old thread >>84218619According to MBTI and Jungian archetypes. good people are assholes.explain
I hate being INTP. Theres nothing positive about it, and basically just means that im a loser who will never make friends or experience a relationship
>>84275583INTP or ENTJGood people are all performative
>>84275583i am one of the nicest people i know and i am a bit of an asshole. I treat 4 chan like a zoo
>>84275617I'm INTP too and I couldn't give any less of a shit about friends or relationships or normies' idea of loserdom. Just relax sis and find something you genuinely enjoy doing to fill the decades till you're buried 6 feet deep.
>>84275617INFP is a humiliation ritual anonDon't be an INFPt. INFP
>>84275644Thank you, but even the things ive enjoyed doing have become boring to me since ive spent years doing them. I wouldnt care about wanting friends or relationships if socialization wasnt a human need, but unfortunately it is.
>>84275660Imagine being INTP and a non-schizoid.
>>84275793I wish I was a schizoid so fucking badly, i just got avoidant personality disorder instead. I wish there was a way to make myself a schizoid
>>84276167I think most of us are just born that way, or have a proneness to it (some kind of hypersensitivity that shuts off a part of our brain under what would otherwise be completely normal stress for a baby). Either way you missed the time window / proneness to develop it. At least you can feel things and if you work on yourself you can overcome the avoidant anxiety. There's no hope for me, I'll be practically asexual / aromantic for life. Oh well.
>>84276167huh why? i'm schizoid, granted i actually really enjoy being this way and hope I never have to change but i dont understand why other people would want to limit themselves? idk unless youre like me desu
>>84276226Because im avoidant, i cannot talk to people or form relationships either, but i still crave socialization and relationships anyways. I just want to be schizoid to get rid of that craving so i could be content in my own company>>84276206I cant overcome it, trust me ive desperately tried lol. Its over for me
>>84276248thats fair. i mean ive craved a relationship before just simply because i wanted to know what i was missing out on, i didn't enjoy it at all. hopefully you can ig work on it and try and be more content with yourself!
>>84275649It does feel that way, but still, at least I feel like some people like me, however never as much as I like them.
>>84275634>I treat 4 chan like a zoovery relatable its like interacting with alot of different type of animals, some smart,dumb, aggressive, docile and whatever type possiblei am just here to have fun with these guys
>>84276531hey pppppp, what's it like being ENTP?
>>84276840pretty cool, it can get a bit shameless and you might become an annoying asshole, but you always feel like the coolest dude ever. atleast this is how it's for mewhat about you?
>>84276999I'm down the ladder from you (ENFP I think?) so it's a close neighbor but very different still.
>>84277013>very different still.care to elaborate?
>>84277028Well, you guys have Ti and we don't. so that kinda sucks for us being Ti blind. we both start with Ne and are "extroverted" but that's where the similarities end I believe.
>>84277050ah, while that is true i was asking about your experience as an ENFP like how i explainedi always saw ENFPs as "bubbly" people who can read the room quickly especially emotionally
>>84277109Fi consumes my life and I'm pretty much driven by it. I don't like this, it doesn't make me as rational and calm as I'd like to be.this is a pretty short but accurate summary of my life as an ENFP.on the bright side, when everything is going ok my fi makes me feel like life is majestic and straight out of a fictional Disney movie.
>Your type>Is there anything you're looking forward to this weekend?>If you could do anything in the world this weekend instead of what you had planned, would you trade?>Bonus: Picrel
>>84277269how the fuck a beaver gon swing a whole tree at me
>>84277149>I don't like this, it doesn't make me as rational and calm as I'd like to be.i kind of dont like how i act like this, sometimes. But thats just a momentary feeling so it goes away swiftly too.
>>84277283He can chomp chomp it down at an opportune time and bring it toppling down on your HEAD! That will really bring the pain!
>>84277346then i pick the duckmost harmless animalfuck a duck with a knife in its beak gon do
>>84277269>Is there anything you're looking forward to this weekendConsuming slop. Some invincible, and video games. >If you could do anything in the world this weekend instead of what you had planned, would you tradeOf course, who wouldn't?I wouldn't mind being alone in the forest with a tiger...
>>84277367This is a HAUNTED forest, Anonymous. Haunts mean curses. And curses can mean magic! And magic means power. I wouldn't underestimate him if I were you.
