Porn destroyed my view of women and I don't think I can go back.
>>84407979It's really not that complicated you're just watching people fuck. I like watching girls (and guys; i swing both ways desu) wack off either with their fingers or humping pillows/table corners or putting a shower head down there because most content feels fake AF to me. Don't make it weird unless it has to be nigga
>>84407979women destroyed your view of women.
>>84407979Women are impotent and can't fuck, but can only get fucked
Women did that for me. They are not good people.
>>84407979woman friends and family members destroyed my view of women more than porn and hentai did
I mean, I feel fine.
>>84407979It made me appreciate whores a whole lot more. They're a very special, valuable kind of woman that makes a ton of people seethe because they can't compete.
I went to a whore and while fucking her pussy I had to think about hentai in order to nut. I am cooked. I do not even fap or watch porn every day at all anymore. Damage has been done I suppose.
>>84407979Same. But instead of women food advertising destroyed my view of cheeseburgers and now I have diabeetis
>>84407979I have a question for men.Let's say you're offered a choice to have a girlfriend that is attracted to you, right now, no strings attached, but the catch is that you can never look at porn again, would you take the deal?If you accept, then let's just say hypothetically, you won't be able to see porn anymore. It will be like colorblindness but for licentious imagery. Even a lewd advertisement or something will look so blurry and jumbled you can't even make out what it is. The girl is like-minded to you and had a similar background growing up, has the same amount of tattoos and piercings as you, has the same amount of hair dye as you, has the same bodycount as you, and is the same race as you and is around your height, more or less. She has the same BMI as you. She has a crush on you, but if you touch her once, then you instantly can never see pornography in any form ever again.
>>84407979porn didn't affect me at all. anyone who can be destroyed by words and pictures on a screen deserves to be destroyed.
>>84409802Is the porn gone as long as I'm with her, or forever? I don't need porn if I have a gf, but I'm not giving up my powers just for her to dump me a week later and leave me porn-crippled for life.
>>84409812Forever. This is a girl that I'm hypothetically introducing to you as already having a crush on you and is attracted to you.So if the relationship ends, then it will be because you broke up with her. As per the initial deal, if you touched her once, you can never look at pornography ever again. If you never made any moves or advances on her while dating before breaking up, then you can still see pornography.
>>84409811>anyone who can be destroyed by words and pictures on a screen deserves to be destroyed.kek
>>84407979I think porn has made me sexually frustrated but not made me change views of women in general.How did it change yours, OP?
>>84409863>I'm hypothetically introducing to you as already having a crush on you and is attracted to you.>So if the relationship ends, then it will be because you broke up with her.But she has agency, no? Meaning she can leave me if she wants to? If she does, she has to take the censorship brainwash with her. Otherwise no deal.
>>84409895>Meaning she can leave me if she wants to?Why would she if she already likes you?Would you leave a girl you liked? That doesn't make any sense. >she has to take the censorship brainwash with herThen this hypothetical would be pointless The point of the question is to see if men would choose pornography over a real relationship
>>84409952Good evening, sexhaver here. Even if ya like each other, the odds that any given relationship will last for life are like 10%, chances are the relationship in your scenario will end after a few years, quite possibly through no fault or active decision of anyone involved. The anon's question has merit, giving up a lifetime of porn for maybe 5 good years with the gal aint it
>>84409802Yes, this is just win win, I would accept that in a heartbeat.
>>84409802No. Porn is too high-quality copium and attraction does not guarantee we will even get married or anything, if we split apart then that sucks. Now if it promises me a successful relationship then that is very enticing.
>>84409952>Why would she if she already likes you?>Would you leave a girl you liked?Because people change instead of being crystallized in the exact same state forever? Have you never fallen out of love?>The point of the question is to see if men would choose pornography over a real relationshipAs I said, I'm fine not jerking it to anyone else while I'm in a relationship, but not with being lobotomized as in the thought experiment.
