I have a theory that explains why some people can plan a successfull life, and some people reach success through intuition alone.>picrelated for illustration but it should be a line graph1: It is possible to reach success through planning2: It is also possible to succeed by feeling alone3: Some people experience great problems when they plan too much (overthink), for example you miss chances4: Some people make terrible mistakes when they act on feeling alone5: Ergo, you should FULLY embrace either going through life by logic OR feeling, not both6: Explanation: You cannot go against nature, you have to find which is right for you
>>84491187Postulates 1 & 2 make the open-world assumption that "there are multiple possible ways to reach success" but only names two. Therefore, your argument is incomplete, because an unenumerated success mode may exist that embraces logic and feeling.
lol, he's on the show
>>84491265But when you look at the MOST successful individuals it's usually according to my theory.>>84491266Are you trying to induce Truman's delusion in me?
mmmm berry waise much thought
>>84491187You have two hands, and need not cut one off. Unless of course youre retarded, and most people are, in which case sever the weaker hand that gets you burned but remember youre retarded for having to do so
>>84491295Success by what metric? If the metric is happiness, then the ones who go the route of going alone without regard for their feelings are intrinsically unsuccessful, and would require some outlet for their emotions otherwise.
>>84491187Literally doesn't matter whatever little shit you have in mind, successful people are tall, good looking, charming, nice jawline, etc.And by successful I'm not only talking about a career or money obviously.
>>84491395>successful people are tall, good looking, charming, nice jawline, etc.Why should anyone listen to you if you're not successful by your own standards?
>>84491395So why aren't all good looking people successful and vice versa? lol
>>84491295>when you look at the MOST successful individualsit's just luck
>>84491423>>84491463To me success has always been a person who's been successful through every stage of life from elementary till he dies decrepit at 90. I find it hard to believe to believe it happens to someone short, ugly and uncharismatic
>>84491505So, Elon Musk is unsuccessful. Controversial take
>>84491515He seems rather successful? Don't know much about his early life though, not like it matters anyway
>>84491505>every stage of life>>84491525>not like [early life] mattersDifferent person or simple unhinged and insane?
>>84491543You probably just care about money, if that's your meter good luck buddy
>>84491505>I find it hard to believe to believe it happens to someone short, ugly and uncharismaticThat literally happened to my grandpa (God bless him).He was pre-boomer though, hard work paid off, he got everything he wanted methodically and on time.
>>84491556Elon is unsuccessful by my standards too, but they're different standards.
>>84491187the other day i imagined i was roommates with that brazilian chad olympic kite surfer and doctor who has a video where he saves a girl from drowning. and i imagined telling him i can't do X or Y because it's overwhelming, and it would turn out he had to do the same things but did them in like 2 hours and was like "what's the problem anon?" in a curious, slightly concerned tone.Chad doesn't write posts about intuitive vs analytical, he just does things competently and quickly, all the time.i imagined a few more characters like that to represent different ways to go about something.
>>84491628>Chad doesn't write posts about intuitive vs analytical, he just does things competently and quickly, all the time.So he's intuitive
>>84491685no anon, not at all.
nonsensical. you should go as far as you can by intuition, then write it down in your obsidian database and keep adding onto it. That's how you overpower competition. bu out-formatting it.
>>84491738>obsidian databaseare you a fall out character
