Basically, the top 1% of men (in terms of looks) are getting 20% of the sex. The top 10% are getting 58% of the sex. But the bottom 33% is only pulling 2.8%. The median man in the bottom third has 0 or 1 sex partners. The median guy in the 99th percentile has 287.However, partnerships between women and "top 1%" men are almost always sterile. Women want to have more kids, but they cannot find suitable partners who are willing to become fathers. The men they desire do not want to impregnate them, and the men who DO want kids are too ugly and undesirable (in womens minds) to serve as dads. Hence, society is gradually collapsing:https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-the-life-sciences/article/toward-individualistic-reproduction-solving-the-fertility-crisis-could-require-a-further-marginalization-of-men/F26A4750B666344157278B72CFC5D223You may not like these facts, but they explain a lot about the modern western world.
wtf women are actually based eugenicists?
>>84492657>bottom men are having sexall men are like that. i have never met a sexless guy in real life and you won't either. the meme is exclusively about weird guys who just stay inside all day on they computer.
I don't go outside either . I haven't found a way to make that all too apparant for others , though . Can you help me ?
>>84492657Just wait until you read the studies on how men are mostly low IQ and never try to have relationships. There is a reason they don't have kids.
>>84492657The entire proplem is that foids want chad sperm, but also want chad provisioning, which obviously chad won't do, even in modern times chad will not even contribute the bare minimum legally required child support not to face possible imprisonment, thus foids support leftisist movements with the intent of resource redistribution from the nonchad population to raise chads offspring, it's quite literally state sponsored cuckoldry, if foids just wanted chad sperm they could go to a spermbank but then they wouldn't be entitled to any shekels.If foids just all fucked chad and fucked off I wouldn't even care anymore, but I'm so tired of foids trying to turn me into betabux that I have genuinely reached unprecedented levels of foidfatigue.
>>84492729chad is literally a cuckold if you think about it.
>in terms of looksYou are a retard. Anyone can get sex if he wants. The most promiscuous men are those with no standards and basically sex addicts.
>>84492729What is the definition of "chad"?
If only there was a system that used to force chads to settle down early and pair up the maximum amount of people when they are most attractive and energetic.
>>84492657Chads won.They can do whatever they please and everyone cheer for themBoomers be like>hell yeah boy! turn my daughter into a slut!Chad is absolutely immune to any criticism.
What's wrong? Can't abuse your institutions to enslave women anymore?
>>84492749a man who has a 7+ face
>>84492778>However, partnerships between women and "top 1%" men are almost always sterile. >women be like: I can't breed!
>>84492729exactly.In fact, thats what the peer-reviewed article link in the OP says: that the government should give women free money to encourage them to have children on their own, without having to marry men they're not attracted to (aka non-chads)interestingly enough, the author admits this isn't good for men (since they'd be paying more taxes and getting nothing in return) but justifies it claiming that there might be no other recourse to stop demographic collapse.certainly something to think about.
>>84492799>We men are natural providers.>Then pay your share and let women raise children.>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO NOT LIKE THAT
I'm 37 now and married, but I spent over a decade in the dating pool, and the only thing that I really learned is that the VAST majority of women past a certain age end up with men that they are not even remotely attracted to, and that creates a dynamic where the man will spend his entire existence with her trying to earn validation that only ever belonged to Chad in the first place.You're better off with a fat, unwanted slampig of a woman that truly desires you than the hottest live-in whore that expects you to dance for crumbs of her validation.
>>84492799>that the government should give women free money to encourage them to have children on their ownAnd of course it's pure fantasy. Have children with whom?Non Chad's? No women don't want.Chads? Chads don't want kids with them. How Chad wirh 270 sexual partners can afford all this child support right? He doesn't want kids. He needs to be freed from obligations to his kids but gynocracy aren't gonna give men that.
>>84492819>thing that I really learned is that the VAST majority of women past a certain age end up with men that they are not even remotely attracted to, and that creates a dynamic where the man will spend his entire existence with her trying to earn validation that only ever belonged to Chad in the first place.Good thing marriage is dead.
>>84492817In an scenario where men pay more taxes and the government gives that money to women to encourage them to become single moms using sperm clinics (which is what the author of the article proposes) what exactly would men be getting out of it?
>>84492832>what exactly would men be getting out of it?Men never got anything out of "it". They did their God damned job instead of complaining like a bitch. Grow the fuck up.
