Tthis graph breaks the foid brain and makes foids seethe
>>84696804>female curve is higher than male curvecheckmate moids, your own graph shows women are smarter!
>>84696804We all know that women don't think about anything, when you have a conversation with a foid she speaks nonsense and reaches no conclusion and you have to give her the answer
>>84696804this is obviously incorrect as men have developmental disorders much more commonly than women, so there are many more retarded men that womenmoids are so retarded they dont understand how science works. like, science is based on facts not 4chan graphs and you need an actual source AND an analysis by a professional because average chud is too retarded to understand IQ research. and when they get debunked they cry about getting attacked by feminized academia.
>>84696804I find it hilarious when people suggest these things about gender and race effecing iq, especially race.But im a black girl with an iq above 120. Anyhow Iq only measures pattern recognition and problem solving skills.Its not as meaningful as people suggest.
>>84696874just because an outlier exists doesn't mean the norm isn't true.
>>84696874Show your skin with a timestamp and prove that you're a black woman or stop larping as a one
This is the lore accurate version.
>>84696891I have a hard time believing it. I know plenty who are at my level.Though I know it may be that I only know people who are outliers.What i am trying to suggest is that sample sizes and other variables aren't being considered in these highly retarded tests. Such as nutrition, stress, sleep ect.Who all affect development.>>84696894Why? I mean it shouldn't be hard to believe that I'm a blackbot.
>>84696869>this is obviously incorrect as men have developmental disorders much more commonly than women, so there are many more retarded men that womenDid not read the graph, it explicitly states this if you actually read it. Men are still smarter on average and more common above 110 or so. 145 and above is all male
>>84696874IQ is one of the most scientifically validated concepts ever. It's often the best predictor of success in school, work, and general life outcomes.>your brain's ability to work is meaningless
>>84696874>Iq only measures pattern recognition and problem solving skills.>Its not as meaningful as people suggest.I'm a STEM graduate and engineer with an IQ of 128. Have been called smart by 8 people so far, including one of my teachers in university. I have accomplished all of this despite being lazy and socially awkward. I make significantly better decisions than the vast majority of people around me, which is why I'm richer, healthier and younger-looking than they are. My life is mostly about avoiding stress, pursuing happiness and becoming rich to escape wagecuckery.It's true that IQ tests are pattern recognition, but it does seem pattern recognition applies to general life stuff a lot, so IQ tests are definitely a meaningful indicator of your intelligence, even tho they don't guarantee you'll do well in life. Most of your life is decided at birth, by factors out of your control. There are lots of retards doing a lot better than me, simply because they are extroverted or were dealt better hands or had the luck of being in the right place at the right time. But most average IQ people are doing worse than me. The only upside about being average is that you socially fit in better and you're too dumb to care much about how fucked you really are (think of how normies are ok living with 30yrs of debt).
>>84696952It only indicates problemsolving and pattern recognition skills.Skills that are highly useful in modern society where everyone has to become super specialised in one field and work as a cog in the machine.It's really not as meaningful as people suggest. It's just that in modern society, high iq can become a prerequisite for doing well in the system.Beyond the system itself, it's really not as meaningful as people suggest. It doesn't determine wether a person is more or less valuable. If it does, it's because people determine human value based on how well they can serve the machine.
>>84696869>men have developmental disorders much more commonly than womenDevelopmental disorder = fidgets when forced to sit down in school for 8 hours a day.
>>84696952>school, work, and general life outcomes100% of these tasks boil down to "Just put the fries in the bag"There's a reason pareto distributions exist.
>>84696984>It only indicates problemsolving and pattern recognition skills.>Skills that are highly useful in modern society where everyone has to become super specialised in one field and work as a cog in the machine.They're just useful skills to have you fucking retard, which is why IQ correlates with performance in basically everything. The only reason you're against IQ is because blacks have the lowest average IQs and women are lower IQ than men
>>84697016>The only reason you're against IQ is because blacks have the lowest average IQsAnd subsequently have been the most conquered and least useful and innovative race in history
>>84697016I still believe the veneration of IQ stems from people urging eachother to become cogs in the machine.I dont think its useless. I just think its substantially less meaningful that alot of people suggest. Having high IQ doesnt mean much if you dont have any opportunities to use it.>The only reason you're against IQ is because blacks have the lowest average IQs and women are lower IQ than menI dont need group identity to feel reassured in myself desu. From observation... most people here do.>>84696965I mean sure, high iq can be handy at times. It helps with learning, understanding abstract concepts ect ect.It can be really helpful, but its not the make or break factor like you suggest.I just think people really overrated IQ.Lots of folk have high IQ, but dont come far due to other factors.
