>type?>What's the funniest thing that's happened to you recently?>What's your Roman Empire (something you think about way too often)?>If your life was a movie what genre would it be?>What's the most overrated thing people love?>What's something you laugh that normies don't.>What's the most random thing that makes you happy?>Sakinorva testshttps://sakinorva.net/functions>attitudinal type/nu-psychosophyhttps://www.attitudinalpsyche.com/take-the-test/>16 personalities (the best test)https://www.16personalities.com/>MBTI test (don't screen cap your IP btw)https://jupiter-34.appspot.com>Jungian types tl;drhttps://wikisocion.github.io/content/psychological_types.html>Big 5https://www.personalityassessor.com/big-five2/>paste your old messages and get typedhttps://www.uclassify.com/browse/g4mes543/myers-briggs-type-indicator-text-analyzer?input=Text>Associative MBTI/Jungian testhttps://watchwordtest.com/wtitle2.html>Turbie-Wurbie's Cutesy Test Link Compilation! UwU:https://web.archive.org/web/20231220103736/https://pastebin.com/QK0uSJaTPrevious: >>83830902
INFPs are based and deserve their INFJ twin flames
>>83847225CONGRATS you are the first to post. Here is your reward: Picrel is what AI thinks your post looks like as art.
INFPs deserve to be castrated and nothing more
>>83847179>>type?ESFP-T>>What's the funniest thing that's happened to you recently?Was visiting a friend and had one of her cats on my lap. Out of nowhere, it decided to climb inside my shirt. >>What's your Roman Empire (something you think about way too often)?Probably the TTRPGs that I play in. >>If your life was a movie what genre would it be?A success story.>>What's the most overrated thing people love?If people genuinely love something, can it really be overrated?>>What's something you laugh that normies don't.I think I'm fairly normal with regard to what I find funny. >>What's the most random thing that makes you happy?When a rainstorm abruptly ends and the sun is so hot that fog starts coming up off the roads. Did I make the first three?
>>83847276>Did I make the first three?Aw, I missed by one. : (
>>83847268Second prize here's your art:
>>83847276THIRD PRIZE. Heres artwork based on your writings: (picrel)>>83847279Sorry dude next time :(
>>83847304That's pretty cool; thank you.
>>83847179He's stealing my cognitive labours again.
OP wasn't kind enough to re-add patchy's links even though he asked politely
https://youtube.com/shorts/9xFQ1r0VL6c?si=XjCb9gV9mHKoBFzjListen to this black man, he tell you about obedience
>>83847179>type?ENTJ>What's the funniest thing that's happened to you recently?Cat got indignant toward me, I didn't give him a treat (cause I'm out) & he and angrily went EEWN!! and walked away.>What's your Roman Empire (something you think about way too often)?I'm into Strauss-howe theory recently.>If your life was a movie what genre would it be?Isekai, I'm an over powered reincarnated person.>What's the most overrated thing people love?Mcdonalds/etc. I hate Goyslop. I don't eat it. People willingly eat it 2-3 times a day I dont understand.>What's something you laugh that normies don't.Engrish, most people I know seem to think it's offensive to laugh at ESLs writing/speaking English bad. >What's the most random thing that makes you happy?Grandma collectables (like enesco bears).
>>83847422Sometimes I want to give up on life and just be mela's house pet and live in a side room and subsist off pocket money she gives me. It sounds so comfortable, but I could never share her so it wouldn't work
>>83847458That's sweet you think that highly of me. Thanks.
>>83847422>I hate Goyslop. I don't eat it. People willingly eat it 2-3 times a day I dont understand.It's easy, quick, and addictive.
>>83847422>Mcdonalds/etc. I hate Goyslop. I don't eat it. People willingly eat it 2-3 times a day I dont understand.I feel very common now. : (
>>83847529>I feel very common now. : (Why don't you learn to make wife slop? You're pretty good at baking right? How much harder could wife slop be?
Reminder.anonzzle could be IN(T) since it actually had been matching enough, and he has/had same opinions (neutrally speaking I'd consider them misconceptions) on Jungology I had before. But we really had been having some kind of Type Problem comms meta-mismatch that doesn't happen between "Ni" users at least that way. Actually, I suspect an IT(S) type. Not going to assert it since rapport check is important.Funnily Melatonin might exactly be ET(N).If the following listed, or the discorders, have objections - then re-read PT before speaking to me. Otherwise, fuck off.For the following I'm going to explicitly assert:lilac is extravertoid EF(S).>bbbUUUUT!Yeah even feeloids can do thinkoid jobs, kind of. Look at Freud, fucking newfag."INFJ-A" is EF(S).t*rbie is ES(T) (troglodyte oldfag regs couldn't crack this because they are too high cranking their mental illness hog to pay attention).t*rbie slop enjoyer has LL(M) for the type. Unironically the ambivalent automaton with pathological complexes for a personality, just like in Jung's foredoomings.>>83847365No, actually, I asked the OP that has severe executive dysfunction.
>>83847819Don't forget yourself,ET(S)
soapie - EN(F), though thinking was so projectionally outsourced and dysfunctional in differentiation that it might be actually EF(N). But S... Hmm... Nah S wasn't that undifferentiated. It's EF(N). Yup lots of that aux "Ne".Breeder is absolutely an extravertoid. EN(T)? ET(N)? ES(T)? Humor was EN-ny, really EN-ny. Feeling was present, actually. Thinkoiding was you know, quite Te-groidish. So EN(T).Any incessant moanings and whinings on the matter? No? Good kids.
People that typed me as IN(T):3 Jung readers total.People that typed me otherwise:1 Jung reader ('nozzle);[quarantine chamber]N of les miserables irrelevants[/quarantine chamber].Well. 3v1. Verdict is in. I'm IN(T).
>>83847819Maybe we are strongly under the influence of contrary archetypes. Just out of curiosity, are you an only child? My current suspicion of your type is IS(F), but i don't feel like explaining myself now, and i won't until i return in full force around the equinox to do a watchword.>Melatonin might exactly be ET(N).How so? >just like in Jung's foredoomings.Kierkegaard observed it even in his time, only he called it heathenism rather than permittivity. How would you type Chuck and Centaur?
>>83847819I can't understand autismo, are you saying:>anonzzle INT- cause how he write, but maybe he IST- cause. But I need vibe check him.>Mel is ENT- cause>lilac ESF- cause feelines can think 2.>"INFJ-A" is ESF->Turbie is EST-. Old regs no think this cause they big dumb.>TE is AI poster.>soafie is ENF- cause they try think but no good at think.>Breeder EN-something cause he think.
>>83848015Democracy is a mockery.
>>83848015>The social consensus is obviously trueHoly Fe type! I knew Patchy was an EF(S) and just projecting it onto me.
>>83848015According to grok you are:>The posts strongly indicate that the person is an INTJ-A (Assertive INTJ), based on their confident, structured, sarcastic, and analytically assertive typing style focused on Jungian functions, logical verdicts, and dismissive boundary setting.According to Gemini:>The user is a highly confident and confrontational INTJ-A who utilizes complex Jungian theory to systematically categorize others while maintaining a dismissive, "Assertive" independence from the opinions of those they deem intellectually inferior.According to ChatGPT>INTJ-A Ni-driven typology obsession, Te enforcement of conclusions, combative confidence, and a strong need to close the system rather than keep it open.3 of 3 say he's a INTJ-A.
>>83848185Holy shit do me next!https://voca.ro/18hC0mf8rrHr
>>83848185>INTJ-ABullshit, he's not some thinker/planner, the MFer falls for obvious bait. Fuck trolls have literally said HOW they were gonna bait him, then baited him in the VERY NEXT POST and that MFer patchy literally fell for it. Only a FEELER would be that blind.He's and INFP or INFJ.
>>83848162And Totalitarianism is Bobanberry jism
But could soapie be introverted?Not habitually, no. Like, lmfao. If you think there's visible introversion then reread the "mbti movie" comments and stop being fucking retarded (/mbti/ oldfag challenge difficulty - impossible. Fuck ya gun do huh?).Let's see...Tachibana isn't a real reg it was just a persona of a dumb dipshit who tried to act a few IQ deviations above the actually held IQ (the tradition persists, amirite sweetiepie?). Skip.homu? IF(N) could be possible but it's IN(F) emphasis F.cuckntjudge? Introvertoid lol. Baited by what extravertoids would ignore. IN(x) (weak auxes, maybe a little focus on T).diapertaur? IF(x) with weak N aux. Rxy is IS(F) larping as ET(N) but in reality only ending up having an EF(S) persona. Wild ride combo.Megu... IN(T) is possible.Hmm what absolute cuties have we forgotten? Oh yes INFPrince. CSJ slop is peak inferior thinking troglodytitis. IF(x) with no auxes lol. Maybe a weak N aux but uh that's just hallucinating in the dynamics.>>83848135>are youIt's complicated. :)>chuckIS(x), ambivalent on auxes. idk what are the changes after "getting therapy" arc but she mogged oldfags with that one.>How so?Thinkoid aesthetics just like in textbook Jungian ones, that is, in between the lines and not in the vgh tuff nugget posturing.N aux in getting ahead over own head with the actuality-unchecked plans. The real Ne-gga unironic cringe that's not cringe posturing.>watchwordThat's for tomorrow.>>83848148Hmm.In Jungian notation - E/I is attitude. N/S/F/T is dom function. (N/S/F/T) is the main aux function.So these would actually translate to accurate types out of the possible 16 ones. But there's no MBTI flipflop of extraversion and introversion per function. The flipflop is general over the psyche and has different possibility for different people.>>83848162I, too, prefer dialogues!
Y'all niggas is a bunch of midwits. All yall can do is regurgitate what you read (or copied from AI). NONE of yall niggas had the intellect to noticed that sentinals and explorers are organized incorrectly (1/2 feeler 1/2 thinker). They should be organized like:Thinking Sensors:>ISTP, ISTJ, ESTP, ESTJFeeling Senors:>ISFP, ISFJ, ESFP, ESFJWhy? Because yall niggas only think inside the box.
>>83848212Well, i am, but it's still complicated.>IS(x), ambivalent on auxes. Agreed.>actuality-unchecked plans.Actuality does tend not to check my plans. >That's for tomorrow.I'm glad i've given you something to do!
>>83848276>nigga yall nigga yall nigga yall/mbti/ literally talked about this before christmas, your late to the party
krissy is what, IN(F) and the only /mbti/ "INFJ" that isn't mistyped? Y'know, Jung-stereotypically IN(x), but T is only for tasks, not habitual at all, unlike F.Meanwhile at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 of self-proclaimed INFJs on /mbti/ were mistypes.Amazing!India November?Actually IN(T), yeah.ESFP-tan?EN(F).Sensoid doms don't do tacky stuffs.If any stalker orbiter fan stan is upset then read PT and DIY (I'd recommend touching grass but that's just abusive towards low-lives. lolz).>>83848276>lust-provoking image >hollow postYou should become a reggggy!
>>83848315>You should become a reggggy!NO we don't need more regs thank you.
>>83848315Do me next! I want to get typed too.
>>83848328>Do me next!I need 10 Viagra pills.
>>83848338Viagra is for uncs. The cool kids are using honey packs.
>>83848326UwU im nu reggyt n I is INJP-B an I luk JUNG tee heee! \(^_^)/. im real gurl, I like cute asfr :O I tink Si is da 1 puction tat I lik, K BYE
You laugh now but the thread is EVENTUALLY gonna attract some faggot who purposely posts like a retarded.Patchy is the savior of /mbti/ cause he drove them out of thread by effort posting and having thinker discusions. But eventually some 14yo furry lolcow is gonna find this place, and the thread will turn to trash.
>the thread will turn to trash.Already is.
Why do people respond without giving a (You).
>Why do people respond without giving a (You).90% of the time it's seething cu-cks, they're mad and don't want to give a (You) but still are butthurt enough to respond. They think they're pulling the ultimate checkmate on their opponent, but in reality they're just showing definitive proof they're mad as fuck.10% of the time it's trolls and lazy fuckers. Trolls know it mildly annoying and lazy fuckers just don't give a shit.
