[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1766905289158097.png (450 KB, 746x778)
450 KB PNG
What if men are the ones with standards that are too high?
>>
>>84522909
take reality, flip it on its head
>>
>>84522909
>I want a loyal woman that doesn't start arguments for no reason
men's standards are unironically too high
>>
Accept your place in the hierarchy of society and date your looksmatch.
>>
>>84522934
>I want a loyal woman that doesn't start arguments for no reason
Its a dating app so its measured by looks you dishonest retard
>>
>>84522946
take a sexist dad joke you humorless fuck
>>
>>84522944
Ok so what's my lookmatch?
>>
>>84522909
>>84522920
satanic inversion
they always do this
>>
>>84522909
>Your standards are too high
Yes.
>Drop them
No.
>>
File: 1723329235275620.png (478 KB, 2757x2757)
478 KB PNG
>>84522944
>just date your looksmatch bro, men are the ones with unrealistic standards on the apps bro
>>
>>84522934
Fellas, is it unreasonable, to want a loyal and kind partner?
>>
>>84522909
I have my age range set to 30-40, and I swipe right on anyone that isnt fat and doesnt have a kid in their profile. I dont think my standards are that high
>>
>>84522909
>>84522920
AMAZING opportunity to shill more for Saint Rehab
https://youtu.be/McwPC1cGcUU
>>
>>84522909
I'm getting tired of this shit. It's always men this men that. Men need to lower standards, men need to NOT do this, instead do that.

Of course this post was made by the goyimpost anyways. Women literally get much more likes and pass a lot of men. I'm so drained from all of this
>>
>>84522909
Women: >=6ft or bust
Men: <30yo or bust
>>
>>84523588
The goycattle must receive the whip on a regular basis at all costs.
>>
>>84523666
>Men: <30yo or bust
big bust
>>
>>84522909
women won't date anyone under 5'10
>>
>>84522969
for low quality and unnatractive men?
you need to date a fat single mom who smells bad, sorry not sorry,
>>
>>84523666
not true, plenty of dudes would date or smash a 30+ woman, probably not marry and have kids, but definitely worth a smash and a night out,
>>
>>84523211
If anyone understood the meaning of "average" then just looking at this would show that headline is utter bullshit.
>>
>>84523666
I'm a man in my thirties who wants to date a woman in her thirties.

But I'm also under six feet, so...
>>
>>84522909
I concur, men are looking for women that aren't fat, naggy or negative. Very high standard for womyn.
>>
>>84523927
>probably not marry and have kids
duh nigga
stopped reading
>>
>>84523718
Even 5'10" guys are getting filtered 70% of the time, you have to be at least 6'2" to not get filtered at least 30%
>>
>>84523588
Men are the ones starved because they can't even have a functional adult lives or healthy non romantic relationships so they retardedly pretend it's getting a gf what will save them
>>
Now we just need someone to upload that image showing the bell curve for the 1 to 10 scale for girls versus the one for guys, and you'll have all the pictures you need in this thread, to prove that yet again, the New York Post is filled with dumb bullshit that isn't true. Nothing but lies.
>>
>>84523588
Don't get drained my dude. Just call this entire thing out for what it is, a big damn lie, and then move on.
>>
>>84522909
I looked up the article and it says women get more matches than men therefore they statistically match with men who get less matches therefore they are dating down. Retarded ass logic kek
>>
>>84525191
who should we believe?
reserchers ... ?
or a random retard on /r9k/? .... HMMMMM....
>>
>>84522909
I literally don't get any likes when I try the apps.
>>
>>84525243
Researchers aren't infallible beings

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/psychology/replication-crisis
>>
>>84522909
>swipe right on every single account for a month straight
>get 4 or 5 matches
>3 are barely interested/able to talk let alone meet
>the others are bots/scammers
>occasional entrapment as well
>>
>>84525243
wtf do you mean believe, I gave you their logic. do you mean agree?
>>
That article uses a sample size of 3,000 Czechoslovakians.
>>
>>84525243
If your metric for "dating up / dating down" is "who got more matches" then your metric is flawed. If men lowered their standards, then the women they lowered their standards to would be getting more matches, and then the researchers would use this new difference in matches to declare that those women are also dating down now.

The fact is there are simply more men on the dating market than women, so women will always get more matches per person than men will.
>>
>>84522909
You're right, I just want a woman that loves me.
I should be flayed alive in public for being such a degenerate faggot with high standards.
>>
>>84525488
wrong,
if men first STOP swiping on every pretty girl who is clearly out of their league and start swiping yes on the uglier women, (their looksmatch) then things will start to even out, not completely of course but more even, no doubt,
>>
>>84525528
The data completely contradicts this retarded claim. All you did was reverse the situation and exclaim checkmate. Definitely the most intelligently bankrupt shit I've read this week.
>>
>>84525542
you are just wrong, if men stopped swiping on women who are out of their league, and started swiping on the normal average woman, then their likes per swipe would go up, women would actually start liking them back,
10/10 stacy isnt going to ma tch with a loser, okay?
its no that complicated, we are talking about percentages here,
>>
>>84525576
Oh I get it now! You're a loser.
>>
>>84522909
So I fell in love with a fat assed blonde Romanian woman and a petite Pakistani woman with her hustles and a professional title.

