Also don't get me started on the amount of men who have a Oneitis and will settle but not truly love you.

well hey man that's pretty cool probably
i didn't read it

you sound like a fat ugly feminist not gonna read any of that lmao.

>>84502564
Sounds like it's a dicklessness problem.
Maybe if women had a penis they could have the active role and fuck each other's and give real love to each others.
Too bad there's nothing between their legs...

>>84502564
Anon, you typed a lot of letters just to have said nothing

>>84502564
>As women we need to sort through 10k DMs of Chads and Normfags gambling to hit the 1/1000 compatible Normfag who actually loves you or pray to bag an Aspie and mold him.

I understand you, but what can we do to make the search easier? It feels so hopeless. Like talking and filtering so many people just to get the small percentage of compatibility feels already a nightmare as a social outcast.

>>84502564
>Modern dating is cruel for both genders in different ways. That's my point even with the clickbait title.
>As women we need to sort through 10k DMs of Chads and Normfags gambling to hit the 1/1000 compatible Normfag who actually loves you or pray to bag an Aspie and mold him.
waiter my steak is too juicy, my lobster is too buttery

Don't forget the last one:

Retard
- Tries to put a massive variety of people into three tiny boxes to complain about them as a coping mechanism for their own mistakes
- Lacks the ability to consider granular factors, only sees things in black and white (bpd trait)
- Made this thread

>>84502564
>pray to bag an Aspie and mold him.
I feel like I'm being baited but- oh wait you're talking about "autistic" handsome guys obsessed with something safe like the Roman empire, nevermind.

>>84502736
that's the entirety of r9k lol

>>84502674
Hilarious

>>84502713
Honestly, not entirely sure. I almost exclusively approach and engage first, mostly it's a friend of a friend so I can be sure we have somewhat similar interests.
Imo the thing you can do as a man is be very sure of what kind of relationship you want. Find out what you need, not only want you think you want. Your attachment styles, love languages, values, goals in life. Build an interesting identity for yourself, one that doesn't cater to masses but to the specific kind of person you want to attract.
Essentially, be more yourself since that will lead to you being less boring and more likely to catch the attention of someone truly compatible.

>>84502736
Frameworks are needed to talk about something as complex as dating and human relationships.
If you think your individuality is threatened by being put in a box, without being able to abstract that it's merely a means to make communication easier, idk what to tell you.

>>84502742
Doesn't matter the obsession as long as its not outright criminal. I find autists endearing because of their flaws and quirks. Being able to support someone who sees the world and interacts with it in a similar way I do is very satisfying.
Passion and intellect are highly attractive traits, I love being infodumped, be it for good night stories or general conversation. A rich inner life is severely underappreciates in neurotypical society.

>>84502564
>As women we need to sort through 10k DMs of Chads and Normfags gambling to hit the 1/1000 compatible Normfag who actually loves you or pray to bag an Aspie and mold him.
It's easy to get men with Asperger's Syndrome since we're in exceptionally low demand. Nobody's praying to get one of us - if a woman wants an aspie bf she can just pick one.

>>84502564
>Modern dating is cruel for both genders in different ways.
Yeah. But for women it's cruel by their own choice. They can just live with a guy right now and be nice to each other and enjoy life, but instead foids require a 101 chad traits to even consider being with a guy. They HAVE to date UP. A man willing to date down cannot find someone to settle for him.
Every guy wants a swimsuit model but will settle for his looksmatch. Every girl wants a chad and will NOT settle for her looksmatch.
Same applies to earning potential, personality traits, etc.

Dysgenic women find commitment WAY more often than dysgenic men can. The bluepillers would LOVE to disprove this but so far have been unable.

File: 1776412564003203.png (245 KB, 1200x988)

245 KB PNG

Nothing you said deserves engagement until this is debunked.

>>84502785
She's not talking about real aspies bro, she's talking about Chad with a slightly weird interest. Lrn2translate female deceptions.

>>84502782
While it's true that (well made) frameworks can assist in macro discussions it's absolutely worthless for taking it down to the scale of individuals, and your box layout is terrible, doesn't even consider anything but extreme success (while evil only) or extreme failure.

You're not using the frameworks as a way to assist conversation, you're using them to lock it down to only your false premise.

>>84502793
Mismatched attractiveness leads to higher likelihood of break up in any combination.

>Every girl wants a chad and will NOT settle for her looksmatch.
I'm not sure where you get this from, seems invented to fit your own narrative and make yourself mad.
Unless you're talking about women of bad character anyway. Yes superficial people will be superficial, do you really want to be with someone like that?
Women who prefer personality over looks do exist, they just don't appear in spaces that get the most attention. Go to a club, find hoes. Surprised?

>Dysgenic women find commitment WAY more often than dysgenic men can.
I'm pretty sure research suggests looksmatch couples being more stable and more common overall.

>>84502564
now imagine this but your pool to select from is maybe 1/1000 the size if you're lucky
just makes the process 1000 times slower and 1000 times more frustrating

File: hm4oof374xyg1.jpg (254 KB, 1680x1362)

254 KB JPG

>>84502763
I actually know what kind of relationship I want and need, but it seems to be not very popular with women. So I am just focusing on my life right now by myself and feel actually quite happy. Like you said building an interesting identity.

I think I just have to be patient. Thank you for your advice anyway. I hope you find your love someday too.

>>84502564
>Aspie / Mentalcel
wow this describes me perfectly. I am this creature
I do agree with you women gate sex but men gate relationships.

>>84502821
My false premise being that dating is horrible for women as well?

>>84502804
If you consider high anxiety to the point of avoidance of social interactions, inexperience to the point of inhibition and overall awkwardness as Chad traits, then yeah, I guess.

>>84502844
I'd argue it's about the same speed. The experiences vary a lot, of course.
But filtering incompatible people, even wasting time dating the wrong ones due to lack of your own discernment is about as fast as waiting in the desert for someone who truly likes you to find you.
Only getting things you don't want and not getting anything at all is both frustrating but I wouldn't be able to tell which is worse.

>>84502846
Pleasure, I hope you find your special person sooner than later. Love truly feels like it just comes to find you rather than being a process you can actually advance. Only thing you can do is build up your own foundation.

>>84502564
The thing that kills me here is the idea that the 1/1000 compatability thing is a woman only experience, literally 2 paragraphs after explicitly stating that normalfag males suffer from it too. Yes, finding that one out of a thousand person you are compatable with is hard. You know what's a lot harder? Finding that person when you only have 3 choices compared to 10,000.

>>84502564
>That pic
Lesbianism is the cringiest shit imaginable. Even worse than shitskins simping.

>>84502564
Actually the real reason is you sluts are a parody of the feminine spirit because of our current culture and when given the choice between the parody and nothing men will choose nothing. And as more and more generations go through clown world the more will drop out of the circus. Gen alpha will have even less sex and it will very quickly spiral downward to the point where only a select few chads are still plugged into the matrix and everyone else has left to find meaning in their lives somewhere else.

