>>84725407
they are everywhere, the real question challenge is tricking one into dating you

>>84725407
100% if you keep looking.
>>84725422
abusechad-lite max and it doesn't matter what you look like, how you sound, or how much money you have. you must be capable of behaving this way, but its an option available and they always go for one anyway. these bitches are all BPDemons looking for someone to give them an excuse to rope.

>>84725460
nta, but the only ropes I care about are the ropes of cum I'm shooting all over those beautiful tits

>>84725407
Less than 1%

>>84725486
you'll have to settle for the open casket in this case i'm afraid anon, but i'll be there too.

>>84725407
whats the probability in finding a non stacy sexual sweet non normie bf? zero, same for you

>>84725556
even chad isn't stacey-sexual, this is the most delusional term you retards have conjured up in awhile. kill yourself.

>>84725618
the post is literally stacy sexual, just because youd settle for less than stacy doesnt mean you wouldnt resent ur non stacy gf and eyeball young stacies. kill yourself stacy sexual moid

>>84725630
>the post is literally stacey sexual
Wow! people who have no options inevitably end up just fantasizing about the extreme because it doesn't matter if they did or not, their not getting anything in the first place! 90% of the virgins on this board would happily date a sub 5 woman who watched their anime and knew about the retarded shit they liked. you are delusional.
> just because youd settle for less than stacy doesnt mean you wouldnt resent ur non stacy gf and eyeball young stacies.
literally everyone has wandering eyes, that's why BPDemons always have it in their back pocket. i know people who have been happily married for decades and their husband still looks at random foids in public. obviously women do the same. in no way means they resent their partner retard.
>stacy sexual moid
classic female projection at its finest, actually this entire post is, but i'm bored so i'll bite.

>>84725662
>Wow! people who have no options inevitably end up just fantasizing about the extreme
just say stacy sexual you midwit, NONE of you would be happy dating a sub 5 woman because ur not happy with anything. all you do is fantasise about the next best thing and what you 'missed out on'

>i know people who have been happily married for decades and their husband still looks at random foids in public.
and what does that mean for the wife he's married to? would she be happy knowing that? i said a SWEET non normie man, any man with wandering eyes is not sweet.

>>84725695
>NONE of you would be happy dating a sub 5 woman because ur not happy with anything
who the fuck is REALLY happy with anything? but regardless of that, you are dancing around the point. you have seen how people jump and bite at the chance to get contacts out of people who willingly admit they are ugly, fat, disfigured, etc. so long as they say they are biologically female.
>fantasise about the next best thing and what you 'missed out on'
this is called human nature, hindsight, regret, and a natural propensity for dissatisfaction are natural human behaviors that have been observed. that doesn't mean you aren't "happy" with your relationship.
>any man with wandering eyes is not sweet
so no human is sweet? i don't believe that your eyes don't wander. i don't believe that anyones eyes don't wander outside of those who have a mental illness. I personally do not because even looking at women makes me uncomfortable in public, but i am deeply traumatized so. i doubt you'd want that either, niggerfoid-chan.

>>84725407
Close to none. Being awkward or not neurotypical will nerf any advantage you have, apart from maybe extreme wealth.
I'm 6'2'', average face, slim/fit and make pretty good money and have savings/investments. But I am slightly autistic and schizoid, so I'm mostly invisible.
Sometimes some women signal interest in me with unnecessary touching, staring and hints...but it's always skinny sub5s I have no attraction towards. Being schizoid makes me prefer solitude anyway. If I can't get a beautiful, smart, entertaining woman then the effort of socializing is nowhere near worth it. And I'm not trying anyway so it is what it is.

>>84725772
>you have seen how people jump and bite at the chance to get contacts out of people who willingly admit they are ugly, fat, disfigured, etc
omg im sick of this talking point from moids, a starving man will eat rotten food, does that mean he LIKES rotten food?? no hes just starving.
> that doesn't mean you aren't "happy" with your relationship.
if you fantasise about other women, you are not happy in your relationship. to argue anything else is stupid.
>so no human is sweet?
there are but they are a very small percentage of people. my eyes dont wander (not that i have ever dated, nor will) because i am so full of disgust.

>>84725857
>my eyes dont wander (not that i have ever dated, nor will) because i am so full of disgust.
So again, you're just projecting your own issues onto everyone else lol. I don't date anyone based on looks, although I do care about their health.

