This is truly a modern master piece art work that should be archived forever.
>>84863738lol you faggots post about this bullshit on reddit too? do something else with your time ffs.
I do not understand what this image is trying to say
>>84863738>attractive actor is considered attractive despite the messy hair and glasses>heh I rest my case
>>84863738Let's start describing features instead of giving subjective numerals She has a gracile skull shape and light, proportionate, and symmetrical facial features. Her stature isn't visible from the picture but the aforementioned features give off the impression of height. She has long, natural hair.
>>84863738She's cute. 7 is underrating her in her prime.
>>84863738>that>like a 7Pluh...
>>84865364>>84865341>>84864125Shut the board down, it's clearly over
>>84863738i see numerous women more attractive than this many times over just leaving the house. 5 on a good day.makeupceling can only do so much
>>84866046Is she not described well enough here >>84865341 for you
>>84863982>>84864125I think he's saying that a plain and "ugly" female is generally preceived as more attractive than a male one with the same traits. so foids will never get with their looksmatches because their default rating is so high or something.
She is pretty. A clear 7. Poor pic but 6 is too low and 8 way too high.
>>84865341anon she unironically has chudface
>>84866046sorry I'll get a concussion and stop using reason>>84866090You think a chad would be rated less than a chad if he looked disheveled?>quick test what do you rate sleep deprived prime sean o'pry
>>84866132shes literally just wearing glasses you stupid moid fuck
>>84866147>upper eyelid exposure>nasolabial folds>eyes too far apartyep chudfaceher male looksmatch is raging on .is right now
>>84866174You're just arguing with one retard. 99% of this board would marry her if they could. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZ_HugKUePs
>>84866147YOU NIGGAS CANNOT FUCKING READ OPS PICTURE CLEARLY SAID >CHARACTER FROM A GOD DAMN FUCKING MOVIE AS CURRENTLY DEPICTED IN THE PICTURE
>file no longer existsWhat's the matter? Looked too much like a chud in that one? Looking for a frauded one?
>>84866182I saw that movie. I thought she was hotter than the Jennifer character. I love girls with huge blue eyes though.
>>84866165>upper eyelid exposureno she doesnt lmfao, she has medium set brows. UEE and medium set brows are not the same. and even if she did have UEE, thats not as strict of a requirement of attractiveness as it is for men.>nasolabial foldsshes fucking smiling and the original OP image she's in overhead lighting>eyes too far apartliterally the only actual negative and thats why shes a 7 and not any higher. you know who else has wide set eyes? gemma ward. and she is a supermodel. fucking moids, honestly you call women hypergamous and then say dumb shit like this.
>>84866147this girl is significantly better looking and is still not in the 9s. women are just delusional lesbians
>>84866182yes retarded fuck, shes still a 7 even if shes wearing glasses because features DONT CHANGE, dumb fuck. kill yourself
>>84866182>>84866192I can't believe I share a board with these mouth breathing people
>>84866203this girl literally has an alien face shape (forehead unproportionally wider than her jaw) and small unproportional lips and nothing about her stands out. she's a solid 6.5.
>>84866189no retard, i wanted to change what i said about the UEE because she doesnt even have it
>>84866215that means seyfried is sub 6.5 then
>>84866147Hnnnng, this is like my dream qt GF. I would be Beastmen and she could play Reikland - we would be a great force to be reckoned with. After we win the game I would fuck her and cum in her throat.
>>84866209>>84866203careful, you're gonna trigger the typical "akshully stacies bad because they remind me of my shortcomings" cope
>>84866203That girl is so much worse looking for me, but maybe because I'm east asian. I think Amanda Seyfried is pretty popular in Korea though.
>>84863738next time a women suggests highly rating an ugly woman, turn around and say she looks like that
>>84866200>all the features mentioned still on displayget glassesyour gay alien phenotype hoe is mid
>>84866203This is a weak 8, making a stupid face in the pic and also a shitty angle, she might be a solid 8 in reality.
>>84866225no because she doesnt have alien head and small lips. also that other woman in the pic is literally wearing makeup and posing in a selfie in selected lighting, i intentionally chose pictures of amanda without makeup so you cant use the makeupcel argument.
>>84866231Amanda has the "average girl next door you went to high school with" look about her, she's not intimidating to talk to like the 8/10 and 9/10s are, she's like a 4.5-5/10 in the op picture and a 6-6.5/10 with make up and frauded lighting & angles
>>84866250seyfriend's breakout role was a low IQ bimbo. if they thought she was exceptionally good looking she would have been too good looking for the role.
>>84866200>>84866241tfw no alien phenotype gf, why even live bros
>>84866262for example: a genuinely gorgeous woman who was cast as a high IQ bond girl
>>84866241you get glasses since you dont know what upper eyelid exposure means, its in the name EYELID. not the part above the eyelid, thats the brow bone.
>>84866165even among psl freaks she's still highly rated so it's no surprise at all that the average population would think she's a 7>>eyes too far apartwide set eyes are attractive on women, or at least preferable to the contrary.Moids wish she was a chud, so they'd think it's the kind of homely attainable woman they could get if she lowered her standards while also patting themselves on the back about how low their own standards are
>>84866273this is a very mediocre looking woman. her eyes carry her appearance.>>84866262bimbos are meant to be attractive, thats literally the point of a bimbo, that she only has looks going for her.
>>84866262>>84866273>>84866274lets cut to the chase, post a woman you think is a 5/10
>>84866292also she must be around her 20s in the given picture
>>84866286I rate her as a fuckable trailer trash becky. Looks very dumb, low class and primitive. Like the other anon said her breakout role as a low IQ bimbo was perfect for her.
