They dont even look the same species
>gay porn, japan>gay porn, usa
>>84697473What? Im a girl
>>84697460>They dont even look the same speciesbecause they arent
>>84697460Dude looks like fucking griffith.
>>84697482He looks angelic
i cant stand that fucking faggot man>oh look im a pretty boy look my life is so good look at me!!throw acid in his face, fuck off dude
>>84697894I wish i could have his babies
>>84697983Youre brown, you would ruin them
>>84697993His Scandinavian genes would overpower my white passing portuguese ones. Many such cases.
>>84698031Hes getting so much pussy that the estrogen is starting to rub off on him
>>84697460Random Indian vs most attractive guy in Finland. Im not even indian but cmon
>>84698095The thing is: that guy isn't even one of the most attractive guys in Finland. He's just average.
>>84697460Timmies are unironically an weird ass species, white majority in Europe wasn't because of vitamin D bs. Never relax around a group of timmies. They play follow-the-leader like robots. They should be all kept in designated containment area for proper care and scientific research, not roam free among humans.
>>84698168>They should be all kept in designated containment area for proper care and scientific researchYeah, my basement
>unfunny finnish leechyeah I don't car
>>84697460That's the last thing soviet soldiers saw in the winter war
>>84698612Wish i was a finnish nurse in those times
>>84698612And this during continuation war (actual colorized picture from around the time it ended)>>84698758You would have had to watch white men die in droves while you try to patch them togetherSound like fun?
>>84698792Id do my best to take care of them. By the way, those two are so cute
>>84697460Beauty is a virtue, one race exemplifies this, all other lack itOne race is inherently of greater virtue by their physical natureThis is their inner vril being known
>>84697481>>84697482Art reflects life, hence >paleness = beauty = physical manifestation of spiritual virtueDespite their swarthiness, the Greeks knew this
>>84698168>They play follow-the-leader like robots.Indian worships Modi like God lmao.White are individualistic. You shitskindians are so insecure all your hatred of White people just comes from the fact that you know you're a ugly abomination and you want to destroy beauty because it makes you realize how ugly you are.be a good indian and kill yourself.
>>84697460>Hey girlwow white boys dont even register as men to Indian Men. The Indian looks like a red-blooded warrior with his full beard and then there's the baby smooth face and delicate features of the white boi.
fucking lmao he looks like Lolong
Witness the evolution of the average brown>>84697894Jeet cope>>84697983Enlightened jeet>>Seethe until you realize you're just mad you aren't the object of his White affection
>>84700143>jeetIm actually south american
>>84697482>>84697502Is that even a guy? Literally can't tell >>84698168Yeah, it wasn't vitamin d at all. All the "dark skinned people can't survive the cold" stuff is also bullshit, I love the cold and I love winter. It's way better than the scorching heat of summer
>>84700179Which one are you?Either way, this applies to all nons. This is quite literally the natural logic of anyone inferior to someone elseI can't possibly fathom being any other race, they're all fundamentally inferior and this is brain breaking
>>84698838>Dysgenic fag with eyes two different distances from the middle of his noseKek, ethnic foids are really obsessed with white men The fact is these faggots are only tough in groups and with guns. They'd never fight another person on equal terms, of even debate on equal terms.
>>84700188He is a guy and 6'5 btw. Wish i could keep him in my basement
>>84699472>White are individualisticthey like to tell themselves that as a cope. no one's falling for it. strongest self segregating hivemind creature known on earth. being sociopathic calculating transactionary autistic humanoid is not being individualistic. just waitting to fall in line to play follow-the-leader
>>84700197>which one are you?The fembot in love
>>84699028you look like this and claim chad status because someone with similar coloring looks chad jfl
>>84700229NTA but it looks like in this case their mouth palate didnt develop normally when they were younger. Its not really fair to compare disabled people with normal ones.
>>84700205>He is a guyhe does do his hair kinda girly with whatever headband thing he's wearing but yeah obviously a guy. can't imagine how faceblind you'd have to be to not see that
He looks good even in pain
>>84700205Why are Finnish men so cute and perfect
>>84698168>>84700206what is this follow the leader obsession, you follow social media trends of people walking in front of trains for izzat
>>84700438I wish russia would bomb them so i could get one finnish refugee in my home and treat him right
>>84700205>>84700429>>84700438stop fetishizing finnsyou're ruining my stone cold truecel reputation>>84700456you would only get the children (if even that) since we have mandatory conscription for men and in a war time scenario every citizen is expected to participate in the war effort
>>84700509Thanks for replying to my thread on int that was really cute.
what's up with these scandinavian pretty boys inb4 finnish aren't scandi
>>84700682my stone cold truecel reputation is ruined it's over>>84700745finns aren't scandi ackchually we are nordic
>>84700767it just means you guys were raped by mongols
damn Fins look like that?!