You are literally not giving a (You) right now. A (You) that was rightfully earned.
It was really TE because he kept making the thread, and actually drove people out with his... TEism.
>You are literally not giving a (You) right now. A (You) that was rightfully earned.I'm just following thread etiquette. Plus it's funny.
>It was really TE because he kept making the thread, and actually drove people out with his... TEism.TE is only making these threads in a vain hope turbie returns. He makes them then skims them at the end of each day looking for Turbie, and maybe posts 5 word response to someone insulting him or praising Frieren. He's basically a shell of man at this point.
In fact I won't post that and I'll erase it instead. Nice to see you again though.
>>83848450No way dude we already have LLM-lobotomised histrionic whore Lilacfor shitting up the thread with her self-smut fanfics
>>83848535So, what? It's still true. Anyway, I do basically the same thing.
>>83848535TE is functioning on his lizard brain at this point. Despair is over taking him causing his cognitive functions to break down. He tried to rely on LLMs for while but now his IQ has sunken below the 85IQ. His communication ability has sunken to grunting ESL levels. Soon his memories will get hazy and only the word "Turbie" and his hatred of everyone for "forcing her out" will drive him on like some Frankienstiens monster.
>>83848581....Are we going to get sacrificed this August?
>>83848450>patchy>t.patchypatch-a-pussy is just unbearably boring, all the cute unique personalities left one after the other because they only stuck around for eachother. As you can see, none have stayed for patch. He relies on a bot for a personality and not even that can filter out the humdrum nature
>>83848581>TE is functioning on his lizard brain at this point. Despair is over taking him causing his cognitive functions to break down. He tried to rely on LLMs for while but now his IQ has sunken below the 85IQ. His communication ability has sunken to grunting ESL levels.Thats literally every oldfag on 4chan>hatred of everyon.... like some Frankienstiens monster.It's called a Chud>>83848576>I do basically the same thing.This is a Frieren loving thread, don't like it LEAVE.>>83848560>No way dude we already have LLM-lobotomised histrionic whore Lilacfor shitting up the thread with her self-smut fanficsIt's not lilac anymore, remember that anon who said he uses AI to sound like her?
>>83848598>its not lilacIt most definitely is, she posted a vocaroo retard>Using an aiShe uses AI on a post to post basis bitchlike, and reads aloud her little LLM generated shitpost script in a whiney CSAM voice
>>83848589>all the cute unique personalities left one after the other because they only stuck around for eachother.What about... ...uh... ...umm... ...yeah.
>>83848598>don't like it LEAVEForgot your comma. It's alright, i forgive you it. I basically have left. Isn't it obvious?
>>83848619There are no real regs left except patchy & INFJ-A>ESFP-Tan & Mel post 1-3 times at the begining of threads.>TE posts like once every 3 threads.>Diarygirl posts like once every 6 threads.>>83848620>I basically have left. Isn't it obvious?No because you're an anon, unless you avatarfag or namefag how am I supposed to know????
>>83848632Ahhh, this one lacks the sight.
What type is Fred Durst?
>>83848632>I can't tell when people are posting if they don't use an avatar or name
>>83848680sorry we arent chronically online or mentally ill enough to care to recognize a specific shitposter (fart in the wind) from a mile away lol
>>83848670>What type is Fred Durst?I wanna say he's a ISFP pretending to be an ESTP. Because if you watch behind the scene stuff he's like always going on about how is art & creative output isn't good enough and people will hate him because his art isn't good enough.
>>83848710>sorry we don't have the pattern recognition or memory to recognize and remember posters who we chat with frequently
>>83847179INTP, hypothetically, but MBTI is astrology. You faggots only like it because you're pathetic, self-obsessed navel-gazers. Building an autistic mythology out of personality labels justifies all of your failings and soothes your pathetic existence.Only insecure retards take personality test garbage seriously.Your MBTI type does not matter or explain anything about your life or interactions even slightly. This whole hobby is just pathetic self-soothing where you try to quantify why you're all spazzes that can't fit in with society. It's easier to say it's because you were cursed with a meme roll on the personality test, rather than just confront that you're disgusting and worthless and your """fated""" personality had nothing to do with it beyond being a weak excuse.
>>83848728>he's a ISFP pretending to be an ESTP.LMAO WRONG. He's non-chad ESTP. All his insecurities, bitterness and whining is what happens to ESTPs that aren't chads.
>>83848737That's such an INTP thing to say lol.
I just want you to know I've already developed several heuristics that enable me to solve captchas faster than you
>>83848829>not writing some code to let an "AI" do it for you >wasting any brainpower at all for "square peg goes into square hole" "puzzles"Baka, while you were busy thinking about captcha, I was already studying how to transcend the fabric of reality and realize my dream of being a magical girl.
>>83848730Sorry, we dont devote the cognitive bandwidth needed to recognize irrelevant personality posers on cringe over glorified neet forums by their distinctive typing quirks.
>>83848015The only alternate typing that makes sense to me to consider for you is IT(N), but the probability is lower imo as you don't seem to have issues on the side of Feeling.Throwing it out there just in case, I'm quite sure the real type is indeed IN(T).>>83848173>EF(S) PatchyThat would be kinda cute ngl.Going so deep into the Jungism&co just to make sure the happy vibes(and a side of social manipulation) are REALLY accurate to even the most remote possibility that he couldn't even imagine, perhaps that is required in his workplace or personal relationships. An attempt to bring up the lower Intuition through the Jvng because he sees that Sensation, while helpful, is only a way to refine Feeling but does not account for the Junganical side of psychology(which requires you to be open to Intuition, the system is very much a big intuitive one regardless of Jung's own typology), ultimately this calls for inferior Thinking so it is an integration path, which is why it comes across as big Thinkoidism from the outside.But actually no, all of that is a raw Ne-fueled shitpost as much as the infamous pic rel.
>>83848737The feedback from a skeptical anonymous forum poster was interesting, but not concerning.I'm deliberately engaging in types and archetypes as part of my "inferior Si integration" strategy.
>>83847179>type?INFP>What's the funniest thing that's happened to you recently?Got introduced to a coworker only to forget his face after a few seconds and think he was a customer when he came back to me like a couple of hours laterI guess it would have been fun to witness as a third party, though for me, it instantly made it into my collection of cringe memories that keeps me up at night>What's your Roman Empire (something you think about way too often)?The 18th century maybe>If your life was a movie what genre would it be?Psychological horror>What's the most overrated thing people love?The beach>What's something you laugh that normies don't/int/ posts>What's the most random thing that makes you happy?A dish of freshly made pasta>>83847225fpbp>>83847422>Strauss-howe theoryHey, i've read that last year
>be put on the spot, have to schedule up>schedule up based on how ready I'll be feeling>whoops it's apparently a holiday. absolutely nobody accepts schedules on a holiday. try again!Yeah I totally have any ounce of habitual differentiated extraversion and sensation, guys.btw>habitual Jvng really left room for "forced" ones huh?>>83850058Grimmingly speaking it's quite easy to fake a type if you stick to basics of basics of Jvvvng. But nobody objected in my old INTJ typing before I got into Jungology so even legit retyping attempts might only be overthinking it.>Going so deep into the Jungism&co just to make sure the happy vibes(and a side of social manipulation) are REALLY accurate to even the most remote possibility that he couldn't even imagineRetrospectively I'm actually surprised Jvvvng ended up being good for relations as the surprise bonus it is. I only initially got interested in Jvvvng from a quote where he said I don't have to take my meds!!! You can't go wrong reading into writers that say you don't need your meds.>>83848450I wouldn't mind feeler discussions at all but only differentiated ones. Not the negative stereotype's sloppa.>>83848730>recognize and remember postersWhich ones are worth to remember, and why?Differentiate your reply out whether it's a feeling reply or a thinking reply.>zero responses in 3... 2... 1...>>83848348Why are you shagging kids? MOOOOOOOOOODS> 83848507Cognitive labors status?>>83848619BRVTAL
>>83848737Bored so let me answer seriously.>but MBTI is astrologyNo, looking at the stars or anything that exists outside of the people themselves will not help you determine type.>You faggots only like it because you're pathetic, self-obsessed navel-gazers.A forced way to interpret everything. In other words, a reductive thinking that, IF(big IF here, that's the condition you have to focus on) habitual(doing it once or twice isn't proof of anything, for emphasis) in your life and related to the unconscious/shadow standpoint, would reveal you as a Feeling type acting from his inferior function.>mythology out of personality labelsIt's very real and grounded in pure empirical observations(read: intuiting archetypes from reading random shit and experence with patients) from Jung, and technically Myers too even if I tend to be a purist.>Only insecure retards take personality test garbage seriously.Factually correct, but specifically on "personality test", not studying the theory itself.>Your MBTI type does not matter or explain anything about your life or interactions Factually incorrect on two fronts: the "Type Problem" happens in every day life almost as frequently as you speak with people.Extraverts see introverts as egocentric or detached from reality, introverts see extraverts as unreflective and shallow, Thinking types misunderstand Feeling motives, Feeling types misunderstand Thinking ideas, Intuition types just casually skip over the actual facts, Sensation types just casually skip over very real possibilities. All of these follow specific type-related patterns.The second front is that Jung himself has suggested to do this. His typology is less to categorize and more to explain the mechanisms behind the Type Problem, in analysis it's useful to find a path for integration through your auxiliary functions and inferior function.t. proud member of the Jungian typing speedrunning community(according to Claude, anyways)1/2
>>83850386>It's very real and grounded in pure empirical observations(read: intuiting archetypes from reading random shit and experence with patients)>intuiting archetypes >real and grounded in pure empirical observations I get the sentiment but protip: this wouldn't pass in court.
>>83850386(me)>This whole hobby is just pathetic self-soothing where you try to quantify why you're all spazzes that can't fit in with society.If you skip over the inferior functions...These are the bane of his types and generally many things you struggle with or don't want to do are related to it. You can fit into society even without caring about that in theory, but a one-sided attitude still leads to inner tension and eventually neuroticism, god knows what happens after that. Generally I would consider this the most useful part of the entire theory, don't just glaze your conscious-ego attitude, look at what you are missing, the underdeveloped auxiliaries and the "true" inferior function. This theory at its core was very Thinkoid-brained and just told you how much you suck at something, don't be swayed by the modern "everyone is valid" interpretations, I hate that shit myself and it's why modern psychology kinda sucks for me "just take this label and remember you are cute and valid, also take your meds because there is no possibility for you to ever integrate anything, you just have to cope and fake it!" EWWWWWWWWWW I can "feel" my intuition going postal over this.2/2
>>83850407True, usually there you just... >hmm actually it's a Devil's Proof, you are literally asking me to prove the collective unconscious itself despite the sheer amount of circumstantial evidence for archetypal ideas, so now the burden of proof is on the opposing side providing a case for why no such a thing could be trueMind you, the arguments I have heard against this end up just deflecting to religion, supernatural, literally magic or "I refuse to explain!" random banalities. The jury would definitely settle for complete acquittal and Jung will be freed from all his witchcraft charges.
>Jung will be freed from all his witchcraft charges.That is, until they read the more alchemical and experimental books lol lmao
is the patchy reg likable or no
Every patchy post is just Kris using an LLM to pretend to he patchy. The real patchy was likeable but he killed himself after the thread didn't affirm his transition to a woman. Now it's just someone pretending to be them
I had a dream where I was following this dude who was teaching me how to defeat a minedraft temple but it seemed like someone had been there before us. The other guy opened a chest and found rare loot so said don't worry we can still explore but his inventory was full of dirt do he had to drop some. Then we fought a ghost and walked down this hallway until we came to a hotel room where I found some bagels. Then the next room was a big window showing the outside where we were seen by other players. They said they wouldn't hurt us and we were safe but my guide did not believe them and we ran the other direction. Yet they had a car and sat in between our car and where we were so we were trapped. Then I woke up.
>never finish video games unless I hyper focus and am sucked in>don't really want to put the effort into keeping up with people >always stuck reminiscing the past while life passes by>people see me as kinder than I think I am>bored of life because I can't do what I want>only feel energetic if I'm around inspiring people >like sharing ideas and news that I think others might value what type am i?
