>Less than 3% of American women are virgins on their wedding night>Almost all of these women were under the age of 25 when they got married>this doesn't even account for whether they're attractive or not>In comparison, 7-9% of American men are worth at least one million dollarsThis is the ultimate blackpill. It's easier for a woman to end up with a rich man than it is for a man to end up with a virgin wife. That's why looksmaxing has taken over and betabuxxing is cope. The type of men that end up being a lot of these women's first boyfriends/partners are usually fuckboys and good looking losers. Also usually someone brings up being a passport bro to mitigate this, but the reality is that any "good girls" from another country aren't going to want anything too serious with a foreigner and to abandon their culture. It could work if you were a second gen from that country, but if you're just a gringo thinking you'll get to marry some 10/10 virgin from another country you're delusional.
Just an absolute brutal of the brutal blackpills, what should we do?
>>84606701>this doesn't even account for whether they're attractive or notThis also doesn't account for whether or not they stayed married. With a divorce rate of 50%, you get 1.5% of women are married virgins that stay married.
>>84606874I think the stats show that virgins are the most likely to stay married compared to nonvirgin women, but even then the chances of divorce were like 15-20%. Not as high as 50% but not small enough to just brush aside also.
>>84606701Those are stats on millennials. The post-covid gen z generation are all shut-ins and have low body counts, many virgins. And the reason less are married as virgins now is because average age to marry is 30. It was 22 back in the 1950s.
>>84606701I have no real reason to care about body count
>>84606893You matter less to her the higher her body count is
>>84606884Nah that's an exaggeration. I think something like 80% of them have had sex by the time they're 19, which is still considered "super low omg look at the zoomies they're so weird and shut ins" when compared to previous gens, but it's not like every dude is some incel.
>>84606911The reality is that if you're not first, youre last, and it's almost impossible to be a grown ass man and be a woman's first if you aren't doing something illegal. But anon is right, if you have a high body count then you won't care if your woman has one. That's why most men need to get experience before getting married.
>>84606701Why does it matter if a woman is virgin? This is a "problem" with men too.
>>84606988That is a retarded argument. It is still absolutely ridiculous to commit to another mans leftovers, regardless of your body count. Going back to the Roman era, men would sleep with prostitutes before marrying a virgin woman. Female virginity was of utmost virtue, and if you couldnt attain it, you just wouldnt marry
>>84606988Dubs checked>>84606999Trips checkedRealistically if you're not in highschool you've missed your shot to get a virgin wife. It's not over though, there are plenty of good girls out there who just ended up with the wrong guy in high school, one body, and are still looking for marriage. It's not as bleak as it seems
Someone just post the marital stability rate over 10 years vs. number of previous partners charts, these cuckold faggot threads are tiresome
>>84606988The gap between 0 and 1 is the biggest leap but the gap between 3 and 10 is still the difference of "probably make it work" to "almost garunteed divorce rape". Ignore body count at your own peril
>>84607063I'm confused. Are those men who sleep with girls in high school ALSO not virgins? Everyone is having sex, why pin the problem on women specifically?
>>84607095Women's body counts predict problems far more than men's
>>84607097How so? If you're looking at it from a conservative standpoint, the man is still giving into lust just as the woman is.
>>84607095When did I pin the problem on girls? I'm speaking to men looking for women.
>>84607124But what's the point? What's the goal of having a virgin wife, if statistically the looking man has also had sex?
>>84607131Brotha that is my point. I'm saying it's silly to look for virgins if you're not in high school
>>84607106>>84607131Because with a virgin wife you actually have a good statistical chance of a successful marraige without divorce rape or infidelity
>>84607155Yeah, and that correlation is best attributed to religion... AND is not generalizable by sex.Also I'm not finding any statistics tying sexual past and divorce rape together. Enlighten me.
>>84607170>Im too lazy to inform myself, please do my research for meWe're not debating rn retard Im informing you that the dependent factor at play is the womans # of sexual partners, I don't have to prove that to you its already been done.
>>84607188I just told you I did the research and nothing came up. You're lying out of your ass.
>>84606861Nothing. Just don't marryJust stop caring
>>84607188>anon asks you for basic argumentation>claims are, big surprise, unfounded>"we're not debating" "I don't have to prove that to you"kek.
>>84606701why don't women just not have sex
>>84606701>>Less than 3%fewer
>>84607602Then that means men should also not have sex. You're essentially arguing for no more sex.
>>84606884>The post-covid gen z generation are all shut-ins and have low body counts, many virgins.data says otherwise
>>84606988>if you have a high body count then you won't care if your woman has oneincorrect.>>84606999>Why does it matter if a woman is virgin?because men and women are different and pair bonding works very differently for them. also women initiate divorce 80% of the time. the higher her body count, the more likely she is to divorce.
