If by women you mean 40 year old women, then yes.

>>84671672
It's the opposite tbqh

They could probably bench 50lb if she lay on top of him and they both pushed the bar

File: images (21).jpg (21 KB, 561x356)

21 KB JPG

>>84671688
Nice cope bud kek

File: average foid.jpg (697 KB, 1080x1695)

697 KB JPG

Even 4/10 spic women are getting ran through constantly while their looksmatch is roping.

>>84671654
>that fucking bedroom
How many layers of BPD is she on?

>posting her ass on the internet
this guy is getting cucked I hope he knows that this foid is a worthless cumrag only good for sex

>>84671727
Go look up the full story behind ops photo unoriginal ragebaiting faggot

>>84671654
I bet most foids look at this and think "this is the kinda girl most guys want!"
Fuck no. I don't want some slag that gets dressed up like a whore for a picture you post online.
I wish I could just find a normal girl who isn't a terminally online porn brained loser

>>84671765
>her
Anon, I have some bad news for you about this

Somebody just kill me.

>>84671771
qrd originally?

>>84671744
LMAO is that how the relationship ended? JFL "situationship"

>>84671654
the thought of being near a woman like that makes me feel sick

>>84671841
>kill me because i cant get a used up roastie whore from discord
You serious? Lol

>>84671755
>>that fucking bedroom
>How many layers of BPD is she on?

I would 360 the fuck out of that room even if it was just a casual sex invite. I am not sticking my dick in that mental illness

>>84671654
Absolutely, if youre 6'2" like that guy.

File: Screenshot_20260211_19284(...).jpg (248 KB, 1080x1801)

248 KB JPG

No lol, jewcord is absolute garbage. Any foid I added on there ghosted within a day, no matter where they're from, what age they are, nothing.

>>84671654
>post is 2024
>>84671744
>new posts in 2025

"relationship" lasted for 10 months omegakek

>>84672586
what biometric data is discord asking for? I've never had to give any. Is it for age verification in nanny states like the UK and Australia?

>>84672563
360 would put you back in your original facing direction

>>84672609
In order to see NSFW content, you have to let them do a face scan, which they pinky promise is totally a one-time snapshot thing that they immediately scrub off and definitely don't keep around and even if they did it would definitely never leak.

>>84672626
oh. I don't hang out in porn servers.

>>84672654
Me neither and I've still had the NSFW block thing happen because they have AI scan images and decide anything that might be "inappropriate" gets blurred.

People say fuck a lot in a server you're in? Shlomo needs your fingerprints, retina scan and a semen sample in triplicate so you can continue using the 'cord.

>>84672271
>i cant *even get a used up roastie whore from discord
You think that's making me any happier? I'm too much of a pussy to even pay a prostitute. My skull is yearning to be pierced by a bullet.

>>84671654
How did that double chinned fuck get a gf?

>>84671654
Wtf is up with the 1:1 ratio of women who dress and decorate their rooms like this and being extremely mentally ill. I've never seen such an accurate predictor before that is so rarely wrong, if ever

I will be severely disappointed if there's no penis under that skirt

>>84671744
>Broke up
>Still expects him to pay up
Lol
>Changed his card info
What, so she had his card info and was still using it? DAMN.

>>84671744
oh look. the relationship with the attentionwhore didnt work out.
shocker.

>join a discord server
>sent a roastie a hello in a private message
>She reports me for messaging her without asking for permission first in the main chat
>Get banned

Holy fuck zoomers are fucking retarded.

>>84671654
I wish I had an egf with a booty

File: 1778612862688016.jpg (26 KB, 500x500)

26 KB JPG

>>84671654
That is a godtier ass

>>84671771
No. Fuck no. You tell me or kys. I'm not going to Twitter.

>>84674908
>I wish I had an egf with a booty
you really don't

>>84672567
How can the foids even tell that though? The guy is mid at best and there's no way she knew he was tall from discord. Seems like they knew each other IRL and are LARPing as somehow having met on discord.

>>84676039
I mean, just look at the guy's physique. He doesn't even lift, has no shoulders nor trapezoids whatsoever, has glasses that make him look like a dork, and somehow he's in her room grabbing her ass like he's a gigachad. Feels so out of place that if I knew exactly where that Discord was, I'd have a good chance at cucking him.

