why exactly did nature make women such cunts? What evolutionary advantage is there of this? Wouldn't it be better if women were actually loving and loyal
because there is nothing natural about the modern world. we are not living according to our nature.
>>84834844Provokes you into raping them thus reproducing
>>84834844most men are not good people, either. just the times.
>>84834844Because women didn't choose mating partners.It's men who decided how to disturbute foids for breeding via negotiations or straight up combat.In such environment foids character had very small effect on breeding success. Two qualities had large success: been pretty and liking rape. And foid were breed to have these.But in today's society were foids got agency their evolutionary traits move them completely in wrong way.tldr they evolved in one environment and live now in completely different environment.
The evolutionary advantage is that she wouldnt procreate with weak dysgenic incels. Sorry but the nature is against your existence
>>84834982This makes sense. Being traumatized by rape would only be a net negative while the whores who got wet and aroused during rape would thrive, be of better health, have more children and thus spread their I-get-wet-when-being-raped genes in the next generation, this would make it more common to enjoy (or at least don't really mind it) rape.
>>84834844makes you more likely to get raped vs being nice where men might fall in love. rapes lead to pregnancies more often than loving sex so unironically during the time when rape was one of the more dominant strats to pass on your genes being a cunt was positively selected for
>>84834982"If Men here won't rape us WE'LL MAKE THE RAPE COME TO US!"
>>84834982>Because women didn't choose mating partners.This is how you know feminists don't study real history. They keep spouting this straight bs. Repeal the 19th.
they can't fight so they defend themselves with scorn/shaming/gossip-4 STR, +2 CHA
>>84835457>and thus spread their I-get-wet-when-being-raped genes in the next generation,Exactly.And here is the thing: of course in the past not every woman was raped, many of them lived more ir less happily lives with their husbands in peace time. But in this case having I get-wet-when-being-raped gene doesn't hurt, society didn't allow woman to abandon husband and run away wtih rapist Chad so dangerous potential for normal life of this gene was contained. But peaceful like in the past could end any minute and it's screaming vikings swipe through a village and carry woman away after beheading here husband. And here I get-wet-when-being-raped gene blooms to a full potential, she will give 6 healthy children to Konung and that woman's genes propagate. While women suffering In these conditions will die from depression or something leaving no offsprings. So having I get-wet-when-being-raped gene had no downsides in the past and big advantages and women outbred and spread this gene around. But now when women have agency it does very bad service for them.