>>84492817Pay share for what? So woman can spend alimony fucking Chad's?If you you pay you should get your part of the contract. Now "marriage contract" is complete profanation men are supposed to pay for nothing, when another side can walk away from their obligations any second.
>>84492657chad gets married to his highschool or college sweetheart. All the super sex havers are just normies fucking drunk and fat foids
>>84492821To be specific the author of the article proposes a system in which governments give financial incentives to women to get pregnant from fertility clinics, encouraging them to become single mothers, using money extracted from the taxes of single men. The author claims that this might be the only way to stop demographic collapase, barring massive, completely unrestricted immigration from the 3rd world.
>>84492713What does IQ have to do with wanting to have a relationship?The people who have the most sex are low IQ.
>>84492847Yes, they got sex.
>>84492832>women to encourage them to become single moms using sperm clinics (which is what the author of the article proposes)There double fucked physical and psychological health wiseAlso women aren't happy with such arrangements, in US estimated 1.5% of kids are born this way. Betting on social institution that only has 1.5% to turn it into Major persentage? Pure wishful thinking.
>>84492862Times change and people will have to adapt.
>>84492729>it's quite literally state sponsored cuckoldryNot gonna lie, this one really pisses me off. My taxes alone fund the existence of two families, while I get absolutely nothing from that. Welcome to Europe. I'm low-key happy that blacks are taking over because this means less white feminist women in future generations.>>84492819>You're better off with a fat, unwanted slampig of a woman that truly desires you than the hottest live-in whore that expects you to dance for crumbs of her validation.I remember that once in high school during some party I danced with the fattest girl and that was the best dance ever because she was the only person actually happy to have me around.----------------I don't have sex for the simple reason that no woman truly wants "me" and aligns with my values. Find me a woman who will:- go on hikes with me without bitching- do her share of house chores- do her share of earning- play vidya- smoke weed and do drugs without becoming a junkie- have intelligent conversations but also laugh at fart and poop jokes- have kinky sexI don't see the point of marrying someone just because they have a pussy, and the truth is, if you have a non-normie personality, your chances of finding a matching partner are epsilon zero.
>>84492826I'm fully convinced that dead bedrooms are a most common situation and that the reason behind the skewed single sex rates (single women having tons of it, average single men having month or year long dry spells) is just women not marrying anymore till much later if ever
>>84492872Or it's adapted very well now. >>84492826Soon South Korea fertility would look like peak breeding.
>>84492826>that graphshits completely fucked lmao
>>84492872You are just basically saying vae victis, how do you expect to convince anyone that your proposal should be implemented?
>>84492799Honestly at this point I prefer the government to import endless rapist niggers and arabs and turn white society into the jeetpit then give my money to foids, at least they would be doing a shit job nobody wants unlike foids that are just worthless leech tax burdens, I have zero sympathy for foids for they are my political and economic enemies and I feel no national, civic or insticintiual whiteknight proclivities anymore, they are equally foreign to me in worldview as some subhsarharan nigger.
>>84492897people will do as they're told, that much should be crystal clear by now
>>84492904Things have breaking points and history is full of examples, even recent ones.
>>84492923>force vaccinated almost the entire population>forced military conscription beta tested in Ukraine on the most violent population in Europe>no resistance whatsoever>but the cuck tax will be the straw that broke the camel's backdelusional
>>84492690The guys on their computers are the bottom guys.
>>84492821I think chads would go for that if they wouldn't have to provide for them but that wouldn't fly.
>>84492936The governments of Bangladesh and Bulgaria have fallen/resigned as a consequence of more or less violent protests in the last two years. That's just off the top of my head, there's more examples out there. Wars and pandemics are extraordinary situations that make society feel very threatened, so taking extreme measures that wouldn't otherwise be tolerated is something that people can somewhat understand and accept even if they don't like them.
>>84492878My wife doesn't meet your standards because she is reprehensibly useless at household chores and doesn't play video games, but every woman I've met that plays games actively has been an attention addicted, duplicitous whore by personalityThe unfortunate blackpill rub is that I'm conventionally 6/10 minimum, 6'2" good shape cute face, and she is maybe a 3/10 on a good day, but that's the only way I've ever found true loyalty and affection from a woman. Everyone else expected the dancing. Hypergamy is inescapable, and honestly it fucking sucks for below average guys because they're at a situation where every single woman that looks even remotely appealing on any level is knee deep in cock from men that would never be seen with her in public.