>>84700745This isnt a Scandinavian thread. Go make another one focused on swedish femboys
>>84700790That's not what you guys said when you were begging to join NATO.
>>84700809Im OP anon im not finnish or begged to join nato lol
>>84700781no actually it just means we aren't part of the scandinavian peninsulap.s. mongols didn't rape us, the finno-ugric ancestors just raped and destroyed indo-europeans so hard that the word for slave is orja in finnish which directly comes from arya(n)>>84700809stfu only the fennoswede elite wanted to join nato and no one asked the people
>>84700829Good luck fighting off the russians without superior scandi supersoldiers
>>84700843the whole army doctrine exists solely to cause casualties so high that it's just not worth italso just like we did during the winter war against even larger russian empire with barely any proper equipment?
>>84700509>you're ruining my stone cold truecel reputation Finnish incels will never exist as long as I'm here sorry kek>>84700456This made me lol. but I would register as a nurse and try to snag a husband there
>>84700869You are right. Dont let them get into your head
>>84700443Timmies are incapable of seeing themselves as individuals. They don't exist here and now, in their mind they exist as part of hivemind across time and space. "Muh ancestor" thing is not just a meme, they are literally incapable of processing the world in any other way. Timmies love to be used and commanded, will fall in line in moments notice for the "greater good" of hivemind. When there's a conflict between timmies, they are not talking about individual difference but who is sucking off the hivemind better than the other.
>>84700205He looks unattractive and transgender. Not sure what you are doing on about
>>84700843Scandinavians and finns are usually so ugly and indistinguishable from downs. Also weird facial portions like large bubble foreheads and short boxy faces. Sometimes the women don't look too bad but too masculine, i think this is just coloring worship.
>>84700905He looks more handsome without long hair>>84700926You are so jealous lol
>>84700888trips confirm my doomcan't even be a truecel in this country it's so over>>84700894my bad i should just head to bed at this point if i'm getting tired enough to bother replying to obvious bait
>>84700926Left is Finnish. Right is Scandinavian. Know the difference.
>>84700968And you are indian>>84700965Have sweet dreams and a good night anon
>>84700988>"And you are the original Aryan"I accept your concession and apology.
>>84700942He still looks FTM and his underbite is showing, yuck. Finns look so gross. Fetishists have such trash taste>>84700968Finns look like a cross between the two, very unfortunate looking people.Scandinavian women look better than men because lower standards but many of them are also quite shocking and manly looking.
>>84697460He is a good looking guy but I don't like other males who think it is okay to flaunt their perceived superior genetic quality for social media validation all while also humiliating another man. I hope the indian is okay. I don't know how he feels right now but I hope he knows he has a great beard and hair
>>84701003>picks out female athletes>buT y DeEz scandis so MANleY!
>>84701003Stop talking about women here. This whole board is about naked women at least leave this thread about attractive men alone
>>84700899This is provably false, at least for northern/western europeans, who are among some of the most individualistic people. Liberalism, in the classical sense, and it's emphasis on the individual literally comes from europeans. The only sense you're correct is the fact (northern/western) europeans have more regards for institutions, in other words, voluntary associations. They don't care about kin or clan and this is partially the result of the ban on cousin marriages and the expectation to be able to form an independent, nuclear household before marrying and having kids. This is all verifiably true, northern/western europeans are the least ethnocentric, and most individualistic, unlike what you're claiming. Because of this individualism and lack of ethnocentrism you have all the institutions and high-trust behavior because you're forced to rely on strangers. Other people aren't like this, which is why they're nepotistic, low trust, and arguably ugly+stupid as well since their marriages weren't based on choice and they didn't have to delay gratification in order to have kids.
Bump before I have time to respond>>muh origidih comment
>>84700905If I've learned anything from this board, it's that women love when men look gay or transgender without actually being gay or transgender
>>84702316Very true. Also stated vs revealed preference and getting the benefits of showing him off like an exotic handbag or petOne is a psyop by kikes, one is the natural ordering of her sex drive
>>84699572Holy shit, never use my language again your bug eyed, shitskin, currymunching street shitterIndians are a genetic dead end, a culture of parasites and a country where every retard thinks he's more aryan than the palest German you've ever metNot to mention, no Indian "man" has ever been a warrior. India has never won a war, literally not once in history. No indian has ever had success in combat sports not UFC, boxing or olympic Judo and wrestling. Literally a country of historically impossible genetic failures. Physically weak and small, mentally retarded, socially parasitic and would collapse if they couldn't scam honest, hard working people.
