Why did men go out of fashion?
Article gets it backwards. They want the clout of being single and the security of a relationship. Hating this women run world while they act like they're stupid to it.
>>82961992The "woman" who posted this btw
>>82962041yeah because white women are super good to men, it's practically their selling point
>>82961992They didn't. Everybody who's socially skilled and dating has a decent partner.
>doing anything but being one of many fuckholes for CHAD is cringe
>>82961992The author has male pattern baldness so I'm going with it's exclusively a *HER* problem
>>82962065it may seem absurd from your perspective but if that's how they feel then that's how they feel
>>82962041why are negroid chimps allowed to influence white women in any way?this should be illegal
>>82962099Black and jewish females inherited feminism from white protestant females. That's not even my take, it's established history.
holy shit the jews will stop at nothing to destroy society
>>82962092this is a literal journalist though
>>82962041She's 29 btw.
>>82962161So that's not how the average woman feels about men? I guess I was mistaken, luckily you were here to set the record straight.
>>82962118birth of 1st wave feminism began in New York, so I'm going to say YUGE x to doubt on the no jewish women being involved thing there, lil bro
>>82962177i did not set anything straight, just pointed out that that's from a journalistbut just look at their choices, they are in relationships
>>82962161She's reporting on how women feel.
>>82962212that's naive as fuck. the jews try to create trends by reporting them as something that people are already doing.
>>82961992social media has fried normalfags' brains
>>82962185Was this supposed to squeeze an angry reply out of me? Everything about it's history is on public record, feel free to check the attendees of the Seneca falls convention and point out the people who seem jewish. They were all from faggot heretic churches and none of them were jews, but like I said, feel free to double check.I know that it's easy to bundle up everything with the jewish question but if you do that, you're basically just coping because you can't admit that your women betrayed your people on their own and that they will always perceive you as an enemy. You know, kinda like how jews see "the nations", the out-group.
>>82961992Show me the article stating they agreed that boyfriends ever were in fashion. Or at least, the admittance to women treating men as fashion accessories. It's not there. Your just a dangle bit on her purse or phone wallpaper. Too many psycho narc women.
>>82962041>>82962099That looks like a white woman with damaged skin, even her face looks old for her age assuming she really is 29 or something
>>82961992>>82962041I don't take opinions from people who live in britain.
>>82962274>This is probably because, for so long, it felt like we were living in what one of my favourite Substackers calls Boyfriend Land: a world where women's online identities centred around the lives of their partners, a situation rarely seen reversed. Women were rewarded for their ability to find and keep a man, with elevated social status and praise. It became even more suffocating when this could be leveraged on social media for engagement and, if you were serious enough, financial gain.>From my conversations, one thing is certain: the script is shifting. Being partnered doesn't affirm your womanhood anymore; it is no longer considered an achievement and, if anything, it's become more of a flex to pronounce yourself single. From the article. They're not being treated as literal fashion accessories, it's about how having a boyfriend is no longer "in vogue" (meaning: popular or trendy).
>>82961992Fuck apps and social media turned foids into Chad-only psychos.
