none of the responsiblity(fighting in war, having children) is blatantly unfair and the cause of most of society's current day dysfunction

Also Women predominately vote for soft on crime, open borders immigration, increased reliance on government, etc

>>82801784
There are no consequences though, abusechads get more chances than incels do.

>>82804920
Approximately 30% of the US population is white male. And 81% of cp convictions are white. Less then 1% are women.

So that means 30% of the US population makes up 80% of cp convictions. Meaning white males are highly overrepresented among pedos

30/80

>>82809373
Yes, that's why foids should regularly get beaten up and occasionally killed by gorilla niggers

>>82800942
And women abuse kids and thosr they have power over worse than men.

Blacks are violent animals
Browns subvert and destroy stabile systems
Jews lobby and subsequently profit off of the above
Women are emotionally manioulated by the above to continue voting for and supporting said policies because they're retarded
White men allowed thenselves to be socially pressured into silence
Politicians hate all citizens and want to flood their nations/create the above situsrions to prevent social mobility so them and tbeir families can continue to hold power
Bankers fund and lobby for all of the above while debasing currency snd straling from the citizens to enrich themselves and their friends
There is the truthful state of the world.

>>82809531
here we have the shitskin poojeet coping that he cant marry 11 year olds in his own island. fagget

>>82808903
>b-b-be nice!!! they're women wahhhhhh
moralfaggots need to die kill them all

>>82807015
they are the men you like and worship not the men you hate, there should be a distinction, don't you think?

>>82809531
>And 81% of cp convictions are white. Less then 1% are women.
Guess how I can tell your stats are trash?

>>82808603+1
>1% of the men causes 90% of the problems
>99% of men already go around trying to jail the 1%
>women lobby to release as many of the 1% as possible while blaming their crimes on the 99%
Just kill yourself

>>82801156
>accuse concretely innocent person of a crime somebody else concretely committed
>they concretely deny it
>"STOP TRYING TO ABSOLVE YOURSELF OF GUILT!!!!"
women's rights were concretely a mistake