>>84492968>The governments of Bangladesh and Bulgariaduly noted, I'm sure the new government will do right by them
>>84492978Yeah exactly. So the choice is:a) be lonely and don't reproduceb) get an ugly goblin with two left hands and no common interestsreally grim, and IMO the first option is just less painful, but I understand men who choose b).
>>84493001In both cases I think it was about too much corruption, so they don't have a very hard task, just to keep the corruption levels where they usually are because that's what they are used to and even somewhat ok with.
>>84493004i chose b and im fully planning on ditching my wife when the kids are out of the house. im a super resentful person, and i've got diabolical plans ready for when she's counting on her easy soft retirement plan under the sun.ive got property in my brothers name in a rural area she has no idea about, and virtually all of my assets are wrapped up in trusts that will solely benefit my kidsMaybe I'm a terrible person, but I will never let another adult experience comfort at the expense of my own. That's retarded.
>>84492657stop linking this non-study, anyone with a brain can see that study was funded and included in the journal so that clickbait articles can link it.No real science was performed in it's creation, and the conclusions it draws are fake!
I'm a chad who is neurodivergant and has had too many negative feedback loops in his life, this is why I am here. I definitely would have been out having sex every weekend, had a few million on social media bringing in 10k or more a month and had lots of friends or whatever normal faggots with positive loops enjoy doing. My mom has Munchausen by proxy and an unknown personality disorder and my dad has OCPD, OCD, autism and generalized anxiety disorder. My mom would literally give me hand fulls of anti psychotics and stimulants as a kid. I don't mean this as just oh you know my mom gave me pills and whatever I didn't want to take them no these were like 5 or 10 pills of 10 times the recommended dose just because she felt like you know she wanted to give me pills for whatever crazy fucking reason. I started seizing out once. I would develop these horrible thinking patterns I would call "complications." I don't want to get too into detail it's disturbing. I would scream every night because I was just in a constant state of terror. When she wasn't doing that or rotting on her bed she was physically abusing emotionally abusing and verbally abusing me and my siblings. I could be locked in my room for days and we lived off of little Caesars for a few years. This was from around 9-12 until court happened and I moved to my dad's. He is a good guy but he has his issues. I was also sexually molested and have only had 3 friends in my life. Constantly bullied throughout school for being weird, and yeah, you get to where I am. I'm lucky enough to not have developed any sort of major issue but it definitely exacerbated issues such as adhd, add, CPTSD, and the behaviors that go along with those. As fucked up as it all has been I'm thankful it did because it led me to be the person who I am now and I believe it made me less superficial and more understanding and empathetic. I wouldn't ask for a better or worse loops. They have shaped me into who I am.
>>84492780How do you objectively measure this? What kind of quantitative ranking determines if someone is a 7 or 8 or 5?
>>84493027Why are you so resentful of her? What will your children think of you?
>>84493049Kek crazy random post sorry to hear that if true Munchausen by proxy is extremely abusive doesn't get talked about enough I wonder why you dropped this absolute bomb in this random thread tho I appreciate your support Mr Broken failchad
>>84493072my wife laid in bed for 2 years and complained of depression while i struggled and suffered to raise a toddler and a newborn on top of working alone. she grew up much better than me, and has a support system I have never even dreamed of. at the end of her malaise, she found therapy and assistance that i arranged and came out the end of it rejuvenated from her 2 year vacation, she threatened to leave me when I took a 2 week medical leave because I was thinking about killing myself.i will leave her destitute and eating cat food. I have already soured the relationship with most of her support system, and ive been fucking her sister for 8 months now.
>>84493063Attractiveness isnt subjective. An 8+ is attractive. A sub 8 is not
>>84492657>Almost all women still want to reproduce, but many struggle to find a good-enough partner.Good-enough in this context means better than them. For example, if you ask any woman that holds a bachelor's degree, her minimum requirements for a man will be that he also hold at least a bachelor's degree. As men and women become more equal, "dating up" becomes less possible for women which is why hypergamy takes place. These women equate sleeping with or having a casual relationship with a guy to dating him long term, which is simply not true. The solution to this is to drill into women's skulls that now that they are equal to men, they do not deserve a man that makes more than them, or is more educated, or whatever. They have to take the male approach to dating now, in the sense that they take what they can get. Men will date the McDonald's cashier, women won't. That's the difference.
>>84493095Based anon. Make a post on here when you finally pull the trigger one day and let us know how it goes.
