[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: file.png (424 KB, 686x386)
424 KB
424 KB PNG
Now that the dust has settIed, who was in the wrong here?
>>
the person who thought shooting at a moving vehicle would so it
>>
>>84367867
The untrained guys ripping people out of cars at gunpoint and unnecessarily escalating the situation
They already copied her plates down, if she was trying to leave you aren't going to stop an SUV by walking in front of it, just let her go and pick her up later for whatever you think she did
>>
File: pursethief.jpg (20 KB, 400x269)
20 KB
20 KB JPG
>>84368235
Is that really what we want from law enforcement?
Just let fleeing criminals go, we will catch them eventually?
I thought it was the job of the police to get in the way of fleeing criminals and trying to stop them from escaping justice
>>
Don't drive your vehicle at some undertrained pig if you don't want to get perforated.
>>
>>84368244
It's not letting criminals go free, it's letting the properly equipped units handle the appropriate situations. Just admit you wanted her killed regardless of the law, because you don't care about the law anyway.
>>
File: 1748918987398.jpg (207 KB, 1080x1225)
207 KB
207 KB JPG
>>84367867
WE ARE RENEEEE GOOOOOD
WE CARRY THE FLAAAAME
WE'LL FIGHT FOR SOMALIS
AND HONOR THEIR NAAAAME
>>
>>84368244
Nah I don't expect cops to ventilate someone for jaywalking or running a stop sign or whatever. You ticket them or send them a court summons in the mail and move on. They were using completely uncalled for force and making people scared for their lives. If the driver in the SUV was a conservative and the cops were sent in by an ego-tripping dem president I'd feel the same way. It was just bad police work all around.
>>
All cops are pedophiles
>Muted
>>
File: Jericho mask off.png (373 KB, 890x890)
373 KB
373 KB PNG
>>84368258
What equipment would the people knocking on her door have that the police officers stopping her at the check point lacked?
>>
File: Clearance Chart 2021.png (69 KB, 897x715)
69 KB
69 KB PNG
>>84368279
This type of thinking is what wiped out crime clearance rates
In Britain, approximately 92% of burglaries go unsolved. They have an 8% clearance rate. And it's because of chickenshit police work like what you are suggesting
>>
The dyke going to war for somalian scammers' right to my tax dollars. Good guys win bad guys lose, give that officer a raise. Fuck cops btw
>>
>>84368321
A car or a barrier if they really think it is justified to stop the vehicle. With how slow she was moving, you could just corner her and she would have surrendered. People should be allowed to protest, not executed with a trial. Not to mention, she was prepared for a visit by law enforcement later, so why the need for escalation in this particular case?
>>
>>84368493
>Fuck cops btw
Yeah, that really fooled us
>>
File: file.png (317 KB, 1073x2485)
317 KB
317 KB PNG
>>84367867
That was probably like the tenth libtard that cop had to deal with that day, it was just a matter of time that one of those retards got shot for being annoying, the incidence rate was way too high, George Soros pays these people btw. Billions of dollars, not millions, billions, it's insane.
>>
File: L4eFgyA.png (1.03 MB, 1277x715)
1.03 MB
1.03 MB PNG
>>84368573
So what was going on in this situation? The woman is an ICE WATCH Warrior, she's been "stalking" ICE, and in her own words tried to make their life a living hell.
https://nypost.com/2026/01/08/us-news/renee-nicole-good-was-minneapolis-ice-watch-warrior-who-trained-to-resist-feds-before-shooting/
She was pulled over at an ICE checkpoint. 2 new officers arrived, instructing her to get out of the vehicle, as officers on either side of the vehicle repeatedly try to open the locked doors, including reaching through her open window in an attempt to undo the locking mechanism. While she is being swarmed by these 4 officers attempting to pull her out of the vehicle and take her into custody she moves the vehicle, reversing it. They all react, including the officer in front of the vehicle pulling out his gun and pointing it at her.
Now it seems like there is 2 courses of action. One which would result in her living, and one in which she dies.
1. Remove the key from the ignition. Remove your seatbelt. Unlock the door and do not resist law enforcement
2. Reverse and point your tires towards the road, hit the gas and try to evade the consequences of your actions.
>>
>>84368420
just for the sake of argument, does a bigger clearance rate really mean more criminals are being apprehended?
>>
File: Seth rich.jpg (40 KB, 780x438)
40 KB
40 KB JPG
>>84368618
It means more people are getting justice on the back end
If you call up the cops and tell them your bike was stolen, 92% of the time they don't call back, but 8% of the time they call back saying "hey we caught the guy, based off your description we found it in his stash and can return it to you"
What kind of justice or closure did the family of Seth Rich get? Yeah he was murdered, we have no suspect, no motive. We think the person who killed him might have mugged him but his valuables were found on his person after he died". It's hard to see how the relatives of the victim were served by the justice system in that case.