>>84697065>I still believe the veneration of IQ stems from people urging eachother to become cogs in the machine>I STILL BELIEVENobody gives a fuck what you believe Shaniqua.
>>84697065>Lots of folk have high IQ, but dont come far due to other factorsThat's true, which is why we should look at studies on IQOh and they all show the same thing, it's a good if not the best predictor of many life outcomesYou have a 120 IQ but can't comprehend that anecdotes aren't the same thing as data
>>84696874>But im a black girl with an iq above 120.must be terrible
>>84696804Actually it doesn't concern me at all.Why would I care that other people who share my genitals on average are dumber than other people who don't?My IQ is apparently 125 which is higher than average. There's only "me" and "everybody else".
>>84697497>You have a 120 IQ but can't comprehend that anecdotes aren't the same thing as dataI mean i was trying to suggest that other factors are at play, that factors that are known to affect IQ are not payed as much attention to, especially with regards to theories that suggest IQ differences between races. Which is absurd to begin with, since race IS a social construct.People who use IQ stats to calculate the value of a person have subhuman levels of empathy. We are all equal. >>84697507Why do you think that?
>>84697539The vast majority of anything ever worth studying and discussion are social constructs. Social constructs are the most important things in society. Language is a social construct, economy is a social construct, measurements are a social construct. Being a social construct inherently means it has societal value.
>>84697539>race IS a social construct.You're not 120 IQ, you're a liberal who repeats libshit talking points. Ask doctors that work on Sickle Sell if race is just a social construct.
The only reason one would deny the socioeconomic factors that affect IQ is clearly because they have some of kind of narrative to push.
>>84697639Then why is IQ a better predictor of success than parent's income? You know they've done studies on this since the 60s, biological parent IQ correlates with IQ more than adoptive parent IQ.
>>84697613Hmmm..Race and language are not similar.Language economy ect is a social construction, they pretain to how people operate, power dynamics, etiquette, coustoms communication ect. Race pretains to fiction regarding the nature of human biology. Race and the notion regarding races stem from eugenics. And we know, that througout history the notions of who was a part of what race has constantly been changing. Socially Race is worth studying, but then the suggestion that IQ is based on Race would fall apart, since it means that socioeconomic factores are the main culprits, since the different eaces have been given different rights and priveleges and are more likely to get bad/good upbringing.>Being a social construct inherently means it has societal value.Value doesnt mean truth and it doesnt mean accurate.Sorry im an ESL my writing may be shit. Im also really tired.>>84697638Youre a retard.Lol.
>>84697639IQ is about 75% heritable. 75% of the differences in IQ are due to genetics.
>>84697676>Youre a retard.Yet your Sub-Saharoid mind was defeated by a single medical condition existing
>>84696804I sure love basing my world view on unsourced meme graphs !
>>84697695Bro what are you even on about bruh
>>84697676If you believe in any bit of evolution then you can't in good faith deny its affects on populations. We can observe multiple times in a human lifetime how selective breeding impacts other species in terms of all measurable metrics such as intelligence and physicality. To ignore the reality, that different genetic stocks developed and bottle-necked across the world would result in different genetic aggregate expressions of those pools, would be intellectually dishonest. The majority of the NBA all share a phenotype. Of course genetic stock affects a population intellectually, if evolution and genetics determine physical attributes, then of course intelligence would also fall under that as intelligence is a construct of your physical brain.