>>84700200Every combat sport is run by Whites. We are a race of the greatest warriors the world has ever known. This is empiracally obvious
>>84699572>>Whites don't register as menThis wasn't a convincing disparagement when serfs used it against aristocrats. The ability of a man to be vain and beautiful is telling of his status. He is removed from the physical and mental stresses you experienceYour slave mentality tells you to hate him for it
>>84700206You bastardize the language of my ancestors to pretend we didn't invent the very concept you're failing to explain to usJeets languishing over their fake izzat is hilarious
>>84700219Hm>>84700229I'm not chad, but maybe chad-lite on a good day
>>84701107I'm not disagreeing with Joseph Henrich's theory outcome, I'm disagreeing on the mechanism. The reason there's the apparent display of individualism is because of their willingness to fall in line for the hivemind at moment's notice. For humans, lot of personal interconnected relationships are needed to be close and negotiate cooperating rules. The reason is because Timmies fall in line with their hivemind no matter what, where humans as individuals with variations and differences, so there are lot of uncertainties and complexities that closer/more specific interactions/relationships fix.It's not accidental the places more easily propagated christianity/cousin marriage ban are Timmy central.>all verifiably true, northern/western europeans are the least ethnocentric, and most individualistic, unlike what you're claiming. Because of this individualism and lack of ethnocentrism you have all the institutions and high-trust behavior because you're forced to rely on strangersSo you got the causality backward here.Timmies don't respect 'institution', or general rights of 'strangers', only whatever is instrumental to hivemind. The concept larger scale modern institution as a thing is itself a Timmy invention, because it's perfect for hiveminds that think of itself existing across time and space. Formation of such institution requires ignoring many individual relations and interactions and, it requires people falling in line, it requires a degree of being ready to play follow-the-leader. "High trust" is a cope for hivemind simplified mentality that comes from Timmy build. Earth is currently under Timmy occupation, their ways of doing things has been forcefed to everyone under pressure. They think it's superior because it works best for them, it's like letting bunch of robots run things, they can make things efficient and safe but they'll remove humanity of many things. People need to understand that Timmies are not human.
>>84701001I'm more aryan than any of your ancestors have ever been, and any of your bloodline ever will beAnd I'm not even blonde or blue eyed
>>84702581>And I'm not even blonde or blue eyedNooooo
>>84702600I'm 100% northern European by blood, a mix of French and German. I have vril, but yeah, unfortunately not chad. Hence chad-lite on a good day
>>84702550This makes no sense, the reason for the individualism is because white people have a notion of the individual, that their free will matters, and that they should be judged on their merits or lack thereof. This is the liberal (classical) worldview, which is conducive towards creativity and individual excellence. The conservative worldview is characteristic of typical of other people like orientals, arabs, or indians, sticking to the old, not creative, conformity matters the most, you are subjugated to the herd. This is as hiveminded as you can get. Even before the liberal worldview when europeans were more clannish they always respected individual excellence and individual glory, hence the worship of heroes. >Inb4 you say something about how this worship of heroes is some bs about europeans conforming to a hivemindIt shows what they view as the ideal, what their role models are, this is in contrast to other people like the who's ideal/role models are people who conform and fit in.>Timmies don't respect 'institution', or general rights of 'strangers'White people are generally more altruistic and trusting, and care less about their kin/clan, which is why they create high trust societies.
>>84702709is characteristic of other people*other people like orientals, arabs, and indians*
>>84702581>>84702536You're a fat fuck. And judging by your proprortions you're probably 5'8" at best. I would beat the shit out of you irl.
>>84702709People have interdependence and need security/resource grantees to live and not chimp out. Human solution to this is having lots of interpersonal relationships that from outside can look like tribe/herd. The reason for it's existence is respect fro individual differences and variations, you can't assume too much about how others operate and relationships they have. Because of lots of network of relationship, large scale institution formation is not really possible.Because Timmies are hive mind, they can just build large scale institution under which they 'efficiently' run individual functioning. You are confusing being able to be survive as individual for individuality in being. Or since you are one, you are probably thinking of other Timmies as individual unit and each should be praised/punished depending on how much they serve the hive. Role models you speak of are about fitting in. Humans aren't actually trying to fit in, they are forming many interconnected individual relations, the the goal is not to fall in line but to form relationships and deals around who you are and how you are with individual variations.The Patric Batemen movie is relevant here since it's one representation of how Timmies process the world. The recent wave of popularity of the meme is how bzoomers relate to him, supposedly feels related to social conflict and male loneliness. Patric Bateman desperately wants to fit in with the hive mind, he is trying very hard but no one understands him and he can almost tell he is not human.