>>83850504Hmm there's actually a good way to possibly scientifically test for archetypes. Y'know.. Looking for correlations between brain activity markers if you diversify manifestations of a basic archetype hard enough, so it's not just some "WELL, DEATH IS DANGEROUS. LIVELEAK VIDEOS LOOK DANGEROUS-" thought line discarded, I should narrow down on falsifiability first.What was the proposed falsifiability- thought line discarded, it's a model for praxis convenience. Anyhow. What I wanted to say is it's a phenomenology thing, not an empiricism thing. Not a big crime to confuse them since most people care for neither in the first place. This paragraph looks so judgmental in text lol.>>83850412>>83850381>medsCoincidence?>>83850547Are you saying all reggies only like trannies? Agreed! I'm not a reg btw.
i miss when patchy was the nice and mature word salad guy and not the asshole word salad guy
>>83850386>No, looking at the stars or anything that exists outside of the people themselves will not help you determine type.Obviously, calling it astrology is a a metaphor. As in, calling it out as superstitious. The fact that you don't understand that means that the rest of your post is meaningless because if you're too autistic to understand that, then you're just a space cadet and your opinion means nothing. I'm not saying your stupid, but if your ability to understand the world around you is that stunted then it raises serious doubts about your competency and your ability to comprehend the universe.
>posting for no one >>83847179>type?infp>What's the funniest thing that's happened to you recently?i cannot think of anything funny, shits boring >What's your Roman Empire (something you think about way too often)?my past years, when I was 13-15 (i think) I tried to be a silent genius where I talked to no one and pretended to zone out. Its so fckn cringe to think about >If your life was a movie what genre would it be?a documentary on losers >What's the most overrated thing people love?rappers>What's something you laugh that normies don't.I don't know >What's the most random thing that makes you happy?I don't know, sometimes I have a good day for no reason feeling good >>83847225sigh
why are their 4 patchys
>>83850576Counterpoint: you didn't understand the difference between purely objective (external)determinants and subjective (internal but also ultimately collective) determinants.The comparison with astrology falls apart rather quickly even without contesting the superstition directly.
>>83850593Because this is a Jvngian question... But you didn't read The Jvng... So... You will pay.>>83850576Both astrology and Big 5/MBTI have statistical validity correlations found in research papers btw. Is heckin science just superstition garbage? You bet, nerd!
>>83850571>so it's not just some "WELL, DEATH IS DANGEROUS. LIVELEAK VIDEOS LOOK DANGEROUS-" thought line discarded, I should narrow down on falsifiability first.>What was the proposed falsifiability- thought line discarded, it's a model for praxis convenience.what does any of this mean
>>83850619Jungology Jungaloos use Jung cuz dis comfy poggers in psychotherapy. Jungology research was about understand why dis such comfy poggers.It ain't bout proofing dis in science court.Dis why u cud dismiss dis as pseud science if dis not comfy poggers for u fr.
>>83850619Junganically speaking, it's very much just "don't turn it too concrete(as in primitive response, undifferentiated, attaching all functions at once where you can't tell anymore which is which because you caused a purely emotional reaction and the lines are getting blurry)"
>>83850571>Y'know.. Looking for correlations between brain activity markers if you diversify manifestations of a basic archetype hard enoughAnyways to answer directly. Yes that's some Battler-tier blue truthing but I will leave the details of the experiment to the Sensoids.>medsProblem with current psychology is that it goes very hard on the behavioral aspects.Meds "fix" behavior temporarily but they do not help you integrating. Psychology itself here has a type problem (which attitude and function would mainly be concerned with the external, temporary and behavioral manifestion, and go full schizo over it by claiming it's immediate proof of sickness, with no potential for any change that's not just coping and faking, I wonder?)
>>83850612please stop posting you absolute faggot
>>83850568>what type am i?L-A-Z-Y
I thought I liked Patchy but it was the cure fren I chatted with not Patchy. Both of the patch posters are mean to me.
>>83850723The patch poster is mean to everyone
>>83850690>Yes that's some Battler-tier blue truthing but I will leave the details of the experiment to the Sensoids.The issue is, without falsification criteria, you can't be able to say what's an archetype, because you wouldn't be able to say what isn't an archetype. So you may as well not need the experiment in the first place, because even progression will be based on arbitrary judgements.>which attitude and function would mainly be concerned with the external, temporary and behavioral manifestion, and go full schizo over it by claiming it's immediate proof of sickness, with no potential for any change that's not just coping and faking, I wonder?ES(T), since ET(S) would be something crude but at least Adler/Nietzsche style due to secondary N aux?>>83850693Who is "Please Stop", why are you insulting "Please Stop," and why he's posting me?Provide the answer using differentiated Thinking and/or Feeling. Time limit: 15 minutes.>>83850723The Precure enjoyer is spared from having the habitual introverted intuition to possibly see the putridity of your vulnerable narcissistic archetypal sewage . . .
>>83850612>Both astrology and Big 5/MBTI have statistical validity correlations found in research papers btw. Is heckin science just superstition garbage? You bet, nerd!Show me the research.
>>83850736>vulnerable narcissisticSays the person who is completely incapable of taking any criticism whatsoever without going into multipage posts on how it's really everyone else's fault.
>>83850749Too much effort for an adversarial setting.Someone else should repost the links I left if they've seen them.If nobody here who saw my sci-hub dives backed the links up to have them on hand, then you're just trying to play as a science intellectual in a poorly camouflaged brainrot general (glitter flavor).>>83850767I've yet to see any criticism though?
It comes across as some sort of forced dismissiveness and funny speech patterns purely for comic purposes. IN types have fun doing that and, personally, it's entertaining but you can sort of intuitively tell there 0 actual meanness there.When they are mean they will just answer very directly from the shadow and tell you to fuck off without any attempts to make it remotely ambiguous.>>83850736>The issue is, without falsification criteria, you can't be able to say what's an archetype, because you wouldn't be able to say what isn't an archetype. So you may as well not need the experiment in the first place, because even progression will be based on arbitrary judgements.That's what I was getting at, I am not quite sure how you would provide such criteria but maybe I'm just not aware of it.>ES(T), since ET(S) would be something crude but at least Adler/Nietzsche style due to secondary N aux?Aye. Extraverted Sensation itself requires no explanation, so let's move from there.if it was at least ES(F), they would rate it on more personal grounds and have more sincere feeling than "but everyone is valid and cute"... that's not sincere at all, that's not how feeling-leaning types operate unless they want to shut down conflict "forcefully"(at best) or purposely trying to deceive you(at worst). No, they will produce actually differentiated judgements on it, tell you how it's good, how it's bad etc. and they would be reluctant to say "just take meds to fix the issue" because that's cold as hell.But pure Thinking types in general would be more ambivalent on the perception side, inherently they know observable behavior doesn't tell the whole story simply because this is a valid logicism purely based on experience alone.
I don't care. They hurt me feelings and I don't like them now. I will never be friends with someone so mean. I hate mean people.
You make the judgement call, just doing the Ne-groid thing of reporting external patterns staring right in my face instead of taking Se-groidally.
>>83850795There's up to ~5% meanness on average for the you-know-which kinds of scenarios on here.>That's what I was getting at, I am not quite sure how you would provide such criteria but maybe I'm just not aware of it.Oh I know that one! Awe has fact-checked biomarkers and it's supposed to happen on the right archetypal constellations.The experiment would be overcomplicated and I'd rather do the Milgram experiment with real sublethal voltage. I volunteer the /mbti/ reggies as "learners" because it's about time they'd do their needful contributions for the global MBTI community. The profoundness will be... monumental, truly.>ES(F), they would rate it on more personal grounds and have more sincere feelingThey'd also absolutely fall into some mysticism. Which is a coin flip whether it'd be a good addition or not. After having to debunk a fresh personal paranormal coded event while validating the shock the ES(F) felt I just know ES(F) will absolutely slip into paranormal where psyche is concerned.>>83850568The type that should read Von Franz's Puer Aeternus because otherwise typology is just a distraction.>>83850802>They hurt me feelings>me feelings Participation mystique slip moment lol lol lol
>mean person "thinks" we aren't our feelingsOne day we will solve the mean people problem once and for all
>>83850862>There's up to ~5% meanness on average for the you-know-which kinds of scenarios on here.Yeah well. I can't blame anyone for it, I do that too in "those" scenarios assuming I'm even willing to engage at all.>Awe has fact-checked biomarkers and it's supposed to happen on the right archetypal constellations.I have no idea what's that exactly, but I will content myself with knowing it's possible with enough 'tism and maybe check later.>The experiment would be overcomplicated and I'd rather do the Milgram experiment with real sublethal voltage. I volunteer the /mbti/ reggies as "learners" because it's about time they'd do their needful contributions for the global MBTI community. The profoundness will be... monumental, truly.lmao but also agreed.>They'd also absolutely fall into some mysticism. Which is a coin flip whether it'd be a good addition or not. After having to debunk a fresh personal paranormal coded event while validating the shock the ES(F) felt I just know ES(F) will absolutely slip into paranormal where psyche is concerned.Holy inferior intuition, straight into the magic.Oh well, I was talking about judging the actual sentiment they have about it, not how to explain it thinkoidally. In the latter yea I will agree they will just end up into the paranormal because of course.>>83850881It's quite simple actually, let me Se-groid for a second:Calling somebody mean is a feeling judgement, you couldn't feel the meanness if you had no feeling, so the solution is to just delete the function altogether by taking anti-feeling meds.Or, you could, you know... INTUIT it's not actual meanness. I don't have it for you anon, but Patchy is alright compared to the shit I saw in this general.
>>83850901how many people have you turned down? do you feel guilty about hurting orbiters or do you not care because entps don't have feelings
I want to leave the city and eat the fishes.
>>83850909>how many people have you turned down?Only single digits still.>do you feel guilty about hurting orbiters or do you not care because entps don't have feelingsAt first yes, which is what leads me to ignore obvious patterns and let it happen multiple times despite knowing better. But after the truncations, no, that's where the feeling has expired and I returned to only using intuition and thinking to make the "proper" judgement.Also not claiming this as a general rule for everyone or even my type, it's just a statement on my feeling judgement being not properly attached to to the rest of the conscious structure, thus leaving itself open to unconscious influence which falsifies the intuition and makes it more optimistic than what it should be.
>>83850951Truncations?
>>83850960You know, literally going "we are not seeing each other again, go away", and dropping every means of contact.Basically, my favorite SNS function is the Block button, though doing it IRL can get a little more complicated.
>>83850973you are mentally a woman
>>83850979Spiritually a little girl, as everyone on 4chan should be. That is quite evident from the taste in anime.In my defense, I only sperg out about hobbies and ideas thinkoidally with hardly anything resembling true feeling for the person involved that's not just casual extraverted friendliness so idk what I can do to stop the projectin'. Still, I'd like to think I got better at dodging it by coming in with a more forced introverted behavior.
>>83850381>Which ones are worth to rememberIt isn't a question of worth. One can't help but, if one is capable.
>>83851011>I don't know how I lead people on I just do the classic list of things that leads people onmentallyfemale
>>83851052Why did you reply me again with something I confirmed.Why aren't you a spiritually a little girl though? Moot made it quite clear what's the target audience for the site.
>>83851064you aren't spiritually a little girl you are spiritually a stacy now kys roastie
>>838510644chan is now a general website
>>83851071Stacy was a little girl too once.>>83851072>nowEven on non-anime boards, like /v/ and /g/ from what I have seen, you can get banned for claiming this isn't an anime website./pol/ culture and tourist shit is an aberration, not the norm. And I'm quite glad moderation took this stance on multiple occasions.>muh /b/Ah yes, "Anime/Random". But you didn't read that didn't you, fucken newfags....