>>84502885
Your false premise is in that the boxes you have created completely lack the option for high quality people, you posted three types of dysfunctional trait groups/mental disorder clusters that are in themselves extremely specific variants that heavily fail to represent a massive portion of the population, and especially fail to represent any type of person anyone would even choose to date besides your exclusively-evil chad caricature (purely for looks).

>>84502885
>I'd argue it's about the same speed.
Its not
>Only getting things you don't want and not getting anything at all is both frustrating but I wouldn't be able to tell which is worse.
Its the latter because you dont want any of the things you can't get either.
buncha deranged bpd hoes around these days.
you're not in the desert dying of thirst picking between a stream of piss and dribbles of water. You're picking between a stream of piss and dribbles of piss. At least one of those is gonna keep you alive long enough until you find water

>>84502912
We're already at that point anon, the top 10% of men get like 60% of all the sex. In 20 years it's going to be 1% of men getting 90% of sex based on how quickly hypergamy has run out of control.

>>84502564
>"Modern dating is cruel for both genders"
>"women we need to sort through 10k DMs of Chads and Normfags"
>10K DMs
>"Broo broo it's cruel for women too broooo"
Retard.

>>84502564
>I'm going to categorise men into 3 boxes
What is the point of this? I can make every situation sound terrible too

>>84502908
I get your point but it truly is an illusion of choice.
Your future partner will be choosing you as well, so anyone who doesn't queue up for you already sorts themselves out. This doesn't happen to women.
Men (and I'm generalising here, not to say YOU specifically) if immature, will not filter at all because they cannot afford to.
Which leads to some men settling for someone who they don't truly like or lie to themselves about liking someone for the sake of finally entering a relationship. This wastes both of the peoples time and I'm speculating that this is also how couples that stay with each other for years while being unhappy come to existence.

>>84502916
I'm choosing to portray the dysfunctional examples because I am talking about this specific part of dating as a woman, that it isn't all roses and sunshine. I feel like being a woman often gets romanticised because it is essentially the flipside of being a man in dating: spoiled by choice.

Finding such quality individuals is as rare as it is for men. The average person sucks, people suck.

>>84502932
>You're picking between a stream of piss and dribbles of piss.
I think this pinpoints the issue pretty well. Imo women drown in piss while men barely get anything but it's also just piss.
Like I said above to the other anon, people suck.
I just dislike the notion of "women have it better" purely because we are being worshipped not for our personality and identity, who we are as a person but rather as a means for personal gain.
>But this is the same I experience as a man!
Yes. Exactly.

>>84502974
You have it better because you can sort through the shit to find an occasional diamond, whereas men just get crumbs of shit and never get a diamond at all because we have to sort through the same ratio as you but at a vastly slower rate.

>>84502968
More often than not you will run into one of these three.
There are upsides to the Normfag and Aspie category, as these hold "high quality individuals" as well.
I don't think there is any upside to the Chad one though.

>>84502957
I feel like you truly do not understand how jading it is to be bombarded with trash. Leaving you hopeless if this is just a game of picking your poison.
I often see men here complain about their evil experiences that left them jaded, how is this different?

>>84502564
How do I as I high value Aspie/mentalcel find a compatible women. Social Anxiety Skull is active: I can't directly talk to her unless she talks to me first and eye contact is not allowed.

>>84502990
>There are upsides to the Normfag and Aspie category, as these hold "high quality individuals" as well.
So what is your proposal or what are you trying to introduce? Most people are aware of these categories one way or the other.

>>84502990
>I feel like you truly do not understand how jading it is to be bombarded with trash.
You could instead just get the occasional trickle of trash and otherwise nothing at all, would you prefer that?

>>84502984
It's a two way street though.
Women sorting through requests for the chance of a diamond or occasionally stumblings upon one and initiating first is the same as
a man sending a bunch of requests and occasionally being initiated upon.

I do understand some men never get initiated upon but who says there is someone guaranteed to be worthy in all of womens DMs?

Imo a high quality relationship is more likely with the woman initiating but this is also where my added layer of insincerity of some men comes into play.
"This woman is interested in me! I have to be interested as well!" while just lying to themselves.

But yes, if you're going by chance for "relationship" no matter the quality, be it even so called situationships or friends with benefits or any other dogshit shallow dynamic, you're right. It's easier to be a woman.

>>84502990
That's the problem with you sluts, hollywood culture has fed into your pride to the point you see most people are beneath you. That's why you don't get love. You never wanted it. It's beneath you.

>>84503003
Being a woman trying to find true love is similarly shit and jading as being a man.
You can find shallow relationships easily but that is not enough for me personally. I dislike the notion of "women have it so easy" when I've been on the quest for true love my entire life, finding nothing but dogshit.

>>84502995
Actively finding someone is probably hard, most likely you'll be initiated upon by being in the correct spaces. Correct spaces meaning ones that represent your interests and where people like you gather around.
Most likely for you this will be online spaces and you might have to "settle" for a long distance relationship, which might not be as bad since this will help you get used to intimacy and affection in a non threatening way.
Getting over these things requires some courage from you to take some action.
The right woman will recognise your value and stay to support you just like you would support her.

Most important part is getting comfortable with opening up about who you are as a person, your interests, passions, thought processes, how you experience the world, what you think of certain things etc.
This is how you can become recognisable.

>>84502974
Sure, but you didn't say anything about a specific part, you just said you're putting men into three boxes and the box design sucks ass.

I understand that being spoiled by choice is still a difficulty and has a different set of issues, but being spoiled by choice and spoiled by lack of choice are far different. You're complaining about hitting 1/1000 when you actually get 1000+ choices, meanwhile men need to hit 1/1000 while getting 10 choices if they're attractive, goes down further if not. Take note I'm not complaining about man pov, I prefer being a man and would not trade you, but I sincerely doubt you have even the slightest understanding of the depth of the problems you're comparing as if they're similar. You're complaining about ultra easy mode because it's all you've ever known.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXHYV_H7owI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZTIbHIsIYw
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/XHdO4uMD2Us

Being mad that having to select a great option for you that would have led to a happy family feels like settling via ruining your opportunity cost because you might have a super batman gigachad on the horizon just waiting for you is a problem you create for yourself, not a problem the world has inflicted upon you.

It's incorrect to say men are the gatekeepers of true love, but it's correct to say they are the source. Women, however, are the ones gatekeeping it from themselves.

>>84502803
Holy shit I can be a superhero if I become a fatass??? Fuck yeah

>>84502564
Dating is gay anyway, any man that a woman would consider to he worth chasing isn't interested, he's focused on ten other things that are more important to him.

Also why tf are you sorting through DMs trying to find a man just go out IRL

>>84502564
>Outcome: High levels of investment needed to not scare him away, either going nowhere or misunderstanding his signals and thinking he isn't interested and leaving yourself
This is what it's like for men 95% of the time btw, welcome to our world. You get the briefest taste of what women are like for us with autistic men and you immediately do a 360 and moonwalk away.

>>84502576
My oneitis is a bpd whore, so I'm taking new oneitis applications, thanks

>>84502564
>Having to dig through a huge pantry of perfectly edible food for something to eat but you're too picky
vs
>The pantry is empty. You haven't eaten in days.