>>84409802>if you accept, then let's just say hypothetically, you won't be able to see porn anymore. It will be like colorblindness but for licentious imagery. Even a lewd advertisement or something will look so blurry and jumbled you can't even make out what it is. Wait. This is just an improvement of my life in general. Gf or no gf. Hell yeah, I'd take the deal. No more struggling with porn. No more torment and failed attempts to quit.>The girl is like-minded to you and had a similar background growing up, has the same amount of tattoos and piercings as you, has the same amount of hair dye as you, has the same bodycount as you, and is the same race as you and is around your height, more or less. She has the same BMI as you. She has a crush on you, but if you touch her once, then you instantly can never see pornography in any form ever again.Fuck yeah. But this better not be a genie thing where Hah suprise you're the woman now. But, either way, even if the relationship doesn't work out, I still have a massive problem in my life suddenly solved.
>>84410062Well you also have to consider that in the hypothetical, the woman will match your bodycount in the interest of fairness. So you're going into it expecting it to fail, because for you, statistically, it's more likely. >>84410220>Now if it promises me a successful relationship then that is very enticing.You can't really ask for anything more IRL without removing the agency of other peopleIt's just a girl that's similar to you who already likes you. That's it. You couldn't ask for a more stable foundation to build a successful relationship off of. >>84410385>Have you never fallen out of love?The emotional state of what we call 'being in love' is not what constitutes a stable relationship. The specific sensual excitement of a honeymoon is not going to last for the rest of the decades you have alive on earth, I'm sorry to tell you. If you think this one impulse is what you ought to strive for then there is no point to the concept of relationships at all for you. Frankly, there's no point to even making a promise for you in general, because you might feel different about it next week.>I'm fine not jerking it to anyone else while I'm in a relationship, but not with being lobotomized as in the thought experiment.I already tallied you with the men who chose pornography over a relationship
>>84410451I have a counter thought experiment for you then, misses woman:You have the opportunity to get with a wealthy man. He shows interest in you, and would like to enter a relationship with you. While youre together, he will pay all of your bills, and you won't have to work. However, you will lose your ability to work ever again, and will never again be able to earn your own money, even if you split up. At best, you might get a donation here and there, but in general you will have to resort to living in a homeless shelter and subsisting off of the food bank to get by. Unless of course, you find another wealthy man to take you in of course.Do you take the deal?
Porn did nothing to my view of women. People fuck for money, big woo, so do men. Men suck DICK for money.What knocked me around in my view of women was watching... women. College girls boasting about the older men they screwed. Teenage girls sneaking into clubs. Women on dating apps who were chubby 5/10s demanding rich tall men "who like me for me" (bitch, what about liking men for who THEY are).
>>84409802Probably not desu, for two reasons:I'm involved in game development, and it's hentai related. Not really a big deal, but it's not zero. The major reason though is your terms of matching me. I've had previous sex partners. I regret it. And also I would be turned off if she matched mine. If you would change those terms to be "can see porn just can't fap to it" and Virgin, then I would accept.
>>84410451OK now you're just being obtuse about this shit. You go "why would she leave you when she already likes you?" and then move the goalpost to "uhhh it's not just about being in love that's ephemeral" as if being in love isn't merely an example of a way to "like" someone. Your thought experiment is done in bad faith.
>>84409952>Why would she if she already likes you?It's happened to me before, multiple times; it stands a chance of happening again.Different anon here. I will choose the woman over the porn, I won't choose self-harm to get the woman. If she wants me to not look at it, I can accept that and do it for her. She wants to bind me via magical hypothetical, then I will wish her well and stay far away. Love is a choice, right? You want to give her the free will to leave but not give us the free will to satisfy her insecurity.
>>84407979>Porn destroyed my view of women and I don't think I can go back.Honestly OP you still need to try fix yourself. The difference between us and animals is that we can fail at something and recognize that our failure but make the choice to try again. Porn is meant to hijack your endorphins and mentally fuck you up, you need to break that conditioning. If you break the conditioning your world view will change, I only say so because I've done it myself.