>>
>>84368244
Car chases actually cause more damage than they are worth, lawsuits from them are also fucking expensive as shit, it really is easier to snag them after they are done running
>>
>>84367867
the person who wanted more illegal niggers in my country
>>
>>84367867
Ultimately, the democrats
>>
>>84368617
There really isn't much point of a discussion when all you want is to kill someone, is there? There are more alternatives, but of course you would ignore all of them, because then you won't be able to justify killing her.
>>
>>84367867
The guy who murdered the woman. When a democrat is in charge again he will be prosecuted.
>>
>>84368956
Name literally a single other alternative. Either she obeys lawful commands and turns off the car, gets out, and is arrested. If she doesn't leave but doesn't obey, they break the window and force her out and arrest her. So literally the only other option is trying to run, in which case, she has to rapidly accelerate towards an officer in front of her car, regardless of whether or not she wants to hit him, she has to go towards him.
>>
>>84368967
He should have just accepted he was going to be run over, history was on her side
>>
>>84369290
the car was moving away from him
>>
>>84369290
He should have just got out of the way
He was retarded and he's going to prison as soon as another administration is in
He threw his life away for Trump's messaging, a 50k paycheck(which he won't get) and an ego trip
>>
>>84369333
Wouldn't double jeopardy prevent that?
Trump's administration prosecuting him and punting so he gets an easy win, and then he can't be prosecuted for the same crime a second time
>>
>>84369327
it literally hits him, on camera from multiple angles, you're just lying at this point.
>it only hit him a little though!
>>
>>84369278
>Name literally a single other alternative.
Arrest her later. She wasn't even causing that much disruption lmao. As I said, you just wanted her dead.
>>
>>84369502
>someone drives through another person
>just let her drive away!
nope, she's utilizing a deadly weapon at that point. YOU just want attempts to remove illegals to fail.
>>
>>84369502
Doesn't letting criminals go and catching them later lead to less crimes being solved?
>>
>>84369548
why would she be treated differently from standard procedure though? what you're saying is not normal
>>
>>84369459
It would be state murder trump has no jurisdiction or he would have pardoned him already a federal pardon is useless for state crimes which is what he will most likely be tried for
>>
>>84369548
Their training specifically tells them not to get in the way of vehicles and her wheels turned away from him towards the right. Another case of giving someone with anger issues a badge and authority.
>>
>>84369548
>someone drives through another person
How about you don't step in front of a moving vehicle and de-escalate the situation as any law enforcement officer should do in a clearly non-violent situation?
>YOU just want attempts to remove illegals to fail.
They should focus on doing that instead of wasting time and money infringing on the rights of law abiding citizens. I don't know if you're just a bootlicker or just bloodthirsty, but it's really poor mental gymnastics from you either way.
>>84369582
You already have clear footage of that person and their car reg. How hard would it be to solve this crime? Come on.
>>
>>84369584
standard procedure is for cops shoot someone when they're using deadly weapons against them
>>
>>84369723
you're not supposed to stand in front of a vehicle to block it. He was crossing past the front of it, not just standing there.
>her wheels turned away from him
yet the car hit him
>>
>>84369915
>how about you don't step in front of a moving vehicle
he was crossing past a stopped vehicle when it started and drove into him. Also, you're moving goalposts :)
>They should focus on doing that
They were, Renee was doing what she was there that day to do - blocking ICE with her vehicle. That gets you arrested. Rather than deal with being booked, she drove her car into a cop and got killed. A puzzling decision, but there are a lot of people who meet bad ends despite doing the right thing, and I save my sympathy for them, not people who win stupid prizes.
>>
>>84370024
>he was crossing past a stopped vehicle when it started and drove into him.
Car was already moving. What are you talking about?
>Also, you're moving goalposts :)
When did I move goalposts?
>blocking ICE with her vehicle.
Yeah, what a menace to society! Just admit you want her killed regardless of the law. She hadn't done anything to warrant being killed. It's embarrassing how you're supporting the state taking away your own freedom to protest.
>>
>>84370011
>He was crossing past the front of it, not just standing there.
Post the video
>>
>>84370092
>>84370103
https://youtu.be/wbL4Rpm8yhc?si=NYI8dbkis9z2rUdL&t=53
He's passing in front of the car when it reverses and then accelerates into him. Anything else you'd like to be corrected on?
>what a menace to society!
It's illegal and they were right to detain her. Once she ran into a cop with her car, he was right to shoot her.
>She hadn't done anything to warrant being killed.
She hit a cop with her car. I expect to be shot if I do that. Fortunately, I do not intend to do that.
> freedom to protest.
I feel like I can do that without driving my car into a cop.
