snailbait editionpicrel is my snail who is #stillaliveqott: how is your snail?shelled: >>83899152
dont worry about what looks like a broken bit of his shell btw supposedly its just from being treated rough at petco and will heal in timeor maybe not but in any case i didnt do it to him...
i was on these threads when i was 14 in 2009 and so most of what i do is trying to entertain and inform 14 year old mes cause its probably a lot harder for mes now than it was for me then. people say these threads werent around that long ago but i swear they were, just not numbered or not always up. idk.
>>83940460No way r9gay existed in 09, there might have been a random gay thread here and there but the thread as we know it didn't.
>>83940480as far as i can tell from archives, there seems to be an r9gay #1 in 2017, but considering people were already saying things like picrel in 2017, there was definitely much r9gay happening if op is to be believed. but its tough to search in the archives because people were saying r9gay a lot soon after r9k existed just to mean that r9k was "gay" as in annoying, per 2000s usage of "gay" as in "fake and gay." i wish there were still 25 trap threads a day though like wtf. where did traps go. fucking trooners.
>>83940591I would say it likely began around 2015-2016 with regular gay threads, they just weren't numbered until 2017.
>>83940614original r9k was started in 2008 and im not sure why there wouldnt have been gay threads at that time, considering /y/ has been around since the start of 4chan. the only way to search original r9k archives is to download the 7zs at https://purl.stanford.edu/tf565pz4260 so unless you want to do that and prove me wrong im just gonna trust my memory on the subject. they probably werent numbered though like you said. judging by the numbers is another way to estimate -- but the rate of new threads varies a lot over time and seasonally so its hard. but i know for a fact that i made some editions around the 1600s-1800s in 2021 at the latest since i moved after that year and i definitely made them before i moved. so judging by that, thats about 800 threads over 5 years, and if that rate stayed constant, then it would put #1 all the way back 10 yrs before that, 2011-12 or so. but i dont think thats accurate considering the rate of new threads has definitely slowed down along with the rest of the board...to some extent because of captchas getting harder but also because of people posting more on discords and less in the thread. and because a lot of young people thing elon musk will drone them for posting in the wrong place or something idk theyre very nervous and afraid. dont worry, when im president i will have him exiled from the pridelands and he will have to eat elephant bones or whatever.
just saw a robot breakdancing on tv
need to suck on a big mogging bulge, good morning
my bulge and weewee is tuny so it doesn't take much to mog me, i just wanna know what it's like for my fbf to have a big penis an big balls and what positive exprience he has that i missed on
>>83940698You might be right, I never went to r9k prior to its deletion. I was still on /b/ and /v/ then.
>apostleposting>pirandello>so much storypostingold times..........
>tfw storyposting now doesn't get me any attention like it used to.
>>83940591>i wish there were still 25 trap threads a day though like wtf. where did traps go. fucking trooners."trap" niggershit was the precursor to trans shit you retard
>No twink bf with feet
>tfw no twink bf without feet
>>83940811your posts used to be much longer! the youngest blood doesnt even know who you are i think. plus im sure the discord users are reacting in the shadows. theyre just too cowardly to be in the archives saying anything at all. i will admit one thing though, i was never really sure who pirandello was. as far as i gathered, he was an italian with a creepy "him" (picrel) voice who would try to get underagers to send him weird sharpie in pooper type pics. but i heard people say a lot of different random things and it didnt quite come together. i was here a really long time ago like i said and then not on 4chan at all for a while and when i came back people were mostly talking about pirandello antics in the past tense. so i never quite knew but it sounded like a real mess lol. i was afraid to ask then because id just be told to lurkmoar but i havent seen anyone say his name in a while so i might as well.
>>83940931I only know prindello from his '>tfw no chubby twink math bf' type posts. I had no idea what he was doing behind the scenes.
>>83940906completely wrongpants. traps loved their cocks. a trap's favorite moment was the flopout, and the less expected the better. this is why all the most popular traps had absolutely massive cocks. not at all like troonery, where they idolize the most e-shriveled penises the most. most of the og traps just grew up and left 4chan. the generation coming after them was attacked with pinkpills constantly and many fell, and the rest became very averse to crossdressing bc it became so associated with troonery. its bitterly sad.
>>83940945>we like men who larp as women to "trap" straight men but in a heckin based waybehead millennials
>>83940938wait what? so he is still here??? i had no idea. those posts come and go but sometimes its pretty frequent still. i had no idea.....wow.