>>84702940Europeans are able to build large institutions because they're individualistic +pro-social, that's it. >Because of lots of network of relationship, large scale institution formation is not really possible.No it's because you need to be individualistic and pro-social. You can be individualistic and anti-social, these are your solitary animals like tigers, snakes, bears, and so on. A lot of the time these are your criminal types. Collectivistic and pro-social are like ants, bees, sheep, cow, and so on, which is why orientals for example are stereotyped as bugmen because they fit this category. They're able to form institutions but they're usually insulated and limited to their group. Then you have individualistic and pro-social, this is white people. They are able to have a larger network of relationship because their pro-sociality isn't limited to their group, since they see themselves first and foremost as individuals. This is what actually leads to large scale, complex, varying institutions, because they're not limiting themselves to a clan and they're not nepotistic, so these institutions are able to sustain themselves. Just because white people find other individualistic, pro-social people to cooperate with doesn't mean they're a hivemind. What ultimately defines whether you're individualistic or collectivistic is whether you see individual as existing for the collective or whether you see collective as existing for the individual. With the later you see society as a mutual contract, even altruistic behavior stems from a pursuit of your own happiness, not out of a sense of duty or shame like it is for collectivists. This is why the primary negative emotion for individualists is guilt, ie disapproval of one's own actions because it goes against one's own values. For collectivists it's shame because what deters them isn't whether they do something they think is objectively bad, but whether the group disapproves of it.
>>84697460Dark hair roots, sad, he looks good though bet he has one of those ultra fat bwc with a huge vein
>>84703193With the latter*>This is what actually leads to large scale, complex, varying institutions, because they're not limiting themselves to a clan and they're not nepotistic, so these institutions are able to sustain themselves. This is why btw the import people like Indians, Arabs, and central/Southern Americans is going to lead to institutional collapse. They're nepotistic so they'll just suck them dry, not realizing the conditions and disposition of person that was required to even develop and maintain them in the first place.
>>84702747I'm 5'7, 200lbs, 30% body fat and have been boxing for 6 years, 3 years of MMA before that. I guaruntee you would not. I beat up jeets everyday and they pay me to do it.
>>84700899This is the insane ramblings of a bug person. But its prudent to combat it for lurkers reading, and to give people the words to counteract such drivel.Whites invented liberalism, flawed as it is, it is the political worship of the self. We also got over ancestor worship when Christ came. Suddenly everyone is an individual human, all unique children of God. Whilst remaining his bride, the church. So we are a collective, of individuals. This is complex, so I hope the simple minds of allegedly sentient street shitting beetlepeople can understand.We as people are a trinity of three, making one. This is a reflection of the nature of our Lord. First, we are physical, the lowest level of reality. Knowable; sensable. Second we are our mind, we reason, we have logic and grasp concepts. Knowable; untouchable. Finally, we are our soul, we are aware of only the vaguest of directions in which it leads, requiring the other two to sus out the directions of the third, like blindly pulling threads of a spider web to find the center. Unknowable; untouchable. We are all three, all at once, making one person. Every individual is a unity, every individual is part of a union with Christ.Such is providence.
>>84701107Perfectly said, and perfectly correct. But you only explained. I'm interested to hear your opinions
>>84702550You fundamentally misunderstand our culture. Submission to society is voluntary sacrifice for your, and others greater good and flourishing. You come from cultures of low trust and dysfunction. It is impossible to expect good from a stranger. White countries used to be safe, because we didn't have people like you in them.You are a bug person, you run off basic instinct, every interaction is treated as nes stimuli, you can't recall past experience to inform today.We come from a culture with low time preference and an educated public. People understood our system, why it worked, and why they ought to continue it.Its unthinkable to a people that could never birth Aristotle, Aurelius, Charlemagne or Napoleon. You have no great thinkers, no great leaders. You are a people beset by a lack of capacity to build a system to maximize virtue. We gave it to the world and you hated us for it. We demanded better, for your own sakes, and you killed us. And now, we will leave you all behind. Not violently, just separately.Your grandchildren will hate you for severing us from you.My grandchildren will populate Mars, and thank me for doing what was necessary for them
>>84702940>>This perfectly proves me >>84703554 rightYou literally cannot comprehend a superior culture. Your physical circumstances have limited your mind which has harmed your understanding of the human soul.You deserve prayer robot but I will not send any for you
>>84703193>>Another perfectly correct response. I like this robotMust be said that liberalism, removes the pro-sociality of structure. Conservatism can add that back, whilst maintaining the meaningful and real dignity of every individual. Part of that means protecting them from threats out and in. Both enemies and subversives. Both vice and criminals. This seems to be a possible future in American politics and I'm excited to see what becomes of it.