>>84410514That would be a question you'd ask to tell if someone would choose careermaxxing over a relationship >Do you take the deal?No. My family is rich I don't know if that matters.A more analogous question would involve banning social media in exchange for an ideal suitor >>84410557>The major reason though is your terms of matching me.It's just to have someone similar to you. Someone would have said "your standards are too low!" or "your standards are too high!" if I made the hypothetical girl a bimbo or so ugly she's deformed and then made it into something I didn't care about. >>84410567>You go "why would she leave you when she already likes you?"Your immediate reaction to an ideal woman for you is anxiety that she'll leave you >and then move the goalpost to "uhhh it's not just about being in love that's ephemeral"What are you talking about, moving a goalpost? Sorry for ESL-ing. Emotions are ephemeral. If your relationship is conditional on you always feeling the way you did the day you met someone, then you might as well not have a relationship at all. This is a great many words just to come back around and say, ok, fine then, you are in the porn group. Idk what else you want me to pat you on the back about. >Your thought experiment is done in bad faith.Schizo.>>84410616>It's happened to me beforeI have a feeling it's not as what I've described here in the hypothetical. Because it's just a hypothetical, I hope you can handle just thinking about it.>If she wants me to not look at it, I can accept that and do it for her. She wants to bind me via magical hypothetical, then I will wish her well and stay far away.Re-read the original post, it's not her that's casting a magic spell on you out of insecurity, it's the terms of making an advance on this ideal gf. It would be some angel or god like Cupid. She wouldn't know about the deal unless you told her. This is just to see if porn or real intimacy is more precious to the responder
>>84409802I would accept that in a heartbeat. Whats porn, compared to cuddling a loved one?>Even a lewd advertisement or something will look so blurry and jumbled you can't even make out what it is. It also gives me immunity to reptile brain manipulations? Where is the downside? :)
>>84407979women destroyed my view of women and made me a faggot, because they are all untrustworthy and disloyalalso, they are gross when you really think about it, hence why post nut clarity exists
>>84410699>Your immediate reaction to an ideal woman for you is anxiety that she'll leave youNo, that's my reaction to the conditional about having to be permanently lobotomized as in your hypothetical.>What are you talking about, moving a goalpost?You go "why would she leave you when she likes you", get an example and then turn around and go "OK but infatuation is temporary" which is the entire point, there's a million reasons why she would leave me. At any rate, the point is, if I have to make a permanent compromise like losing the ability to fap to other women, and she doesn't have to do anything and can even leave me if she changes her mind while leaving me defective, then no, that's not a fair trade at all. What's she putting on the line in exchange other than just pulling off some typical woman crap and acting like she's gracing me with her presence and I have to sacrifice something to "earn" her?>If your relationship is conditional on you always feeling the way you did the day you met someoneA relationship isn't conditional on that, but a porn-lobotomy is.
>>84410699>This is just to see if porn or real intimacy is more precious to the responderThen make it only binding for the duration of the relationship next time. If its forever it brings a whole lot more into the equation than just that.
>>84410699>Re-read the original post,Re-read my reply. That she wasn't the hypothetical gf, it was you. You wanted to see if robots would choose girl over porn. However you decided to add in weird nonsense. I am not choosing porn over the girl, I am rejecting your hypothetical due to the nonsense. Were it simply "you have to give up porn for the girl" I could accept the thought experiment.>>84410699>someone similar to youI'm not attracted to someone similar to me though.As to the "moving the goalpost" the other anon mentioned, it's a phrase, look it up.As to the "your immediate reaction to an ideal girl is anxiety she'll leave you", well, duh. Every woman I've dated has done so, it's a valid fear, but this time you want me to put neural crippling on the table? No.
>>84410753>permanently lobotomizedMate, it's just porn. But as the hypothetical genie making this offer to you, I accepted your refusal three posts ago (I think it's three posts now?)>there's a million reasons why she would leave me.I think it's just wishful thinking then >then no, that's not a fair trade at all.It's supposed to be a gamble, which is asked to see what is more precious to men here>>84410785firstly, there's no incentive to make the relationship work then, and second, there is no tradeoff and makes it a pointless question. "would you have sex with a woman who likes you and then dump her and run away to go gooning?" that's idiotic, why would I even be interested in the responses to such a question>>84410800>You wanted to see if robots would choose girl over porn.Just men You are not a robot by your own admission So far the results have been split pretty evenly however there has been some confusion over the terms and attempts at negotiating them.