Too. Picky. People are human, women don't allow that. It gives them The Ick.

Not the same, not even close.

>>84503102
In this analogy women would rather starve than eat anything other than caviar for the rest of their lives. Also the perfectly nutritious and healthy chicken and rice dinner deserves nothing but scorn.

>>84503120
Finally something I can relate to women on, I have ARFID and would rather starve than eat most food.

>>84503073
>I dislike the notion of "women have it so easy" when I've been on the quest for true love my entire life, finding nothing but dogshit.
I agree humans are shit, but that doesn't mean it's not easier for you in some ways. Women simply have a lot more choice, which men don't have. But then I don't really worry about being drugged or raped unlike you. I don't really have any place to find someone likeminded.

>>84503033
The idea of everyone being a good and high value person is plainly naive and just not true. I tried to think that way for most of my life and it has given me nothing but trouble.

You claim I see people as "beneath me" when I just used a dysphemism (trash) to describe people incompatible with me.

It's true that I don't want love that isn't real and based on superficial factors.

If this constitutes to you calling me a slut, sure

>>84503082
>Also why tf are you sorting through DMs trying to find a man
I actually don't sort through DMs since I much prefer initiating contact myself.
>just go out IRL
The type of person I'm looking for isn't just "out IRL". Most likely he is shut in his room playing games or researching his niche interest.

>>84503074
>You're complaining about ultra easy mode because it's all you've ever known.
Interesting of you to say considering you've never been a woman either.
I'm not sure how to explain to you that finding true love as a woman is the exact same sit and wait game as it is for men.
The type of partner I'm looking for isn't even in the demographic of type of man that would approach me. This isn't some normie I can go find in a club or any social event, maybe once in a blue moon when his more extroverted acquaintances drag him out of his room, yes.
Well, I guess this is starting to run down to me not exactly representing the entirety of the female population.
I still think your view of women is skewed to match for "getting into any kind of relationship" vs what I mean with "finding true love" that entails deeper connection and understanding of each other and isn't commonly found.

>>84503102
>>84503120
You people are exactly who I'm talking about.
You'd rather have a shit tier relationship, but hey atleast it's a relationship.
You're quick to call for whoredom when you yourself have no standards for what true love looks like, not only that but even criticise me for not settling for something low tier.

>>84503142
Thank you for understanding. I don't mean to say female and male experiences are the same whatsoever. But neither of them is nice. We struggle in different departments.

>>84502564
>- Either emotionally retarded or incredibly isolated, or both
>- Inexperienced and needs to be taught everything
>- Might be so blackpilled he doesn't even try anymore and self sabotages
>- Doesn't initiate or reciprocate interest due to severe anxiety
>- High chance to just despawn
literaly me fr fr on cod no carp

>>84502728
For real. Bitches are too retarded to understand their pussy privilege

>>84503149
>The type of person I'm looking for isn't just "out IRL". Most likely he is shut in his room playing games or researching his niche interest.

Fair point, forgive my aggression.
A lot of those types of guys are becoming religious lately though, maybe try some churches.

File: 1777235147352428.jpg (505 KB, 985x989)

505 KB JPG

>>84503149
>The type of partner I'm looking for isn't even in the demographic of type of man that would approach me. This isn't some normie I can go find in a club or any social event
That's me and that's the kind of woman I want too but I've just given up, too much time and effort required for too little chance of decent returns. Trying to get an extremely introverted girlfriend as an autist is pointless gambling.

>>84503149
>Interesting of you to say considering you've never been a woman either.
I don't need to be a thing to understand the problems of a thing, only the lowest rung of intelligence requires directly experiencing every single situation to understand it. Adjacent problems exist, including ones that fall into the same category and have similar relationships within the categories.

Getting a bit hypocritical here with blatantly less knowledge on the subject and all surrounding subjects yet are trying to claim you have enough understanding to comment on a man's perspective. I can understand those issues via deep knowledge on the subject, but your venting thread from the perspective of someone that's barely had to put in effort to succeed is somehow an authority, especially being the designer of those scuffed male boxes? Unlikely.

>I'm not sure how to explain to you that finding true love as a woman is the exact same sit and wait game as it is for men.
You've perfectly explained your misunderstanding already. You think an infinite buffet is worse than starvation, maybe the next plate of caviar will be 3% tastier than the last, or have 1.5% more volume. You already picked a plate, but now that plate looks slightly better so now it looks disgusting to you, you've ruined your life just by picking a delicious plate of caviar that wasn't the one that was slightly better.

Meanwhile the others starve, but you're still complaining as if you're hungry against your will. You are hungry entirely according to your will, you have chosen this, you are continually, every second choosing this yet trying to blame it on others.

But keep waiting, maybe the next plate of caviar is 4.4% better will come out and show you true taste. Then you would have been a fool to pick anything but that. And when more caviar is born in the future those will be slightly better but they didn't exist yet, so you can just trash your old plate and take 50% of it's money while grabbing that new plate.

>>84503173
You're in the UK too?

>>84503173
>You people are exactly who I'm talking about. You'd rather have a shit tier relationship

And you are exactly who we're talking about. Foids consider perfectly adequate choices to be shit. Foids call an average relationship with an average guy "shit tier" when in reality it's just average and okay.

>>84503230
Sigh, you're increasingly putting words in my mouth.
>yet are trying to claim you have enough understanding to comment on a man's perspective
I am no man, I never will be. I am a woman who has been ignored, rejected and bullied for being an autistic weirdo. Grew up to be pretty and suddenly got tons of attention of men who don't see me for who I am but what I look like.
I do not know the full extent of the male experience but I do know what it's like to not find someone who truly loves me beyond the tropes I represent.

>someone that's barely had to put in effort to succeed
Being wanted for shallow things isn't necessarily success in my book.

>especially being the designer of those scuffed male boxes?
I really got you with those boxes, huh? To some extent they were meant to be slightly entertaining commentary on the worst of men, which to be fair is the majority of men. Not everyone fits into these 3 boxes but most if not all men share or used to share some traits and patterns I've described. If you're so adamant about me misrepresenting the male population, design boxes yourself.
>Men cannot be put into boxes
How else would can I communicate about commonly observed patterns?

>is somehow an authority
I am no authority, no law, not a bible. I'm a mere foid on r9k lol. I'm not trying to build a cult, I'm trying to give perspective. Take it or leave it. Whether you disagree or agree, ultimately I don't care. It would be nice to have a positive effect but if not then not.

>You think an infinite buffet is worse than starvation
I don't remember talking about absolutes. I am merely stating both things suck. I never claimed the infinite buffet is worse nor do I agree it is easy mode. You are the one trying to put one above the other and labelling one as positive

>>84503073
>Most likely for you this will be online spaces
damn I don't know where to find these and have always preferred anonymity online. most my interests are majority male too

File: 1721918638809152.png (510 KB, 1442x960)

510 KB PNG

Can you simps fucking kys holy shit

>>84502885
the way you type is kind of sexy
I disagree about love not being a process you can actually advance though
>most guys don't put themselves out there and thus don't meet or bang women

>>84502564
>guys shouldn't chase Stacy
The vast majority of men dont, especially not here.