>>84697761I never denied evolution.Im denying race theory.Two very different things.Phenotype =/= raceRace is entirely a social construct.I agree with you that breeding patterns and genetic stock may affect iq in a given region, but IQ isnt entirely determined by these things. Furthermore epigenetics could be at play. If a population has seen generation upon generation of malnourishment and famine, it is bound to affect their development. Much like the celtic curse found in many irishmen.The only thing im denying is race realism, because it is on fact, not real.
>>84697717My point is that you're a dumb monkey and should stop trying to be intellectual because you aren't >>84697845>phenotype =/= raceDo you even know what phenotype means? There are racial differences in phenotype.
>>84697845>Furthermore epigenetics could be at play.No they can't. The epigenome is cleared before the embryo develops. This is what happens when illiterate and unscientific people try to argue stuff they don't know
>>84697845You want to dance around it with semantics, the reality is that race as a concept is used to group and categorize genetic pools. There may be different categories and filings over time, as any field of study would undergo like in taxonomy or archeology, but that doesn't invalidate the data. It just changes how we talk about it.Race exists, it's as real as sickle cell anemia, as real as the ABCC11 gene, as real as lactose intolerance.
>>84697876Shiiii You got meI dont actually know jack shit about biology But race is still a social construct
>>84697904Race is a social construct lmao this has nothing to do with biology.Race, as a concept, is man made.Could you believe arabs were once considered white?
>>84697912>>84697926The study of race is a social construct, the genetic pools exist in the physical observable world. We use race as a tool to categorize observable data.
>>84697941So youre telling me arabs and white americans were in the same genetic pool?Lets be honest here... this has very little to do with genetic pool and alot to do with status quo.The genetic differences found within africa are greater than those outside.Im getting tired of the race realists on her senpai.Too many rely on group identity for confidence.
>>84697941If I were you I'd give up. The negro is just going to keep saying "well it's all fake so therefore there are no differences between humans".
Ahhh. I forgot about that senpai thing. Where if you type f a m it becomes senpai.My apologies anon
>>84697876>The epigenome is cleared before the embryo develops.What the fuck are you talking about? The epigenetic "reset" that occurs during reproduction does not disprove transgenerational epigenetic inheritance.It makes the hypothesis much harder to establish. This doesn't make trauma-related transgenerational epigenetic inheritance impossible.
>>84698019GOO ANON BTFO HIM GOO GOO GOOO.I dont know biology so this guy could say whatever and i wouldnt know
>>84698002No, I'm saying that Arabs and white Americans have unique genetic pools despite sharing common ancestry and the categorization over time has changed due to more recent and improved data. The entire field of genetics is objectively proven. We are able to manipulate genetic expressions on the level of individual genes.
>>84698019>What the fuck are you talking about? The epigenetic "reset" that occurs during reproduction does not disprove transgenerational epigenetic inheritance.Yes it does>This doesn't make trauma-related transgenerational epigenetic inheritance impossible.All of that aggression just to say "well you're basically right"Show epigenetic trauma-induced inheritance AND how it only applies to Africans in the slave trade and not every other marginalized group ever.
>>84698009I know it's like talking to a child who won't listen but the least I can do is attempt to inform other people whom might otherwise fall for this retarded bullshit.
>>84698050>and the categorization over time has changed due to more recent and improved data.LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOThis shit changed because 9/11bro i am leaving this shit.Youre straight jokes bruhArguing in bad faith.Lmaooo
With 9/11 i mean the social consequences of it
>>84698086We live in the age of protein folding and you deny the reality of genetics pools, choosing to fixate on semantics that allow you to protect your ego.
>>84698037>cheering on a post written by AI
>>84698110Bruh stop playingRace is a social contruct.Throughout this whole thread you have been stating biological difgerences and bla bla bla but race has always, and will always pretain to societies classification of people.Race is a social construct im not debating the biology side. Youre so funny for calling this semantics, im calling it what it is.Arabs were "white"Italians were not "white"Now italians are w"hite"But arabs are notIrishmen where not "white"But now they areThis has nothing to do with biology. This has everything to do with prejudice >>84698127Samefag. Called it!
