>tfw you correctly recognize all of society's problems would instantly vanish if we had a 1:4 ratio of men to women >tfw you also realize it will never happen because we live in hell
>>84329203why yes, my sexual malaise is the entirety of the world's social issues
>>84329211it's alright, you're a bit dumb so you can't compute the second-order effects of such a population imbalance
>>84329203All technological and medical innovation is driven by men. We would be in the Stone Age if we had that gender ratio
>>84329232i'm actually a lot dumb
>>84329271It wouldn't really matter because there would be no war or conflict and everybody would just be chilling and fucking in their tribes.
No, actually. We need an equal distribution but with a 4:1 disposable to not-disposable male ratio.
>>84329203That would be a nightmare for monogamy. Most women wouldn't be able to get a husband
>>84329962Men don't want women to be happy, men want women to be their slaves
>>84329968I believe in Catholic Social TeachingFulton Sheen describes it in Three to Get Married, while Bishop Barron talks about it in the context of a Transcendent Third. The concept that a couple's bond is strengthened and sustained by both partners simultaneously falling in love with a higher good, specifically God. Rather than just focusing on each other, they look together toward God, providing a stable, shared purpose that endures beyond emotional changes
>>84329203>reduce your real economy by 4 times>it will solve all problems of society
>>84329962all women are lesbians or at the very least bi anyways so it wouldn't matter
>>84329203Women are the cause of societies problems tho. Having more women would just make things worst.
