[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


if loneliness turns you hateful, then you deserved the loneliness all along
>>
what if it made me retarded?
isolation usually just does that to me
>>
File: 1739248917658.jpg (260 KB, 1024x576)
260 KB JPG
>>84699987
Loneliness making me hateful? Do you think loneliness alone was what made me become what I am today? My life is a hell, nigga.
>>
>>84699987
I am going to rape your tight little asshole so hard
>>
>>84699987

>what you deserve is retroactive
>this is le heckin' good

Shut up.
>>
>>84699987
A powerful statement. And very true.
They're not gonna like this one.
>>
Or maybe you deserve to be lynched for letting me become lonely. Ever thought about that, nigger?
>>
>>84699987
"If only getting fucked by chad made you bitter, then you deserved the bitterness all along."
wow! so true!
>>84700000
mad digits anon
>>
File: 1780259745971315.jpg (19 KB, 409x414)
19 KB JPG
Do the majority of people deserve loneliness then? Because prolonged pain does create bitterness in most people eventually. It's not really a sign of bad character, the body just eventually conjures anger because it's activating and serves as a defensive barrier and as fuel to solve your problem.
>>
>>84700249
>mad digits anon
I wouldn't have realized the numbers if it wasn't for you, lol. Thanks for checking them.
>>
>>84700239
>implying you felt lonely because OP let you alone
>also implying OP is black
Do you want to be OP's friend or not?
>>
>>84700274
It is a sign of bad character actually. That's the point. A person with good character is unlikely to be lonely, and if they are, they are not going to turn hateful toward other people or society because of their loneliness.
>>
File: 1780233468857777.gif (887 KB, 500x256)
887 KB GIF
>>84700356
Absurdly and childishly simplistic viewpoint. Resentment doesn't make you a bad person and nobody is immune to Resentment. Just because modern society is unforgiving of negative emotions doesn't mean those emotions are bad. And for many lonely people, resentment is just a state of deprivation. Show them warmth or kindness and they'll be euphoric and lose all negativity in an instant.
>>
File: 1659821103503289.png (485 KB, 766x697)
485 KB PNG
>>84700339
>>implying you felt lonely because OP let you alone
Yes I can imply that. For OP isn't an individual but an abstraction in my head. Maybe you could even call him the manifestation of everything that is wrong with this decaying world.
>>also implying OP is black
OP is spiritually black, which is arguably far worse.
>Do you want to be OP's friend or not?
OP is a faggot and I saw him blow an aids-infested homeless guy behind a gas station.
Hope this answers your question.
>>
>>84700406
There's a difference between resentment and hate. The original question specified hate. Feelings of resentment towards what seems like an unjust or unfair society can be understandable. But many people take it much further than that, to the point where they regularly engage in hateful conduct, dehumanizing an entire gender. If your body "conjures up anger" directed at random innocent people, that speaks poorly of your character and rationality. A rational person of high moral character does not feel anger toward innocent people due to his own unfortunate circumstances. He seeks to overcome his challenges, improve himself and his situation as best he can, using his own freewill, rather than wallowing in misery and self pity.
>>
>>84700605
I would feel weird while interacting with people who have more money and are more "attractive" than me but that could be attributed to my social anxiety,