>>84703595Yeah anything in excess becomes a bad thing. The laxity and lack of discernment or discrimination (and by discrimination I just mean being able to distinguish people and recognize threats) in europeans results in the naivety of thinking that other people are like them. If everyone was like that it wouldn't be so bad, but when there's people who'll take advantage of you it's not so good.
saar the timmies but i want to live in timmies country instead of in the trash and feces heap of Bharat which I think is #1 but don't want to live in
>>84697460They are not, but are titlets and titcows the same species by the same logic?Show me another animal species where secondary sexual physical differences exist on such a level within the same sex.
>>84703554Lol its this larping fat amerimutt who thinks he's a nordic nazi warrior again. No one ask him why whites have the most wars and largest scale genocides against each other in human history if they're so high trust.
>>84700745how the hell does norways strongest man look like that and not a hairy bald fucker with a big round face like all the other countries?
>>84702550The fact that white people do not randomly commit acts of horrific rape against their own women like you disgusting jeets do does not make them a hivemind. What you call "follow the leader" is really about respect for other people. Most liberal institutions were the result of struggle against the oppressive feudal order, where ones station was determined entirely by birth. They exist to ensure the dignity and rights of all our citizens are protected. Now, some of these institutions are holdovers from the old aristocracy, and exist to protect the property of the bourgeois, but you can not fault white people for this, since there is not a single true meritocracy on the planet, and European civilization is still objectively the most free and the second most meritocratic (despite their flaws and disrespect for individual freedom the Chinese are more meritocratic than us). In Europe, even animals have rights. You street shitters, meanwhile, still hold on to this medieval mentality of domination by the aristocracy. You cry about the oppression of the Britishers while you gleefully trample on the lower castes, to the point where you can not even guarantee them a basic level of sanitation and dignity. You are a truly pathetic civilization. Even Africans are more dignified.
>>84697460The Finnish streamer looks like a possibly mean personThe Indian guy looks a little cute and like a cuddly and friendly fella
>>84704449The funny thing is every group you mentioned had civilization and culture before Europeans and did not need to invade other continents to pillage or extract in order to get it or uplift themselves. Thats what makes your rambling so nonsensical and a waste, western culture thrives and is free thanks only to non european influence and the people who want it to be that way are the opposite of you kek
>>84704472The Chinese were slaves to the aristocracy (who were also literal invaders) until they were liberated by communists (an ideology formulated by a European jew). Every culture, save for isolated islanders, conquered and plundered. Whites just went the furthest because our technology was the most superior. India, like I said, still exists in a caste system. Indians have no equivalent of the magna carta, no popular revolts on the scale of the French revolution. Your whole theory of the world and it's history are based in resentment and delusion.
>>84704462Foids are too evil and soulless to comprehend this post. They just see attractive man and want to devote everything to him
>>84704472Every single people invaded and conquered other people and land, it makes no difference if you traverse an ocean to do that. So I'm not sure what your point is, that Europeans needed to conquer other people to uplift themselves? If so, then you could say that about everyone else. Or is it that they needed to specifically go to other continents? Which isn't true, they WANTED to explore and traverse the world, it's not that they needed to do it. Furthermore, in regards to the treatment of subjugated people, Europeans are by far the least extractive and most merciful people. As a counter-example, Amerindians were all scalping and torturing each other. The European offers them reservation or a way to integrate into their society. If this were purely an extractive process than no civilization would be being built where there existed mostly wild and untamed land. We can also take Rome as another example because when they conquered people and lands they also offered a way to integrate into Rome, and wherever they went they built civilization. This is not to say conquered people were treated as equals, just that they weren't treated nearly as bad.