>>84410699>That would be a question you'd ask to tell if someone would choose careermaxxing over a relationshipNot really, was moreso meant as an analogy to how your scenario makes the fulfilment of basic needs above a bare minimum dependant on being in a relationship with someone else, and how that power dynamic isnt exactly fair or healthy
>>84410881>Not really, was moreso meant as an analogy to how your scenario makes the fulfilment of basic needs above a bare minimum dependant on being in a relationship with someone else, and how that power dynamic isnt exactly fair or healthyNot even Google Translate can save me this time
>>84410868>firstly, there's no incentive to make the relationship work then, and second, there is no tradeoff and makes it a pointless question. "would you have sex with a woman who likes you and then dump her and run away to go gooning?" that's idiotic, why would I even be interested in the responses to such a questionThe incentive is that you can have sex with her for as long as you can abstain from gooning. The way you phrased it is dumb, because as has been plentifully stated, who in their right mind would permanently lobotomize themselves forever if they can get dumped a year in through no fault of their own
>>84410918>who in their right mind So far, two anonsThree anons are having a row with me about the terms of the hypothetical, I think >would permanently lobotomize themselves (not be able to see pornography again lol)>forever if they can get dumped a year in through no fault of their ownYour mom might sneak behind you with a kitchen knife and stab you to death tomorrow, and then a meteor will fall from space onto your head, and then lightning will strike your dead body.
>>84410868>It's supposed to be a gambleAnd what's she gambling in return? Is she paying me a thousand dollars upfront? No, I am not permanently quitting porn irreversibly for a chance at a gf, that's a bad trade.
>>84411000>And what's she gambling in return? Is she paying me a thousand dollars upfront?I think this is the 3rd time I've said it This is just a question to see if porn or intimacy is more precious to men (This is not a hypothetical question posed to a hypothetical girl inside of a hypothetical)>No, I am not permanently quitting porn irreversibly for a chance at a gf, that's a bad trade.Think about it this way. You are also quitting the chance for the girl irreversibly for internet porn. What has internet porn ever done for you? It is 9pm and I'm tired so I will go to bed and count the responses tomorrow. Currently I think it's 3 | 2, porn is in the lead
>>84410994>(not be able to see pornography again lol)I'd weigh that about equally with only ever getting to eat bread and water unless you go to an expensive restaurant, or being unable to listen to music unless its a live performance. You can live with it, its just a major bummer>Your mom might sneak behind you with a kitchen knife and stab you to death tomorrow, and then a meteor will fall from space onto your head, and then lightning will strike your dead body.>bad thing with 0.0000001% chance could also happen, so why you afraid of bad thing with 80% chance ???
>>84409802visual porn doesn't compare to the degeneracy of pornographic literature, or my own dark fantasies; so i don't think that this hypothetical really works for as intended for me.
>>84411069>This is just a question to see if porn or intimacy is more precious to menX time of intimacy is better than X time of porn, X time of intimacy is not better than 10X time of porn, that should answer your question for most men
>>84411069>You are also quitting the chance for the girl irreversibly for internet porn.I have a chance at her in the same way that she has a chance at me, but she doesn't have to make any irreversible investment so I'm getting scammed.>What has internet porn ever done for you?Porn doesn't have a mind of its own and it provides me with joy. The girl has no guarantee of lasting because she has a mind of her own. Like I said, I'm not sacrificing squat for a girl in an unequal trade where she doesn't have to put anything on the table either. I pick porn for the same reason I spend discretionary income on a computer instead of on ephemeral experiences like traveling.