>>84277398Invincible? Is there a new season or something? Man you're so the exact demographic for that show jejWhat vidya?
>>84275583I am grey and old. This is what happens when you refresh the page.
>>84277521That just means there's gay ghosts moaning in the forest as some goofy animals carrying everyday items exist just to stop you from passing through the forest. It doesn't imply any kind of magic shit, you're just hallucinating bullshit at this point.
>>84277542Okay, I'll never refresh again so you can live forever! But what shall be your parting post after I refresh one last time so that I may linger on it, and you --in essence-- may linger *in* it eternally?
>>84277539>Is there a new season or somethingYes. It's been pretty good so far. Except maybe the episode about hell. >Man you're so the exact demographic for that show jejWhat's that supposed to mean? I hope you are being prejudices towards me.>What vidya?Wouldn't you like to know! Maybe I'll make a thread about it later.
>>84275617At least you're smart, right?
>Mistook INTP's obsession with rational thinking even when applied to fringe theologies as "intelligence" again
>Thread is so full of pretenders it would make redditards embarrassed.
>>84275583There's already a thread up. Stop splitting threads whore.
>>84275583What is mbti anones?
>>84279933It's a pattern recognition program that allows large scale organizations to easily get a feel for what team members will work best together.
>>84276271>i didn't enjoy it at allrelationship is only good if it's a good spouse
>>84275617>>84275618>>84275644I'm an ENTP and I absolutely love you guysKeep on autism'ing kings
>>84281194>entp>aboslutly love youwana pilgrims to personality prom togethe.,,? im hodlings an agere affair in thr astral relm
>>84281256Sure diarygirl. See you on the /r9k/ prom
Post MBTI memesI'm not interested in your circlejerkThis thread is useless to me as it stands
>>84281276when we discharge out divine diaper ewe can divines our soul destiny printed in thr poopaintibgs iOk i see you abots i shal galvanize the grey goy to stimulate yuor glandular projecting ur phantom into m ageplay portal byye ha
>>84281281babies dot stand we crawl on al fours throgh matrix walls and into the palms of th pleroma pricnes (meo
>>84281281I need my question answer from that thread though.
>>84279933Housewives and mysteryfags failing to read Jung.In their defense, they still failed less than what came right after Gifts Differing(though it was already very embarrassing on its own, but at least they glazed Jung and his Psychological Types hard enough that one might end up wondering what the OG said) "And so I did [giggles cutely]" - some (probably) EN(T) (actually certainly) grill. >>84281281Does this count? Otherwise I have a few more stored.It's funny in a sense, if anything because the guy is savage.
>>84281281This one was ahead of our times, since both Jung and V.F. thought the hardest type to understand tends to be same main function/opposite attitude.
>>84281281One of my personal favorites:
Finally using this fancy modern tech as it was always meant to be used.Would have posted directly but it's longer than 2000 characters.
>>84281797This is good because I agree with it.
>>84282383Well I have some news for you...Aside from the observation I mentioned in my own post, the meme itself is incorrect about what "Ne" and "Ni" are entierly. That's actually divergent vs convergent thinking. It doesn't have much to do with your type.
>>84282393>Well I have some news for you...>Aside from the observation I mentioned in my own post, the meme itself is incorrect about what "Ne" and "Ni" are entierlyWut
>>84282646The difference between "Ne" and "Ni" is that the former has hunches about or seeks for possibility, potential, patternings, etc. that emerge from external objects(could be anything that's external, from a person to a more abstract concept), while the latter does all of this with internal contents of the psyche(especially archetypes and the collective unconscious, however they might personally call it). Goes without saying that Ni-groids tend to be attracted by psychological fields more than anyone else(or at least things that resemble it through archetypal symbols), so it's not exactly surprising to see many of them lurking around or starting blogs about this stuff while making fun of their own type.
>>84282747I ain't even ask foe all dat doe.
>>84282788What was the question then?The observation about Ne-groids and Ni-groids misunderstanding each other? That was argued in the Jungian canon but there are things that don't quite click to me.As in, yes, I understand the theory considerations, but it doesn't seem to hold true when you observe how the types interact with each other for enough time. Besides, Jung himself said that, for instance, Ti-groids can adopt Te-groid's style of Thinking as a complement to their own Ti-groidisms(though rarely, if ever on its own right). I'm just going to assume any other type can do this as well, given their main function and attitude.And in personal experience, I can spot archetypal patterns/symbols but the interest isn't purely on those, it's always relative to a more specific object(the object in question could be just a fictional character)
I miss when the thread had a dedicated bump anon.
