Is this graph true?
I've traced the graph back to the book Dataclysm, this is an article which reproduces some of the graphshttps://archive.is/DspPQSo it likely is a real graph. Not saying the findings are true or meaningful though
>>84374919Yeah, im asking if the findings are true. Its from OkCupid, and the findings seem accurate but some people claim it doesn't represent all men. So I was wondering why it doesn't, and if there are any studies that show otherwise.
>>84374940you're conflating physical attraction with romantic attraction.also you're a tranny.
>>84374873I once blooged about this right here:https://praxonian.substack.com/p/does-okcupid-data-show-men-are-mostTL;DR: can be true, but also possible it's notMore related here:https://praxonian.substack.com/p/attraction-vs-sexual-attraction-vs
>>84374940left side of this pic is the best proxy graph for age of attractiveness(for men looking at female) you can find in research imo
>>84374873>women lie>researchers didn't take this into account>didn't make a questionnaire that revealed who they actively chose to date throughout their lifesMen are honest and women are hypergamous collectivist whores who lie even when asked the truth under oath.
>>84374873yeah, men are shit and retarded so they only see a partner in terms of fucking, that's why they believe the wall for a woman is at like 20 years old.Women just have a superior understanding of what things like life and love actually are.
>>84374873>23 at the very bottomdamn...
so there just wasn't an 18-19 box to tick?
>>84375087physical attraction is built in, not a choice. women wouldn't' get it since they lack direct physical attraction to anything
>>8437487380% of moids want the top 20% of womenHuh desu, so I guess it was all just incel projection all along
>>84376573absolute vs relative ranking. ~20s look the hottest relative to the rest but in absolute ranking, non-obese women all look 8+/10 until 35. it's like ranking between hot celebrities
>>84376828Cope, but ok bro whatever
>>84374873women need to try harder
>>84376939meta analysis (Frankenbach et al., 2022) of 211 studies looking at sex drive differences found:> 76% (adjusted: 71%) of all men will have a stronger sex drive than the average sex drive among womensee pic for attraction difference that has most ages, also men retain sexual desire for their wife past marriage/relationship where for women it drops
>>84374873Raw sexual attractiveness, maybe but I find talking to even 10 years younger people jarring - not a great base to develop romantic interest. Young people don't get my references! They suck! Geriatric millenials ftw, baby! :D
It's important to acknowledge that women are considering things like how much a man can provide them, the impact that the man will have on them socially, the lifestyle similarities they would share, etc.Men are just receiving the question "who are you attracted to" and being wholly honest about it. It's two different perceptions of the same question. As someone who works in an office with a lot of older women, older women are 100% very attracted to men younger to them.
>>84375087>Women just have a superior understanding of what things like life and love actually are.Tick. Tick. Tick. You hear that? Your time is running out.
>>84374873No. 20 is the lowest age they allowed men to answer.
>>84377007Not at all, this is just most attractive.
>>84376573The female gender literally rejects more than 50% of all men on dating apps if he's not 6ft. The female gender wouldn't even give a guy a chance if she's the same height as her in heels , meanwhile we got told we're the insecure ones about our height.
>>84377146>male male marriage has about a 30% chance to fail, implying each of the men contributes 15% of the failure likelihood>female female marriage has about a 70% chance to fail, implying each of the women contributes about 35% of the failure likelihood>male female marriage has about a 50% chance to fail, which lines up perfectly with the man contributing 15% and the woman contributing 35%Love how well the numbers line up to confirm that women are undeniably the problem.
>>84374955Take your meds, obsessed schizo lunatic.
>>84375087how can you "love" someone as boring and stupid as a woman? it's a meme. it's all about sex
>>84374940>but some people claim it doesn't represent all men.Of course it doesn't, that's how statistics work. Everyone is different. You even got the extreme ends with pedophiles that prefer 5 year olds and grannyfetishists that prefer 90-year olds. The point of the research is the average, it's a generalization on purpose.
>>84374873Lies.>The ages are lower
People also need to realize that there is a big difference in what bodies people find the most attractive, and what people they actually seek out relationships with. I'm in my late 30s and I can admin that teen women look very sexy. But that doesn't mean that I'd want one as a girlfriend. They are too immature and we'd have few common interests and perspectives due to being in completely different stages of life. Love requires more than just good looks, it requires compatibility on a personality level, and that's very rare with a large age gap. And most men understand that.
>>84374959>>84374955all women are retardedthereforeget the prettiest one you can because it's the only metric you can control for.My body count is above 30.I've dated floozies, teens in my teens, milfs, medical doctors, scientists, and attorneys.picrel is the ultimate truth>btw, your female doctor is a freak. Shibari blindfolded handcuffed DP kind of freak
>>84375087dilate.YWNBAW
>>84378766>They are too immature and we'd have few common interests and perspectives due to being in completely different stages of lifethis is how I've always felt about all women. they're simply too retarded and childlike for me to connect with them. they're also izzat seeking jeet tier subhumans. everything is about social izzat to them. why would a young, hot woman marry an obese old, wrinkly man who's rich? izzat. why do autistic women go for normalfags who have nothing in common with them? izzat. why do women practice hypergamy? izzat. why do women care so much about appearances and other superficial, pointless gay shit? izzat. they're just poos looking for izzat to redeem. I can't tolerate izzat seeking subhumans.
>>84378833checked and checked.They have no skills so they rely on looksWomen have makeupmand astic surgery and Men are full of T, so even mids and fatties get dicked down on a regularThus none of them ever have to become skilled at like, just at izzat/faking it.Jeet tier indeed.
The chart represents who they find *most* attractive, I often see women in their 30s and sometimes 40s and 50s more attractive than some run of the mill fat manjawed obnoxious 20 year old. However these women with attractive features who take care of themselves were probably more attractive when they were 20. Aging changes many of the features men find attractive, clear smooth wrinkle free skin, pert breasts, round posterior, slender waist, the "hour glass" figure, little deformation of her body due to fat or bad posture over the years.Women look for an overall "hunk" physique, broad shoulders, square jaw, lanky limbs and torso, they care less about the details like a man's rough hairy skin, after that there is also personality, it is not enough to be physically attractive they need "confidence" and the like.My advice to women is to ignore all the nonsense on social media and just focus on being healthy, your beauty will come out naturally after that. Whether it be """feminists""" pushing "fat acceptance" or Chuds judging your "cellulite", you are receiving some very bad advice. Instead listen to wholesome enlightened antisocial media like 4chan. We are not an echo chamber, we love criticism and after years we are more refined, we are all literal geniuses who know better than everyone else.
I think its totally true considering how many incels online say women are disgusting and hit the wall after 30 and considering normies have even less empathy are even more retarded than the avg guy here
