Even if we're able to return to a society without divorce, misandry, cheating, etc. We should continue to let our species spiral towards extinction. Because that's what we deserve.The fact that a large number of women were able to be brainwashed into thinking that living as the matriarch in a family unit is a form of servitude is all we should need. No matter how much we do for them, no matter how much we sacrifice, women's minds will always be feeble enough that it may happen again. The solution to the gynofacism we suffer through today is to give them what they want. Keep to yourself, earn your own dollar, and give as little as you can back to the system that will never respect or appreciate you. Continue to stay away from sex and relationships so we stay at below-replacement birthrates.Don't try to put out the fire you didn't start. Even if we return to a stable, traditionalist way of life where women respect and value men, it'll mean nothing with the knowledge that women can live shamelessly in a world like ours.Sadly, women are a part of humanity. And women don't deserve to live, so we can simply choose to die off with them rather than continue to suffer because of them.
>we should choose the worst option because... well, because we just should, okay?Atheists can't reason.
>>84412782Don't forget that the planet and its biosphere would enjoy a glorious 600 million years without us
>>84412886that image is the equivalent of "i will be a politician" for communists
We won't return anywhere, as weak men continue to give up we will enter a new society in which only women, trannies, and 5% public insemination Chad's exist. All of the Joe's and bobs will get turned into biofuel as their jobs are replaced by robots. Not because they are more useless than women, but because they are much more of a nuisance and potential threat
>>84412907Yeah, after we figure out FTL travel.
>>84413035>weak menit actually takes a lot of strength to deny biological programming and ignore women. the weak men are betabux fools getting married
>>84412782I really get the feeling you genuinely and actually think women are the source of problems in your life. Most of the problems faced by the average person relates to an inability to access basic necessities, which happens when you attach the profit motive to demand inelastic things. If everyone can afford a house and food is very cheap and education is taxpayer funded then women can afford to be much less selective with their partners because the consequences are much less severe. But people on here seem to want the exact opposite of that, which necessitates being strictly selective.
>>84414625If women were shamed out of being single the cost of housing would go down dramatically.
>>84414679Yeah that definitely makes way more sense as a way to set up a society as opposed to providing basic necessities.
>>84414703I got nothing against basic necessities but i don't consider women having rights as one.
>>84414736If women can have their rights taken away from them for being women, you can have your rights taken away for as bad of a reason too. I don't understand why you would want to live in that world.
>>84414774Feminism happened so I already live in that world. Women have proven completely unable to reciprocate notions of equality.All that remains is for men to realize the mistake they made and undo it.In the long run women's liberation is a self-correcting issue anyway. I'd just hope for a secular return to patriarchy rather than through some christfag/muzzie pretext as fundies outbreed the feminists.