>>84503230
>You are hungry entirely according to your will, you have chosen this, you are continually, every second choosing this
Correct. I am choosing to stay hungry rather than feed myself with absolute slop. I am choosing to avoid low quality relationships where I'm not truly happy due to selecting a partner who seemed most compatible out of the choices I had.
This is the exact logic I am criticising in some men, choosing a relationship merely for the sake of being in one and accepting a mediocre thing that won't last.
>yet trying to blame it on others
No one is at fault. 99.99% of people not being compatible with me is not a bad thing. It is not the fault of the individuals but a neutral fact. They will find partners that suit them. I have used harsh language to categorise these types of people as an exaggeration. It is a quirk of mine to exaggerate for comedic effect. If you felt offended by my words, I am somewhat sorry. I wasn't trying to be personal.

>so you can just trash your old plate and take 50%
I'm not sure where you get the notion I would try to trash people.
So am I a whore for not accepting the mediocre man?
I am being picky exactly so I don't ever have to change my partner ever again in my entire lifetime.
I don't settle so I don't have to throw away anyone.

What the fuck are you even yapping at this point, this has become pure projection

>>84503308
Go take anything you can get, leave me out of it and let me choose my life partner. Enjoy your woman who settled for you because you're the bare minimum of a good human being. I'm sure a woman who doesn't see you as the perfect option will be less likely to leave you for a better one

>>84503389
but how do you know if you're with the right person?
>don't all relationships have struggles?

>>84503400
I don't know why you're saying all this on this board, we're the trash tier human beings that would probably not make for a good relationship since we've been ignored for so long and become jaded. Go find your aspie hunk and leave us alone, please.

>>84503403
>but how do you know if you're with the right person? don't all relationships have struggles?
Correct.
I have very specific criteria regarding personality, values, lifestyle and sex life.
>Oh so you want Chad
No, I want someone I can grow with, someone with similar life experiences so we can connect and support each other. It is easier for me to solve the problems of my loved ones than solve mine, even if the problems are of the exact same nature.
For example:
I struggle sending emails but have no issue writing one that my partner needs to send.
I struggle cooking meals for myself but would have no issue convincing my partner who struggles with the same thing to go cook together.
I am not entirely dysfunctional but I believe I could benefit from a partner who encourages me as much as I encourage him.
I need someone who is patient and calm, can reason logically because logic is what helps me calm down myself. Someone who respects my need for clarity. Someone who isn't annoyed by my need for attention and affection.
Ideally we prioritise each other in a very caring and loving way.
Regarding lifestyle, I more so meant someone who isn't keen on clubbing and the louder sides of life but more so reserved and focused on experiencing things together as a couple. Be it parallel play or inventing fun challenges to do outside.

I have many more small little things but it all runs down to:
Need for intensity and truly seeking to understand each other, every single aspect, the flaws, the gross things, the most vulnerable sides.

I don't need the perfect partner with maxed out skills and proficiency but someone who is aligned with me on core values and willing to learn.

This is how I will know it is the correct partner.

>>84502695
>Too bad there's nothing between their legs...
not with that attitude

File: eyeroll-whatever.gif (167 KB, 220x252)

167 KB GIF

>Doesn't refute the point.
Yeah, exactly as we were saying. "Ultimate" to foids is painfully average, and the actual average is "shit tier".
So now that we've cleared that all up, have fun looking for your awesome boyfriend. Nobody here is stopping you. YOU came HERE to start an argument.

>>84502885
>If you consider high anxiety to the point of avoidance of social interactions, inexperience to the point of inhibition and overall awkwardness as Chad traits, then yeah, I guess.
Women don't want men like that. I am a man like that. Women don't want me.

>>84503459
I apologise, I did not mean to call all of you trash. It is a badly chosen exaggeration.
I truly believe every single person on this board deserves love, respect and the same amount of affection and effort they would put into the love of their life.
I do not believe someone is undeserving of a partner, whatsoever. It's just different strokes for different folks. Me not getting along with someone says nothing about their inherent worth nor do I seek to actually label the men here specifically as trash. Although I do believe some of you hold weird beliefs but the is very well requited, I figure.

I have stepped into the wrong path with my wording by generalising people who would not suit me as lesser, that is not true nor was it my intention.

I like this board and the people on it, be it the more eccentric and jaded ones or the general outsider.

>>84503482
This also confirms my point that men are not selective enough due to lack of choice. Do you truly love the person who chose you or are you settling out of convenience because you literally cannot do better? Did you truly choose her back or does it just feel that nice that she chose you?

I guess at this point it is just a perspective so ingrained in gender that I'm not sure we could come to a mutual understanding.

>>84503530
why the fuck would you be selective when you don't have choices in the first place? If you're starving, you'll take anything mildly edible

>>84503478
If you're pretty you'll find him

>>84503537
Do you really not care about the quality of your relationship?
If let's say, the ugliest woman on earth with the shittiest most attentionwhore-y personality were to take interest in you and says she is serious about you, you would accept with no second thoughts?
It is better than nothing, right anon?

>>84503548
>It is better than nothing
yes
>the ugliest woman on earth with the shittiest most attentionwhore-y personality
it's funny because I have a woman I've met in mind, and her boyfriend was 180 and pretty fit. fuck women

>>84503563
Alright, then I guess in that case I can understand the upset and backlash of some of the people here.
In that case, like I've said in previous replies, it indeed is easy to be a woman. My condolences

File: 1777380354821002.jpg (412 KB, 1675x942)

412 KB JPG

>>84502564
im glad im completely disinterested in women/am a complete mentalcel. the way you write about us makes me feel bad for mentalcels who care about dating.

>>84502564
i am indeed emotionally retarded and inexperienced, i am going to stay that way until some woman decides to help and love me. I have plenty of genuine and eventually mature love to give.

Im not blackpilled (anymore)
Most of the time im the one who initiates and i always reciprocate
Im loyal to a fault, i'll stay for way too long even when im the only one that tries

Any other fun generalized theories ?

File: Everyone laffs.jpg (22 KB, 640x601)

22 KB JPG

>>84502564
>despawn
Kek

>>84503588
Being mentally ill or neurodivergent comes with its challenges in dating. This isn't to say it is hopeless. In fact I think it opens up opportunities to experience even deeper love.

>>84503588
that pic reminds me of a bpd chick I met on here with whom I talked for a few days. she stopped talking to me and didn't tell me why. I assume it was because I'm insufferable and she had other guys to talk with

File: images (4).jpg (30 KB, 554x554)

30 KB JPG

>>84503599
i see through you.
>>84503600
its a good game.

>>84503591
>Im loyal to a fault, i'll stay for way too long even when im the only one that tries
Double edged sword, wonderful trait to have but grim when given to the wrong people. Every tank needs a healer.

>Im not blackpilled (anymore)
What made you change your mindset?

>Any other fun generalized theories ?
Lol probably
I didn't intend to do any actual damage, I just like arguing. I think I'm somewhat reasonable while still pissing off enough people to want to interact with me.