>>84704588>Whites just went the furthest because our technologyChinese technology was on par if not more advanced than most Europeans and is also the reason you have firearms to this day. Whites went the furthest because they were(And many still are) simply less moral and more degenerate. >>84704588>>84704639>Durrrhhhh everyone invaded others we jus betterNo lol and they rarely travel oceans to invade total strangers. I can already tell you are a fact dodging loon but 90% of what you describe as "merciful" is probably just whites getting their asses kicked or being made to stand down after a point.Europeans stole 45 TRILLION DOLLARS from India in just over a century alone. And trillions of dollars more throughout Africa, The Americas and SEA. Nothing about that is "least extractive" compared to anyone else.Europeans committed some of the largest scale genocides in human history in all of the places i just mentioned. Mostly through methods of famine or disease spreading. The "untamed land" claim is an outdated white colonizer trope that anyone with more than a middle school education knows is bullshit. Europeans ONLY integrated people into societies they took by force and forced others to build AFTER being confronted and fought over for it which invalidates whatever you have to say about their morals and standards.Your ancestors were either psychopathic rapist and warmongers or peasants who migrated to benefit from the land they stole.
>>84700843there is something uncanny about a dude with a feminine pretty boy face and ripped body. I'd find him attractive if it were a twink, but this combo looks extra troony.
>>84704728>No lolYes, the particular seethe against Europeans is sour grapes.>rarely travel oceans to invade total strangers.You think the Chinese didn't travel the oceans to invade other people because they were more "moral"? Are you retarded? Conquering and enslaving people is ok, but going across the ocean to do that is reprehensible?>"merciful" is probably just whites getting their asses kicked or being made to stand down after a point.It's literally the opposite, for example, Rome showed mercy to those who didn't resist. They could retain some autonomy and were able to integrate into Rome, in exchange for taxation, being under Roman rule, and offering soldiers. Did whites get their butt kicked by Amerindians, blacks? Obviously not, yet they offered Amerindians a way to integrate or they offered them reservations, and they freed the blacks and eventually gave them citizenship. Meanwhile in the arab world they were literally castrated.>Europeans committed some of the largest scale genocides in human history in all of the places i just mentioned. Mostly through methods of famine or disease spreading.Spreading disease isn't intentional, furthermore, it's more than made up for given the fact billions of people are alive today due to the inventions of white people. The economic and political systems are all because of white people, it's what's allowed you to be typing such nonsense right now and not have to worry about roaming war bands.>The "untamed land" claim is an outdated white colonizer trope that anyone with more than a middle school education knows is bullshit.It is untamed by our standards, I don't care if it's not untamed by your primitive standards>Europeans ONLY integrated people into societies they took by force and forced others to build AFTER being confronted and fought over for it which invalidates whatever you have to say about their morals and standards.Did you read the part where I said they weren't treated as equals?
>>84704728>durr hurt Chinese technology was more advancedYeah, in the 1400s. Not so when Europe actually began to colonize the world. Also as I said before, the Chinese were literally conquered by other Asians during their century of humiliation. The Manchu forced them all to wear the same haircut, as a form of humiliation. The idea that only white people conquered is peak historical illiteracy.>they rarely crossed oceansYes, again because they did not have the ability. Nobody sailed to the Americas before Europeans, because nobody knew how to measure longitude or build the robust galleons that Europeans had. This difference in technology is best exemplified when Europeans won against the Ottoman Empire during the wars preceding it's collapse, when the Ottomans had previously been equal if not superior to the Europeans militarily speaking. Also, what difference does it make if you're being conquered, that the people came across the sea? Do you think the arabs cared that the mongols came over land, when they destroyed the Islamic golden age? You are grasping at straws to try to prove Europeans conquered the world because we are essentially evil, but this falls flat when any understanding of history would show you that war, even total war, is the exception and not the rule. (1/2)
>>84704728Also, if Europeans are truly inherently evil, why did America abolish slavery? They had no selfish motivation in doing so, it was entirely religiously motivated due to the Christian belief in the inherent dignity of man. Many of the abolitionists even regarded black people as inferior, but still regarded slavery as immoral. You conveniently demonize Europeans for doing the same things almost every other ethnic group did, but ignore that they established a system of universal rights, which actually is rare. Not exclusive to Europeans, mind you, but still rare, and something India never did. The caste system is baked in to your religion. You treat your own people like trash, and you bring the same attitude when you emigrate and treat service workers as being beneath you. It's like you are unable to comprehend respecting other people. That said, I'll concede that we are inferior (and also space aliens?) if it gets you to stay in India.