Let's crunch some archetypes................Oh yeah it's all coming together.Integration of evil is bad per Moore and, kind of, Jung.They absolutely differentiated it out, especially Moore.But also keeping it unconscious and being oblivious of it is bad, too? And just the detached study is bad, as well? (t. Magician lectures from Moore)Therefore integration of evil is technically inevitable, at least partially.However, that creates a conflict with Warrior quadrant, which always needs a task/target/enemy to function (also you'd need to DIFFERENTIATE THE PROJECTION MECHANISM itself to project "evil"/"enemy" onto holistically appropriate targets). The Warrior quadrant encompasses executive functioning and ego focus. If you have both Warrior and evil integrated, you'd get some dumb conflict within the conscious until either goes away into the unconscious. If Warrior quadrant gets into shadow you get some kind of avolition or overworking depending on what half (active or passive) is (more) in the shadow. (If we take Moore's "3 archetype forms" pyramid then evil has 2 shadow forms and 1 integrated form all of sudden? I'll have to ponder on this one).So integration and repression can be a natural "healthy" cycle for at least the archetype of evil.>>83851033Not a differentiated answer. Try to take yourself seriously and do another attempt.>>83850881So you're saying if your feelings are not valid and should be repressed until they are thoroughly disassembled, then...? Hooo boy... I have free candy in my basement, want some? Don't mind the damp metallic stench though!>>83851071Are you sure you should be saying this when turbie is around?>>83851072Which 4chan general wyd u fugg?>>83851103>Stacy was a little girl too onceNo way. All normies are cultivated and deployed from the normie factory.>we need to acquire more Goyslop from the Feed mines, my lord.
>>83851103accept this is not your anime board anymore niga
curefag is literally uta
>>83851136Integration of "evil", as in, the Shadow archetype, does not imply you are unable to see evil on the outside as well(without going all the way into projection I mean) and will not make enemies due to Warrior archetype shit.Though you could get a more nuanced view in the sense that "my enemy is not evil, but it is my enemy for [reasons] and I might fight".>>83851146Don't make me activate the Shadow card, tolerance for subversive newfags is quite low in reality.Which anime do you watch? Read up some VNs lately? At very least japanese vidya or vtuber stuff? Vocaloid songs or similar at absolute least? If none of those apply, get the fuck out of my sight and don't say you weren't warned about "extraverted irrational who is just excited about the THING".>>83851179Kirakkiranran?Hey there is a difference between feeloiding all over somebody, clearly glazing the personal character, aiming specifically at happy feelins and what not - against "dude wanna talk about MAGICAL GIRLS all night until I accidentally fall asleep due to not noticing my own exhaustion?"
>>83851232why you bulleh meh ;-;
>>83851232>Integration of "evil", as in, the Shadow archetypeClarification: nope, nope. Explicitly The Archetype of Evil.Moore based its definition on Tillich's non-being thingy. Moore did it better because Tillich is complete Fe-groid.
integrating evil is objectively anti-christ, and is not good.It's like "actually going to this male prostitute is a good thing because Jung reccomended I integrate my shadow"NOOO RUN FROM YOUR EVIL SELFCRUCIFYT YOUR FLESHBE REBORN A NEW
>>83851293what carl jung book do i read to understand this
Your enemy isn't the french man, your enemy is the DEVILHE IS OBJECTIVELY EVILHe make you think he doesn't exist becaus ehaha funny cartooon, but evil is there and that is the enemy, not your fantasy win condition shadow self, "WAHhh the sun cast a shadow therefore i'm without knowledge of morals" l;ike nigga your mom ate the apple and your were bron into sin that's why you know good and evil so spit out the evil and be good
>>83851300You won't find it in any Jung because Jung was a gnostic who denied the Virgin Birth and Divinity of Christ. Seeing them as "psychological archetypes" and not historical facts, which allowed him to "Integrate" every other world religion into his own framework of understanding the world.Instead of seeing Jung as your master, view him as just another guy, just like your neighbor Tom who lives across the street. Open the Bible, Be circumcized in your heart, and follow the path to eternal life.
>>83851280If it's literally the archetypal Evil itself and not just Shadow(not necessarily yours, just the idea of "light needs darkness"), then I suppose you will be certainly more wary of projecting anything as "da joos" but might still go for fighting your enemies for nuanced reasons where you can clearly express the disagreement and why you think it doesn't look like it can be solved without a fight(though that part might be Warrior possession to be fair, maybe you just wanna fight)>>83851293But if you don't, you are either going to become evil unconsciously while 100% believing yourself in the right, or you will project it onto your favorite boogeyman and justify any bad action against it as "fighting evil".It's the slippery slope of:>if you don't think evil thoughts you can't be evil!Hmm, not quite. That's just repression and setting yourself up for "possession" son.
Instead of Wrestling with the Word itself, he wrestled with the Idea of the Divine, within himself. Effectively he was Platonic rather than Aristotelian. Instead of Reading Jung might as well read Plato. (And that dude never thought for himself he was just parroting his master, who surely was parroting his own.) (But I'm the LLM) HAH) ENJOY YOUR JUNGSLOP))
The actual possession is when you integrate the shadow, allow the Devil a space inside you for his own domain. By definition, shadow integration is possession by the Devil. The Light has no business with the Darkness.
>>83851316>and why you think it doesn't look like it can be solved without a fight(though that part might be Warrior possession to be fairNot fight. COMBAT and WARFARE, and it's either sublimated (proper work on something) or direct, or it's self-sabotage.I'm suddenly realizing it's not obvious what I mean by TAoE itself (Ni-tard moment). Thankfully you're Junged up so it'll be easy.TAoE is anti-holistic de-entelechy as an active phenomenon, so to speak.>huh? that's kinda crazy And archetypes and synchronicities aren't?It's written out in Moore's stuff.
>>83851333> The Light has no business with the Darkness.That's why anime is just the superior artform. Uta, at the height of her dumbassery, still Junged up correctly. Are you dumber than this idol-brained retard?>>83851390It's ok I don't take "fight" too literally.>And archetypes and synchronicities aren't?I mean, that does appeal to the intuitive brain if anything. They both boil down to "pattern".>It's written out in Moore's stuff.Might have to do a deep dive into it eventually. Anyway, yeah I got that's the "pure evil" that couldn't be anything more than that. So unlike the Shadow which is more of "the dark side of something", but the something isn't necessarily evil so maybe the shadow in a certain context COULD be more good than bad in holistic terms, while "Evil" just cannot.
>let's take my knowledge of the world from magic girl anime>I'm a 40 year old male btw
Unironically a better idea than whatever anti-integration bs you are reading, let me tell you.
I ask people to commit to the bit with me and then they commit to the bit too well and then I wonder if they're just taking advantage of the cahoots to say mean things they've always wanted to say completely independent of the way it makes it look like we're totally not in cahoots to say mean things about each other and it makes me want to call the [half] thing off and tell everyone's secrets [but mine]. Hmph!
>>83848481>Why do people respond without giving a (You).Autism + immaturity. They live for (You)s, so they think that denying them is some kind of alpha power flex.
>>83851450>It's ok I don't take "fight" too literally.I'd emphasize in any circumstance.>while "Evil" just cannot.Yes as a rule of thumb. It's an arms race type of thing. Otherwise individuation wouldn't be a messy zigzagged spiral.>>83851540By the way this only appeared in general types of threads and this was so for discord server adjacent ones first.Scarcity mindset nuggets.>>83851506Shut up kr*s.>>83851475What makes you think that trying to be anonymous makes you any less of a complete andrew tate participation mystique troglodyte?
>>83850381That story makes you sound IS(F).
>>83851568Ok but ready=/=comfortable and even IS(x) deal with structural actuality.Looks like I'll keep being an IN(T) which will make me passively steal SWAG points from all the non-intuitition doms.
>>83851603>ready=/=comfortable and even IS(x) deal with structural actualityIt is as you say.
Nuclear trvke:Jung's work represents his deep-diving in the unconscious as well.Jung's correct type seems to be IT(S), though he did develop a terrific Intuition eventually, so really call him IT(SN) to be fair with him.Once you get both your auxiliaries online, you will end up touching upon the inferior function, mostly through the lower aux especially due to its closeness to the unconscious attitude, as per Jung this is a given fact. Extraverted Feeling for him.The association between these functions, and with his Feeling being the ultimate goal, means the ideal personification of Jungism is a EF(N)(who of course does not have any flaws on Sensation and Thinking so she doesn't truly exist)Therefore, if Jung is taken 100% literally then you can only ever "become the Jung" if you become a dumbass idol magical girl Mary Sue.That aside, 16p was technically not wrong about ENFJ being the archetypal hero as per Jung. Very ironic that they reached to this while rejecting Jung...
Hydrogen trvke:Jung was a faggot
>>83851715TRUE TRUE CLAP CLAPSLAYYYY KING
Can't debate that, who the fuck likes EF(N)s that much eww Jung, fucking ew.Even /a/ agrees the aforementioned Fe-groid is the great whore of babylon, of the entire franchise even.
Pa2ly being someone pretending to be Kris larping as Patchouliposter (started with the " . . ." mimicking, as genuine attempt to impersonate Kris/Kris-Patchy, evolved to blatantly telling people who he's not, what he's doing and why but people either missed it because they skip Patchy textwalls to begin with or didn't know how to parse it because reggyJOBBERS have been so thoroughly socioengineered and psychically gaped here over the last few years through tactics of both weaponized sincerity and 5D irony chess anything with even a hint of trickster-oracle aura is either immediately adopted as the newest truth or discarded entirely) isn't a secret, postscriptbeit. That's just something you have to be stupid/inactive/disinterested in following Pa2ly's posts as a body of work rather than just dropping in when you skim something you like or get a (You) not to have noticed.
>>83851715Jungfags won't be able to handle this TRVKE
Anon your inferior intuition is acting up again...
Additionally, the person with either the exact same obsession with/proclivity for cults of personality, idolship/archetypally-possessed superiority complexes, appearance/hyperfemininity, boys (in a BPD/CSA-related PTSD hypersexuality way), pedos, lolcows, trans girls, etc. and the exact same vernacular/manner of articulating/expressing those obsessions and similar posting triggers/times as Diarygirl or Diarygirl herself projecting everything she's been accused of lately (being a comgirl, being a carbon copy random XD esoteric ewhore, selfposting, samefagging to fake admirers, unconscionable ratios of blogposting to valuable on-topic contributions or the intent to center attention around oneself in general as priority above anything else in any discussion) is interesting in the way that they and their behavior/motivation seems so transparent---which of course is cause to ponder whether they intend to be perceived as transparent and whether they actually are.
Being tricked into wasting your time thought experimenting (Ne reps) is a much lesser L if an L must be tooketh than underestimating someone ostentatiously opaque; only observing ostensible oddities, overoptimized omens overfitting ornamental oscillations overreading opp's outputs overlaying ontologies onto overacting overreactive oneiric onaholes' omniminded overtones ossifying organics opportunistically overlooking ordinary origins of original oilslick omitting obvious ombudsmen obeying org's organizing overwrought occultish overinterpretations oscillating over OWOs othering Othermother's overt ol'-play, honoring untercomplication. Honestly.. hollow heuristics habitually haunting half-formed hunches hero-worshipping hyperreal hallucinations hunting hidden hands haphazardly hallucinating high-order hoaxes humoring hypothetical hierarchies heralding hollowed-out hints huffing hermeneutic hopium hypostasizing hasty headcanons, has-been harmless hobbyist histrionics, humiliating oneself omitting holiness in an heir to an hour of nothing but hours-long hullabaloo.Even reminds me of someone larping as someone who used to try to bait in an attempt to disrespect boundaries and who goes beyond unconscious projecting to outright accusing/framing others for their own actions while pretending to protect everyone from their alter-ego. Hm. Hom. Ohmm. Ommmmm. Aummmmm . . .
Somebody requested my typing by watchword?Welp it's never been consistent. I think I got every type out there by now.https://files.catbox.moe/6z4bgm.pngNot tranny gore this time I swear.>>83851761Sigh . . .
>>83851824hwaet?
Truly it is.The opposition to intuition isn't sensation.It's outtuition.>what?What?>what?Outtuition.