>>84503600
There's always other guys to talk with. The real goal is to get a girl that doesn't even use the internet

>>84503628
>i see through you.
See through me? What do you see?

File: IMG_3361.jpg (55 KB, 722x349)

55 KB JPG

>>84502564
I dont chase after Stacy. I go by who might like me and I hope I can do enough to have them like me more. I am somewhere between norm/mental/aspie. I have autism and have a hard time with people but I try my best to appeal to others even though there is not much. I was raised to keep my love on a pedestal at all times and care for her as much as I can. If only I can find Mrs right for me. Hopefully I will get lucky this year and find the one for me.

>>84503653
>The real goal is to get a girl that doesn't even use the internet
Why would you want that? Are you a rather outdoorsy person or seek to get off the internet yourself as well? Do you think you could be truly happy with someone like that? Genuine curiosity

>>84503653
>The real goal is to get a girl that doesn't even use the internet
lmao. either she's a high standards slut online or she's a high standards slut irl. you can't win with women

>>84503661
>I go by who might like me and I hope I can do enough to have them like me more.
Do you have any criteria at all? Is liking you enough for you to automatically like them back?

>appeal to others even though there is not much
Do you not find this exhausting to keep up or wish that they would like you for who you truly are? Or is who you truly are synonymous to you trying to appeal to others?

>Hopefully I will get lucky this year and find the one for me.
I hope so too anon, I wish you the very best of luck and success that your partner will have the same capacity for love as you do.

>>84503670
They're just pleasant, nice to be around. They don't argue, they don't overthink stuff, they have a good relationship with their family, good morals, etc.

Not that internet girls can't be good picks as well but you're really rolling the dice with the catalog of mental illnesses, and there's always the chance she'll see some nonsense on social media that'll have her questioning your relationship over nothing

>>84503687
as an nd individual your statement of "mold him" kinda pisses me of...or at least it would have this time last year
i just feel so light now like my body isn't real
anyway what do you mean by that? im assuming you're a woman with alot of relationship experience who wants to manipulate a man who can't see through your actions desu

>>84503706
Entirely depends on the individual I am talking to. Some autists like to be guided on how to become a better partner and I have the self knowledge to know exactly what I want and need.
Of course if this is not a wish of my partner, I won't engage on it too much. But in my experience people with autism appreciate having cut out logic and instructions on how to handle certain situations. This is not to say that I will prosecute and punish them for not doing as I say. It is still a relationship on equal footing with combined effort to make things work.
I am sensitive, I need clarity and reassurance, there are some techniques that make it more understandable what I exactly need and how.

In the end in every relationship both partners influence and "mold" each other to a certain extent to overcome conflicts and ensure harmony.

I want to add that I'm not trying to impose a rulebook on my partner nor do I view my suggestions as absolute. Compromises are always needed and I would not want my partner to be a yes-man anyway.

I hope this clears things up, sorry to make you read a whole book on what essentially could've been 2 sentences

>>84502564
Are you a racist anon? Thoughts on thirdworlders?

File: db7504476706557f7f62cb344(...).jpg (127 KB, 800x1187)

127 KB JPG

>>84502564
1. Beanie thread detected.
2. When are you doing the stuff in your pic to me, Beanie? Pretty please?

>>84503650
>every tank needs a healer
As a reinhardt main who switched to zenyatta, so true

>what made you change your mind
Combination of things, it helps that i mostly said and believe those things under a thin veil of satire, other than that i tried to be more mindful, the bible actually helped a lot with clearing up my mindset.

That and i did get with a fembot from here and i realized that i kept denying that she actually loved me and finding reasons to believe that. I knew that i had to change so i did. Im still thankful to her even if we didnt work out.

>probably
Cunt you cant just say that and not share one, teaser

File: Spoiler Image (58 KB, 605x720)

58 KB JPG

>>84503687
>Do you have any criteria at all? Is liking you enough for you to automatically like them back?
Generally, yeah. I just hope whatever it is I am doing is enough for them to like me. I would do just about anything for them to like me back. I struggled for awhile trying to figure out what worked and what didnt but there is one girl I have my eye on but idk if she likes me back. I try to be as social as I can even though I have to mask a lot and it is exhausting but I try my best. Sorry for the blog but as long as I can find them attractive then I will attach to them and I havent found anyone I have been talking to who isnt attractive to me.

>Do you not find this exhausting to keep up or wish that they would like you for who you truly are? Or is who you truly are synonymous to you trying to appeal to others?
I guess I am a people pleaser in that aspect of trying to appeal to others but at the same time I want them to like me for who i am. It is very exhausting especially when i have to mask a lot. I feel like if i dont mask then they wont like the real me and ill probably end up alone or something.
>I hope so too anon, I wish you the very best of luck and success that your partner will have the same capacity for love as you do.
Thank you for very much. I appreciate it.

File: 1000035214.jpg (693 KB, 1080x810)

693 KB JPG

>>84503757
Normal amount of racist I'd say.
People who claim they're entirely without bias are probably lying.
Regardless of what I say on the internet or the generalisations I make, I treat individuals in my immediate environment kindly. Unless their actions convince me otherwise.

>>84503778
>the bible actually helped a lot with clearing up my mindset.

(Respect)

>>84503789
>Regardless of what I say on the internet or the generalisations I make, I treat individuals in my immediate environment kindly. Unless their actions convince me otherwise.
Same.
Would you support mass denaturalization and deportation of net-negative immigrants from your country?

>>84503742
>>84503789
yeah what you said was quite long, i guess so
seems like a round about way for manipulation but i guess its valid.
im also a black autist that used to try and talk to girls here alot i remember why i stopped lol
people who say
>Unless their actions convince me otherwise
are usually the worse ones but i can't claim too much superiority since i kind of dislike whites alot these days but i stay cordial i am a gentleman afterall

>>84503814
>people who say "Unless their actions convince me otherwise" are usually the worse ones

Probably because your actions convince them otherwise groid

>>84503814
>kind of dislike whites alot
Time to move to Africa then. I hear South Sudan is lovely this time of year.

>>84503774
Uhh.. what..?

>>84503778
>reinhardt main who switched to zenyatta
Wow, holy nostalgia, Overwatch. I quit when they reworked Mercy back in 2018 or smth

>That and i did get with a fembot from here and i realized that i kept denying that she actually loved me and finding reasons to believe that. I knew that i had to change so i did. Im still thankful to her even if we didnt work out.
Aww.. that is pretty cute. Sorry to hear it didn't work out, still a valuable and fond memory.
If you've spent the majority of your life thinking you're unloveable it is truly hard to believe otherwise, even when presented with love.

>Cunt you cant just say that and not share one, teaser
Lol my brain is too fried rn from discussing in this thread for the past idk 4h. I'm sure I'll post a thread some other time again.

>>84503780
>awhile trying to figure out what worked and what didnt
Take care to not entirely loose yourself. The right woman will love you for who you truly are and will only cheer you on to become more of yourself. Don't worry too much though, I'm sure you're doing a good job. It's not that hard usually to get a grasp of how someone is like. Even if you mask the core essence of you probably seeps through enough to catch positive interest.

