The author of "Daddy's Little Toy" has been sentenced to 18 months community service after she was found guilty of producing and distributing Child Sex Abuse Material in January. The conviction was due to the fact that book in question was itself deemed to be CSAM by a Sydney judge. It depicts a relationship between a 45 year old man and an 18 year old girl, but includes scenes where she role plays as a toddler. She also has to register as a sex offender for 8 years, meaning she won't be able to do activities such as drop off or pick up her children from school.https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-04-28/nsw-erotic-fiction-author-lauren-mastrosa-sentenced/106617458
>>84468419>18 months community service after she was found guilty of producing and distributing Child Sex Abuse MaterialPussy privilege>that book in question was itself deemed to be CSAMWait what?>a relationship between a 45 year old man and an 18 year old girlHoly shit Australia is cucked
>>84468436Has been for as long as it existed. How they ever maintained a image of being tough guys is beyond me.
They're quick to regulate when it has nothing to do with taxes and the economy, they're fine with corporations sucking everyone dry, but if you make AI porn you need to be put on a list.
>>84468419I don't want to defend women but this is ridiculous
KEK. The US is shitty sometimes but at least they're not sending people to jail for making them imagine unpleasant things
>>84468494We do have obscenity laws here, but usually a work is assumed not obscene until a cort determines it, and convictions can be difficult in this matter.
>>84468519US obscenity laws are very rarely enforced, though. Peter Sotos has been publishing books about how child rapists are libertines as recently as 2024, and nothing is done
How is this be a bad thing again? There's never been a better time to be born. Before antibiotics you died instantly from getting a single scrape and the average lifespan was 14. And you always had food poisoning because they hadn't invented water yet. People couldn't even read until 1918 when the US invented writing and began compulsory education. For such a young technology as novels it is reasonable to have some common sense legislation. The people just want a compromise. With current printing technology books are high capacity. During George Washington era books were maximum ten pages in length. Nobody needs books longer than that. Certainly not if it's about literal child rape, the child in the book is only 18 years old. People aren't dying at ripe old age of 14 anymore, so the laws need to reflect this. Age of consent is 28, whether the law reflects this fact or not. This is more in line with historical trends when you compare average lifespans then and now.
>>84468555Probably because nobody fucking reads in America anymore so they don't even know it exists
>>84468419good. sick freak should be behind bars
>>84468568It's more like it's usually not worth the trouble and possibility of it getting pushed all the way to the supreme court since free speech activist have been looking for a court case to challenge the very concept of federal obscenity laws on constitutional grounds. Like I know the government generally doesn't care about money spent, but it's still years worth of effort all for words or drawings you have to go out of your way to find and generally consumed in private that are mildly offensive.Gore videos are also offensive (imo) but I still think it would be a retarded waste of time and effort to try and punish someone over such videos. Looking at such things doesn't objectively hurt anyone. The law should be based on objective harm. Not subjective hurt feelings of a 3rd party that went out of their way to be offended by wrongthink.
>>84468419If you write a smut novel and title it "Daddy's Little Toy" and then put children's letter blocks on the cover then that's already enough, no investigation needs be done
>>84468634If you use a imageboard or communicate online without your full legal id being known to both the government and the public at large then that's already enough, no investigation needs to be done.
If you have a VPN or ever used one or if you know what TOR is, that's all we need to know, no further investigation needed.
>>84468568No one gets arrested for loli porn either
>>84468697Exept for those couple of cases where someone was. Mainly from customs or the post office being cunts.
>>84468685Enough to determine what? If you write a smut novel and then title it in a children's letterblock typeface it's not a mystery ti know what it is
>>84468724If you write on a imageboard then post online anonymously it's not a mystery to know what it is.
>>84468419>scenes where she role plays as a toddleryou guys are women really into this?
>>84468744That I'm a loser with no social life?
>>84468762A wrongthink thoughtcriminal with offensive opinions in need of reeducation and/or punishment. That is where all this shit ends. That or death camps.
The West is completely going to shit. Move to Asia if you've got the ability to do so
>>84468798It's literally not a mystery what a smut novel titled "Daddy's Little Toy" in children's blocks is to me. I don't need to do any deep investigation to know what this picrel entails. There is literally zero logic leaps or assumptions it's just barefaced telling you what it is. I don't know how to reduce it into even simpler English. >>84468824Hao, hao
>>84468829It's literally not a mystery what anon on a imageboard is to me. I don't need to do any deep investigation to know what that entails. There is literally zero logic leaps or assumptions, just barefaced telling you what it is. I don't know how to reduce it into even simpler English.