>>84704870No one argued chinese were highly moral and never did anything, only that Europeans are worse. Actually, the worst one the planet by far when atrocity is measured.>They could retain some autonomy and were able to integrate into Rome,No one gives a fuck about Rome, you aren't Roman we're talking about semi-modern Europeans from the past 500 years.>Did whites get their butt kicked by Amerindians, blacks? Obviously not, yet they offered Amerindians a way to integrate or they offered them reservations, and they freed the blacks and eventually gave them citizenshipThis is more disingenuous cracker talk from you. Whites lost several battles/wars with amerindians and blacks. You offered "a way to integrate" to natives after wiping out 99% of their population and knowing they were virtually powerless, gave them barely habitable land. The civil war in which most of you did not even fight in and was partially fought by blacks also, the freedom of blacks was mainly just a tool to cripple the south's economy after. Slave owners received reparations and apologies before blacks ever. Your logic is basically "Yea we are pieces of shit but yknow we could have done worse". >it's more than made up for given the fact billions of people are alive today due to the inventions of white people. The economic and political systems are all because of white people, it's what's allowed you to be typing such nonsense right now and not have to worry about roaming war bands.There are several cases of intentional spreading of diseases amongst natives. 0.0001% of your population invented things to advance medicine or technology so it makes no sense to give the rest of you a pass. Furthermore your entire society and civilization exist because others built it for you and have never made a organized attempt to actually take it back. Love how you ignore your people stealing trillions btw.Your entire identity is sour grapes over co-existing with people you wronged kek
>>84704951>Also, if Europeans are truly inherently evil, why did America abolish slavery?MOST are truly inherently evil without a doubt due to passing down traditions. "Many of the abolitionists even regarded black people as inferior, but still regarded slavery as immoral" You basically answered your own question, they obviously did not give a shit about them and the freedom of slaves was more so a power move. Why free a people just to subjugate them to 2nd or 3rd class citizenship and allow them to still be hunted down and oppressed by southerners for nearly a whole century?Europeans did things every other group did on a much larger scale and in the most brutal methods. Even your claim about arab slavery is silly, in other cultures it's usually passed by debt or perhaps losing tribes in war. Europeans made it law that people of a certain phenotype were property and subhuman by default, regardless of behavior or individualistic value. India's caste is nowhere near on the level of what Europeans have done to others.Lmao how the fuck is a weirdo neo nazi talking about respecting other people? You need medication dude
>>84704870continuing...>Europeans ONLY integrated people into societies they took by force and forced others to build AFTER being confronted and fought over for it which invalidates whatever you have to say about their morals and standards.The conquered is at the complete mercy and whim of the conqueror, I am not saying it's moral. What I'm doing is being realistic and measuring European actions in this place of power vs non-Europeans, the only fair judgement we can actually make. Instead of having some ideal of how people should be treated and then seething that Europeans don't measure up to this ideal despite everyone else being worse.>Europeans stole 45 TRILLION DOLLARS from India in just over a century alone. And trillions of dollars more throughout Africa, The Americas and SEA. Nothing about that is "least extractive" compared to anyone else.Pic related, 45 trillion was a bs figure from an Indian marxist, marxists of course don't understand how wealth creation actually works. Same can probably be said for bs about about trillions of dollars stolen throughout Africa, Americans, and SEA. Here's why the argument is retarded, even without taking the resources from Africa for example, Africa would still be a shithole. Why? Because they can't build civilization, in other words, wealth is something you create. Hundreds of millions of jeets and africans exist soley because of white people, so remember that next time you type some bullshit about muh 45 trillion muh fugga.>>84704968>only that Europeans are worse.They weren't, measuring by how much atrocity vs good they did Europeans by far are the best, billions of people exist today because of white people.>0.0001% of your population invented things to advance medicine or technology so it makes no sense to give the rest of you a pass.Ok by that logic then the small percentage of people who actually engaged in conquering and the decision-making are the ones responsible.
>>84704968>There are several cases of intentional spreading of diseases amongst natives.Another myth, like muh 45 trillion muh fugga. The fact you can even debate the wrongs of white people betrays your claim of how evil white people are. You exist because of white people, you type this bullshit because of white people, and the only people who would even give a shit about your whining is white people. No other people give a shit about the lamentations of the conquered. Only white people have a conscience and are willing to commit civilizational suicide because they think they did wrong.