>>84493081Thanks mang. Want to know what's crazy? She's married to a multi millionaire now who uses her as a sex toy. Her kids are all grown so she has "cancer now." She is genuinely a stunning looking woman. Her trauma comes from being raised in a cult and raped all day. So yeah, she abused her kids and now goes to iceland, mexico, japan, anywhere basically and lives in a mansion. Good genes can't fucking lose. I guarantee I'll have it better within 10 years with all of that has happened to me than a sub5 who had a good upbringing. Humanity is inherently superficial.
>>84493095Oh, I see. What do your kids think of her? She seems rather horrid and spoiled.
>>84493045Its real but it should be said that the preeminent authors seem to only publish papers in Sexual Evolutionary Psychology all with similar themes. I don't see anything wrong with the conclusions of the paper though besides the wild speculation most of it basically common sense at this point
>>84492690>i have never met a sexless guy in real lifeAnd you know this how?Do you ask every man you meet how much sex he has? Do you demand he back his claim up with proof afterwards?Or do you just assume every guy you meet is having sex by default?
>>84493097Answer the question. How do you objectively, quantitatively, measure attractiveness? Why is someone an 8 or a 7? And why do you think it is an universal number everyone agrees on?
>>84493150Do you just assume every guy you meet is a kissless virgin incel like you?
>>84493161Facial features and their distances from each other.
>>84493167I don't assume anything about their sex life either way. So why do you?
>>84493172>objective>quantitativeSeems like you do not understand what these words mean. Indeed you are proving that a number ranking is purely subjective.
>>84493161>And why do you think it is an universal number everyone agrees on?Because women do
Who cares. Let the entire world become nothing but back or Indian. It will be funny.
>>84493193>" How do you quantitatively measure facial attractiveness" By analyzing specific geometric, proportional, and structural features of the face.Sounds you like don't.
>>84493202Dunno why you are trying to talk to someone whose worldview cant fathom what a "stereotypically attractive man" is.
>>84493214It's just a failtroll so I failtrolled back but true its not worth it
>>84493202By analyzing how? Show your math. Show the exact math you used to arrive for yourself being a 5.42 and Brad Pitt being a 8.17. If you can't do that you will have to admit it is all subjective.
>>84493197One woman's 9 is another woman's 5. Women have varied tastes in what they find attractive in a man, unlike incels who lust after the same exact "chad".
>>84493299Shut the fuck up, I'm not an expert.Prominent masculine facial bones make an attractive face.
>>84493304Its not, litteraly all women can agree on what an attractive man is and what an ugly man is.
>>84493304femcels really are delusonal. its legit hilarious how men figured out what women really found attractive with the whole chad thing and you keep continuing to gaslight and lie as a defense mechanism
>>84492657>Be happily married/partnered normie to high school sweet heart>In same same bracket 0-32 percentile graphic as stone cold in elWut?>Be fat ugly girl shagger>Be prostitute shagger>Be in same 99th percentile bracket as gigachadHuh?This is bs and doesn't reflect that most sexual dysfunction is just young people perpetually online without any third space to meet and form communities. Or workaholics with no access to third spaces either.
>>84493004If you have option b) at all, is only because you're chad
>>84492657Yeah this is already known, but you can be even 70 years old and have money and get a cute young girl 100 %. Women are the niggers of gender.
>>84493330Incels find chad attractive. Women don't.
>>84493336Incels are all low IQ and think that a man's worth is measured solely by his amount of sexual partners.
>>84493592Replace the word incels with women and your statement would be utterly correct.
>>84493603Incels are like women in a lot of ways.>low IQ>emotional>illogical>entitledBut their attitudes towards sex and sexual wants are completely different.
>>84492657Strong take and weak die why should this make us mad? We are all weak incompetent men who lost out so what point is their in being mad about something u have no control over.
>>84493588Woah there! Did you really just use homosexual as an insult? That's like, totally not cool, my dude. Let's unpack this, y'all. Women only date virtuous men who are free of hatred and wholly pure of mind, heart and soul. They would NEVER date a BIGOT who insults and bullies others, because as we all know, female approval is the ULTIMATE indicator of a man's virtue and moral character (this is why criminals can't get gfs) You need to fix this if you ever want to lose your virginity.
>>84493336Lmao, completely irrelevant comparisons, nobody is getting married in their teens and 20s, which is the relevant age bracket for studies about casual dating. The average age of first marriage is 36 where I live and constantly going up.