They didn't love me back.
Explain that, asshole.
>>
Male standards:
>Be alive(optional)
>Not be obese (optional)
>Have a vagina (optional)
>Resemble some form of feminity (optional)
>Be nice (optional)

I mean how much lower can we really take this before we just start asking for a fleshlight with a mouth?
>>
File: 1756406594290105.jpg (70 KB, 896x504)
70 KB JPG
>>84522909
1. I'm not chad enough.
2. You couldn't pay me to betabux for one of these La Creaturas with a bad attitude because she couldn't lock chad and is reminded of it every time a chad enters the room and she can't cheat on me with him and is on a cocktail of SSRIs to survive the constant disappointment.
>>
>>84525606
That's why men should lower their standards, they think every women is for "betabux"

Pretty sure most men don't even want a relationship they just follow the herd because they understand at some level is what they need to do
>>
>>84525528
Would make no difference since chad will happily fuck mids
>>
>>84525618
Men shouldn't lower their standards regardless of what clickbait articles and La Creatura foids say.
>>
>>84525528
>things will start to even out
There are literally more men on the dating market though.
>>
>>84524880
>why cant moids do the bare minimum and become milionaire finance mob bosses like in muh shittoks?
>>
>>84525618
>men standards
>litteraly just be a bio woman and dont cheat
>thats too much waaaaah
>>
>>84525576
>league, and started swiping on the normal average woman
Thats already happening but average women dont want average men
>>
Men have no standards for women. What torments men is women's standards for men, but what torments women is their own vanity.
>>
>>84522909
they are, men expect me to shave when they don't
>>
>>84522909
2/10 foids cannot seethe any harder
>>
>>84523175
Can't hit the top if you aim for the bottom
>>
>>84526402
You have shit taste then, real men like it hairy
>>
File: 1000074967.png (1.78 MB, 1448x1086)
1.78 MB PNG
>>84522909
The truth is, men just want a kind, loyal girl, women want a guy who won't abuse them and be loyal. Looks don't matter that much in the end. I've got stunning female friends who married goblins I never thought would get a girlfriend when I was in my incel-ish phase. I never really got sucked in completely, thank god. I just thought I was the worst person in the world, but I always treated my female friends right, even when I was frustrated. That perhaps is most important, actually knowing some women in person and not just through idiotic incel folklore.
>>
>>84526402
I trim
I don't expect women to go bald down there, but if you don't at least trim, you're being unhygenic
>>
>>84526441
How is not shaving unhygienic? Sounds like a cope
>>
>>84526440
>That perhaps is most important, actually knowing some women in person
Do women even exist anymore? I haven't met one in over a year
>>
>>84526464
>trimming
"not shaving"
I'm not going to argue with a disingenuous retard
>>
File: file.png (109 KB, 1810x964)
109 KB PNG
>>84526473
You don't hang out in female spaces + male surplus
>>
>>84526476
>but if you don't at least trim, you're being unhygenic
So not shaving is unhygienic according to you.
Learn some fucking reading comprehension you complete retard
>>
>>84526487
Does this retard think that trimming and shaving are the same thing, or that trimming is a subset of trimming? lmao
>>
>>84526480
I don't live in female spaces, all the girls my age left town for college
>>
>>84526487
lmao anon is like
>I went to the barber and got a haircut
>he shaved my head by cutting a few inches of the top
he's actually probably esl
>>
>>84526488
>disingenuous
Says the faggot who wants to hyperfocus on the difference between trimming and shaving

>trimming is a subset of trimming
Do you speak English?
>>
>>84522909
>>84523588
the reason this is happening is because all the junior reporter positions are filled by foids. it's why they spam this shit
>>
File: file.png (261 KB, 735x541)
261 KB PNG
>>84526500
>picrel
>>84526491
keked
>>
>>84524291
Nah, I'm even getting filtered.
The funny thing is when I don't focus on pussy, it attracts me.
If I chase, then I'm suddenly filtered.
>>
File: 1770608519054103 .png (310 KB, 538x600)
310 KB PNG
>>84522909
>Women swipe left on the overwhelming majority of men.
>Men are the ones that need to lower their standards on dating apps

What?? What foidbrain wrote this article? We need some Integrity in Journalism laws. Clearly the writers and editors cannot police themselves.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.