>>
>>84370135
>He's passing in front of the car when it reverses and then accelerates into him
So moving in front of a moving vehicle then? Anyone with a few brain cells could figure out what she was trying to do, so why would you stand in her very obvious path?
>It's illegal
Illegal migrants are surely more dangerous than a woman with a stationery car in the middle of the road, so why would you so unnecessarily escalate the situation?
>Once she ran into a cop with her car, he was right to shoot her.
Right, so a cop can simply disobey procedure, but if a civilian makes a tiny mistake (very slight bump), it's shoot on sight. What a fair system!
>I feel like I can do that without driving my car into a cop.
I doubt you've ever been to a protest with the amount of bootlicking you're doing lol
>>
>>84370298
>So moving in front of a moving vehicle then?
No, he was moving in front of a stopped vehicle which then began moving while he was in front of it. He didn't stand, he was walking. You're clearly willing to lie to try and "win" an argument, so why would I bother with the rest of your post? Take care anon.
>>
>>84370309
Quoting your own words:
>reverses and then accelerates
Where is the stopping?
>You're clearly willing to lie to try and "win" an argument, so why would I bother with the rest of your post?
Ah, so you've run out of excuses for your law enforcement friends
>>
File: fGvvLX9.png (1.14 MB, 1275x716)
1.14 MB
1.14 MB PNG
>>84368956
What did she think she would happen?
She was surrounded by officers from all sides, who were telling her to get out of the vehicle, including reaching through the window to try and unlock the doors. She reversed her vehicle, all of the officers surrounding her vehicle reacted negatively, yelling at her, and the officer in front of her vehicle pulled out his fire arm and pointed it at her.
At this point, she decided to hit the gas. It seems like she was resisting arrest and refusing to respond to lawful orders, doing so in a way that jeoparized the life of the officer that was in front of her vehicle.
It seems like she was trying to avoid running over the officer with her backing up and tire turn, but the fact she hit the gas anyways when he was pointing his gun at her after she reversed was saying she would risk his life to escape accountability.
>>
>>84368235
>>84368573
>>84368956
>>84368967
we need that pussy trump to be replaced by a guy like bovino
>>
>>84367867
I think it might be the guy from the agency that is known to specifically train their guys to escalate situations by for example jumping in front of moving vehicles so they can justify wantonly executing people without trial? Just my guess tho.
>>
>>84370539
Ice does not have jurisdiction over us citizens boot licker
>>
I dont give a fuck who was in the right. That fucking lesbian whore deserved to die. She had an annoying voice and she was fucking fat and ugly.
>>
>>84370596
i respect this way more than those who insist lethal force was unambiguously justified
>>
>>84370539
>What did she think she would happen?
what the fuck does it matter what she thinks? it has nothing to do with whether lethal force is justified or not. that is completely backwards from how it works and so obviously motivated framing. you arent smart enough to be able to look at this objectively
>>
She was on the wrong side of the fence, what a fool.
>>
>>84370627
It matters what she was thinking because that explains her behaviour.
Like with George Floyd, she didn't end up in this situation by accident, it wasn't thrust upon her, their actions lead to the situation they found themselves in. It seems like it was an escalating situation of poor decisions that resulted in their deaths
>>
>>84370581
Would you say that an FBI agent cannot arrest you at the airport because they aren't allowed to make stops like that?
If you were trying to transport more than $100,000 in a suitcase on that plane, would you say an IRS agent couldn't detain you, or impound your suitcase because they're not allowed to do stops at the airport?
If you were illegally poaching at a national park, would you say that Federal Wildlife Officer or a Special Agent with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wouldn't be able to arrest you because they don't have permission to stop you?
If they set up an ICE checkpoint, they can stop you even if you're legal. Like if they set up a Sobriety Checkpoint or a DUl checkpoint on new years, they have a right to stop you even if you're not drunk.
>>
>>84367867
she was obviously just trying to flee, but she didn't have the right when she was being detained, and it wasn't the officer's responsibility to just assume that she was nonviolent. a vehicle is a weapon. it's all very simple. no one will face any punishments for this. she died for nothing.
>>
>>84370627
you're the one engaged in motivated framing, because you refuse to acknowledge how easily this all could have been avoided if she simply complied when being detained. why do you believe she shouldn't have to comply? why does she have to be given the benefit of the doubt by officers when she was so hostile and non-compliant?
>>
>>84370298
>Right, so a cop can simply disobey procedure, but if a civilian makes a tiny mistake (very slight bump), it's shoot on sight. What a fair system!
refusing to accept detainment and ultimately fleeing arrest is not a tiny mistake. you're just a pissy leftoid who doesn't get how the world works.
>>
>>84370092
>It's embarrassing how you're supporting the state taking away your own freedom to protest.
Actually just kill yourself holy shit



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.