>>84410868>It's supposed to be a gamble"Hey men give up something permanently for the CHANCE of something working outIt's a shitty hypothetical, just accept the criticism.I am a robot. Robot != incel>>84410994>Your mom might sneak behind you with a kitchen knife and stab you to death tomorrowUnironically correct. That's why I don't talk to her.
>>84411069Intimacy is more important. However your hypothetical isn't intimacy, it's the -chance- for intimacy. I can reject your hypothetical and go out and get a gf tomorrow without relying on having my brain fucked with.>>84411129In fairness to the hypothetical girl, she had no responsibility here, it's the genie here who you need to take issue with.Relatedly, women will propose insane shit like this, have us tell them directly why it's stupid with no room for argument, and then turn around, look at the legal system and family courts and divorce law, and go "I have no idea why men don't want to get married!"I used to think they were malicious, and don't get me wrong many if not most are, but there's something cognitively wrong with them. It's some glaring blindspot like niggers have with per capita.
>>84411268Most people just think that women are "giving" something by entering a relationship and men are "gaining" something so there's a fucktarded expectation that men need to pay some kind of toll just to enter and live in a red queen state where you run just to stay in the same place.
>>84409802No. Fuck no.
>>84411282>ladies, have you tried being nice to men?>wtf that's emotional labor, I'm not his momIt's actually almost impressive, at least if it was on purpose
You're not a real robot if interacting and observing women isn't what destroyed your view of women.
>>84409802>but the catch is that you can never look at porn again, would you take the deal?If she doesn't leave me and there's regular sex then obviously take the deal.
>>84409802>have a girlfriend that is attracted to yougo on...>no strings attachedexcept you're about to list the string attached, but whatever>the catch is that you can never look at porn again, would you take the deal?just to have someone attracted to me? noto have someone I like stay with me forever? yes>The girl is like-minded to youdepends in what way, but ok>and had a similar background growing uprelatability is good, ok>has the same amount of tattoos and piercings as you0, so ok, but even 100 tattoos/piercings would be ok>has the same amount of hair dye as younone, ok>has the same bodycount as you0, ok>and is the same race as you and is around your height, more or less.not important, but ok>She has the same BMI as you.not a problem, she could even weight more than me, as long as it's under 350lbs>She has a crush on younice, ok>but if you touch her once, then you instantly can never see pornography in any form ever again.Is this enforced in a curse-like way, where only pornographically produced nudity/smut is blurred from my vision, but I can still view other women practically like on a beach or in a super market?as long as she's dedicated to me only, and the curse only affects pornography in the context of jumbling it, but I still understand the context of what's happening, that sounds like a really good deal
>>84411352No sorry read the thread. She can leave you at any time. No, if she leaves you can't undo the brain surgery. JUST ACCEPT THE BRAINWASHING FOR A CHANCE AT PUSSY YOU SISSY YOUR A MAN RIGHT
>>84411367>She can leave you at any time.Not worth it then because there's a very significant chance she leaves.
>>84410699>>You go "why would she leave you when she already likes you?" >Your immediate reaction to an ideal woman for you is anxiety that she'll leave you Are you a woman, and if so, a young/inexperienced woman? My literal first relationship as a teen was with a girl who cheated on me the first time I left town for a week. You have to realize that a relationship starting well before crashing and burning is an experience the overwhelming majority of people who date go through. If you don't understand that "ok, but does she stay into me for the long haul" is an entirely legitimate question, that's an indicator of your own naivete.
>>84410451>Frankly, there's no point to even making a promise for you in general, because you might feel different about it next week.Women once again not understanding the point of a promise. You stick with it, even if you no longer feel the same or if circumstances have changed.