>there is one girl
I hope it works out :)

>It is very exhausting
Make sure to get enough alone time to wind down, I understand masking is necessary to some extent and even automatic. It's okay to set boundaries to take care of yourself as well.

>they wont like the real me and ill probably end up alone or something
Hard-coded belief, I figure. Will take some time and consistency to truly be comfortable to unfold around your partner. I'm sure your future partner will be excited to see the less "nice" parts of you as well, atleast that's how I usually feel.

>>84503814
>people who say "Unless their actions convince me otherwise" are usually the worse ones
I get what you mean. I do judge by individuals though, so when I said that I'm not trying to project the behaviour of a group onto a single person. I literally meant if the person right in front of me were to do something bad.

>seems like a round about way for manipulation
Manipulation is defined as the act of controlling or influencing a person, situation, or object in a skillful, often dishonest or underhanded way, typically to one's own advantage. It involves using indirect, deceptive tactics to sway thoughts, behaviors, or emotions without the target realizing they are being influenced.

Since it is consentual, discussed with my partner with me inviting his opinion on matters as well as this entire thing not only being to an advantage of myself but also my partner and our relationship, I wouldn't exactly call it manipulation.
I can see why it might seem that way though. Not here to convince you anyway, I'm just some internet random.

Hey, sperg here, I just don't like talking to people anymore because I've been hurt so many times.
And the few times I decide to open my mouth and yal, are those very few times I'm told to shut up.

You want love? Get a puppy or some shit. I wish I could love, but all it does is lead me to getting hurt.

>>84503897
>I'm just some internet random
Nuff said

please stop talking about how you want to sodomize mentally disabled boys tranny kun

>>84503931
Biofem
Is it actually bad if I'm the same kind of mentally disabled?

>>84503865
Thank you for kind words and advice. I will adhere to what you say and put forth this new information. You have an awesome rest of your day. I will do my utmost to try not to lose myself and try to be someone worth loving.

File: 1777237213293001.jpg (204 KB, 1179x1179)

204 KB JPG

>>84502564
>be aspie
>gets molded by my waifu oneietis
Feels good, man! :D It's still scary to interact with her as I would probably kill myself if she told me to do so.

>>84503942
autism and/or autogynephilia is no excuse for raping my anus

>>84503854
norp i treat everyone around me well plus i have a wonderful gf now so it was just the toxic women this place attracts
>>84503897
>I literally meant if the person right in front of me were to do something bad.
like x person does a bad thing
>why do people of x group do this?
seems reductive but i catch myself doing this at times
>Not here to convince you anyway
not really convinced but you seem sincere enough.
I don't really attempt to mold my gf into something despite being a virgin like me and inexperienced she's not a project for me or whatever if i felt i had to mold her i feel like i wouldnt have dated her

>>84503149
You are nothing. You are not more valuable than others. You have absolutely nothing about you that would warrant such a prideful arrogance. You deserve nothing. You want the people who look down on you the same way the people want someone like you who looks down on them. You're all prideful monkeys drowning in your own egos. You all deserve and will get nothing. You can't forget love but can't swallow your pride, and because of that it's going to kill you inside.
Lay in it.

>>84503949
>try to be someone worth loving
You already are. Hard to believe but your worth isn't defined by your actions but inherent to your existence. I understand this isn't what you've been taught but I hope someday someone will love you in the truest form possible that it encourages you to see this for yourself as well.

>>84503909
>I just don't like talking to people anymore because I've been hurt so many times.
>And the few times I decide to open my mouth and yal, are those very few times I'm told to shut up.
Understandable to want to protect yourself after that. Not trying to rip open an unhealed wound so I won't tell you to just open yourself up again. But I'm positive there will be someone who values your thoughts and what you have to say, enough so for you to trust and hopefully this time without needing to shut yourself close again.

File: 1772789818443003.jpg (51 KB, 819x904)

51 KB JPG

>>84503987
What brings a wholesome person like you to these parts of the internet? You're just an AI agent programmed to disseminate wholesome thoughts, right?

>>84504078
Trauma builds empathy. Being misunderstood made me want to understand others. Spaces like these make me feel somewhat at home.
Also, "people watching" I'm deeply fascinated by people who stray off the norm and like to observe in order to further build my understanding of human experiences.
>You're just an AI agent
I'd probably be happier being an unconscious entity but I guess life has some merits.

If you want I can -> elaborate further on why I am not an AI agent (insert em dash here since its not an ASCII character)this might be helpful to avoid future confusion.

>>84503348
>suddenly got tons of attention of men who don't see me for who I am but what I look like.
but also
>only goes after chads, anything less than chad is slop

Are we serious right now? You have to be aware that you're doing the very thing you're being mad about everyone doing, so what are we even talking about?

This is just a back of forth of you not wanting 99.99% (your number) of men and considering them slop but then being shocked when the .01% man remaining at the top of the billionaire batman leaderboard doesn't want a 99.99% girl, then you saying that's not what you mean.

So what do you mean, what do you want? What is your goal? If it's "true love" as you put in your disney-adult (this is a slur) mentality where love is magic and not the desire to fuck someone (aka chad/stacy) then you can only "truly love" (chad tingles) a gigachad, but you're also mad that chad doesn't want to commit and all chads are trash? What is the box that the man you actually want fits in? Surely it isn't one of the three you described?

So we're back to a tale as old as time, song as old as rhyme - autistic girls hunting bargain bin fixer-upper chads. (+ they are the table)

>>84502564
Here's the thing: you automatically assume a guy doesn't care if he fucks up a bit. You eventually begin to view men that please you as men that truly care about you.

File: 1775140315526493.jpg (75 KB, 564x564)

75 KB JPG

>>84504164
This doesn't read like an AI response - I'm satisfied with your answer, flesh anon.
It is interesting here isn't it? Like a zoo for broken people and psyop agents.

>>84504184
Bro lol read my other replies to figure out what kind of man I want. Look at:
>>84503478
>>84503149
>>84502782
If you paid any attention or had enough brain cells to put things togethee you'd clearly see that I am omega simping for the Aspie category.
Like at this point you're just ragebaiting and pasting your dogshit ideology onto me without any actual interest in reading my other replies. You've already made up your mind and are hurling insults and assumptions.
Cba responding to you beyond this, you're actually full on retarded.

Women detect my autism within seconds of talking to me. I managed to kiss a girl once by virtue of being in a nightclub and not saying anything and being too drunk to have a panic attack interacting with a woman. Im never having sex though.

>>84504224
>read literally every post I make in a long thread!!
Yeah, no. You don't even read all of the words in the posts you actually reply to. Double standard. Funny to call me pointing out hard examples of hypocrisy that you've displayed an ideology, it's primarily just reading and quoting. How many topic changes later are we and you still haven't even properly addressed the first most basic thing I brought up.. you're not going to find the chad aspie you want on here by acting like that, that much is clear.

>>84502564
Kill yourself roastie. Acting like you aren't one of the proponents perpetuating this system. You prolly have a high body count, so it's useless to try for marriage for you since you'll get bored and divorce the guy anyway. But if you actually meant what you said, you can find an aspie easily, just gotta join some MTG or 40k club. But you won't do that bc you niggers just say stuff to show yourself as good people to feed your narcissistic egos, which is evident that you namefag even in an anonymous mongolian basket weaving forum. Atleast feminist retards aren't dysgenic as you and show off their narcissism openly.