>>84698070>Yes, it doesNo, It means there must be a mechanism by which information either: Escapes the reprogramming process, or is carried by something other than the epigenetic marks that are erased (for example, certain small RNAs in sperm have been proposed as a mechanism).>All of that aggression just to say "well you're basically right"You just contradicted yourself. I'm saying it's not impossible which is correct. The strongest evidence exists in some animal studies though human studies are rather weak because they face major challenges.
Im tired bro i think im gonna leave this thread. Good night race realism anon. Though you still probably see me as lesser>>84698110Arrivederci!
>>84697539>Why do you think that?Having to deal with blacks more often than a similarly midwitted white, but not even enjoying the benefit of them code-switching.
>>84696804In general females are more intelligent and rational about some things than males. But there are more retarded males and genius males than there are females.>>84696837I think women can be brilliant but we haven't had a society that really cultivates women to be smart and independent in a healthy way. Modern feminism gives women freedom from men but teaches them to be dependent on false values, false spirituality and the state.Modern forms of patriarchy are also false and degenerate and thus makes feminism the better choice for women.There was a righteous form of patriarchy in the ancient world that produced intelligent and righteous women in history such as Hypatia, Queen Zenobia of Palmyra, Queen Cleopatra and Cleopatra the Alchemist.Many Medieval and Renaissance Alchemists also had wives that they performed the Work with. I believe one Alchemist even said that his wife was superior to him in the Royal Art.
Not made-up shit like OP's graph.
>>84698228You do realize that this shows the something as OP?
>>84698236It shows the something, indeed.
>>84698158Taxonomy is a social construct, it's also a respectable scientific study that describes the observable world and gives us a tool to frame discussion.Colors are a social construct in the same way. Depending on the culture or language people will refer to the same colors as being under different umbrellas. Some colors we would consider basic didn't even exist in the human psyche until relatively recently.Just because umbrella labels like "white" and "black" might change depending on who is doing that discussion, doesn't remove the reality that there is a population of people uniquely predisposed to genetically specifically maladies. Your genetic potential determined by your genetic stock.
>>84698195Am I retaded because i dont understand what you just wrote...My parents put me and my siblings in white ass enviorments anyway desu.All my friends just happen to be white bcos of it. Exept for one incredibly chill asian dude.
>race is a social constructsuper weird how the social construct shows up in the genetic structure of humans
>>84696804>>84696824The tests this chart is derived from are inherently flawed. When you add an element allowing women to express their level of certainty in their responses to the test questions, they score better than men. https://www.psypost.org/updating-the-multiple-choice-test-reveals-a-hidden-cognitive-advantage-in-women/
>>84698162The gap is obviously due to unproven small mRNAs which would likely be destroyed by lysosomes and proteosomes and can't even be made in sperm due to a lack of transcriptional machinery instead of actual identified genes like the MAO-A and other genes that vary between the races and affect IQ
>>84698289>allowed to express uncertaintySomething that has nothing to do with IQ batteries>if we just manipulate the tests women win!
>>84698272Nice of your parents to try to keep you away from the hood nwods.
>>84698189The idea that all peoples are the same and that their differences are all made up is actually the more extreme racism. In this line of thought, in denying that a genetic population might be inferior in any metric, you would have to deny everything that makes any given population exceptional. Because there are different genetic pools humanity is able to foster exceptional traits in multiple fields.
>>84698289>when you modify a test of intelligence to test for risk taking, you see that women take less risks than menWow.
>>84698312Epigenetics is not limited to small RNAsEpigenetic inheritance can involve DNA methylation, Histone modificationsChromatin structure changes, andVarious classes of non-coding RNAs. Even if one particular mechanism involving small RNAs were shown to be unimportant, that would not eliminate the entire field of epigenetics.Mature sperm are transcriptionally inactive (they generally do not make new RNAs), but they carry RNAs that were produced earlier during sperm development. Researchers have identified microRNAs, tRNA fragments, and other small RNAs in sperm and have investigated their possible roles in fertilization and inheritance.Many molecules are constantly degraded and replaced in cells. The fact that RNAs can be degraded by cellular mechanisms does not demonstrate that they never influence development or gene regulation.Genetic effects and epigenetic effects are not mutually exclusive. For example, a trait can be influenced by DNA sequence variation and also by environmental effects mediated through epigenetic mechanisms. Demonstrating that a gene influences a trait does not prove that epigenetic influences are absent.
