It's hard not to see people in tiers, I feel like the vast majority of people myself included are just bio slaves and then there are a few well regulated people that are super interesting, smart and original
Ur kinda right but it's whatever
>>83000609>few well regulated people that are super interesting, smart and original>he doesn't knowthe most interesting, smart, and original folks are NOT well regulated people anonAll the greats had something that happened to them that re-wired their brain and made them fucked up/greatMy only piece of sincere advice is genuinely just be yourselfBUT go all in, if you think you're a woman-hating incel go all the way
>>83000632>if you think you're a woman... go all the wayDo you see how this is shitty advice?
>>83000666>dumb fuck doesn't get itmany such casesi'm going to indulge you though, so by your definition *what* makes a woman a woman?
>>83000687According to the US legal code section one, "words importing the masculine gender include the feminine as well," meaning "men" refers to anybody. According to Leviticus 18, "Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman." Pastors argue that this applies to women as well. Therefore, it follows that "woman" refers to anybody. Don't like it? I'm just the messenger. That's a woman: you are one if you say you are. Take it up the legal and religious systems, not me.
>>83000799if you're a woman because you say you are, then why shouldn't you go all in?
>>83000799>According to...nigger I'm asking you specifically, don't base it off of man-made laws or any sort of divine covenantWhat do YOU think is the idea of a woman? Is she supposed to be fem? Is she supposed to be petite and dainty? Is a woman, to you, just someone who has tits and a vagina? And if so, if having tits and a vagina makes a woman a woman, then she has to lean into it, make everything all about it, no?
>>83000855Because Goedel's incompleteness theorems say that a system cannot be defined from within that system.>>83000859>What do YOU think is the idea of a woman?Let's say that I think that the perfect woman is a solid titanium cube covered in silicon arachnoid wetware, and that I am a woman. Should I go all in on becoming a titanium cube, or am I pursuing a false ideal?
>>83000916Go all in!Be yourself a.k.a. the idea of yourself and go all the way>inb4 that's dumbOf course it's dumb, but if you're yourself why the fuck should you care about what anyone else says?Your life is your life, you wear your own shoes and you walk your own path, so who the fuck cares what everyone else says about what kinda shoes you wear or what kinda path you're threadingThey don't see how many times you've changed shoes, they don't see how many paths you've thread upon, they only see you in that specific moment of your life so they're going to judge you on that specific moment of your lifeNORMOIDS DON'T SEE, ANONNORMOIDS DON'T SEE WHAT WE'VE BEEN THROUGH AND WHY WE ARE THE WAY WE ARE, WHO THE FUCK CARES ABOUT NORMALNIGGERS
>>83000973Erm that's for tryhards. Just be yourself
>>83001006>Just be yourselfI been sayin that, homie
>>83002070But if you're "going all the way" then you're trying to become something that you already are, which seems like a waste of time. It's like Bill Gates dropping out of Harvard to run Microsoft. Why try to be yourself when you can just be yourself?
>>83002203>trying nope, not tryingbeingYou said it yourself, "Why try to be yourself when you can just be yourself?"Don't try, do/beBecause deep down you've had it in you all along
>>83002265If you consciously try to "go all in," then you've already broken your flow and lost wu wei, the "doing-without-doing."