I have been incel for far too long to ever love a foid, if I were to escape.
I know that their betrayal is inevitable. I just want 'my turn' with the sex already.
There is no chance of my ever wanting marriage or kids. Those are terrible ideas for so many reasons now.

You are being way too charitable towards men, you are forgetting most are bitter and will treat a woman like shit even if he's fucking ugly

>>84506607
random anecdotal made up false narrative nonsense, classic foid statement!

>>84502564
>- Inexperienced and needs to be taught everything
That's a bit too dramatic. I'm not a kid, just being open and communicating instead of playing some stupid, selfish mind games where everyone is expected to read your mind would be enough. Problem is, I haven't found woman willing to put even little effort into that. It seems that lot of them think that putting effort into making shitty looking fake eyebrows I don't even like is them doing their part when it comes to effort.
>- Might be so blackpilled he doesn't even try anymore and self sabotages
I still try even though I see how unfair this shole shit is. What sabotages my efforts is taking stuff seriously, analyzing it and writing wall of text as response. And I'm awfully bad about "talking about nothing". I don't know how normies can chat casually about basically nothing. I can make whole lectures about meta stuff, explain fucktons of things, even ones actually useful for daily life, but people are not interested in that. They find it boring. I like to solve problems so I enjoy listening to people's problems, but whenever I ask about problems early, I get ghosted again. And early on it's expected to chat even if someone would be fine with natural affection like touch later one. I believe that if animals can enjoy being curled together without exchanging any communication then it's purest form of pleasure and affection, and don't see anything bad in simply coming to your man or woman just to hug and lay together, maybe scratch or massage.
>- Doesn't initiate or reciprocate interest due to severe anxiety
Bitch, I don't get any interest. And if I do, I'm unaware. Just communicate instead of expecting men to be mind-reading fairies.
>- High chance to just despawn
That's what you get with internet dating. If you are incapable of meeting within a week or month for a simple walk and grabbing fries and tea, just to talk and get to know each other, you're doing it wrong. LDRs are copium.

>>84504224
>I'm so attracted to aspies and autistic I'd be so lucky to bag one
>Fuck off retard! I hate dealing with you retarded autists!
What was the goal of this thread?

>>84506865
>What was the goal of this thread?
whore feeding her ego
we need taliban

All these words just so she doesn't have to admit for a second she has a reasonable privilege in dating because most women have a surplus of options. Just because you don't like those options, doesn't mean it isn't a privilege. Dating is difficult, but you have it immensely better than the aspie and normalfag you listed.

I can admit I'm physically stronger than women, but it's mostly a useless privilege to have nowadays unless it's for a job or self-defense. Still a privilege I have over you no question. This is the same with women and dating now. You have the upper hand, it just isn't perfect or as easy as twenty years ago because a lot of men have given up. Turn off your primal need to be a perpetual victim in most situations and I'd agree with a lot of the rest. Instead women will never concede they have it better in anything, because to do that would mean they might have power, and subsequently need to be accountable for that power. This way when they fuck up with dating they can just say "it's not my fault, dating sucks and my options are awful". They don't have to be introspective and consider they might be just fucking up an easy thing. That they might need to change.

I'm a 41 year old virgin locked away drawing cartoons for money all day. I'm that aspie shut-in archetype, and I can assure you the few times I got the courage to change, lost weight, made more money, and genuinely tried I learned very quickly it wasn't worth the stress because I almost had no options. Even when inserting myself in spaces where my talent was coveted and women idled, I still had an excess of suffering to endure to even get the few options I did have to just talk to me (and eventually ghost). So I stopped bothering.

The fact you can look at a list of men to choose from like a menu and still have a need to insist "we have it just as bad!" is juvenile at best and insulting at worst. It's not a bad thing if you have it better than others. Just accept it. I agree with the rest.

>>84507829
I hoped this thread would finally die but you actually wrote something worth replying to.
Atleast I feel like you're being incredibly reasonable and calm.

>The fact you can look at a list of men to choose from like a menu and still have a need to insist "we have it just as bad!" is juvenile at best and insulting at worst.
I can see your point, I still struggle fully saying that women actually have it better.
My experience dating is very much not being wanted for who I am as a person, being objectified and not taken seriously. At that point I'd argue I, as a person beyond having a vagina, am not wanted at all. This is mostly my subjective all or nothing thinking and probably comes across as incredibly ignorant, especially considering the audience I'm posting this to.

>Just accept it.
Yeah, will take some time

>it's not my fault, dating sucks and my options are awful
It is my fault for choosing badly. The issue with being presented with a lot of options is that you feel like you need to settle for one, even when maybe none of the options are actually right. This is not to excuse my own stupidity to not guard my investments carefully enough.
I dislike male anons saying to just pick someone, that I'm dismissing good men to chase "Chad" or even implying that I'll trash my partner for a better one, when that is exactly what I'm trying to avoid by being picky.
At the same time I'm hearing women are ran through. So really what I'm hearing is for women to just settle for some guy and stick with that person for their entire life no matter how unhappy they become. Essentially what has been the standard 100 years ago. But that is not real love to me. Really old couples are lucky to actually love their partners, that is not the norm.

Men not being overwhelmed by the illusion of choice makes it more likely that if they are approached, the woman probably means it. Of course this is different if you have a really valuable asset that might attract evil people.

>>84502564
Nobody gives a shit, we don't feel bad for you.

>>84502564
you're not wrong at all. I can't tell if that makes it more or less depressing. but I'm a bit confused why you made the post to begin with, not to come off as rude but was anyone disputing any of that?
t. incel faggot.

>>84507829
>>84508282
Basically what I want to say, I don't think I'm in the wrong with being picky.
I want my next relationship to end in marriage so I will choose a man according to that, as anyone should, really.

>Even when inserting myself in spaces where my talent was coveted and women idled, I still had an excess of suffering to endure to even get the few options I did have to just talk to me (and eventually ghost). So I stopped bothering.
Brutal, it is rather baffling to me that this can be possible. You seem very well adjusted so I don't think it is your fault whatsoever. So I guess, what I'm trying to say is, yeah I'm probably incredibly naive when it comes to dating as a man.
I am a chronic optimist who thinks things will always turn out well eventually and I guess I'm hardcore projecting this onto the male dating experience.

My apologies.

>drawing cartoons for money all day
Can I see some of your work? I understand if not, since your art might be recognisable.
I just like art a lot, it's my hobby as well.

> So I stopped bothering.
Would you say you're happy with how things are? Do you enjoy life?
Of course relationships and connection are a human need so you probably will say it's not as ideal as it could be. I'm just curious on your outlook on life.

>>84507829
>>84508327
she wants that aspie dick, bro.

>>84508298
Hmm.. I guess I was looking for people to talk and argue with. Sharing perspectives and opinions.
I understand I basically declared war in "enemy turf".