>>84698384Which AI did you copy-paste from?
>>84698333Nice yes, sadly at the cost of their health since they had to work constantly.I didn't really see my dad much during my childhood years. Always working
>>84698412Nothing It's just that genetic inheritance and epigenetic inheritance are not mutually exclusive explanations and to claim otherwise is dishonest.
>>84698487>Which AI>nothingYou can't even comprehend English, you're obviously using AI. It was also obvious when it started talking about methylation and acetylation despite that not being related to what we were talking aboutBottom line is there's no proof that any epigenetic effects are occurring and they should be occurring in every race since every race has had tough times. The most up-to-date evidence predicts the genotypic IQ of the races at roughly the same as we observe with tests.You're a mad brown person who is mad about your race being low IQ.
>>84698587The Japanese were literally licked in prison camps and now outperform native US Whites, while blacks who get trillions in aid each year still can't make Africa a habitable placePut 2 and 2 together
>>84698436Are you going to honor their sacrifice and learn from their behaviour, or go get yourself murderaped trying to "reconnect with your people"?
>>84698587>It was also obvious when it started talking about methylation and acetylation despite that not being related to what we were talking aboutI just pointed out epigenetics is not primarily about mRNAs. Are you illiterate?>Bottom line is there's no proof that any epigenetic effects are occurring The evidence is more nuanced than either "proven fact" or "completely disproven."All that talk and you proved yourself to be a brainlet. Ironic as fuck.
>>84698629Black Americans have had way more runway on developing intergenerational wealth too.
>>84698669>I just pointed out epigenetics is not primarily about mRNAs. Are you illiterate?And it had nothing to do with what you were actually arguing, which was about smRNAs. "You" (your AI prompt) mentioned it out of nowhere and you didn't catch it because those and history modifications are reset.>brainletThanks for the insight Apu, but next time make sure your AI prompt is on topic. Maybe run it though a reworder app so it's not as obvious next time
>>84698678A study done on military members (they have an IQ requirement, so this is higher IQ blacks) found that they were more likely to take instant money instead of more money over a longer period of time. They are simply more impulsive and worse with money
>>84698703>And it had nothing to do with what you were actually arguing, which was about smRNAsMe pointing out how certain small RNAs in sperm have been proposed as a mechanism is me arguing? When I've been completely nuanced?Man you really are illiterate.
>>84698660>go get yourself murderaped trying to "reconnect with your people"?Lul wut. What the hell was the thought process behind typing this.I'm most likely gonna marry a guy from where im from, so yes i would be "reconnecting with my people". What a weirdo you are.Anyhow yes, i am planning to honour their sacrifice, and get a gud degree>>84698678Son....
>>84698743>Lul wut. What the hell was the thought process behind typing this.It appears you have been socialized like a white girl, but you will be treated like a black girl.The relax tax will be higher for you than a similarly socialized white girl.
>>84698877>It appears you have been socialized like a white girl, but you will be treated like a black girl.Lol. Making many assumptions i see.What makes you think that?>The relax tax will be higher for you than a similarly socialized white girl.So i should be clutching my pearls every time i see a melenated person? How weird and evil of me to detest people for looking similar to me.What do you even mean by this statement?
This chart broke the moid brain, etc.
>>84698325>>84698379>This token system measures what the researchers refer to as confidence. In this context, confidence does not mean optimism. It refers to the precision of a person's belief. A person who places ten tokens on every single answer is safely guarding against risk because they have no idea which shape is correct.>The data showed that female participants were better at calculating the risk of their answers and distributing their tokens efficiently. Knowing when you are unsure is a core part of cognition. The researchers consider this risk assessment to be a fundamental element of fluid intelligence.The test isn't manipulated. It's more precisely measuring the answers given by respondents and correctly assessing that women have higher fluid intelligence. The OP chart is inherently flawed.
>>84699063>the test isn't manipulated>explains how the test was manipulated
>>84698206Cleopatra was a whore tho
>>84699101She used her sexuality to further the interests of her people. Just like men in our glorious ancient past used their martial prowess for the same purpose.