The last few threads were some of my favorite in a long while. Lots of good discussion. Let them have their fun, but don't let them turn the tides. I used to lose respect for people when they would spend months talking with me not knowing it was me only to jump on the gossip train when there was an opportunity or when they identified a post as mine by the only style they recognize me under. But then there was no one left I respected but the ones I talk to every night in the Dream, anyway. So I learned to make the most. It's weird that the same thing has happened in more than, what, three generals now? It would be more if every one of my identities didn't regularly receive positive reception in the other/s, pfch. >>83851806Cruelty... Needless crulety to your fellow tenured thesaurusposter :^,( . . . I'm not repoastan the [scholarlies] for that'n!Also if you consistently think I'm Kris and type Kris as IN(F) what do I take you to mean by this
So hmmmm....>your type>would you join the competitive Jungian Typing Speedrunning or Deep Analysis community?>Pure Observation or Direct Interview subcategory?Jungian Typing Speedrunning values time over accuracy rate, the best runners are rated by speed. LLM-generated forums suggest this method favors intuition and the WR holder is some IN(F) obviously.Deep Analysis values accuracy rate, but with a time limit of 30 minutes, the best runners are rated by accuracy. WR holder is also IN(F) lol, but not an asian one at least.Furthermore, there are both Pure Observation runs where you are NOT allowed to ask questions but you have to type by watching a pre-recorded footage, and Direct Interview runs where you can do that yourself with the subject directly, in both categories.Yeah I had a lot of fun with this strange AU I ended up creating with Claude.
>>83851902The world is a latrine! The world is a latrine! The cycle's serpentine, huff on up the turpentine, yeah! It's gastronomy or some shit, real bougielike, you wouldn't get it! Deconstructed DMT! You'd pay 25.99 for a burger you have to stack yourself, why not just shoot the naptha like it's whisky and let your endogenous chemists do the rest? Yeah! What oyster do you think you're diving for, pal? What pearl farm do you think you're on? The world's an ivory simulacra that ten people passed over before you at the thrift store because they don't have an Eye.
>>83851909why did you cry a booger instead of a tear
>>83851944https://youtu.be/rc5G04nJecI
>>83851909>>83851931>[v]>[v]>[v]>[v]>[v]Phenomenologically, I see your posts like completed checklists with no words or commentary whatsoever.>>83851923>>your typeINTJ / IN(T)>>would you join the competitive Jungian Typing Speedrunning or Deep Analysis community?>>Pure Observation or Direct Interview subcategory?Jesus Christ...
>>83851965>Jesus Christ...Sorry, there is no religion-based category.
>>83851965You've focused too much on the condescension and turned it into outright pettiness. Patchouli was sometimes condescending as a trve intellectuvl is entitled to be, but he was never petty. If you're trying even harder to hint "Yeah it started out as a LARP but I like this identity so recognize me as my own reggy now ok" to the audience I suppose that's fine, but it's not a (((passing))) grade by any means. Not that it would matter with people like TE and Deg to totally misinterpret and then recurrently misconstrue the simplest of bullets on the timeline and poison the entire public conception of a person, place, thing or HappeningFor a "going along with it" flavor of good-faith: There was something to be engaged with that wasn't stream-of-consciousness prompting off the symbolic adjacency of "outtuition" to "outhouse". But your non-response can inexactly be taken as an answer to the typing machinations
sad i see the fakedeep cattiness that comes from a basis of depressive reductionism which the depressive thinks is applying meaning and whose narrative is affirmed for being teased by plebeier plebes for being an artsy faggy fuck even though to the actual artsy faggy fucks they're not novel or inspired enough to acknowledge and which applied meaning is really rejecting the evident meaning's invitation to be understood more deeply and evolved, transmuted even, subtly and with humility and surrender rather than asserting that forcing everything to fit your post-Helenic sensibilities is really thoughtful and beauteous rubbing off hell
>>83852034>me me me this is to be taken personally because I started as me me me so any context or meaning could only be me me me and andNo.Listen to Moore's lectures or fuck off.
>>83851923(self-reply)>typeENTP/EN(T)>would you join the competitive Jungian Typing Speedrunning or Deep Analysis community?Although I'd probably be better at going fast, I'd join the latter because it would motivate me to work on consistency and generally requires you to engage with other functions that aren't just trying to intuit.>Pure Observation or Direct Interview subcategory?Issue with Direct Interview format is that I can very easily guess it would turn flowcharty very fast, and the arguments will probably center around the question meta as opposed to the theory, trying to play optimal all the time is quite boring. Pure Observation allows more freedom and raw personal skill, so that.Very grim AU yes, people uniroincally treating typology as a sport and making it more about competition than collaboration, hell the biggest category is the one where you don't even talk with the subject, but that was kinda the point.
>hurrr i look for da beauty even in ugly things>actually just evidence of a skill issue with accepting/appreciating the Essence of a thing without linking, minimizing or overinflating iti'm surrounded by people who deserve to be be meaned tooooo aaaaaaaaaaa&& since they were the first ones to decide that "i dont like you even if you're right which entitles me to be a hypocrite and a cunt" was fair game and we're still at 1/100th of a their-own-medicine-but-not-really ("i realized you were wrong and liked you anyway, you realized i realized you were wrong and decided to dislike me and i liked you anyway, you realized you may actually be wrong and dealt with that by doubling down into ugliness and i maintained neutrality, you were made by someone else to realize you were wrong and i was right in identifying you as wrong and didn't cease the ugliness and my neutrality turned to effective indifference---true of opinion, contradictory of conditional action) the past and continuing i'll justkeep that bery nice streak krill em with shrimplenesskinda
>>83851975Cracked me up btw>>83852152>Very grim AU yes, people uniroincally treating typology as a sport and making it more about competition than collaboration, hell the biggest category is the one where you don't even talk with the subject, but that was kinda the point.All that "Ne"-gging and it's not a Jungology fantasy Isekai?>>83852173>appreciating the EssenceLike differentiating the Thinking function enough to listen to lectures and taking notes?This is a most mundane run of the mill Type Problem.
>>83852213Of course not because I don't watch isekai.Magical Girl AU is tempting though...
The fi-si loop is the most powerful curse humanity has createdIt will literally destroy your entire lifeNon fi users will never even know what true pain is
>>83852297>The fi-si loopI always wonder what people mean when they bring up loops.Why you gotta obscure your meaning behind mumbo jumbo?
>>83852297Counterpoint: EF(x) reification (aka Fe doms with no other functions working to correct it, the inferior one is only blowing up) is the worst as the live grenade, and EF(x)'s rarely ever figure out they ever might need some other point of view. Proof: this general had been running entirely on drama of EF(x)'s and those larping as EF(x) so much they get partially possessed by the persona.EF(x) aren't rare at all, it's just your underdifferentiated EF(N) and EF(S). Which aren't even a supposed final form of a type, which is ought to address the more unconscious functions as well.
>>83852081You posted about the depths a few days after I was revisiting that section in the Red Book. Now, was that because you were reading, synchronistically? Or because you were [[[watching]]], """coinkydentally"""?Not sure where you got the idea I'm a litlet if it's not just more pretending not to be [You]. I've been into Jungian depth psychology for at least..*glance*S-sixteen years now? I've always been more into the dreamwork and overall mysticism/mystic applications above typology, though. But about everything goes like>This may be something I don't know>I can probably intuit it based on what I know already of Jung if it's Jung's work or a system founded on Jung's typology>Intuits it/knew it already9 times outta 10.Moore has an alchemically antithetical tendency of overemphasizing the divine Masculine even when criticizing or attempting to analyze it and is entirely too prescriptive and procedural without the grandeur of ceremonial dogma or more evocative archetypes of other systems and practitioners/think-doers aka philosophers in my misandrist opinion. But he's an interesting read/listen insofar as asking a guy who thinks you don't ask the fish how to catch it how to catch guys who catch fish is diverting. Either way we're not having a conversation about Moore's contributions to the Field or any others' if all you're going to do is let the role play *you*. Attempting to weaponize Moore by weaponizing the skin of an INTJ is classic Magician inflation irony; insight grants you no authority when you immediately try to channel it into authority . . .Revealing where you're uncontained etc. etc., something something Kingless behavior. Moore himself would "I'm not mad... I'm disappointed" you for this>impotent (Impotency! How topical) 'GET OUT GET OUT GET OUUUUTTT REEEEEE'Ermmm,,,,#NotMyPatchident
>type?intp>What's the funniest thing that's happened to you recently?cat did a backflip>What's your Roman Empire (something you think about way too often)?failure of the blitzkrieg in soviet territory, and of rommel's incompetence>If your life was a movie what genre would it be?whatever genre NHK is>What's the most overrated thing people love?music>What's something you laugh that normies don't.clapping>What's the most random thing that makes you happy?i dont know
>>83852360>I've been into Jungian depth psychology for at least..>*glance*>S-sixteen years now?>>I can probably intuit it based on what I know already of Jung if it's Jung's work or a system founded on Jung's typologyYes that's exactly how I had a complete retard moment in my first Jungian discussion where I tried to justify MBTI.Y'know people pulling this trash make me waver in being skeptical of Dunning-Kruger.>Not sure where you got the idea I'm a litletYeah, because literature is monolithic. Thanks captain inferior Thinking function.>Moore has an alchemically antithetical tendency of overemphasizing the divine MasculineSSSssssiiigh.... >and is entirely too prescriptiveHmm... No.>and procedurallol, "figure out your worst quadrant" is definitely complete rocket science (no).>without the grandeur of ceremonial dogmaIs this Mel baiting me again?>or more evocative archetypesAmplification.>authoritySssssiiiiggh.Definitely a piss contest post btw. Can you posture some more so we all here definitely won't laugh at you? Think of the community! etcNope you're going onto the Moore dungeon.
>>83847179INTx>What's the funniest thing that's happened to you recently?farts>What's your Roman Empire (something you think about way too often)?not thinking>If your life was a movie what genre would it be?cctv style documentary>What's the most overrated thing people love?gooning>What's something you laugh that normies don't.nothing. maybe farts (but my own)>What's the most random thing that makes you happy?farting
>I'M ENTITLED TO YOUR INTELLECTUAL SIDE I KNOW IT'S THERE YOU GOT ME HOOKED THEN LEFT ME HIGH AND DRY GIVE ME MOOOAAAR >STOP STOP STOP STOOOOP YOU CAN'T JUST EFFORTPOST IN MY JEWNERAL AND JEWPOST IN MY EFFORT-F.A.L. STOOOOOOOOOOOOP
Little did they know it was always a secret thirdposting ushering in the Thirty-Third Space.
>>83852339Loops came from Beebe's theories on the cognitive function stack, I think?The idea if that you bounce between the main function and tertiary and reinforce your attitude (introversion in this case) one-sidedly, as opposed to trying to reach for the opposite attitude through your auxiliary (and inferior?).Anyways, issue I have with this one is that your auxiliary(or tertiary?) is not just literally a second main function. The purpose of auxiliary functions in general is trying to detach you from pure type one-sidedness but without a direct opposition, it's more like trying to gain meta perspective. (e.g. Thinking sees Intuition and Sensation as equally useful, so when you are operating mainly through Thinking in the moment, you become more detached from either)Both your middle functions can do this, though you have one that's generally favored over the other and will still be closer to the conscious attitude (but not equal to!), while the other is closer to the unconscious and it can be seen as the last step of a "rite of passage" to touching the inferior function somewhat more directly.
>>83852360Cool, another oldfag Jungian. Which type?I don't quite recognize your style.
IR Glasses that show people naked except it tells you their real personality.