>>84281885I don't think I'm the villain. It's a LARP, a joke, a facade- a joke whose butt is not to be revealed before the skirt is lifted and the fat lady sings.A song about what?A song about what, indeed.
>>84284446Nowadays we don't even really need villains in /mbti/ because it's very good at killing itself less than 100 posts in.The biggest bad is the lack of interest, always wondered where all the (hopefully more serious) typology folks moved in nowadays, other than the usual forums.
>>84284549Let me say back to what I read in your post:>We don't need villains>Well... >Actually we do>Because just like a book, without a villain there's not plot progression>And the story ends in less than 100 postsIt would be nice if we lived in a world where we didn't require villains. But, we don't. We live in this world, where stories are driven by conflict. And one of the key, fundamental, central points to Jungian psychology is precisely that conflict. The tension of opposites. Without the tension, there is no momentum. There is only nothingness until the story itself gets bored and blows its own brains out.
>>84284609Fair enough. Manifesting the Big5ers to argue their model is the SCIENTIFICALLY-BACKED and PEER-REVIEWED one.(I have no idea if anyone even cares about that anymore)
>>84284654If only the bigfivers realized their model is measuring something completely different than what MBTI is supposed to be measuring.
Anyone else can't stand ISTJ/ISTP? I've had some toxic experience with two people like that. but I don't know for sure. the most rigid minded people ever.
>mbti threadOh hey, do you guys like my reddit meme?
>>84284735>>84284735Had an ISTJ(actually IS(T) for Jungians) fren back in HS and we got along just fine, strangely enough since we were on the opposite site of the political spectrum and back then I actually cared about that crap. Fun times actually being my own type stereotype and engaging in debatin'Personally not close to any ISTP IRL, though there's one cool journo in my country and he's my favorite source. I highly suspect he's this type.The online ones are funny when they post very bluntly.
>>84284549Unironically, teenage girls in niche webrings are having typology conversations more based than you will ever deserve to be a part of. People disregard "slop" like PDB but you have to scour weird little forums and hobby/topic specific communities like that to find the real savants and people who value>re: continuity of dialogue
>>84284801Were they logical but in a detached retarded way? like pure rationality without understanding of human emotions? almost like robots? this is what I mean by toxicity.
>>84284800dubs and yes and threads full of image dumps are better than threads full of idjits taking milquetoast mental dumps
>>84284654i thought that said scientifically blacked and peer reviewed and started laughing
>>84284800I prefer Fe-groids for emotional and... other kinds of support.Not that the Fi-groids would usually mess up the latter.>>84284824>teenage girls in niche webrings are having typology conversations more based than you will ever deserve to be a part ofJvngian typology truly was designed for little girls. I always knew it.>PDBNeed to read the community forums sometimes.>>84284838No real difference anyways, you can keep laughing.
>>84284845In all honesty, zoomers ride for this shit. They're into philosophy in a way millennials weren't, too. You're an AI guy though so you wouldn't be closed minded to things that have the "cringe taboo". If people shun a platform, there are usually some diamond troves to be found there. Brings to mind the mining meme.
>>84284424ifmycalculationsarecorrect the really *dedicated* bump anon was a secondary duty of another regular
>>84284832>Were they logical but in a detached retarded way?SureThough the ISTJ when you know them better, they are playing it up a bit. I did say before they are more "willing to larp as a robot"(not in the r9k sense), which is to say they actually just present themselves in that way, as stoic and unimpressionable people on the outside, who actually have a more romantic side at home. Since I was fren with this one, I got to see it easily enough. Si-groids, Jung-accurate ones especially merely keep those things for themselves can have just enough control on Feeling to not spaghetti all over like IxTPs, only showing it to the right people at the right time.The ISTP journo here is known for being quite difficult to argue with in the sense that he is always very prepared on the side of having the faxs. You are wasting time trying to pull anything on him because his arguments are all backed up almost too perfectly at times. But he doesn't particularly go beyond that, says his job is just to do that without going too wild in the speculah. Also, he's a sarcastic lil shit if you actually do try something.