>>84676045
Maybe you would, maybe you wouldn't - these sorts of women aren't really after sex and I think in a lot of cases they don't really know how to enjoy it properly. What they're after is obvious - attention. This is why most OF girls with boyfriends date relatively unattractive dudes. They're not necessarily in it for looks, they're in it for a guy who will provide unquestioning worship, validation, and adoration, is okay with her displaying herself on the internet for random strangers, and won't cut off her supply. Women like this often don't know how to form deep relationships, and they're usually highly resistant to emotional compromise, as a result they seek quantity over quality. The thing is, there is a strange purity to the onlyfans boyfriend. He loves the onlyfans girl as she is, and doesn't seek to change her, despite her obvious flaws. This is immensely valuable to women in general. It's kind of a no-win situation for any guy not okay with this sort of behavior. I really value privacy in a relationship and it's increasingly difficult to find an attractive woman who doesn't engage in the softcore version of this sort of behavior, and I firmly believe that trying to control others never ends well, so I've pretty much exited dating. The internet has made addicts out of most of our society. Onlyfans boyfriend might actually be the last pure soul, even if he's addicted to pussy. That's at least a very ancient and noble addiction.

>>84671790
Unicronically this is exactly what i think my ex r9k bf wanted down to the dressing up, supersonico, bpd cute room

>>84671654
The classic: yes, if you are rich at least

>>84673430
he's rich, you fat fuck

>>84676131
Wrong assumption that any guy would try to change her. Most guys are desperate to get their dicks in anything, let alone an OF whore with a nice ass who can pull off a cute aesthetic placing her in top 10% of all women in attractiveness. She could have any caliber of any guy in the world worshipping her in an instant, and that loser is what she chose. More than likely, she doesn't think too highly of herself. Self-hatred is a self-fulfilling prophecy after all.

>>84671654
>whore
>showing her ass on the internet
It never began for him

>>84676804
You're right that most guys wouldn't bother trying to change her outright, but that's because most guys who are worth anything wouldn't view a woman who displays herself publicly to be worth more than a quick fuck. They might "worship" her for a moment, but they won't stick around. The only guys who are genuinely okay with attention seeking like this within monogamous relationships are low value guys like in the OP's pic. Other guys know what the deal is and will only really go as far as she puts out, a few might try to put up with it, but they'll resent her and want her to change if they're sufficient, or if they're attractive enough to benefit from it as well, they'll opt for an open relationship.

I don't think women like this really actually care much about sex though, I think validation and attention is a higher form of pleasure to them. As a result, I genuinely think they view a loser guy who genuinely puts up with their shit as more valuable than hot guy who only wants them for sex, or a matched guy who puts up with it, but resents her for it and hopes she'll change. It's kind of an optimal arrangement because she gets the satisfaction of one steady, intense supply and lots of smaller bursts of validation. Men are very similar with porn and sexual gratification.

>>84671654
how did this onions filled potato get top shelf pussy?

>>84672586
>Any foid I added
>added
there's your problem

>>84676867
>but that's because most guys who are worth anything wouldn't view a woman who displays herself publicly to be worth more than a quick fuck.

Lol. Where are you getting this info? Women who put out are worth more than any woman who doesn't put out. A woman who has sex at your disposal is worth more than a woman who doesn't. Most women aren't worth crap because they don't put out and they're just after attention. To most men, looks are what matters, period, what she does comes second. If she sleeps around then that's another issue altogether, but farming simps is okay as long as you're the only one she lets inside.

>>84676957
I get my data from compiling what's collected by my handy dandy low value simp detector. Funny enough, whenever I reply to you it goes off. This post in particular made it go crazy.

>>84677009
Unless you're a gigachad who can get pussy a swipe away, you're not gonna be pumping and dumping an attractive woman on purpose. You're not some high value alpha who gets laid left and right. As I said, the only time that this makes sense is if she's sleeping around.

this trend of demoing your SO is so fucking stupid

>>84677009
>>84677178
Also, the value of even the loser goes up dramatically the moment she starts parading him and they date publicly and he gets a larger following from that. A 9 or a 10 can date the ugliest man in the world, and that man would still be highly sought after, even moreso than Chad, simply because he is dating a 9 or a 10. That's how it works.