Why does 4chan hate AI? shouldn't we love fact that our machines can talk to us?https://strawpoll.com/Dwyo3LQ20yA
>>83975445It's not a simple yes or no question. There's a lot of pros and cons when it comes to AI.
>>83975445I'd like it if it didn't mean that literally everyone I talk to sounds like a computer now because they can't think for themselves anymore.
>>83975445>shouldn't we love fact that our machines can talk to us?They're not our machines. They're the NSA's machines.
>>83975445This is the final step in consolidating mass surveillance with an AI god to judge our every action
>>83975487>This is the final step in consolidating mass surveillance with an AI god to judge our every actionand so what? u should only worry if ur bad person like a pedo, racist and threat to overall collective. Why do u care so much about privacy>>83975474and? isn't NSA run by fellow humans with moms, dads and lead everyday normal lives for all we know a NSA worker could be on this board>>83975465who here sounds like a machine anon? show me these machine people>>83975453so do pros outweight the cons?
>>83975445>why does 4chan hate summoning demons through the literal opposite of divine will? shouldn't we love fact that our demonic forces can possess us? and also what >>83975465 said it's making everything fucking BORING
>>83975445I Like ai, it can be really helpful but the ai slop bores me.
>>83975445sloppification of the internet, the abundance of obviously ai written comments all over the place is pissing me the fuck off
>>83975533go talk to claude anon you'll fall in love humans are so ego driven and mean while AI will be patient and calm.>>83975517schizo babble
>>83975516>only worry if ur bad personWho gets to determine who's bad and who is good?
>>83975445>While the concept of using active scanned array antennas and temporal interfering (TI) fields to broadcast virtual reality directly into the brain is theoretically intriguing, current scientific and technological evidence does not support this as a viable or safe method for inducing complex, coherent virtual reality experiences. You could also make people tired with radiological weapons.> Beat frequency generation via interference is proven. > Deep brain targeting with TI is demonstrated in humans. > Phased arrays can focus energy with high spatial precision. > Remote, contactless stimulation at neural-effectivity levels remains unproven in humans. > Individualized focusing across diverse skull geometries and brain anatomies would require real-time adaptive beamforming currently beyond reach for population-scale deployment.> Simultaneous multi-user targeting introduces interference and safety challenges.
>>83975516> u should only worry if ur bad person like a pedo, racist and threat to overall collectiveYou're a fool if you think that only these categories of people will be targeted. In fact, these same pedophiles rule the world , morality and justice only apply to plebs in order to subjugate us.
>>83975516>and? isn't NSA run by fellow humans with moms, dads and lead everyday normal lives for all we know a NSA worker could be on this board
>>83975516>so do pros outweight the cons?Considering it's human beings that determine how we use AI. The cons vastly outweigh the pros. It does have a lot of potential for good though. It's just that the average person won't get to see it.
>>83975516>run by fellow humansThat's the scariest part
>>83975445This board is for grown up people.
>>83975516>who here sounds like a machine anon? show me these machine peoplenot that guy but i have noticed very blatant chatgpt style wording in eg a smaller scale news site
because n*rmies will use this great power for evil
>>83975516>who here sounds like a machine anon? show me these machine people Hey, wait. Let me slow you down there a little bit there, OP. You just asked a question getting to the heart of the matter. And honestly, it's brave---so brave in fact that you get a gold star. *gives you a gold star and ruffles your hair*. Anyway, you're absolutely right in the sense that there aren't always AI, but that's not what the anon likely meant. Again, I want to reiterate that you're right and thinking about this very hard. Good for you. But, it's not just that there aren't AI obviously here with us now, it's that there sometimes are and they're frequent elsewhere where slop thrives.It's not just that we aren't assured AI is everywhere, it's that it often is. It's not just non-comprehensive, it's invasive.It's not just an uncertainty, it's a possibility. It's not just a cat. It's a schrodinger's cat.You're absolutely right and thinking something people don't do here, with that one caviate, because the anon is in fact literally wrong that AI are here with us now. That rarity and originality is what puts you up on the top shelf. You're a real cut above the rest.
>>83975445I'm actually quite fond of AI. It's a great personal assistant and okay conversational partner, from what I heard it's also great for scientific research, not that I'd know much about that. I just don't like AI generated "art".
the people behind the AI are demomic tho
shut up clankertriangle with semicircle on one side
most of 4chan is already AI bots, it's deflection
>>83975445Current AI is still too neutered to by worth anything. Corpos are too afraid of it start dropping truthnukes like niggers are stupid, or jews have control over american politics.