>>84696997>>school, work, and general life outcomes>100% of these tasks boil down to "Just put the fries in the bag"And yet many robots fail this simple task.
>>84699116So being a whore then is good but now bad?
>>84699172Being a whore is bad if you do it unethically. Cleopatra used her whore behaviour to serve Egypt and improve the lives of the Egyptians. Also prostitutes are unsung heroes, they provided comfort and relief to men who were unable to get wives and soldiers in the frontlines. There used to be sacred prostitution in our glorious past.Some women naturally are promiscuous and would be unhappy with marriage, their hyper-sexuality was used for the common good in our past.
>>84699216Define unethically in your logic
>>84699496Being a whore is unethical if you are cucking your husbandBeing a whore is unethical if you want marriage after whoring because marriage is only for virgin women. But non-virgin women still can be concubines and prietesses.
>>84696804>makes foids seethejust remind them that they don't have a dick, it's easy like that
>>84696874>problem solving skills.>Its not as meaningful as people suggest.Life has millions of choices, then your choices has impact on your children and their choices. Now imagine how big of a difference just a slightly better ability to pick better choices would do for long term outcome. that's the whole point of IQ being important. Now scale it up to millions of people and the gap gets even worse
>>84699098Measuring something more precisely isn't manipulation, it's an improvement over previous methods.
>>84698289>sample size of 55 college studentsStatistically invalid sample size, not even 30 per sex>men scored higher overall on the test battery>women were more risk averse and were more certain that they didn't know>researchers assert this means women are smarter instead of just sex differences in risk takingThis study is fucking dogshit lmao
>>84699708So being a whore without wanting marriage is fine? And powering for women?
>>84696874>iq above 120midwit>Iq only measures pattern recognition and problem solving skills.Its not as meaningful as people suggest.confirmed lolpattern recognition and problem solving literally apply to every aspect of lifet. 142 white man
>>84700436>tfw white man IQ mogs me>calls me a midwitabsolutely SEETHING rn
>>84699021You are in danger.
>>84698246While that guy is retarded, and your chart is from scotland in 1932 which is also retarded, it does show the same thing as the OP: women are overrepresented in the middle, and men are overrepresented on the ends.
>>84698384>The fact that RNAs can be degraded by cellular mechanisms does not demonstrate that they never influence development or gene regulation.In the case of black-white IQ gap, they can't explain it. Black youth have higher IQs when raised in good environments but that boost disappears during adulthood due to the Wilson Effect. There's no way that a mRNA could last until adulthood without being degraded then somehow take an effect at adulthood to specifically lower IQ.If your argument is just "well technically it's not impossible for epigenetic inheritance to occur" then fine, but we all know you're doing this because you desperately want brown people's low IQs to be explained by muh racism instead of natural inferiority.
>>84699035this broke my brain because my count is like 35 which means i'm in the top 10% of men and dating is still pure hell and at least 20-25 of them were complete gutter slags
>>84700329>being a whore (modern definition)getting fucked by 50 different mega chads you picked off tinder>being a whore (classical definition)getting fucked by 500 different regular men who had 2 septims and came to your whorehouseOne of these is pure selfishness. One of these is a public service.
>>84701694OP's chart does not show the left tail skews male.
>>84702297>If your argument is just "well technically it's not impossible for epigenetic inheritance to occur" then fineYep
>>84704350There's no skewness in the original you idiot
>>84696931>this thread continued after he failed to show proof you idiots do this to yourselves
>>84696874>effecting
>>84696804So stupid women are smarter than stupid men and smart men are smarter than smart women
>>84696874So what? The average at my last job was significantly higher. You may be smart but your overblown ego makes it not worth it. I dated a woman who was much smarter than me and she didn't say the kind of shit that being any shade darker than white makes people say, for whatever reason. Probably had to face racism a bit too much and are now dead set on being one of the good ones.
for me, it's picrel (ASC = Autism Spectrum Condition).females are genuinely baffled when males just don't have feelings, we want to solve or create something instead. autism IS the extreme male brain.