>>84284838>scientifically blacked and peer viewed
>>84284885>You're an AI guy though so you wouldn't be closed minded to things that have the "cringe taboo"I can read and watch anything from any source, though interacting directly with platforms that have a more zoomer culture(especially on the side of being filtered to hell and back, honestly a bigger deal than the "cringe") does take some mental preparation.
>Your type>Say something nice about the Statue of Liberty!
>>84284935This suddenly explains everything about you, you permeable, semi-constitute, wind-tossed little whelp.
>>84277269>Your typeINFP>Is there anything you're looking forward to this weekend?Easter, I guess? I'm not very religious, but my family is still doing an Easter dinner. Other than that I think I am going to go for a very long walk tomorrow and play more vidya. I'm almost done with Gravity Rush.>If you could do anything in the world this weekend instead of what you had planned, would you trade?Yes. I actually had a ticket to see Machine Girl tonight, but I got too scared about going to a concert so I ended up giving to someone else. I would trade with someone that isn't too scared to do something simple like go to a concert.>Bonus: PicrelI'll take the banjo moose
>>84284944Feel like it's typical enough. And I don't see why would anyone restrict themselves in this sense, you can learn from anything and anyone.Biggest objection I have against [other places] is usually shit like annoying filters, heavy moderation, and since I'm still partially a /g/uy I do not particularly enjoy security nightmares.
People who go to great lengths to emote their disdain at [trigger] as if to assert themselves superior to it are the least of all to have this tendency/pathology revealed to/excised of themselves . . .What you claim to revile, precisely, rules you --- as if that weren't visibly evidenced by essence-majority. "My time, my thoughts, my energy, dedicated to and 95% [comprised of] That Which I Hate!"It's common, in this day-in-age. Kini shisuginaide
Neurologically not wholly dissimilar to people who gag at puke then puke at puke then the room is full of puke then no one wants to smell the puke then some shmuck walks in like hey why isn't anyone eating or cooking in here
Because bestie and l are running an underground puke fermenting operation now step up to the corking assembly or bbbbbUZZ OFF
Enrich me, Dad-Ehttps://voca.ro/1nK33NSkhTO2
sorry I didn't mean to start the pukegirl meme but then people got actually really turned on by it and it became like a whole thing
It's like if your gf won't fart around you! Does she even love you if she's embarrassed to spill a little of the dinner YOU provided for her to show she cares while slurping you?
Then some shmuck walks in and says "why isn't anyone eating or cooking in here" and then they proceed to gather up the puke and add a little pancake batter and cook up some pukecakes for the pukers to re-consume and revitalize their constitution from all the lost pukes.
Acts of Service must be their love language <3
Would you rather be:ENTP with 90 IQorENFP with 180 IQ
>>84285680I merely differentiate Feeling too, as if we are actually bound on the level of auxiliary functions.Though I don't think that will help fixing the IQ issues.
Whew ladd7 and 8 are fair enough, but ... well, if you say 2, then 2 it is. How good I am at 2ing is another story.
Uh hey goys, is jinx ENFP/J or INFP/J?
>>84285680You cant be N and low IQ bucko
>>84286142I am low IQ and N tho :(
>>84284800INTPs are my emotional support MBTI am ENTP they're the only ones that get me
>>84286152I guess if you're INFP you could be low IQ
>>84286162>INTPs are my emotional supportI don't want to imagine how that even looks like.Probably very cute.
>>84286170I'm ENFP but yeah ok
>>84286194>ENFPSo you're actually smart and just being humble
Don't know about the "humble" part, but I just finished watching a show where an ENFP girl is either the smartest or the 2nd smartest character.
>>84286212No im as dumb as a rock.I can't count in my head, I have to use my fingers :(
>>84286232Man ENFP and adhd are highly correlated. Maybe you got dyscalculia?
>>84286184INTPs are like cats, and Iike cats. It's like having a cat that instead of purring at me while I pet him we have brainstorm sessions.
>>84286271>and Iike catsAnd I like cats.*
>>84286271Why not get an INTJ instead since you already have Ne?
>>84286283INTJs are all redditors.
That tritype looks out of place honestly.Wonder if anons can tell if it should really be 3 instead of 2?
