[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/r9k/ - ROBOT9001


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: aueso4.jpg (84 KB, 578x433)
84 KB JPG
I've always been against immigrations. Due to how immigrants negatively affect the economy, not to mention how they refuse to assimilate.
>>
>>84830923
that's nice anon, how was school?
>>
>>84830923
I'm a leftist and hate immigrants, next
>>
>>84830923
>more immigrants means more diversity
>more diversity means less white supremacy
>less white supremacy is a good thing
that's really how deep the thought process goes
>>
>>84830923
Immigration and even the "melting pot" idea have been taken off its original course. The idea used to be that, given the fact that people interpret the world in different ways, which is influenced by their enviroment, a society in which multiple cultures interact would lead to each one of these subgroups enriching the other by offering the best of their cultures. This can work, for example, in Europe, where the main ethos of the continent is mostly the same. People from different cultures would still remain somewhat insulated or at least exist in an enviroment dominated by their own people while still sharing the common, wider social space with other groups with similar values but different characteristics.
The problem is that the idea that it is the duty of 1st world countries to "save" or "help" 3rd world people by allowing them to live in their society. These are people who DO NOT share the same ethos or general social norms as the population of the country they chose to flee to, and thus the original cohesion erodes. Now, the goal isn't cohabitation and the betterment of overall society, but the "saving" of the less fortunate.
>>
>>84830923
prehippie old school leftists weren't big on mass immigration
Most of my views can be described as "left" and I don't want millions of third worlders invading my country

One thing I want to add is you'll never see any republican oppose "legal" immigration because a third worlder will do the same job for less money and won't join a union
Any republican will tell you illegals are still our jobs and housing, why do they think that suddenly isn't a problem if Ahmed has a green card?

Also H1B visas are pure bullshit
>>
File: 1774155591366234.jpg (91 KB, 986x541)
91 KB JPG
>>84830923
Mass immigration is a classical liberal position, not left-wing. It's mostly porkies and billionaires that support it because it allows them to outsource labor to cheap migrants while keeping wages low across the board and prevent unions from taking hold.

Marx, Lenin, and Mao were all against mass migration and saw it as a means of robbing the workers of their own labor power. "Leftists" aren't the people you should be strawmanning, Elon Musk is who you should be hating.

All that said, anti-immigration in modern American politics is just about racism which is retarded. Instead of targeting the giant corporations that are bringing these people into our country moronic chuds just target random immigrants who have no control over the situation because they aren't the ones making hiring decisions.

I can already tell you probably aren't anti-immigration if you're a typical /pol/tard chud. Migrant workers are the reason all your food is dirt cheap and your service/retail jobs are full of glorified slaves, and you like that; fuck paying local farmers and mcdonalds workers a living wage right? What you don't like is seeing brown people in the streets. You're just racist. You want to exploit their labor but you don't want them occupying the same spaces as you. You don't want to target billionaires and jews because that would mean having to pay Americans a living wage and an expansion of unions and universal healthcare blahblah and that would be terrible. What you really mean by "anti-immigration" is you want a caste system like Dubai. But Capitalism doesn't care about that, because race is irrelevant to profit. You as a white man hold no greater value under Capitalism than your brown neighbor and coworker. This is all just extreme cognitive dissonance on the far-right's part tbqh, they're too loyal to their billionaire masters to oppose the one thing that guarantees constant mass immigration.
>>
File: 1778357599795464.mp4 (2.28 MB, 720x1280)
2.28 MB
2.28 MB MP4
>>84830923
>Defend yourself leftoids
Mass immigration brings more Black bulls to white countries so they can sexually please our women, sissies and trannies.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.