To say I feel anger is a big stretch. You aren't going to get anything done while comparing yourself to other people.
>>
File: apu 27.jpg (68 KB, 802x802)
68 KB JPG
>>84699987
what about self hatred?
>>
You niggas deserve to be permanently outcast. If you can't find a way to adapt to your environment, you deserve to die out. Fuck your meaningless life.
>>
>>84699987
I'll always love anyone who gives me their time
>>
>>84700605
You're mixing together multiple different offenses of varying severity and treating them all as the same.
>But many people take it much further than that, to the point where they regularly engage in hateful conduct, dehumanizing an entire gender.
This describes repeated actions rather than thoughts or feelings and thus might be enough to label someone as bad or close to bad, yes.
>If your body "conjures up anger" directed at random innocent people, that speaks poorly of your character and rationality.
Bullshit. Anger is often irrational and pain beyond a certain severity or duration overwhelms anyone to the point where not every thought and feeling they have is squeaky clean and PG and Disney-approved, no matter how much moral absolutionists shame them for having the wrong thoughts.
>A rational person of high moral character does not feel anger toward innocent people due to his own unfortunate circumstances. He seeks to overcome his challenges, improve himself and his situation as best he can, using his own freewill, rather than wallowing in misery and self pity.
Or... he can do both, in different moments. It's really not as simple as "If you ever have an excessively hateful thought or feeling you have lost your Good Person Card, forever." It's about averages and the totality of a person's character. Someone can have hate mixed in and it pales in comparison to their good qualities. Sometimes they're composed mainly of hate, but are redeemable because they respond well to love. Sometimes they're composed mainly of hate and bite the hands that reach out to them and thus become less sympathetic. Some people are self-pitying to a condemnable degree, some people are just human beings and feel frustrated at some times but overall do a respectable job of improving their situation and their psyche. No matter how much you wish it to be, people will never be bad just because they experience emotions you disapprove of.
>>
>>84700690
Been a while since I've read something I agree with. Good post, anon
>>
>>84700775
I appreciate that anon, thank you ^^
>>
File: 1772729167640.png (2.26 MB, 1920x1080)
2.26 MB PNG
>>84700476
Wow, that was deep.
>>
>>84700690
>You're mixing together multiple different offenses of varying severity and treating them all as the same.
Uhh.. no I'm not. I actually did the opposite of that. I said that there are indeed different degrees of severity and that they should be judged differently.

>Bullshit. Anger is often irrational and pain beyond a certain severity or duration overwhelms anyone to the point where not every thought and feeling they have is squeaky clean and PG and Disney-approved, no matter how much moral absolutionists shame them for having the wrong thoughts.
And one aspect of how we judge character is how one deals with their emotions. You can feel anger, resentful, bitter, but you will be judged based on how you respond to those emotional impulses. A person of high character does not lash out in an impulsive rage every time he feels angry, nor would he go online to make hateful comments directed at an entire gender or random innocent individuals.

>Or... he can do both, in different moments. It's really not as simple as "If you ever have an excessively hateful thought or feeling you have lost your Good Person Card, forever." It's about averages and the totality of a person's character.
I agree that it is nuanced. Character is dynamic rather than static. It's something a person can develop. They may have poor character in one stage of life and develop good character later on. I disagree that it's just about "averages" though. Sure that might be a theoretical way to quantify character and compare people to each other, but I would say a person who acts with good character for 6 days of the week and poor character 1 day of the week, they are not of good character. Part of the requirement of good moral character is consistency; people should be able to trust that you will act with moral decency in every situation. If they have to guess whether or not you will behave well, then you are not of good character.
>>
>>84699987
>If starvation turns you desperate, then you deserved starvation all along
What you sound like
>>
>>84700931
I have to go now, but pretty reasonable post, might reply later if thread still up
>>
>>84700948
Desperation is an inevitable consequence of starvation.
Hatefulness is not an inevitable consequence of loneliness, rather it is a reflection of poor character.
You failed.
>>
>>84700972
Its almost inevitable, may as well be since like 90% of people will become hateful of socially isolated.
>>
>>84700980
Even if that were the case, a person's personality and character almost always at least partially explains their loneliness. It's something of a feedback loop, where people with antisocial personalities or poor character are more likely to end up lonely, which causes bitterness and anger, making their personality even worse, which makes them even more unlikable and antisocial, re-enforces loneliness, and so on.
>>
>>84701086
That is true which is why its such a difficult trap for some people to escape.
>>
>>84699987
Poor Migu. Don't cry.
Myself, I have to keep smiling, or the things that are precious to me will break.
>>
>>84699987
Loneliness doesn't turn me hateful, lies, gaslighting and betrayal absolutely do though.
>>
True, and if getting raped makes you hateful you deserve it also
>>
>>84699987
Interesting, imagine a hot-air balloon but instead of that its Barack Obama with a giant ass farting your way up.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.