>>84705039>They weren't, measuring by how much atrocity vs good they did Europeans by far are the best, billions of people exist today because of white people.Your logic is fundamentally retarded because Europeans never would've advanced anything without their stolen resources or civilization in which only 0.0001% contributed anyway. A Way higher number of European soldiers, "explorers" and pillagers invaded compared to inventors and the rest of you benefit from their actions and fight to keep them in place. As a collective, white people have done far more evil in the world than good and it's not even close. It's also laughable you think some white guy in the 1800s was researching things for the sake of brown people. >>84705102>WHITEY DINDU NUFFINYou also exist because of non-white people, as your people were in Europe dying of plagues and constant war before colonialism. You over estimate the power of white people, they primarily colonized through famine, disease and economic sabotage. People surviving that has nothing to do with white mercy and everything to do with white failure. No one is patting your weird ass on the back because you didnt stab them deep enough.>Only white people have a conscience and are willing to commit civilizational suicide because they think they did wrong.No such thing, you just have chronic white self-victimization. Civilizational suicide would be to allow everyone invading your people, killing and taking what's theirs like you have done to them and subjugating you to 2nd class citizens. Something you people pretend is happening when an Indian or other non-white moves down the street from you. You are actually fucked in the head, and your victim status contradicts your inflated ego of white superiority. It is actually people like you that drive people into being "Anti-white", not propaganda or history of the past incase you don't get it by now.
>>84705039Also to add another nonsensical argument. >The numbers are wrong because marxist Brits literally inflated and manipulated taxation and other policies so its impossible to get perfect numbers, they stole a shit ton either way.Stealing from other people because "They would still be shitholes" is not a valid argument. You're still a thief, not to mention you don't shit you're saying anyway colonialism has done far more net negatives to Africa than positives. Brits literally burned down entire cities in west africa that you claim never existed.Your argument is retarded because it always boils down to "We did that horrible thing but not as horrible as you claim!" Once again you are evil creatures who i honestly believe developed mental illness from a lack of sunlight in those mountains and caves and maybe yamnayan rapes played a role also. Not all of you but a large enough number to have influenced your people into being the main villains of humanity for 500 years for sure.
>>84705183> Europeans never would've advanced anything without their stolen resources or civilization You don't understand how wealth creation works>A Way higher number of European soldiers, "explorers" and pillagers invaded compared to inventors and the rest of you benefit from their actions and fight to keep them in place. A higher number of inventors than any other race. And what's with this criticism that they benefited from their actions and fought to keep them in place? >As a collective, white people have done far more evil in the world than good and it's not even close.It's incredible how deluded you are, even if conquering isn't "moral", in the end, you would probably rather live in a place filled with white people instead of Amerindians scalping and torturing each other. So when you actually measure Europeans to non-Europeans you see that1. They conquered just like other people, they were just superior2. They treated the conquered better3. They did more than just conquer but also developed technology and medicine and institutions and political/economic structures that everyone relies on todayYou have the audacity to say shit like this when it's Europeans who ended slavery, came up with the notion of human rights, and are basically the reason why billions of people exist today. You are using the internet, you are using a computer or phone, you have electricity, etc etc >As a collective, white people have done far more evil in the world than good and it's not even close. It's also laughable you think some white guy in the 1800s was researching things for the sake of brown people.I didn't say it was for brown people, did you need them to think of your brown ass for you to be grateful of all the conveniences you have that allow you to exist and live comfortably?>You over estimate the power of white people, they primarily colonized through famine, disease and economic sabotage.More jeet delusion
>>84705305continuing...>And what's with this criticism that they benefited from their actions and fought to keep them in place?This here is just more proof that white people are held to a higher moral standard than non-white. Who else is expected to not benefit from the actions of their nation or who needs to fight injustice? Again, these arguments are retarded because you're comparing white people to an IDEAL instead of REALITY. Compare them to other people and you'll see that1. White people are the ones who care about injustice happening to other people and actively try to help them2. White people came up with the notion of human rights3. White people came up with the political and economic structures that the world relies on today4. White people invented almost everything that the world relies on today5. White people ended slavery6. That they weren't worse in comparison to other people in the context of conquering new lands, they were simply better at it, they actually treated the conquered betterThis is why when you say>We did that horrible thing but not as horrible as you claim!"It's so disengenous, because you can make anyone look horrible if you put the limelight to all the bad things they did, but then compare that to other people, and then weigh that against all the good they did. When you do that you'll see other people are worse and white people did the most good. You are a jeet living in a white country for fucks sake, you use technology made by white people, you live comfortably because of white people, you even EXIST because of white people. The technology white people invented is what even lead to a larger population even being able to be supported. Even as a collective white people are less ethnocentric, they view other races equally, like what more could you possibly fucking ask for.
>>84705368disingenous*
stop arguing with retarded jeets. they hate you because they feel inferior, it's not about justice. fuck them. just go outside and take a nice walk. theres hundreds of things you can do that would be better than arguing with retarded brownoids online. find a qt white girl and impregnate herlove from nigeria unironically