>>84468867Then you should be able to say what I am plainly, without abstraction, instead of repeating what I'm saying back to me over and over
>>84468906You are deeply missing the point.
>>84468910You are deeply avoiding making a point to miss in the first placeI correctly identified this as degenerate pedoshit that should be tossed in a book burning within a fraction of a second
>>84468931>You are deeply avoiding making a point to miss in the first placeAre you pretending to be stupid or are you actually retarded. The point is that any argument you make for censorship and locking people up for wrongthink can and most likely will eventually be used against you. That is my point moron. For example>I correctly identified this as degenerate pedoshit that should be tossed in a book burning within a fraction of a secondCan be use on you>I correctly identified the degenerate imageboard user that should be tossed in a camp within a fraction of a second
>>84468419its scary how anything can be legally classified as "CSAM" now. First it was drawings, now it is mere writing.Literal orwellian doublespeak in action, and everybody is too afraid to speak up against this shit out of fear of being seen as a pedo.
>>84468977Wouldn't it be rightthink if I can correctly identify this object for what it is, you ESL monkey?>any argument you make for censorshipPedo material should be censored It is censored I correctly identified it as something that should not have even been published at first glanceWhat exactly is apparent about every imageboard user at face value that should warrant him to be jailed? If you don't say what it is in concrete terms without repeating me, or apologize for making a shit equivocation, you aren't getting another crumb of (You)
>>84469088>you ESL monkey?Funny since you are the one who can't seem to grasp simple concepts that even a gradeschooler could follow. I can't understand a basic logic for you. You are literally too stupid to understand the very simple point being made.
>>84469038This is why Americans keep trying to explain to Euros and the angilosphere that you ether have free speech or you don't. It's a binary, not a spectrum where the government can be trusted to pick and choose only the bits you personally find intolerable. They have proven through all of human history that governments can not be trusted to regulate speech and will literally always every time take whatever powers allowed to them to censor and expand them to the point of absurdity and abuse because it given them more power.
What's funny is actually raping kids will get you a cushy position as congressman, senator, or seat in the boardroom. Even president. Brrr a few million dollars and bribe the raped's parents to keep quiet, make the detective a DA or mayor, then keep the couple million in change to buy a new helicopter for your yacht. Some pornbrained foid types up her fantasy reminiscing the good ole days with her stepdad as an 18 year old Mary Sue and she gets an eight year sentence.Unreal just how different the lives of the jew class and regular class people are.
>>84469245Europe is a lost cause. They will swear up and down they have free speech. Their masters have successfully convinced them free speech is entirely seperate from bad speech. Free speech is saying you don't like schnitzel, hate speech is saying you don't like falafel. One opinion is OK, to be celebrated. The other means depersoning and jail and even that's not going far enough. If the EU doesn't like the outcome of a vote they'll nullify the results, remove the ticket item or party that won for election interference, and keep holding a vote until the members vote correctly. Democracy is fundamentally broken and untenable.
>>84468829Could be a regular roleplay thing. It's not like it's rare for women to want to be dominated and controlled in a bdsm setting as they call their partner "daddy"
>>84468419>charged with promoting "child sexual abuse material" >implying that her written novel with 0 children involved is just as damaging as real child porn Diluting the meaning of real life child rape to own da pedos
>>84469642this. this isn't child porn. going as far as writing a novel where a baby gets raped by an adult, because no real baby is getting raped during its production. and it shouldn't be illegal for that reason
>>84469663I mean it shouldn't carry the same penalty as abusing a child but it also shouldn't be published or sold, it's not a mutually exclusive take
>>84469678Who are you to tell others what should be published or sold?Books featuring all kinds of bad and offensive things are published and sold.
>>84469683Someone among whom would see it and make a complaint to the publisher and then they'd probably take it down, there is no artistic or literary merit to "Daddy's Little Toy" and there is no historical consequence to it eitherLike Balenciaga dressing kids up in BDSM stuff
>>84468419I'm generally put off by DDLG type roleplaying but if that book is legally CSAM then what is the Quran? Aisha was 6 when married to Mohammad and 9 when she got the dusty dick of the holy prophet. Australia would never admit this though.
>>84469746>DDLG bad>but cuckold and mommy dommy goodYou're biased whatsover.I'd argue DDLG is more natural and better for soceity than either for those two.Surprisingly, only of them is banned. I wonder to whose benefit?
>>84469707Or in otherwords >I don't like it therefor no one should see it>Like Balenciaga dressing kids up in BDSM stuffYou are misremembering that controversy. That isn't what actually happened.
