The term incel was first used by a girl. Does this mean femcels are the true incels, and 'incels' should be called malecels instead?
>>82910881She didn't create it even if she claims she did, hers wasn't the first use of it
no it means male female bullshit on /r9k/ is years overplayed, cringe, boring and underagecoded and you have an ENTIRE FUCKING WEBSITE CALLED CRYSTAL CAFE
>>82910886Erm she actually did create the term incel it was later co-opted by others and changed in meaning
>>82910881The term faggot was first used by your dad. Does this mean your dad is the true faggot?
>>82910895no im the true faggot u nigger
>>82910893No she didn't create, this has been debunked countless times
Faggot used to mean a bundle or sticks and was/is used as the name of a meatball in gravy dish. However we both know that when I point at you and call you a faggot I am not saying you are kindling or British meatballs. Also that girl in the span of a few months found a pardner and had sex after allegedly coin the term, which should tell you all you need to know. Women can be spinsters, they can never actually be incel.
>>82910914>this has been debunked countless timesCan you post the debunkings?
>>82910881Women can delude themselves into not believing in their own agency just like dudes can. Sad fact is you have rejected cute girls without knowing it just like the femcels anons like to decry for rejecting them. And no, the existence of women that'll go out of their way to shit on your advances does not justify painting all women that way just like it isn't fair to paint all dudes like daylight pussy rapers - No being looked at does not mean he's leering at you, you paranoid hole
>>82910881The term "incel" isn't connected to a sex. It's like "alcoholic" or "schizo", it just describes a condition.
>>82910924all these moids do is steal from us, they dont let us keep anything sigh zero originality
>>82910926>Sad fact is you have rejected cute girls without knowing itWhat kind of non-falsifiable gaslighting bullshit is this?
>>82910962Just because you do not believe in your own agency does not make the statement non-falsifiable
>>82910990The statement quoted is indeed a non-falsifiable claim pulled from your ass and has zero to do with anything to do with agency. Are you retarded?
>>82911034You're trying very hard to convince me that you cannot positively affect people around you by the way you act and present yourself and I am not convinced
>>82911281No I am not. I am trying really hard (not really) to show you how the statement you made is invalid, dumb, and manipulative.
>>82911327do you know where you are? or what
>>82910881The term "involuntary celibate" wasNot sure if "incel" was though
>>82910881It means that women tend to catastrophize. I expect that the women who coined the term has had several relationships since. If a woman is able to get over herself she will find someone. There is no such thing as a femcel.Meanwhile for men there's no respite for the manlet, the autist, the bald, and the lame.
>>82910926>Sad fact is you have rejected cute girls without knowing itno-one here has been approached by a single woman their entire lives
>>82910881I first heard incel on r9k and wizardchan in the early 2010s, no idea if it was somewhere else earlier
>>82910881>The term incel was first used by a girl.No, it wasn't.>Does this mean femcels are the true incelsNo.>and 'incels' should be called malecels instead?There's no such thing as femcels. "Incel" can only refer to males.
>>82910881femcel is different word. Did she make term "femcel" first?
>>82910881>>82910891>>82910924reminder that its all womens fault>"Fertile-phase women were particularly sexually attracted to men perceived as arrogant, intrasexually confrontative, muscular and physically attractive, no cycle shifts were observed in women's attraction to men seen to be successful financially, intelligent or kind and warm. Men who appeared to be sexually faithful were less sexually attractive to fertile-phase women."https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2394562/>"We found men's attraction was significantly correlated with 12 partner characteristics... for women, only two partner characteristics showed a statistically significant correlation with their attraction: physical attractiveness and sport activity, indicating that women are strongly drawn to men who are good-looking and athletic."https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00570.x>"Studies 1 and 2 showed that men, but not women, perceived a responsive stranger as more gender typical (masculine/feminine) and, in turn, as more attractive."https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0146167214543879>"In general, results showed that women considered taller men and men with larger SHR (shoulder-to-hip ratio) as more attractive, masculine, and better in fighting ability."https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-022-02416-2>"Our study also identified that the vast majority [of the female sample] (84%) preferred a romantic partner taller than them."https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4168/1/3/17>"Women were most likely to choose a speed-dater 25 cm taller than themselves, whereas men were most likely to choose women only 7 cm shorter than themselves."https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003347213001590
woman invention
>>82912145>Fertile-phase This is known as the Ovulatory shift theory. It was initially proposed around 2008 but later research found weak to no relations.>masculine attractiveI'd be careful with that, facial masculinity for example has no relationship with attractiveness or mate preference but other indicators like deep voice and height are preferred.
>>82912268>This is known as the Ovulatory shift theory. It was initially proposed around 2008 but later research found weak to no relations.>no citation, just some ai slop responsegot it.
>>82912282just search ovulatory shift on google scholar breh and sort by dates and whatnot
>>82912404>just do the research for me because my ai prompt didnt give me sources
>>82911457>>82911327You will look back on this interaction in embarrassment
>>82910881no shit you think anyone listens to men today? clearly a woman had to say it catch on.
>>82910881>>82910933i don't take things seriously unless a man says them. a woman could say a car was speeding towards me and i'd ignore her
>>82912145As intresting as that all is, it doesn't address what I asked for. Which is evidence of debunking of the narrative of a woman creating the term incel