>>84411405The point she's trying to prove is all men, yes all men, would choose porn over the perfect relationship. Perfect relationship is not defined in her original premise so people seek clarifications. Is she nice to me? Will she leave me? Will she cheat? Will she follow the religious laws of wife and her to duty husband? Can she cook with any level of proficiency? >erm no, women are people too you can't expect your gf to actually like you>she might leave, but it's impossible to say when. One year, two, five, maybe 20, all things end eventually>women never cheat, porn is bad but sometimes you meet a guy and then one thing leads to another but it's just sex so you can't take it personal and if you dump her for it that's your choice because that's not really cheating>she has the same religion as you but none of the conviction or willingness to follow the laws>she can cook like you but needs to be taught. Even if after demonstrating you also write the recipe down on an index card taste is subjective so it's actually your fault when she makes substitutions, burns it, or adds too much or too little of the ingredients because giving volumes/weight/times/temperatures is oppressiveIt's the gay genie game. You get the perfect gf but can never have sex, she will hate you, hit you, cause chaos and foment bad blood between everyone in you family and friend circles, she will randomly break your dishes or "help" you by washing clothes on high heat then dry on infermo heat ruining your clothes and it speaks to your character when you get mad instead of showing gratitude when the washes the stuff you explicitly told her not to wash. Also she will kill any pets you have because having pets is just an abstract type of porn. See? Men are all the same, perfect relationship no strings attached, yet you choose porn over her.
>>84412474That's a fallacy. If it was a perfect relationship, she would never leave and meet all your perquisites.
Porn made me realise how gross women are
>>84407979That's your problem. It is your mind. This doesn't mean woman are one way or another. You deformed your mind shoving garbage in it. Now you see the sons of God distorted, but the distortion is in your perception.It may take some time for you to clean your mind and set it straight.Never mingle with Atheists.
Porn liberates women>>84412186
>>84412797Hebrew claws typed this post
>>84412729Precisely. Perfect gf, but not actually perfect. The whole premise is bizarre because many men don't even use porn, or only rarely. I've never met anyone who actually likes it or seeks it out specifically. It's just a modern dutch wife.But the cunt playing gay genie is disingenuous. Anyone who accepts such a deal(which is all men), she starts jengaing. Well actually perfect wife doesn't necessarily imply this, that, and tho other. After a few exchanges your hypothetical perfect wife is now a frigid prude that refuses to show affection, won't help around the house, and is basically just a parasite. You work to provide her with a house, food, clothes, and leisure. In return you get nothing, or maybe 20 cups scattered throughout the house in random locations because she gets a new cup every time she takes another drink of something.
>>84411114All pornography is obscured You would not be able to read erotica>>84411268>I can reject your hypothetical and go out and get a gf tomorrowOh, carry on with your life then don't mind me
>>84412474>all men, yes all men, would choose porn over the perfect relationship. You literally didn't read ITTSome men chose intimacy and companionship over porn, I think it comes down to fear of commitment >>84412846>she starts jengaing. Well actually perfect wife doesn't necessarily imply this, that, and tho other.Look, I can't tell you the future even in a hypothetical. Maybe you beat your wife every day and you end up having to be split. The gay genie is not trying to fuck you over. The girl will be like-minded and similar to you, and so any perfidiousness will be matched and you should get along in theory. >>84411396>"ok, but does she stay into me for the long haul" is an entirely legitimate question, that's an indicator of your own naivete.She's not a hoe like your first relationship and this time you don't have to be the judge of character, the genie is doing it for you>>84411384>there's a very significant chance she leaves.There really isn't
>>84411244You can think it's shitty if you want it doesn't really matter >Hey men give up something permanently for the CHANCE of something working outIt's worth it for some, and it's a pretty high chance of working out lol, I just don't want to run your life.
>>84413791>She's not a hoe like your first relationship and this time you don't have to be the judge of character, the genie is doing it for you Yeah you obviously don't have a clue. It's not even entirely about character, people change as they age. I wonder why you're so invested in making sure you don't have to commit the foid character in your game of dolls to anything long-term - don't you think it's fair to expect long-term commitment in a monogamous relationship?
>>84407979>women stop having sex with 90% of men>"IS PORN DESTROYING US????"
>>84413791>There really isn'tDivorce rates are above 50% So the chance is significant. If you're going to set hypotheticals they should at least be clear cut across the board and not ambiguous when it comes to terms of contention. Men are going to take a relationship over porn. The problem is that men are constantly horny, so when they're not in a relationship they need a way to get off. If you guaranteed a loyal wife then no one is gonna turn it down.