>>84469767The court documents in the photo shoot talking about child porn beg to differ.
>>84468419>>84468436>>84468453>you VILL marry ze eggless hag>und you VILL provide her wif ze financial support>UND YOU VILL BE HAPPY
>>84469753>assuming I like kekoldry or mommy domOkay.
>>84469825No, I was talking about the law, not you, you fucking brainlet.There's no consistency to this because, just like every other law they push, it's not for the "safety of children", it's for the safety of the elite (to be kept in power).
>>84469678Who is being harmed by the production of Daddy's Little Toy?
>>84469843Great, because all I said was that DDLG makes me uncomfortable, directly followed with a point about the Quran getting defended legally from Australian censors. And then you assumed I was your enemy for no reason. You fucking brainlet.
>>84469767>You are misremembering that controversy. That isn't what actually happened.Are you fucking retarded on purpose Balenciaga dressing kids up in BDSM theme clothes is not germane to a functional or harmonious society in any capacity Netflix showing softcore porn of kids with "Cuties" is not A smut novel called "Daddy's Little Toy" written in children's toys is not Are we being serious right now
>>84469845Everyone in any contact with it whatsoever
>>84468703Prosecutors also add obscenity charges when people get caught with the real stuff and the drawings.
>>84468419My uncle was sentenced to years in jail after distributing child pornhe installed cameras in my room and recorded me when I was like 12he killed himself in jailkarma!!
This is icky but it's crazy you can go to jail for writing fiction
>>84469974Mostly to pad out sentences
>>84468634What if it was ironic?
>>84469931you are a faggot prude who probably has terrabytes of toddlercore on your hard drive
>>84470025Are you agreeing that's bad?
>>84469940They don't have to read it.
>>84470025https://youtu.be/Hg49x9NvOeI>we just need to give children freedom>our porn is fictional, just a drawing>is pedophilia that bad?>IF YOU CRITICIZE US YOU ARE A DANGER TO CHILDRENyou're fucking stupid. Even moreso than I am for having a shoe video in my history.
>>84470015What if I yelled fire in a theater but it was ironic>>84470025>hey can we not sexualize children in public >you are a faggot prude I bet you're a pedophile >>84470074They don't have to produce it either
>>84469931>Balenciaga dressing kids up in BDSM theme clothes is not germane to a functional or harmonious society in any capacityIt also didn't happen. Which is why I said you are misremembering that controversy. >Netflix showing softcore porn of kids with "Cuties" is not Calling Cuties softcore porn is also wrong. I think the movie was gross, handled the subject matter poorly, and was overall bad, but to call it porn is stupid and wrong. Nor do I think it should be banned. It should be shamed and made fun of, but not banned. You know what is germane to a functional or harmonious society?Freedom of speech, extremely strong personal liberty, and civil rights. Censorship of things you clearly don't even know about because the idea of them existing offends you is not conducive to a functional and harmonious society. It's the highway to anarcho-tyranny. I am being deadly serious right now. Your ignorance and impulse for censorship is more dangerous to society then any controversial novel ever could be.
>>84470113>It also didn't happen.You're doing it on purpose then >You know what is germane to a functional or harmonious society?Not making perverse material out of little kids and when it does happen not having faggots give me an essay on libertarianism in defense of it >I am being deadly serious right now.You are in a clown outfit on a unicycle right now OH NO HE CENSORED DADDY'S LITTLE TOY NO IT'S LOST TO US WHYYYHow about we can have freedom of speech and also censor shit like that? Like I said, it's not one or the other
>>84470108Nobody has to do anything, let's just sit around and do nothing.
>>84470163No, people should do things Making smut with a kid's toy aesthetic is not one of them, and publishing it is definitely not one of them
>>84470140>You're doing it on purpose thenLook it up tard. You are remembering wrong. You being overly emotional makes you less convincing not more convincing btw.
By that logic you shouldn't be able to write any crime novels because there are crimes in them
>>84470189There are far more offensive books out there that do far worse things to "fictional" children.Besides, you know nothing about the content of the book and are just have a gut reaction that you are using as justification for abhorrent totalitarian dogshit takes.
Pedophilia is part of the western canon To suppress it is a form of cultural genocide an erasure of our shared heritage and traditions
>>84470211Got it, so you're retarded
>>84470234Oh great more dogshit Go mourn dogshit being picked up from your neighbor's yard >you know nothing about the content of the book and are just have a gut reactionIt's all that's required
>>84470329>>84470334It isn't trolling if you are actually mad.