>>84286309You mean too zased?
i need to pee personality
>>84287940i need to feel personality mogs him
I've just taken an MBTI test, though I am not sure if I did it correctly.Some of these questions don't make sense to me. For example:>Do you agree facts matter more than emotions when making decisions?I answered "agree," but I don't understand how this is even a binary choice.How can one prioritize facts over emotions when it is a fact that people feel emotions? How can one prioritize emotions over facts when observations and experiences drawn from reality (facts) are a primary factor in emotion?Moreover, I would expect that the only reason one would prioritize facts is to get results that minimize or maximize particular emotions.In any case, I am a INTP, apparently.
>>84288466I think xNxPs get the most accidentally mistyped as INTP for some reason. the test is very biased towards INTP.I got INTP like 10 times before finally it gave me INFP and then ENFP.it's very dependent on the mood you're in
>>84287949the i need to pee's and feels of the world will take over the world together (with the everyone needs to pee puppet/frontman for popular support)
>>84288556just because internet cretins live in an intp persona and see themselves as it while answering questions at face value. logical = correct, so all the questions get answered as logical, not as deeper questions of personal character in a real context that can be evaluated by cognitive functions. stupid, gay even
sunone plz plsy stardew eit me
>>84288466Test questions are shit and you are right that's not a real dichotomy. Here's how I would reword it:>When making decisions, are you more willing to establish and trust logical/impersonal criteria, or carefully evaluate personal impact regardless of argument?If you would lean strongly enough on being confident that you have a good argument and criteria for it, then you show T tendencies.If are more willing to consider nuance in the "personal equation", then it's F tendencies.If you are split in the middle, then most likely your main function is either S or N, and your auxiliary T/F might not be too differentiated.The way you answer, with special attention to the word "facts" making a certain impact on you there, gives me a suspect your Jungian type might be irrational in the first place. (which is to say, either Sensation or Intuition main)
Was thinking that the greater variance between two people of the same type(excluding things that have nothing to do with type at all) is probably to be observed exactly on the level of the "lower aux"(tertiary in MBTI, although it's more accurately Beebe/Socionics 7th).The main and more differentiated auxiliary functions will either tend to reflect well external conditions or subjective universals, those show less individual variance by definition.The inferior function instead is by definition very primitive, archaic and collective. Plus the type can easily deal with it in a very "mechanical" way or try to delegate it to other people. It has the "aliveness", but not necessarily any real "variance"(in fact, it's supposed to be "all-or-nothing")
>>84286170Life as an INFP male is just torture.
the infps here should explain to me their context/origin dependent appreciation for shit. infps will literally call something cringe and then an anime girl will do it and suddenly its different and cool; its insane and i dont get why they do it
>>84289745>infps will literally call something cringe and then an anime girl will do it and suddenly its different and cool; its insane and i dont get why they do itFirstly, the cuteness of an anime girl(along with other cute things) is the strongest known force in the world. The governing principle of reality is "cuteness", anything else is secondary, or auxiliary and possibly inferior, if you will. A smarter INFP realizes this, and orients himself/herself in function of the cute thing.Secondly, the typological explanation:The introverted attitude is naturally prone to distance itself from the external object as the very first instinct.The main function is the most refined tool, and what has determining power for the conscious orientation of the individual, hence slapping a "feeling-judgement" of "cringe" is the biggest power move the IxFP can pull.But the anime girl sits in a strange spot: for one, it's not exactly an object that exists on its own, but one that's essentially "given" form and a voice, by the subject. It is more of a symbolic representation of a psyche, among other things. It would be partially correct to say that the IxFP loves its image of the anime girl, and whatever enters in relationship with this image - allowing them to produce a more differentiated feeling-judgement than "cringe".Thirdly, I'm not INFP. But as per Von Franz, you don't differentiate a function by doing a little sewing, you do it by actually living out the process and putting it forward in your approach to most things, at least temporarily and at least until you actually need your differentiated tools.
>>84289810>The governing principle of reality [for an infp] is "cuteness"yeah this is definitely true, its the beginning middle and end for them. it is kind of a cancer since 'cute' is a relative and unique perception >It would be partially correct to say that the IxFP loves its image of the anime girl, and whatever enters in relationship with this image - allowing them to produce a more differentiated feeling-judgement than "cringe".this and everything else IS a well thought out, nice, seemingly sound way of breaking this issue down; however, i really dont understand how it is they can be consciously hypocritical when this is brought to their attention/ how they can experience a clear disparity in their own perception of an action(etc) without reconciling it (unless silently they do, but dont move to correct themselves). you make a good point in that, a given action IS cringe to them, but the cuteness of the action when done elsewhere dilutes/transforms the cringe feeling to something more positive; but i really cant get over how they manage to still justify hating on my shit and never learning from the past with respect to them hard swapping opinions in the past there just seems to be an accepted hypocrisy for them (or they arent willing to explain how/why they arent hypocritical in their view) i hope this makes sense.