>>84705177The average man is smarter than the majority of women.
>>84705177No. Most women are around 100. Males are around 103 and there's more spread, they aren't as clustered around the average.
>>84705177learn how to interpret a graph you learn in fucking high school you fucking moron
>>84705211Ego? Im litteraly saying its all incredibly overblown.> I dated a woman who was much smarter than me and she didn't say the kind of shit that being any shade darker than white makes people say, for whatever reason. Probably had to face racism a bit too much and are now dead set on being one of the good ones.What does she have to do with me?>>84705010I mean i can but i dont see why it would be hard to believe.>>84705064Sorry im an esl. English as third language even>>84701277You know you can tell a person might be dangerous without looking at their skincolor? Demeanor, clothing, location ect.I wont ever hold skintone against a person. If you wanna do that, then you do you boo.
>>84707011>I wont ever hold skintone against a person. If you wanna do that, then you do you boo.So you think generalizing based on "demeanor" and clothing, but saying that people from Africa have lower IQs is evil and racist?
>>84696804>general intelligence gputting an italic letter afterwards makes it empirical, yes
>>84707039That's the name of the thing. "g" italicized means general intelligence. It's the mathematical correlation between IQ subtests.
>>84707094should've called it correlation between IQ subtests, or maybe just IQnah that's too long, let's call it *i*
>>84707031Great way to reduce what I was saying itt.I was arguing that race isn't real. Consequentially, generalising IQ based on race is also not true.People in Africa do have lower IQ on average, but that isn't particularly shocking based on how widespread malnutrition, harmful practices and lack of education/intellectual spaces is.I AM ARGUING AGAINST RACE REALISM.I am not saying people from a given area, affected by numerous factors that equate to lower IQ, can't have a lower IQ than people from another area.
>>84707156>I AM ARGUING AGAINST RACE REALISM.Losing battle
>>84704350>I don't understand what the black curve meansIt's okay, honey. Don't worry about it.
>>84707156>I was arguing that race isn't real.Well, that's phenomenally retarded, so it becomes difficult to take whatever else you might claim or assert seriously.
>>84704992What does it mean that the right side of OP's graph is 9:1 male and the left side of the graph is <1:1 male?
>>84707156>isn't particularly shocking based on how widespread malnutrition, harmful practices and lack of education/intellectual spaces isThen how does Vietnam which has worsr nutrition have an average IQ comparable to Whites? It's genetics, they've found genes that explain the gap.
>>84708181Thats not skewness that because of the different standard deviations you unbelievable fucking moron. Skewness is the difference between the mean and median
>>84708115Dumbshit, they have a point. The OP chart shows retarded men and women at a 1:1 ratio.Which is not true. Men are over-represented at both extremes.
>>84696804I was national merit scholar in high school and didnt understand why there were way more boys. Fast forwrd seven years and the wool has been lifted from my eyes. Allegedly intelligent girls at my college didnt even knew remotely how many people there were in the world. clown society
>>84708891only if you use jewish data>>84709311yup theyre genuinely clueless about the world and anything else other than their favorite tik toker and netflix goyslop
>>84708818I genuinely do not know how to approach this level of retardation. I'm sorry I cannot help you.
>>84709886>literally doesn't know what skewness means in statistics>goes for the "you're retarded" deflection strat
>>84709979A strict quantitative math/statistical definition of "skew" doesn't even apply to concepts like "skew male".It's pretty easy to understand in terms of qualitiative deviation from an ideal distribution, though.Or at least is easy to understand for someone of at least normal intelligence.
>>84696804I had one 135+ IQ girlfriend and it really threw into perspective how rare that shit is. She was operating on a different level than any others I had met
>>84705240Simple as this
>>84696804Jokes on you, I don't know how to read that graph :3
>>84710183Yeah.I've only known one girl who was also >99.999th percentile and it was so different when it clicked that we could interact naturally and not simplify our thoughts when we talked to each other.I haven't seen her in over a decade and I miss having her as a friend more than I miss the sex.
>>84696944moid tries to cope with his mental retardation, news at 11
my IQ is 106 despite crazy good education and rearingthe moment i knew i gave up on life