>>84470352I'm the one being trolled here
>>84470403Ah yes, because the opinion that censorship is bad is such a troll opinion that you can't comprehend anyone holding sincerely in your tiny worldview. I am sure you are also utterly shocked that no one finds your nonsense convincing or even coherent.
>>84470465Censorship can be bad Censorship can be good In the instance of censoring the sale of kiddie themed smut, censorship is appropriate >you can't comprehend anyone holding sincerely in your tiny worldview. I can, but willfully not acknowledging the other side's terms that censorship is not universally bad is disingenuous. That's why I'm being trolled>I am sure you are also utterly shocked that no one finds your nonsense convincing or even coherent.No actually hundreds of thousands of people sign petitions to get stuff like this removed.
>>84469822Yeah nah he sounds way more retarded so change it
>>84470542You can't censor people thoughts even if this wasn't written down she's still thinking them
>>84468419>>84468436>>84468440Abusive assholes are also cowards who get triggered when you even make a joke about their behaviour or hit too close to home. Putin went after cartoonists for making fun of him.
>>84470562You must not be the anon I was talking to. She can think about dogshit all day, but if she tries to sell it, proliferate it, or make this into a public performance of any kind then a reactionary censoring of it should be expected. If you want to be a purveyor of dogshit then you should expect to do it in complete obscurity
>>84470542>Censorship can be goodI disagree on a first principle level. Censorship is fundamentally wrong. Evil even. I have zero tolerance for censorship. >people fundamentally disagree with me so I am being trolled. You don't know what trolled means it seems. >No actually hundreds of thousands of people sign petitions to get stuff like this removed.And millions have killed and died to fight for the rights to keep people like you from power.Sic semper tyrannis
>>84470767>Censorship is fundamentally wrong. Evil even. I have zero tolerance for censorship. Why?
>>84470617Nope.Don't like it don't read/watch/look at it faggot.
>>84470789Nope, if you don't like it then go create your own society built on kiddie themed sex material commerce.
>>84470786>why is it wrong to use force because I don't like someone's speech >why is it wrong to cause objective harm to someone who causes subjective offense Nigga really?
>>84470815How about if you try to violate my first amendment rights you get to to experience my second amendment rights. American society was built on free speech. You are the one that needs to leave. Go to China, or Iran, or some other regressive shithole where your civilization destroying ideas are practiced in full.
>>84470827>You can't sell that here, sir That speech seems just as free>>84470854>Let me distribute kiddie theme sex material in your neighborhood or I'm going on a murder spree Don't know about Iran, but in China I'm pretty sure I wouldn't have to worry about you EPI'ing kids.That said, neither would tolerate this behavior, neither are 'free speech absolutists' ready to die on the hill of child porn For example, this guy https://youtu.be/0ePTbCwXIek?si=srf30u1hCTEz-JbNSo he should retaliate at the pentagon for firing him? What about his free speech?
>>84470916>hurp durp>Despite what I was arguing for for the whole thread now I will claim I was arguing something else that I think is easier to defend even if that easier argument doesn't follow from my previous argumenthttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motte-and-bailey_fallacyOr better yet>Hey, what about this thing that is totally and completely unrelated to the current argumenthttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_herringI am not bothering to reply to you unless you start making better arguments as now you have annoyed me with your stupidity.
>>84471050>uhhhh reddit fallacy >reddit fallacy>and uhhh I'm not reading cuz you're stupidFair
>>84470216Stephen King should be arrested for IT by this logic
>>84471121He is never going to live down that scene. People will bring it up even after he is long dead.
>>84470617yep, that's my exaxt reasoning for banning any public endorsement of homosexuality or any other deviancy. Society destroying behavior SHOULD be censored.
>>84468419it's funny because you know the law was made with men in mind, and would not be questioned if a man was charged.
>>84468419There is a anime with the same premise but there is no sex.A 17yo chases some 40yo restoraunt manager.
>>84468829Picrel is her next book titled "Daddy's Diddly Tiddy Toy". She gets raped by the police each time she gets caught hiding illegal material.
>>84468436>a relationship between a 45 year old man and an 18 year old girlWorth mentioning that big reason this novel got in hot water was because of portions where the older man was lusting over the girl when she was an infant/young child. Not even the part that was mentioned in >>84468419's post about her roleplaying as a toddler, but actual flashbacks to when she was a toddler.
>>84468419Why are they so uptight about a fucking book but won't do anything about the actual pedophiles in their government?