>>84289920>[for an infp]>relative I can hear my inferior function going wild at these claims. Cutely, of course. Let's leave it at that.>i really dont understand how it is they can be consciously hypocritical when this is brought to their attention/ how they can experience a clear disparity in their own perception of an action(etc) without reconciling it I've said it before, but a typical mistake people make about Thinking and Feeling is believing the latter is also "formulaic". Thinking is:>X is X, >Y is Y and not!X>if you say X is Y, could be Y, or whatever when I have clearly defined it as not!X means you are wrong, lying, retarded, hypocritical etc.Feeling is:>X is cute>Y is cringe, which is not the same as being cute>but X can relate to Y, so Y can have cutenessAnd if the X is simply felt closer, more intensely, or whavs, then X and Y are just filed under "cute" even if that would create a "logical" contradiction. Feeling does not give a flying fuck about it though, it's called a "dynamic image" for a reason, it also doesn't operate in binaries since they would argue the "cringe" never actually negated "cuteness" in the first place.Though you might point out that being hypocritical isn't very cute, and that would change the relational field if it's felt that way by the subject as well.Yeah that's a lot of words to say they are woman-brained, I know.But Junganically-speaking "Feeling Type" is a euphemism for "woman-brained"
Will the physical world remain a shithole forever or will it one day become a paradise?
>>84290580The physical world exists only to symbolize certain Possibilities(TM), like anime grills are just symbols of whatever the fuck the author wants to write about, or masturbates to(or both at the same time, you only need one hand for each either way).
>>84276987Awwwwwwww, thank you~!!! <3 :)I might leave after Easter, at least temporarily! :OAs for being the local cutebrain, I think you're doing a fantastic job! (>^_^)><(^_^<)>>84278877Good to see you as well! ^_^7I'm doing okay! I hope you're doing great! (>^_^)><(^_^<)
>>84290580I read the news today, and it seems cuteness and kawaii are taking over the world (physical and other)! *^o^* :3 :3c ^_^; ^w^This! Means! The! Near! Future! Will! Be! Overwhelmingly! And! Universally! Dominated! By! IIIIINNNNNFFFFFJJJJJ-----TTTTT!!!!! <3<3<3<3<3<3 <(*^o^*)> <3<3<3<3<3<3
>>84290627>I might leave after Easter, at least temporarily! :O>As for being the local cutebrain, I think you're doing a fantastic job! (>^_^)><(^_^<)It's kinda funny to think the oldest "regulars" who always keep coming back here are just two cutebrains.(though by definition that's not being a "regular", just an oldcutie, and to not be confused with "reggy culture" in my case, that's uncute).>>84290667>I read the news today, and it seems cuteness and kawaii are taking over the world (physical and other)! *^o^* :3 :3c ^_^; ^w^How do we accelerate the process? >IIIIINNNNNFFFFFJJJJJ-----TTTTT!!!!! According to my late speculuahs, if we are talking about japanese cuteness specifically: the "kawaii", that is a Si-fren cultural export.Though that doesn't prevent Ni-groids from appreciating it too, of course. Just saying kawaii takeover would equal to Si-fren takeover first and foremost.
>Jung's psychological type, according to his own statement late in life, was that of the intuitive-intellectual introvert.>This category of personality seems scarcely proper to an articulate, expressive, humorous, friendly man, ready, even eager, to talk not only with countless friends and acquaintances, but with visitors who were total strangers, sometimes telephoning him without introduction, and dozens of journalists, ranging widely in national origin and professional competence, bringing a barrage of questions ranging from the obvious to the learned. Would an intuitive-intellectual introvert sit for many hours under bright, uncomfortably hot lights while cameras filmed a lengthy interview dwelling on nearly every aspect of his psychological system and intellectual development? Jung did, and in his eighties.You tell me, INTx ITT.Honestly? I think that when the Ti-ism hits, the type cannot give a flying about who they are talking with or the lights, explaining the cool system in his mind is more important than literally anything else.