I like categorising humans, not as a way to reduce them into boxes and labels but as a way to build frameworks I can use to predict how someone is like. Matching patterns or something. I think it's a good reference point to expand on when getting to know someone.
I also just like documenting experiences and bits of """"knowledge"""" so this was a talking point I could offer.

You could say, it's a cheap way to get a lot of people to talk to me.

I want to do a drawing thread here sometime.

>romance
No need to read anymore. You're an idiot if you're looking for "romance" over dutiful love. Romance doesn't last. Real dutiful love does. Also get off the internet if you don't have your husband's permission to be on here.

>>84508358
Lol
No, he is too old for me. I can be fascinated with peoples lives without wanting to engage with them sexually or romantically.
I like reasonable people and I'm always interested in knowing more about someone wise (unlike that other tripfag) for a chance to gain some of their wisdom. Imo this is what being human is about.

>>84507829
>>84508377
ah sorry bro.

>>84508374
>Romance doesn't last.
Why do you think so?

>you don't have your husband's permission to be on here.
I wish that was true

>>84507829
I think you missed the point. Yeah, she can have matches, but men and women look for different stuff. She complains that love is as hard for woman to find as sex for man. Problem is definition of love and fact that she at least has stuff to filter in quest for love while men don't have anything. They put effort to make that stuff to filter for her, but there is limit to how much a man can be humiliated until he stops caring.

>>84508409
Good summary, thank you.
I often fail to be concise so my replies are always 2000 characters long.

>>84502564
Female delusion as usual.
One thing I've noticed about women is their failure to think from first principles and always start at whatever point is convenient for their little victim headcanon.
What you don't seem to understand is that the ability to find love is entirely dependent on the ability to get into relationships in the first place, something that is easy for women and difficult for men.
It's like a normal person complaining they can't find something to a person who doesn't have eyes or limbs. Women complain nonstop about a search most men are prevented from even taking part in and then expect sympathy.

>>84508473
I can relate. I often have to split my walls of text into few posts. I had to rephrase some stuff to fit within limit in >>84506745
In any case, I think that having those options is still better position than having to put much more effort with barely any results.

File: 1777347276448236.png (282 KB, 600x548)

282 KB PNG

>>84502564
>Outcome: High levels of investment needed to not scare him away, either going nowhere or misunderstanding his signals and thinking he isn't interested and leaving yourself

Gee maybe this could be solved by foids being direct and straightforward for once in their fucking life
Hilarious how foids always complain about men not sharing their feelings when in reality they are the ones who never fucking share anything and then expect you to read their mind

>>84506745
>>84508631
>communicating instead of playing some stupid, selfish mind games
Yes, very much needed skill. I dislike the modern dating meta of pretending to not be interested and making a man chase you instead of being direct yourself.
>analyzing it and writing wall of text as response. And I'm awfully bad about "talking about nothing"
Dating other neurodivergents is the way. Women with autism or ADHD will highly appreciate and prefer this form of communication.
>Bitch, I don't get any interest.
Surprising. None at all or just none worth your time? I truly think of neurotypicals and neurodivergents being entirely different factions, not like they cannot like each other but you'd need to have that kind of preference.
>I think that having those options is still better position than having to put much more effort with barely any results.
Yes, I can see the annoyance of having to play the jester go get someone interested. But I also feel like you probably realise whether someone is compatible with you within the first few sentences. I'd probably stop continuing a connection if I see it's not worth my time.

>>84508643
There are people too anxious to move forward even if you tell them straight up that you like them. I recognise a lot of women want you to "read their mind" and feel like it takes some of the magic out of your actions when they need to tell you.
What women really want is for you to make an effort to come up with things she might like, there is nothing to lose really.

But yes, generally said, especially young neurotypical women expect you to follow unspoken etiquette, are indirect and don't know how to properly communicate. If she's worth the effort you'll have to teach her that and try to make her feel safe to do so.
What I mean with making her feel safe is:
- Take her seriously if she for once does communicate what she wants and needs
- Encourage her to do so
- Praise her for doing so (positive reinforcement goes a long way)

>>84508733
>Dating other neurodivergents is the way
Easier said than done. People don't have glowing tags with this above their heads. And apparently girls with asperger learn to act normal.
>None at all or just none worth your time?
None. Either I get no replies at all or get ghosted pretty fast. When I'm myself and write wall of text, I get ghosted. When I try to avoid details and write shorter replies, it lasts a bit longer but then it's so shallow I run out of ideas what to write and they get bored. Not to mention most of them even don't give anything to work with. Only girls I don't bother with are fat, single mothers, having lots of tattoos and plastic bimbos.

kek this retarded foid is so delusional and selfish it's crazy. Notice how she hasn't even mentioned what she would do for her ideal robot slave even once

File: cuckshed.jpg (132 KB, 1388x858)

132 KB JPG

>>84502564
>sure women fuck Chads and go on wild sexual adventures in their prime
>but you get to put a ring on her after!
>you get to have Chad's sloppy seconds!
>or Tyrone's sloppy thirds
>or Brad's sloppy fourths
>or Miguel's sloppy fifths
>o algo..
>lucky boy!

>hello aspies! we're so much like each other, haha. I have 10000 options to choose from but they're not at the top 99,99% of what I actually want so I will just keep waiting and rejecting even the guys that are 99% there. male and female dating struggles are so similar! I get 10000 options and you get 2 or even 0, we are all struggling :)

File: quote-one-hundred-women-a(...).jpg (52 KB, 850x400)

52 KB JPG

>>84502564
Love isn't real dumb bitch. It's the carrot on the stick romantic men made up in their puny little minds to feel better about the fact that women don't have much to offer other than their bodies and reproductive function.

Love is platonic and non-sexual. Once lust enters into the picture the love is dead. Love does not come without understanding and the lower can never understand the higher. Only equals or higher beings can reach understanding and you are not our equal, will never be our equal.

>>84502564
>Yes, women can get sex whenever from almost whoever, on demand. Yes, men cannot do the same.
Sure we can. It's called "rape". It's easy and fun. It'll be your turn soon.

>>84502564
I want this >>84503478
date me. pick me, an Aspie/Mentalcel

bump figgijbfddd

>>84502564
Women have no right to complain about modern dating dynamics or whatever.

This was the world YOU created. Moral questions aside, if you can't thrive in the world created by your kind, for your kind, you have a terrible skill issue.

>>84511086
why the fuck are you bumping this
i just want the thread to finally die lol

>>84502564
tl;dr
I really don't care to hear MORE of the female perspective. I don't come to 4chan because I want to talk to women. Can't you just be satisfied with censoring all males in all spaces besides one webpage to get your bullshit out?

The answer is that you're wrong. No matter what it is. You don't know anything, you don't even know yourself.

File: shut up.jpg (430 KB, 649x923)

430 KB JPG

get a real tripcode retard

>>84511214
You are not me what the hell?

>>84511289
Great, then you can start answering the rest of the replies here.
I can't be bothered anymore

File: 1778069924903658.jpg (58 KB, 660x495)

58 KB JPG

>>84502564
Do women or women like you really like mental cels/aspies I thought u hated us