>>84413888You slept with someone as a teen that was a literal hoe. You are a wanton. And a bad judge of character. It's said often (accurately) about women who choose men that abuse them. Most people in society need their matches made for them, but that's another discussion. >in making sure you don't have to commit the foid character in your game of dolls to anything long-term - don't you think it's fair to expect long-term commitment in a monogamous relationship?She will reciprocate commitment because you can reasonably expect that to happen, based on the information given being true >>84413915>So the chance is significant.If you are a slop person, sure, worry about it, but I wouldn't. >The problem is that men are constantly hornyThis is not true, and it's also not even a problem >Men are going to take a relationship over porn. Are you speaking for all men? They didn't ITT, most chose porn
>>84407979i got a fat girl with a huge ass that cums exclusively from penetrationmy weiner is bigger than most guys in pornim an ugly fuck and a giant loser, but that aspect of my life rules so hard that i dont care about anything else. i view other woman that only cum from their clit as broken defective goods now.
>>84413929>They didn't ITT, most chose pornBecause you offered a shitty hypothetical where their brain is permanently altered for life where they're not guaranteed an equal trade of a wife for life.
>>84413929>She will reciprocate commitment because you can reasonably expect that to happen, based on the information given being true >you are a slop person, sure, worry about it, but I wouldn't.Proving my point, you have no fucking idea what you're even discussing and will find yourself completely blindsided the first time a relationship goes sour.>>The problem is that men are constantly horny >This is not true, and it's also not even a problem Simultaneously cute and retarded statement, which is fine as that's half the appeal of foids in the first place, but it's impossible to take you seriously
>>84408069pretty much, porn did nothing
>>84413998You aren't an authority on this subject and I don't take you seriously. My dad >>84413945Hypothetical questions asked for fun usually have elements of permanence to the conditions >what if you woke up as a cat >UM IS BEING CATTIFIED FOREVER? DO I GET TO HAVE HUMAN HANDS? HELLO??? SHITTY HYPOTHETICAL
>>84414077* my dad would be an authority on the subject because he has been married for 30 years and says to me that old people as they age veritably don't care about sex
>>84414095You're so retarded you're responding to "you obviously have no relationship experience" with "but my daddy told me its like XYZ." Obviously your priorities change as you age - that's my point!Hard to believe younger foids have become so delusional they genuinely believe their counterparts aren't constantly horny, though. Try looking up women's accounts of getting on testosterone
>>84407979professional porn is the only thing that makes life worth living. i just looked at the entire girlsdoporn siterip and it was a horrific, soul destroying experience because 99% of them were fuck ugly
>>84407979women destroyed my view of women, especially their behavior on social media
>>84409802>is around your heightfucking gross, i don't want a lanklet gf
>>84413999does he think doing fisticuffs is going to mend the massive social breakdown taking place and vvestern civilization's collapse
>>84414170>Y-you're retarded because I am a wanton and slept with a whore who left me Ok>Hard to believe younger foids have become so delusional they genuinely believe their counterparts aren't constantly horny, thoughI think it's just your porn addiction + your boredom, especially after puberty
>>84409802No because I already have a girlfriend who is attracted to me, and nor being to able to perceive sexual content sounds soul crushing.
>>84414203I think you care about a weeks-long relationship that ended nearly a decade ago significantly more than I do at this point. >"Actually that ancient trope of men being horndogs is entirely your porn addiction sweetie. Men stop being horny after puberty!"No, I think you're just living in a reality you've constructed based on things you read online, or from whatever scrolling app has rotted your brain.
>>84409802>Even a lewd advertisement or something will look so blurry and jumbled you can't even make out what it is. Millions of men used to get off to scrambled premium porn channels like picrel. You are underestimating our ability. Near my middle school there was a tree that had two humps that looked sort of like tits and hole that looked vaguely like a vagina. Would something like be blurred? Because that's all a man needs.