>>83940956He or at least someone posting like him was here a bit ago but he's been mia for a while now. I thought he had found his chubby math bf and left in peace.
>>83940945Jump off a bridge bitroon
>>83940368FUCK YOUR FUCKING SNAIL
>>83940953its just a word idiot. the meme at the time was "traps aint gay." everyone knew they were men, but people would meme that they were trapped so they could still call themselves straight. and like, even with what youre saying, ok, you go home with someone you think is a cute chick who turns out to have a cock, what is the problem exactly? just dont have sex if you dont want? the only way it could actually be "a trap" in a not-ok way (sorta) is if you think its a chick and you believe him saying "i like it in my butt better" and so you go up the butt and then oops you were plumbing a guy. but theres one easy solution to this, which is dont go up anyones pooper with your pricker, and as far as buttholers being "tricked" my sympathy is basically zero because both guy and chick butts have the same poop in them. you go in a butt, thats on you. the right thing to blame millennials for would be normalizing "buttsex" as a meme and as an act, and for bringing in the idea that you couldnt criticize "buttsex" or you were "homophobic." that was definitely the precursor in terms of retarded logic to "transphobic" and such and so.
>>83940971call me a troon again and see what happensi beat you black and blue with my red bull can
>>83940988>>we like men who larp as women but in a heckin based wayrape and then behead millennials
>>83941001they werent larping though? do you know what larping means? it means "live action role playing." traps were just posting pics of themselves -- they werent even calling themselves chicks most of the time. if you think a random pic is a chick when its really a guy who just looks like one, thats on you. do you think all men should have to wear a sandwich board saying man man man? i still get taken for a chick on occasion, especially when i put my hair up. is it my fault other people are wrong? no. i just look like how i look like. inb4 you dont actually read this post and just copypaste the same thing again
im on the borderline between millennial and zoomer anyway, i get called both by the other lol
>>83940995what about biscum? why are you here bishit when you're missing on trannies and traps?
It's incredible to me that there are people who go on 4chan to debate and argue. I used to do that when I was a teenager. You guys are still teenagers right?
>>83940368you might be too gay to notice this but that thing in the background of the thumbnail looks like a vagina
>>83941022how are traps meaningfully different from troons?
>>83941039i dont believe in "orientation" personally. i think ruling out one thing or the other leads to having a complex if there does exist one man or woman in the world that you like despite not liking most of that sex sexually. youre clearly quite confused, so we'll have to start from the basics. traps are men. if i were chasing traps, it would be g-a-y. if you think traps are "really women" then you are in fact perpetuating the troonery you blame millennials for.
>>83941073traps are just guys and dont consider themselves anything else. they usually like guys and think its funny to post pics where they look like a chick. they dont take pills or get any kind of bizarro surgery. they just wear big hoodies, often had swoopy scene hair in the day and are really skinny. usually they dont even wear makeup. you have to understand, trapping was a very different thing back when webcam and phone pics were like 400x600 and very very blurry. it was really really easy actually. it was often basically just trolling, someone would post a trappy pic and get a ton of replies cause ppl thought it was a chick and then they would post their cock. this was literal 2006 stuff. if you werent around then, then youll just have to believe me, but "trans" was literally not a thing anyone ever said at all. in that day the only "trans" was a "transsexual" and they were extremely extremely rare. even being on 4chan i dont think i saw the word "transgender" until 2010ish at the absolute earliest. and they were really a completely different group of people from "traps." the idea of "transgender" first got really big basically around the time of original bronies and it was many of the same people. traps were always much more associated with emo and music like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KleUddM2IPw -- they were scene/emo inherently pretty much. original drag queens werent "trans" either. they were gay. "transgenders" basically bullied their way onto rupauls drag race around 2016ish and made them change such funny song lines as "trannychasers up in here/welcome to my stratosphere." they were funny, self-aware and self-effacing. troons are not.
>>83941066its actually one of the only sensible places to do it, because here you can actually get to the bottom of why you disagree with someone, and figure out whether you have different facts, different logic, or different morals. i have actually figured a lot of things out from conversations with people on here. i dont necessarily mean anyone changed their minds, but you can at least find out why someone thinks what they think. everywhere else you just get blocked, banned, or dooted as soon as you dont agree with someone. basically the only other place you can do this besides here is comment sections on blogs where the author lets people actually talk, but there are only a few of those in existence.