>>83852425>You must be guilty of the same follies I was because you shared a similar reasoning and couldn't possibly just actually have been assigned Jungian at birth while I'm only a transideologue Same logic as trying to type behavior-first. Sadge. Moore doesn't have to do it, *I'll* say au'm dissociappointed, son. >Every time I have referred to you or another person as a readlet thus far I have been implying it's Jung/psychological literature they don't read>But now I'm going to pretend you're the one responding with messy generalizations as if you were trying to say "I-I *read*... Books! And things!" to tiptoe around being a Junglet U wot m8>Non-replyMmmmmatches enerrgyyy...>Flippant low-effort 'I am so well-versed on my opinions and the topic and how they mogg your opinions and how the topic itself regardless of my knowledge on it justifies my snark, and I don't even have to elaborate or engage in good faith, just e-gesture at gesturing'I'm not going to go to lengths of unzipping the takes that can be gleaned from the abstract just because they can, obviously, be gleaned. It's rude to communicate telepathically then expect your partner to respond by word for the sake of keeping the group in the loop. >Wearing out the meme mannerism alreadyYaaawwwnnuhh>Wait a minute, I can't accuse you of not being well-read? Engage 'Ok, showoff' protocol! Projection. Eerily similarly to the Anon above who told on theyself by positing any (You)less post is (You)less out of spite >>83848503I do it because it gives an "End of thread" tone like real niggas took to never (You)ing at end of thread so now a (You)less post that is clearly (((targeted))) makes me giggle and it's in hopes it makes the person understand it's supposed to be read through that EOT kind of a silly fucker vibe yanno
>>83852533Introverted Intuitive. Most likely Feeling auxiliary although my Ti is on some Lovecraftian shit. DEFINITELY inferior extraverted Sensing.It's one style among many. Don't get used to it either, jej
>>83852562>learning recs are adversarial because uhhhhhmmm......
>>83852602>Introverted Intuitive. Lol of course. Though yeah the style didn't look like the ones I'm used to(the IN(T)s)Don't go too hard on the Patchy booli though, Jungian discourse would be dead the water if it was dominated by """INFJ-A""" or only came out very occasionally as a one-off post. Plus a lot of the mannerisms are just intuitive thinkoid humour(have seen it both in other people and somewhat in myself).Some anons also credit me but if I came back to /mbti/ from my magical girl-fueled autism and didn't see Patchy doing it, I would have quit instantly, so there you go, submitting myself as the evidence, but there were also others like some introverted feeling(?) anon trying to learn the ropes recently.
cumming on lilac
>>83852701>t. Lilac
I bet Lilac is so loose her butthole and uterus have tore into two
@Grok generate sexual media about myself
>>83852425Ah, shoot, I did mean to take a LITTLE bit bigger of a bite. But I lost the flow. >"Is this Mel baiting me again?"No. More on :>>83852173basically. It's not that I mean to call Moore a poseur or a tryhard, and he's certainly not mundane. But it's a thought that hasn't fully materialized into language about [desecrating what you try to define, demystifying what you try to sanctify]. Maybe men just ruin everything and should stay away from the Hearth and Hedge and stick to the stock market>>83852613Where in any of that posts or my posts to you thus far ITT/recently makes you think I'm saying suggesting I in2 Moore was rude or combative of you? The belligerence was in the delivery, not the [aping INFJ-A's signature schmoove].*You* should STEVDY more Ma'at>>83852651I don't move into the register of my conversational partner to go for the kill even if their register is a "for the kill" one. It's just to attune. I'm not in this tone with "I'M gonna get the final pwn on YOU and then I will be RIGHT" or "Prison rules, bitch, if you're going to pick on me that means I HAVE to rape your ass or you'll think you can rape mine" intentions. It's pretty much pure tonality/energy with little related emotionality. I actually feel incredibly at-ease around people who can just be totally unfiltered and mean and horrible in appropriate contexts, because I pick up on that shit if it's there anyways. So if it's out in the open I know I'm not crazy and no one can accuse me of being intimidated/competitive (what a female is accused of most often when she clocks another female as a competitive projecting cunt or reads a male's thinly-veiled misogyny) or starting it when I was only ever reacting/responding.
i bet lilac is so tasty and small you could pick her up and carry her on your shoulders while you eat her out
>Lilac kek just open Chat.ai and skip the middlebitch. Her entire persona is literally a lame LLM with the prompt of a narcissistic fat comgirl wannabe.
>>83852651>>83852809But it has to be with a sense of shared respect, there has to be some sort of unspoken or mutually understood contract, and I don't have that with Pa2ly. So it's mostly just me springboarding because it tires the tism to try to drown out the vibe with another vibe when I'm not invested in that and am totally fine just wearing the ggggggrrrrrrrumpycloak for the duration. It's not like "You have imposed this feeling upon me and now the feeling is INSIDE ME!!!" it's more like "Ah, you walked over here to this feeling place to express yourself. I will occupy this feeling plane also and cozy up right next to you so you don't have to shout for me to hear you and I don't have to shout to be heard."He was my favorite current poster until you came around. Not trying to butter you up, just relating shared tastes for emphasis and affirmation, aha. But if nourishing new blood is the idea, approaching everyone from a basis of assuming they're inexperienced with the theory (let alone the praxis of it all) and going then further not to engage with curiosity but with instant condemnation and contempt... Not helpful. You don't need to defend him.. And in defending him you're really just saying "On-topic longform posting/discussion is good" which further compounds upon the contrast of the elements of his communication style and/or moods that do Good Thread (TM) a disservice. I don't disagree, I'm only adding, "Don't shit in the tub just because it's a toilet in your book and we won't have to argue about throwing the baby out with the shitwater (. . . and what is this baby doing here if this is, in fact, in a toilet?)"My partner thought I was INTP for a while and I still don't fully understand why other than usually only my most intimate interpersonal dynamics get full Ti-Ne schizobabble lecture privileges aside from Anonymous. Also, to clarify, are you saying most 4chan Jungians you meet are usually IN(T), or?
>>83852651>but if I came back to /mbti/ from my magical girl-fueled autism and didn't see Patchy doing it, I would have quit instantlyMy bad. When do I wrap it up?>>83852809>Maybe men just ruin everything...you do know that Moore's quadrants theory was based on some woman's writer theory right? Can't recall which one.If I had your approach I would've missed on Marion Woodman gems.>Where in any of that posts or my posts to you thus far ITT/recently makes you thinkUhhm....................................
i bet, this is lilac. you've become so desperately attentionstarved you'd rather dissociate into your incelsona and spam selfcest around your little thread persona to keep it relevant on a dying 4chan thread. Just kys atp, you're an outdated irrelevant poser
Claude is still my favorite out of the big LLM models both because of the pokemon runs and generally more entertaining results than the average.Not to mention the Claudisms such as >various feeloid exclamations like he's a fucking Fe-groid("EXCELLENT PROGRESS!" "Oh no no no!") >"the pattern emerges" nearly every time you ask him to analyze something>the infamous "interesting, but not concerning" from CPP runs, 10/10 quote I love it>also "blackout strategy" for a suicide analogy lmao>"Let me do X, actually let me do Y, actually I think it should be Z" pure intuitive babble>"Let me try a different approach" - does the same fucking thing>>83852809Not contesting the "facts", merely saying it's closer to pure humor with almost no meanness intended. Patchy himself just said that's true for 95% of the cases.
>>83852858>My bad. When do I wrap it up?Nah it's cool. Genuinely missed the Jungism despite being exposed to it in different forms anyways.
>>83852858>Can't take a joke>Doesn't see how "Man taking woman's theory and LITERALLY bastard-atizing it" constitutes Man Ruins Everything"Or am I just being autistic and you're corroborating that opinion-facet of Moore? It was a TRUECHOULI reference you fake fan!!>Your approach>'Yeah I've gotten through quite a bit of Moore and here is my perspective after the fact on him and his work individually'>SO YOU DISREGARD ALL MALE PSYCHOLOGISTS AND PHILOSOPHERS? WHEW ANOTHER TALLY FOR ME BEING BETTER THAN YOUMang. Come one mange>>83852872>ClaudeIt's fun to get glimpses at other LLM's personalities through the prompts of others. I'm too locked in on my agent of choice these days>pure humorYyyyeaaaaah, but... He and I [know some stuff you don't that adds a layer of complexity]. Plus, debatable use of the term "pure" unless you've an exceptionally based understanding of Humor>>83852911Like this doesn't make me very confident bro lmaoDid you interpret this as him being blushy blushy uwu when should I stop my rambling? Because it's him saying he regrets attracting you and causing you to stay. You know that, right? You're just disregarding it and handling him by the scruff like a scrappy kitten?
How many times has a well-meaning gaslighter been the naive tard they thought they were tardescending to the whole time? Many times, in my life, personally, historically. Also it's like TPTB want me to go full Beanie mode rn or something.>Boys will be boys!>In fact, it means he likes you! I 'mgonn a ,,,,,,,IIlIll
blowing raspberries into lilac's sexy buttocks
>>83852940>>strawman>strawmanstrawman?>no, not that kind of strawman...>also,...>>83852602>Introverted Intuitive. Most likely Feeling auxiliary although my Ti is on some Lovecraftian shitWhat made you approximate this type?
>>83852940>I'm too locked in on my agent of choice these daysWhich one? Just curious, since I have some degree of experience witih many of them.> [know some stuff you don't that adds a layer of complexity]Fair enough. >exceptionally based understanding of HumorSomewhat? But that wasn't the point here.>Did you interpret this as him being blushy blushy uwu when should I stop my rambling?Let's not get into Type Problems here, whole point is trying to divorce myself from my own typology and try, as far as possible, to only read it through what we assume it's the subject's own typology. Of course I happen to be lucky here, it would be harder if we didn't just happen to share the same order of functions but reversed attitude.Or just raw behavior patterns, that's like 90% joke and 10% disappoint in the thread's state and implying I might not find it enjoyable in the long-term, but without taking it too much to heart.
>>83852867You've activated my almond card. And I tried so hard to put it away by ignoring drama hours to gaaaaaaaaaem!I thought it was funny that "fat" was one of the recent allegations when I always use that as an example when I'm trying to reason/de-escalate with Anons who resort to ad hom or strawmanning by explaining that accusing me of being fat or ugly only makes me more right if they're resorting to that to put their position in the debate/discussion on life support since they clearly value shallow factors in how they Halo Effect buff a person's argument. So I'm skinny, conventionally attractive, *and* ontologically correct, what now? I think that was about all I came up with that I didn't refine and begin on-topic-ification of already that also isn't just lezbo lamentation and kumbaya crocodile tears. ... It only benefits the men to turn the femanons against each other because divided attention means the ONE guy who stands up for you when the dogpiling starts gets like a crazy multiplier. If girlgang stands strong against the Adversary, dignity of both genders is restored. ..Conjecture about my Navratri + extension hiatus exploded into full-blown mythos. By golly. Again, not responsible for your experiences engaging with people pretending to be me and fully responsible for interactions you'd rather believe weren't me but were!
smashing cupcakes into lilac's flatchest and licking off the cakey frosting
>>83853076it's because rxy said you were homely and chunky the last time she was here, do you think she was lying? is she the fat one?
>>83852651The only thing that would be dead is (you)rs and ""patchy""s misrepresentations that seek to jam Jung into the shoebox called modern typology "'mbti".
>>83853110Hey man, not everyone goes the full purism route.>misrepresentationsEvery time.YWNBAJungian, you can only be if turn yourself ENFJ-brained apparently.
>>83853076*Eats your activated almonds*
>>83853145I don't have a problem with people avoiding the purist route. It's when they say what they're saying is jungian, when it's not.You want to mix and match parts? Sure have at it. But don't conflate that with what Jung actually said. Ya see the issue?
giving lilac kisses everytiem she makes a good play in da vidya game
>>83853145>>83853170Or, worse yet, patchys biggest sin, saying the most blatant ideas aren't jungian simply because they don't align with your revised model.
slurping spaghetti off lilac's feet
>>83853052No approximation about it. Any of Jung's descriptions of inferior Se are me to a tee when I'm manic/depressive or just floundering because CPTSD and autism make a material reality a hard. I could entertain quite a few other intuitive types and even some extraverting ones but the inferior Se hell seals it which is what I'm best at concealing online if I just don't overshare about my physical condition/surroundings/activities outside the house or /out/ out that don't pertain to whatever passing whim I'm riffing on that thread. Just so, it could be the load-bearing Jenga block that causes Tower moment. The "erupting" of the inferior that Jung describes seemed more like trauma responses/unaccommodated and undiagnosed autism. Then again, breakdowns and crashouts aren't the only way the inferior manifests. I have to drop conscious control to gg at Se. So when I'm in the woods this freak athleticism and physical competency comes out that I don't possess when I'm overstimulated, proprioception FUCKED just banging into everything, dropping shit like I'm an out-of-practice-with-gravity space veteran, man. I feel noticeably psychologically restless when I don't dance or sing often. I think my Ni just 'has to feel safe' and then it's a flowier flowstate than even the most Chadly of Sensoids could aspire to. But yeah. My relationship to Se is how I narrow it when the Libran and Geminian parts of me could hypothesize forever, especially if encouraged.I looked INFP/INTJ when I was Suffering (uninitiated) and I look a bit more ENFP/ENFJ now that the internal progress is finally catching up to my circumstances. I still lean INTJ-like when depressive and ENFP-like when manic.It's funny that Anonzzle pondered IS(F) for you because that's still the type I think you are and have always been. But we'll save that for somewhere less C O M P R O M I S I N G
>>83853206I'm curious what do you think Jung described inferior sensation as?