>>84607095>I'm confusedno you're not. you're pretending to be stupid, assuming the sexual activity is evenly distributed.
>>84607632>pair bonding works very differently for themExplain how it's different. >the higher her body count, the more likely she is to divorce.False equivalency. Show statistics.
>>84607637They are both having the sex. What's the uneven distribution?
>>84607640>>the higher her body count, the more likely she is to divorce.>False equivalency. Show statistics.There are plenty out there, retard. Google themUsed up women are broken. They can't pair bond or have good relationships
>>84607650>There are plenty out thereYet you can't name a single one. that's funny.>Used up women are broken. They can't pair bondActually, there's very limited scientific investigation into how sexual promiscuity affects pair bonding. Even worse for your argument, there are no studies specifically on how it pertains to women as pair bonding involves the same neurotransmitters among both sexes.
>>84607640>False equivalency???you're just throwing around terminology you don't understand>Show statisticsvery well.https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10989935/https://www.psypost.org/new-psychology-research-indicates-your-sociosexual-orientation-could-make-your-marriage-more-difficult/https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3407304/https://www.athensjournals.gr/social/2017-4-4-3-Pinto.pdfhttps://labs.la.utexas.edu/buss/files/2015/09/sex-lies-pspb-2005.pdfhttps://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/02/180212190946.htmhttps://imgur.com/a/promiscuity-infidelity-excerpts-hPBWccfhttps://ifstudies.org/blog/men-and-women-with-multiple-sex-partners-are-less-desirable-as-long-term-mateshttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0192513X231155673>>84607646>bothwomen are fucking the top 20% of men. those men have harems basically.we see this pareto distribution everywhere, including on dating apps.
>>84607673I'm not doing your homework for you sweaty.
not really a Christian country
>>84607676>very wellMost of these pertain to both men and women... you'll have to be more specific if you're trying to prove misogyny. >women are fucking the top 20% of men.WHERE ARE YOU READING THIS???
>>84607716>WHERE ARE YOU READING THIS???okcupid data, womens dating profiles, women themselves speaking openly about their "bare minimum"https://igotstandardsbro.com/now fuck off, you dumb child
>>84607735holy fucking unreliable evidence. you don't even know what you're saying anymore. that doesn't help prove your 20% figure at all.
>>84606701God it's brutal spending your whole life fapping to females on a screen knowing they exist IRL they're just with different better males
>>84607745that anon posted quite a few things. all you did was ask questions and assert things are equal. do you have even a single thing to share?
>>84606893>I have no real reason to care about body countShe will compare you with all of her previous partners. Was there one that was better looking? One that earned more money? One that was better in bed? You'd better hope that you're better than ALL of her previous partners in every way
>>84608305Why do you care?>I just do!! Men are wired like that! Its instinct! Muh basic needs!Lmao. Weak faggot. Stay like that.
>>84608317You will never find yourself in others
>>84606701>7-9% of American men are worth at least one million dollarsDoes this account for age? Because if not you're a dummy for including 60yr olds with retirement funds and paid-off mortgages.
>>84608400Why do you even have beef with me? I'm just a loser that wants pussy, there are endless other males like me.
>>84606884>And the reason less are married as virgins now is because average age to marry is 30.Now simply nobody marries.
>>84608424getting old doesn't preclude them from marrying a gold digger
>>84607624May we see this data?
Zoomers are the most sexless generation alive. Men and women today lose their virginities later than ever, and have less sexual partners.
>>84609688>Men and women today lose their virginities later than ever, and have less sexual partners.only the menwomen are turbosluts
>>84609821Men and women. You are a lying gay psyopper.
If feminists didn't push completely unnatural and Jewish age of consent laws it would be much easier to find a pure virgin.
I think i've discovered why no one is having sex.
>>84607170https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10989935/Nta or even an incel, usually just a /v/ lurker but this is one of the most well known stats in all of sociology. There's no way you were incapable of finding statistics for it
>>84606701If you're a gringo in SEA or any other third world country, money is the answer. Has always been. I'm talking to a 10/10 SEA goddess, and she is likely not a virgin based on what she posts online but she sure as hell responded to me when I flashed the possibility I might be rich right before her eyes.
>>84609891>lyingshut the fuck up retard. we have the data>the proportion of 18- to 24-year-old individuals who reported having had no sexual activity in the past year increased among men (18.9% vs 30.9%; age-adjusted odds ratio [aOR] for trend across survey periods, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.04-1.39) but not among women>but not among womenhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2767066
>>84609921damn, i really forgot to include the title of the graph in the picture. it's obesity rates. fat people are grotesque beyond belief. no one should have sex with them. ideally, they would kill themselves, but I will allow them to go on a diet instead.
The vast majority of couples have sex with eachother before marriage
>>84606701I'm glad I'm not a virgin anymore. Who would want to be a virgin if the only men interested in virgins are misogynistic incels?