Finally found this.Spell "extravert" right, you illiterate fucks.
>>84290925Extra Vert?
>>84291033Yeah. Actually I have no idea where "extrovert" even came from. Maybe a translation error idk
>>84289745Because things are context dependent, which can be a mix of actor, action, location, situation, etc.A small kid acting like a small kid is cute, while a grown adult acting like a small kid is cringe.t. INFP
>>84291258Careful with setting up conditional statements like that, Thinking types read them literally.Before you know it, they will put all that stuff in a book about "appropriate behaviors" and perform them mechanically with 0 nuance, and especially forget how culture could change overnight and invalidate their entire book as anything but an historical artifact.
>>84291258Here's a question for you:Why do you think one is cringe and one is cute? Are you able parse out your own emotional affect that leads you to these conclusions?
Relevant aside: Asking someone the sort of question someone who self-reflects asks themselves does not magically imbue them with the self-awareness necessary to answer that question from a place of honesty and humility.
i just spent 20+ minutes typing and then accidentally hit the escape key while grabbing my glasses cleaner on the top left of my keyboard. put my glasses on and the whole thing was just gone; its over idk if i can be bothered, i had it almost just right
If someone really were an differentiated feeling type, such a question would not be difficult at all.Unless, of course...They weren't really a feeling type, and just your average robot who is an extroverted thinker mistyped as a feeloid because they're depressed.Many such cases.
>extroverted thinker mistyped as a feeloid because they're depressedYou know what? I think you are onto something pointing at these types probably running around saying they are INFP and shit when depression strikes.As for what's the "average robot" type or whether a feeling type should be able to articulate "emotional affects", I will leave those matters up to interpretation as an exercise for the reader.
>>84292117It is a difficult question to answer, because it is by its nature highly contextually dependent, as most value judgements are. So if you are not some objective arbiter going off a rulebook defining a set of apriori moral rules, then it will always be colored by one's own emotions. But I guess if I had to boil it down into the most essential answer it would be that, it is cute when that action is born from a sincere naive instinct, and cringe when it is born from a perverse imitation. I also have a secondary slightly unrelated belief that cuteness and "funniness" are gender opposites (in a kind of chiral sense) born from the same cognitive response, where women/the feminine tend to be more cute and men/the masculine tend to be more funny.>>84291503True, but if you are thinking type getting confused on this, you should probably just read on of those old books on etiquette together with some introductory book on acting/theater just to get a more indepth idea on the concepts of character and context.
>>84293107>it is cute when that action is born from a sincere naive instinct, and cringe when it is born from a perverse imitationWhere would you put the "kawaiiko" archetype then?Their entire shtick is that they turn cuteness performative to some degree, to not be confused with a character who is just cute, it's properly differentiated as a type who overdoses on it(termed specifically "cutesy") and understands it has social advantages. A japanese idol is pointed as the most obvious example who is likely to lean into the archetype, but we also have those who seem a mix of genuinely childish but also controlling/deceiving.PDB would like me to believe these are also INFPs, just overindulging a little and reaping the benefits while we are at it.
What's the meaning of life for INTJ?
>>84293291Becoming a writer of some sort, if actual Ni-groid.Trying to communicate something that will be misunderstood for a long time, then eventually starts to click and everyone will be impressed by how far-reaching the vision was. That seems to be what these types do best, and they don't even need to try much, can just write straight out of their stream of consciousness.
>>84293107>sincere naive instinct, and cringe when it is born from a perverse imitationThat's a very thinking-forward perspective you posited. >then it will always be colored by one's own emotions.I was specifically asking for those emotions with that question. Maybe I didn't make that too clear, but my intent was to find the emotional motivation behind the rational feeling-judgement of cute/cringe. Because, being as it is a feeling judgement, it contains within it the subjective emotional affect, and a differentiated feeling type would have little to no issue parsing out the judgement from the affect.Which is to say, feeling types would be able to separate the value judgment ("this is cute/cringe") from the underlying emotional tone that produces it, and clearly articulate both.
>>84290862>intuitive-intellectual introvert.this nigger fucked all of his female patientsintroverted my ass
>>84293476Bold of you assuming introverts can't be whores, or manwhores.Granted, for an INTP it's very LOL but hey, they told you about how wild the "lower aux"(Sensation in their case, closer to extraversion) can get.
>>84293476lmao.captcha tung my anus.