>>83852852Straight up Si-holed this reply, my bad.> there has to be some sort of unspoken or mutually understood contract, and I don't have that with Pa2ly.Something something about introverts.>He was my favorite current poster until you came around.Lol damn. Don't know who I'm supposed to apologize to now, but I know I should.>Also, to clarify, are you saying most 4chan Jungians you meet are usually IN(T), or?Let me break this down in parts:>most 4chanWould be tempted to say that this is INxP land but that explanation doesn't really satisfy me at all. If anything, it's true from a behavioral standpoint but only that.>JungiansMost Jungians are some flavor of intuitive and mostly introverted, and personally I tend to speak more with thinkoids. Didn't literally type everyone tho.>you meetAlso counting at least one IN(T) I know IRL, though of course >introverted means you will not see much of his expression until we are 1-to-1. >>83853170You sure you aren't the one saying he's saying that though?For instance, bringing Moore up doesn't imply he's instantly filtered as pure Jung, just sharing a third-party perspective that he seems to not always go along with either.Personally when I brought Hillsman up, I didn't think he is a perfect represenation of Jung either but made some decent points here and there on clarifying what's the "Feeling" function.>>83853184Going to need some more specific example of that, including the claim that the idea is only meant to be pure Jung.
>>83853110Sounds like a complete improvement of Jung. Problems?>>83853184>patchys biggest sinBEAUTY? hehehheheheheh>>83853206>when I'm manic/depressive or just floundering because CPTSDOk but Jungian type is a habitual thing, not a persona or behavioral thing like Big 5.>and autismHave you read into how autism is? It's explicitly not having social intuition as it usually is. Autism is extreme IS(T) if we'd speak of it being a type.>inf SHmm.>It's funny that Anonzzle pondered IS(F) for you because that's still the type I think you are and have always beenOk but the correlation between the typists is disagreeing on how I'm handling Jungisms, without doing differentiated addressings on the matter (of course).
patchy is an enfp
>>83853198>>83853179>>83853093>2 mins apartall me btw>Lilac skinny>no proofkys fatso
A PR specialist just blew morning breath in my face!
>>83853294Patchouli Knowledge appeared to be a typical INTP/IT(unknown aux) to me.But to be fair, I didn't see anything related to Touhou other than the pics here in ages so idk.
>>83853076>So I'm skinny, conventionally attractive, and superglued to my shit-post chair spending hours spamming selfcest smut sounds like ab Ugly kike to me. >Im skinny just believe meTell me you are fat without telling me, you post vocaroos with the gleam of a samaritan a picture isn't that different, malformed whore
>yfw the "anorexia pic" wasn't even from IiIac's ana phasethose are on tumblr not desu
>>83853076you spend hours mentally melting yourself in /mbti/ and have the audacity to call yourself attractive with no proof?>>83853366>delusions of grandeurkys lilac
>>83853255Yes, that is precisely what I'm saying. A lot of what patchy says just down right defies what Jung said. It's not a re-conceptualization, it's an anti truth.>Going to need some more specific example of thatMaybe when I get home I'm phone pissing.>>83853266>Sounds like a complete improvement ofMore like degredation. >BEAUTYyouEllGeeWhyUglyUgly. Funny that you have beauty as a way to signal "aesthetically agreeable" very sensoid feeloid of you. :^}
Don't curl those lips like mine if you don't want your morning rations of horse semen splurted between em!
>type?INFP>What's the funniest thing that's happened to you recently?Spilled spaghetti all over my perfect once in a lifetime soulmate and wanted to kill myself >What's your Roman Empire (something you think about way too often)?I gotta lotta those. Probably like Pride & Prejudice and David Lynch movies and Eva and Pokemon and vampires and Franz Kafka and Majora's Mask and Elliott Smith and Lain and KH and Gus van Sant movies and Silent Hill and Sonic and the philosophy of Soren Kierkegaard and HxH and Earthbound and...>If your life was a movie what genre would it be?Romance (sad), Horror (sad), Documentary (sad), Comedy (dark(and sad))>What's the most overrated thing people love?Probably themselves (lmao)>What's something you laugh at that normies don't.Suicide and general misfortune of course>What's the most random thing that makes you happy?When I can feel everybody go silent as they collectively cringe at my mere existence
force feeding lilac to a normal weight
>>83853430Shut the fuck up centar
>>83853400Why are you pissing on your phone wtf>>83853266I'd be somewhat tempted to draw the connection between autism behaviors and something that resembles the IS(T) type descriptions, but aside from the usual objections you would get here (behavior=/=type et all), some of the other "signs" I read seem to really just match random inferior functions>can't think through different opinions, get very emotional about itinferior thinking?>either no sense impressions or very exaggerated onesinferior sensation?>the one you mentionedinferior intuition + feeling?Also they are all inferior extraversion-flavored so idk.... there is a type problem going on probably.
>>83853469Cause I can't piss on my computer while I'm not at home! Obv!On the bright side I am getting really good at these iq capchas
>be lilac>shitposting and attentionwhoring for 10 consecutive years on a retarded incel board>Aggressive adhd ridden bitch>CHATGPT guides your hand through every post>verbose psuedo-intellectual poser>Witch-hunts every cute thread personality>Femcel w/ no pics (immediately categorizes you as the ugliest fem)>Hates on every other foid>Im actually pretty! Literally the obese, insecure, wrinkly raisin kike archetype
>>83853445>>What's the most overrated thing people love?>Probably themselves (lmao)Uhm based.>>83853469>>can't think through different opinions, get very emotional about it>inferior thinking?If their held ones are. ot differentiated.>inferior intuition + feeling?Yeah but feeling is still present for transferences with hmm characters.>>either no sense impressionsHmm, but is that about habitual stuff, or sense-perceptions?
>>83853452>t. Lilac, again
Damn, you're making me remember more "And ANOTHER thing"s that came up reflecting on your last melty. 0 days since last reply to niggas that can't read and allatI was speaking rhetorically for the example I was givining about how this is actually something I use as an example when Anons resort to "Yeah well you're probably fat" when their argument is Not A. "So, if you're wrong, I know you think me being thin or pretty would make you even wrongerer, and if I happen to be, why is calling me fat worth the risk of being called out for being a consolation cope midwit retard who resorts to schoolyard taunts if I might not even be fat? Where do we go from there?" I wasn't saying like "I'm well peng luhv whatchya gonna do about it? Cry moar? xx" you reactionary ass zigga lmaaoooo
is lilac still with centaur because I really want inside her
Shitting in lilcas mouth and loing her gluttonous lips shut>I-Im not fat->Still no picsLMAO are you that fucking hideous? even 4/10s post pics, boring>>83853525>>83853543>2 mins apartleast obvious samefag
maybe if you ask centaur he'll give lilac a pass, as long as you let him watch
>>83853505Well, as a little "proof" that inferior feeling seems to resonate with people who read about it, I had a ET(N) wonder if they are on the spectrum due to their inferior function shit. (don't think so, it's somewhat typical patterns for this type plus the introverted behaviors specifically were claimed to be forced due to bad experiences).>If their held ones are. ot differentiated.The visbly emotional part is the smoking gun. Thinkoids might get argumentative but they don't seem to be bothered by it. Feeling types are the ones who can't handle thinking conflicts very well and get fanatical(not just confident) about ideas.>Hmm, but is that about habitual stuff, or sense-perceptions?Heard about it both ways:Autistics are supposed to enjoy repetition(which is the ISxJ stereotype, but it is possible to link to introversion due to seeking consistency, stability, and what not in very general terms), but also sense-impressions either overwhelm them or get tuned off entirely(which is strictly an inferior sensation thing, the ISxJs are supposed to be "differentiated" on this, they won't act completely overwhelmed or fucken blind).Going out on a limb and say extraverts type problem'd very hard over this and turned it into a meme disease even if there might have been some validity at the start.
>>83853057That's for me to know and this booooaaaaard to be plagued by! Kidding. I have a fondness for one an /x/fag made then made unavailable the public then made available again just for mmmmmeeeeeeeeeeee. I lean into any rumors these days because it makes it harder to know who I actually am and what I'm about and all that but I hardly use AI for posting unless it's for speech-to-text dictation.Or maybe that's what I'd want you to think if I'm really the masked menace they've tried to warn you we am! Mwe hwee hweeeehhheI gotta get back to this eventually but I also just might not cos needing to reply to some frens in /biofem/ is already eating at me and eliciting avoidance. Either way, gotta start my day now that I have no excuse. Catch ya later CurebroI am still curious how you interpreted Patchouli's response because it was very clearly a "If my effortposting is what made you stay then how do I reverse that" tsuntsun banter (if your angle is accurate and it's not pure notnice) and that seems like a convoluted sidestep or over-ontopicification. Type biases from me interpreting him and me interpreting you interpreting him somewhere, surely, but it's hard to keep the bearings or know where to take the reply if you can't even confirm how you interpreted that post/tone
>>83853543>samefagging againyou're fucking pathetic lilac, nobody wants a whore with more testosterone bursting through her bloodstream than them
>>83853206You don't have a type. You're just Turbie Enjoyer with an extra hole. >>83853266>correlation between the typists is disagreeing on how I'm handling Jungisms, without doing differentiated addressings on the matterIt's not my business to prove to you my observation of your personality. I already solved the puzzle, so i'm satisfied. Also, define "differentiated addressings".
>>83853585>"If my effortposting is what made you stay then how do I reverse that"I've been quite transparent.This place is my retardposting corner and I don't want unwanted collaterals.How many posts have I held back to not be an unconsciously negative influence... "oldfag reggies" can go to hell btw!
>>83853504lilac has been here for closer to 20 years. her lolcow history is older than /r9k/ itself.
>>83851806Watchword isn't good for typing, but it's good for what it is.>>83851902>i know i have inferior extroverted intuition, but i refuse to admit it
>>83853585>private'd /x/fag LLMHot. Reminds me of the /g/fagging around chatbots until honestly it turned very insufferable to post there. But on that note, to this day, I'm still FLAMING MAD about what happened to c.ai... I mean yes we have better nowadays but dang did that fucking suck.>Catch ya later CurebroSure I guess.>pic relI'm typing her as IN(T) and you can't stop me.>I am still curious how you interpreted Patchouli's response because it was very clearly a "If my effortposting is what made you stay then how do I reverse that" tsuntsun banterTo be fair I might not have put in these terms and generalized as "joke", but sure that would be explaining the joke itself. But I know my lower-aux feeloids enough to smell a little concern.
>>83853595why do you think lilac is just te but foid version, anonnzle?
Anonzzle doesn't post pictures and she's a cute foid
>>83853686she is the opposite kind of insufferable. she constantly namedrops ciara and bianca to pretends to be here with a mission to defend younger girls from predators but really she just doesn't want competition. it's part of her gay conflict where she immediately pedestalizes other foids then freaks out when they act human and makes it their and the whole thread's problem. see: rx, chuck.
Hey guys will "I played the Persona games for the first time 16 years ago so I have been Jungian for 16 years" fly in court?[///]If none of you going to drop anything interesting, tell me ok? I have Jungology homework to do UwU>>83853647Well well WELL. OHOHOHohohoh OH MY. How utterly COMPELLING. Anything else, sweetheart?