>>84725893
i just told you my eyes dont wander you ESL fuck. i

>>84725857
>a starving man will eat rotten food, does that mean he LIKES rotten food?? no hes just starving.
it has been observed that men are objectively less picky when selecting for looks, i don't know what else to tell you. you can argue about how they wish they had someone better, or whatever. there is no real way to prove that.
>if you fantasise about other women, you are not happy in your relationship.
everyone fantasizes. i realize not feeling comfortable with that, that's why partners don't tell eachother these things. its insecurity feeding, but its not bad or unnatural. you cannot control the thoughts your brain instills within you, you can simply choose to ignore them and move on with your life.
>there are but they are a very small percentage of people.
they are mentally ill.
>my eyes dont wander (not that i have ever dated, nor will) because i am so full of disgust.
same for me, i guess.

>>84725901
>i just told you my eyes dont wander you ESL fuck. i
Not because you're this non-shallow person though. You just hate people.

File: unknown.png (3 KB, 355x79)

3 KB PNG

>>84725407
>pink nipples
the other two you can easily assess but how can you tell someone has pinkies without risking prison?

>>84725922
im the person they are arguing with.

>you just hate people
yes i do and i am willing to admit that.

>>84725912
>it has been observed that men are objectively less picky when selecting for looks
again because theyre not the sexual selectors. they dont get to PICK, they get picked and thats it.
>there is no real way to prove that.
and there's no way for you to disprove it.
>everyone fantasizes
i do not agree.

>>84725931
>yes i do and i am willing to admit that.
And I'm accusing you of being hypocritical. You just come up with bullshit to reject men.

>>84725922
where did i say im not a shallow person? ive never even dated to KNOW if im like that and nor do you know if it's 'just because i hate people'. even if i was shallow, at least i have the decency to not pretend im so sincere

>>84725936
>again because theyre not the sexual selectors. they dont get to PICK, they get picked and thats it.
high value men do get to pick, and they still frequently pick women outside of the top physical attractiveness wise.
>and there's no way for you to disprove it.
research burden of proof.
>i do not agree.
anyone who consumes romance media inside of a relationship is pretty much disqualified automatically. outside of that, i think you can just use your head and realize thats true. idk. seems self evident.
>>84725962
nah, i was saying it was me responding to you anon lol

>>84725995
>research burden of proof.
you realise this means when you make an argument, you prove it? you are making an argument the same as me lmao, if you think men are less shallow then you have as much responsibility as me to PROVE that
>i think you can just use your head and realize thats true
not an argument

>>84726004
>claim: Men will date/have sex with women who are generally considered below average in physical appearance.
we both agree on this, as we already said because its not only self evident but its also been proven via studies.
>claim: Men in relationships with women who are generally considered unattractive resent their partner/dream about being with someone more attractive
you need to prove that. you are making the claim. that is the logical concept of shouldering the burden of proof when making a claim that both parties cannot agree upon. reversing it into "YOU CANT DISPROVE IT" is religicuck garbage and intellectually dishonest.
>not an argument
well, there is no other way to determine that. i seriously doubt anything has been done to try to prove that objectively.

>>84726064
>you need to prove that
im not here to convince you, i dont care to convince you lmfao. again if there's no way to disprove or prove it, then the discussion is meaningless. im only here to vent frustrations not to have intellectual discussion where i give you my sources and lah-di-dah

>>84726064
adding onto this, i only argued back against ur shitty 'but duuuh men date ugly women tooo' talking point, because thats very easy to debunk as a big nothing burger to what i was saying.

>>84726119
you can't disprove something without a basis of proof to attack, sigh. i don't know why i bother arguing with foids. you always hope you might squeeze an intelligent thought out of them and its always the same shit. have fun whining about problems you make up for yourself, niggerfoid-chan.

>>84726140
midwit moid claims you cant prove something and still wants me to prove it somehow, lmfao. 'burden of proof' directly after saying 'you cant prove it'. you cant prove a lot of things in life, it doesnt mean theyre incorrect.

>>84726139
its because you view it from your own privileged lens, that is why you have these insecurities. because YOU are PROJECTING.
you are worried about him fantasizing about someone "better" because that is what WOMEN do when they SETTLE as SEXUAL SELECTORS. men and womens brains aren't wired the same way, but you are ignoring that out of convenience to make yourself feel better about being a RETARD. i seriously wonder if women are capable of any level of intelligent thought.

>>84726173
>because that is what WOMEN do when they SETTLE as SEXUAL SELECTORS
everyone settles retard. even men settle as the sexually selected.

>men and womens brains aren't wired the same way
vague claim that has nothing to do with the convo and no elaboration, yet calls me a retard lol. men are literally wired to be stacy sexual lol. women are wired to be chad sexual. (which i never claimed otherwise, mind you) this is human biology and yet ur the one arguing against it lmao

>>84725509
slinging ropes on her fat tits, one last goodbye, what a dumb slut