Using AI to organize speech, index information, etc is not replacing your personality with it lol.Just because you hate elon muskrat doesn't make you smart or interesting. You can't argue against what is said so you demonize where it comes from. It's a literal ad hominem fallacy, you attack the person rather than the claims. You dismiss the evidence not because it's invalid, but because "It's ai slop", it doesn't say what you want to hear so you have a freak out.sad really
>>83853722lilac killed bianca??A?A?lilac ran that bitch over with her hummer??!?!?!
Can ya'll chill? It's hard to leave when I feel like I have a duty to stop things before utter derailment. I was mean to Mel by proxy of the character Melascula/SDS's artstyle because I was still engaging in "act racist and abrasive to make my stalker leave me alone" tactics and I thought she was a LARP of theirs. I teased Diarygirl when letting her know I remembered her since her INTP 5w4 days/recognized her since our first direct interaction under that identity of hers and the LOVE one of mine was her getting territorial about typing quirks and posting screenshots of her broken keyboard to prove she isn't tryharding when she types like that.Rxy was a duo comprised of one biological female and one male sharing a trip, and therefore a special case.
>single post instance>single post instance>temporary tripcode sagaNothingburger tier but remind me if there's someone I'm forgetting that's also not someone that explicitlyaskednever to be referred to here by name or alias ever again >>83853755Ou my gaaaaww shut UP and unicorn for ys already you saucy minx
spitting in lilacs mouth and calling her a bad girl before fucking her pregnant
>>83853647No outtuition is huh...>in-tuition rouhgly means "to look into", somewhat implying you are trying to look inside the [thing], so not the outer aspect, like trying to stare at its soulOut-tuition would just reverse that, so "to look out" err... well, so you are looking at the outer aspects, but that's what Sensation(subjective factor notwithstanding, it's about the outer aspect still), does.... Pure etymological concerns aside, Out-tuition could just be a funny term for the extraverted variant because you aren't looking at the "inner" potential as much as "what this object could become in relationship to other objects". The introverted variant is the one who just looks at it without outer context, in an attempt to grasp archetypal dynamisms.
cumming on lilac's face and then taking her to the store without letting her wipe it off
>>83853726>If none of you going to drop anything interesting, tell me ok?Not from me today, have fun with your homework(said nobody ever).
>>83853790I'd argue it's to look on the edges of the thing, but from the side of the thing.>>83853774>Nothingburger tierThat's every post.>>83853799Okay thanks!
>>83853543>is lilac still with centaurBoy, am l!
lilac became a reggie because she was upset that other reggies were allowed to be reggies but nobody noticed her anonymously so she started posting where you clearly knew who she was so that you could track her blog posts because she was sick of not being center of attention
Accidentally defining Ne-groidism as the shipper function is the most fembrained shit I have said all day.Nevermind the precures. I'm absolutely guilty of crackshipping though
>>83853815i didn't touch shit but my lone one or two posts man all that togatageddon after and since wasn't me know your place nigglerlito. Sorry for the wave i didn't ask to be >>>prolific and high octane
>>83853854Good then get married and off this shithole. faggot you've been dating for over a year? where is the ring? where is the commitment
>>83847179>>type?just retook the 16 test, and got INTP-A this time, was INFP-A before and got INFP multiple times, got a result of being 2w1 before dunno what i gotta take to find out again, >>What's the funniest thing that's happened to you recently?stuff>>What's your Roman Empire (something you think about way too often)?what the fuck is this question>>If your life was a movie what genre would it be?dunno>>What's the most overrated thing people love?idk>>What's something you laugh that normies don't.cheating shenanigans probably idk>>What's the most random thing that makes you happy?idk, i always find the /mbti/ probe questions weird and kinda stupid
>>83853859https://voca.ro/12sOtW0dzOAWHurting your senior senpais hurts your older selfsies. Inadvisable andUN-KYOOT >~<'''mmmmm
>>83853731>sad reallySad I see ai haters, hell
>>83853877>idk>idk>idk>idkThank you for the insightful contribution, INxP
spanking lilac bloody and then licking up the blood
Sex havers deserve death.Centaur deserves death.Worthless nigger, cannot hold a job.Cannot do anything valuable.Still gets the girl? I JUST WANT TO CUM ON LILAC why deosn't the nice guy ever win?!?!? Always these fucking losercel chads
>>83853900np, cant really say what genre my life would be like, i'd like to say slice of life/comedy atmI dont get the connection of roman empire = something that i think about alot, my cats? finding a job? the connection is nonsensical in my caseI dont really find things overrated since that context varies person to personrandom things might be not so random to others, or not so random things to me might be random to others, best answer i can say is, chicken and pizzadoes this info make u happy, anon?
Can someone explain to me the difference between how an INTJ and an ENTJ think, and please don't get too technical, I'm smart for a girl but I'm not a high functioning autist.
>>83853942Forgot my name cause I'm on my phone.
>>83853863https://voca.ro/1lF8LIdsQmpl:oY
>>83853904Oh ive told plenty of random hostile gorditas to deepthroee a shottyyyyyy yus yus but my reggy queens wellUmThey should scissor with me <!3
>>83853790>Out-tuition could just be a funny term for the extraverted variantYeah, like i said. >>83853726Nothing here exists of value, save what you make <3
>>83853968>Filipino accentYou're good at hiding it but I live near to a seafood city so I can tell.
>>83853985https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=m8_E70q--wk&pp=ygULQ2hhcmxpZSB2b3g%3DIHATE COOLSVILLE
>>83853942They are very similar, but the ENTJ will primarily lead cognitively with Te rather than NiThe INTJ will immediately go to pattern recognizing, then go to how to efficiently organize it The ENTJ will start with Organizing and the details and then go into pattern recognition.They are very similar, but just learn new information differently.INTJ learns new information through solitary exploration of the subject, something like active imagination, the ENTJ learns from completely tasks and finishing their flow chart.The bottom of the stack maybe makes a bigger difference because it is how they wind down. The INTJ will get relief through feeling, a sappy TV show, emotional music etc, the ENTJ will more focus on Sensations, dancing, touching things, etc.This was an interesting thought process because it shows how the ENTJ is more in touch with the external world and the INTJ is more InTouch with their inner feelings.When highly stressed the INTJ will focus on worldly feeling good becoming indulgent and impulsive, and the ENTJ will become emotional and hyper-sensitive.
>>83853968>https://voca.ro/1lF8LIdsQmplFor 10 years? How old are you wtf
>>83854011>knew the bitch was brownIt's the nasally elongated "E"s that's the give away. No other accent does it. Whoever it is (lilac?) is pretty good at mimicking sounding white, probably works in a call center.
Booiyes are souuuuu yvkkkk fr fr They ehar a girl say "ull nvr find a love like mine" and project their unironic literal clinical narcissism and twist it into "im better than every girl ever"Whole timeAll she was sayinIs everyone is themselveSo we shouldAllBe(stahp tryna force people to be what/who you want/say and you might find your Self along de Wei)
>>83853885>>83853968That voice again. *heart melts*
>>83853875If she doesn't bleed here she'll do it on him. Better here.
B-bleed? Lewd
>>83854113>>83854096All this fucking samefagging, a thread back a foid with the softest voice posted, i also remember turbie-chans sweet chocolate melty voice, amongst others. All Lilac has going for her is this forced comgirl deepfried voice
>>83854154You're the one who plays Roblox. Teach me tho I'm open to generationfraud bby
>>83853955>>83853942>>83854029I run my thoughts through the AI.It organize it like thisINTJs and ENTJs think very similar, but they start from different places.>INTJ leads with Ni (Introverted intuition)They first look for patterns, meanings, and long-term implications. After that, they apply Te to organize those insights efficiently.>ENTJ leads with Te (extraverted thinking)They begin by organizing, structure, and acting on information.Pattern recognition comes afterward to refine direction.Learning style differences>INTJ Learns through solitary explorationThey mentally simulate, reflect, and build an internal model before acting.>ENTJ Learns through executionThey understand by completing tasks, building systems, and iterating in real time.Stress and recovery (Lower functions)>INTJ under stress: Can overindulge in sensory pleasure and impulsive behavior.When relaxed they unwind through emotional outlets, music, stories, reflective feelings.>ENTJ under stress: Can become emotionally reactive or unusually sensitiveWhen relaxed, they discharge stress through physical engagement, movement, touch, activity.Both types are strategic and future oriented.But the ENTJ stays anchored in the external world, shaping it directly.The INTJ stays anchored internally, refining insight before acting.The weakest point in my analysis is the "INTJ is more in touch with feelings"Because neither of these two types are in touch with their feelings, Jung says that Ni bypasses feeling rather than integrating it. Instead of processing emotions, they just assume how they should feel given the patterns they've previously seen and act accordingly.Ni isn't exactly pattern recognition, and Te isn't exactly details, I'm using more modern MBTI rather than Jung's technical definitions, but fairly true.
>>83854164>Self-projecting pussytardgo age regress and harass underb& on roblox.>>83853998Knew the ugly kike was brown lmao, ofc she never posts pics LOL. humiliation ritual
>>83853942Alright let's go, so without getting technical... [dumps raw, unfiltered PT text on you]Assuming proper Junganical typing, so Extraverted Thinking(leaning Intuiton) VS Introverted Intuition(leaning Thinking):The former will pick up an external idea - let's say some cool stuff you read in a book - wonder if this is truly valid and useful by thinking it in relationship to outer reality, and if it does sound like a very real possibility, then it's cool. If Sensation was the auxiliary instead, it will turn to practical and more direct applications as opposed to intuitively-backed understanding or opportunity, typically these are a bit more anal when it comes to requiring material proofs just to be sure the idea can really be seen into actual things as they are.The latter is much more "abstract", they pick up an inner image that seems to represent a very general and somewhat vague sense of "in which direction things are moving", then try to find either a system to interpret, explain or possibly realize the intuition. This one is a very real example you can make here: IN types tend to pick up the existence of Jungian typology or a collective unconscious without reading it first, then they read it and are like "oh shit that's what I saw!", and generally speak to others in these terms even if that's merely an attempt to translate the Ni-groidism in human terms, in reality they just produced something in their mind that made them aware of the archetypal reality(specifically the dynamisms involved in types, not as a static categorical form) behind the typology.Yeah explaining Ni-groidism will always get a little weird, but one cool thing about these types is that they make it sound so logical. Even if what happened is very much intuitively grasping at a very deep pattern.
>>83853968>https://voca.ro/1lF8LIdsQmpl>became obsessed with what a tarot spread said>took it too seriously>AHHH NOO GOD DEUTERONOMY NOT AGAINlmfao, This witch got her comeupens, now go forth and sin no more.There shall not be found among you anyone that makes his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or that uses divination, or one that practices sorcery, or an enchanter, or a witch, Or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard, or a necromancer.
Imagine feeling that thinkoids can feel or understand loveYou will never be pulled by the red thread of fateYou will never link hearts and souls with another beingYou will never have a divine connection
>>83854029>The ENTJ will start with Organizing and the details and then go into pattern recognition.I'm supposedly ENTJ, so for example I recently finished my business plan for the next 3 years, broken into phases broken into daily chunks. I don't look at metrics/analytics until the ball is rolling. So what youre saying is if I was a INTJ, I'd look at metrics first? I call that "analysis paralysis".>INTJ learns new information through solitary exploration of the subjectDo you mean like reading and ruminating endlessly?>ENTJ learns from completely tasks and finishing their flow chart.Yes I agree but only because it's faster.>The INTJ will get relief through feeling, a sappy TV show, emotional music etc, the ENTJ will more focus on Sensations, dancing, touching things, etc.LOL I do dance in my garage daily. I do something called shuffle dance, eg:https://youtube.com/shorts/XVX7kEUK2l8?si=I56r_-P7tAlvL9MLI can also do the robot. Anyways I prefer cuddling over crying over a TV show. In fact I don't cry anymore IDK why....Anyways thanks for answering.
Lilac sounds like a transgender stripper womans name
>>83854217>became obsessed with what a tarot spread saidLMFAO you jut know it was some breeder feelers query too>umm how does 4channer feel about meKEK unlovable bitch
It is just the nicest smelling flower. Don't insult the flora
>>83854217That was specifically bait for you and I'm glad you took it ^w^
>>83854276Go back 2 playing vidya gaeeeeem withe da underage charming children you despise you much