>>84866288bimbos are meant to be lolcows in movies. if they were actually that good looking it would distract from the comedy and the entire female audience would be seething.
>>84866274Literally the difference between looking up or down. You used the same trickery when you selected the previous pic.
>>84866292>sydneysweeneywithoutmakeupandwithouthertitsshowing.jpg
>>84866320Cope, she's literally a godess and you're just mad because you browse r/smallboobsociety
>>84866332delete every one of your posts in this thread you braindead coomer
>>84866332Men should just start wearing makeupIt's the easy solution to level the playing field.
>>84866336struck a nerve huh?Listen, her total SMV value mogs Amandas 1000000000x, a looks rating isn't just about face it includes the body and height, Sweeney mogs her to the 9th dimension and we both know it
>>84866351sydney sweeney is literally a meme propped up by maga soiboys. If she wears make up and has her tits out and puts on the charm sure she's great.
>>84866320As a former PSL autist I can agree she's very mediocre, the very definition of 5/10. The problem is no one can be objective when it comes to Sweeney because she's deeply tied to internet culture wars. Some people will say stupid simp shit like >>84866332, others will claim she's downright ugly.
>>84866360>brings up politics out of nowhereDo you honestly think, given that both Sweeney and Amanda were never famous, that the average man would pick fucking AMANDA over Sweeney? Sweeney simply mogs the fuck out of her with the body card which accounts for 70% of the looks scale for women.
>>84866381nigger you're the one who brought up everything but the face out of nowhere. I just said I think Sydney is great when you take everything into account. stop sperging out.
>>84866351this thread is specifically about face retard. the OP image didnt include body.>>84866309>Bimbo is slang for a conventionally attractive, sexualized, and dim-witted woman.>>84866319this doesnt even deserve a response. you're retarded. genuinely. >>84866292it's hard to give an example of a 5 out of ten because you have to factor in things like country, personal preference etc etc which may skew by like .5 of a point either way. anyway im purely thinking in terms of skinny, white and young.
>>84866399The lady in your picture mogs the ever living shit out of Amanda facially, she's literally chudmaxxxing in this image
>>84866421the woman in the pic i sent literally has man jaw, assymetry, actually has nasolabial folds, long face, ugly hair and shit nose to lips ratio.
>>84866421we can settle this definitively by just doing an AI gender swap on Amanda
>>84866399>this doesnt even deserve a response. you're retarded. genuinely.Yet you responded. Not convinced? Look at the picture you just posted. Extreme eyelid exposure or simply looking down? (It's the latter, idiot) That's why the blonde girl you're simping ITT has clear UEE in one pic and none in the other.
>>84866445i didnt say the woman in the picture i just sent has UEE you actual dimwit. give a single picture of amanda with UEE, also the picture you responded to of the two brunettes side by side were both looking forward, the one on the left has her head slightly lower but if you have two braincells to rub together and make fire you'd be able to still see that she has no UEE if it were slightly lifted more.
>>84866440>man jawNo man views this as a bad thing unless its to a comical degree where it's distracting, it translates to: will give you chad sons, it's even the beauty standard in western europe.>assymetryyeah but waaaay less than the chuddy amanda picture, + she is literally staring sideways>ugly hairits literally just short hair you sperg>shit nose to lips ratio.org autism>long faceyeah I can see that, still mogs the ever living shit out of the chudlines Amanda has though
>>84866443no we cannot because women are not men. no shit if a man looked like a gender swapped woman with feminine features he wouldnt be attractive.
>>84866480>its literally just short hair you spergno its ugly colored, does she want to be brunette or blonde? fucking pick one. and her parting sucks and it just looks choppy and not flattering at all for her.>it translates to: will give you chad sonsdoesnt mean its attractive, exactly, it's a masculine trait, you want women to have masculine traits? it's not the beauty standard in western europe.
>>84866483cope. there's a reason slavic women tend to be above average in looks and the men tend to look like incels.
>>84866483>LOUD INCORRECT BUZZERits a well known phenomenon male to female snapchat filters create beautiful women while female to male filters create absolute chuds
>>84866521yes.. because slavs have feminine features which look good on women and not on men lol
>>84866461I didn't say you said it. I'm saying the upper eyelids are showing and the reason why (she's looking down). You can't trust pics where someone is either looking up or down even slightly. You can try it yourself right now. You don't even have to look in the mirror, looking up slightly will make you feel the difference physically. Probably easier to feel if you have hooded eyes.As for your request, here you go. No fucking way...she's looking down.
>>84866532I know nobody here is having children but if they did they should not choose someone who looks like Amanda Seyfried.
>>84866541>No fucking way...she's looking down.what are you actually arguing? i said amanda doesnt have UEE, you clearly have a problem with what i said so i ask you to send me a picture of amanda with UEE, so you send me a picture of her looking down? when ur point is literally that looking down gives a fake impression of UEE, which would align with my point that she doesnt actually have UEE...
It's just brutal how the body pill remains undefeated, even a retarded redneck like Sweeney can brutally mog by body alone
>>84866483This is only true for "beautiful" people in the 6-7 range. The two biggest stacies posted ITT would be attractive as men too >>84866203>>84866209
>>84866554Elle Fanning mogs every blonde in Hollywood despite not having an exceptional face or body. How does she do it?
>>84866561that blonde is not a stacy, are you brown? that is such a mediocre looking white woman, i have seen this woman a million times irl, she looks like a slightly more attractive piper rockelle lmfao
>>84866563>How does she do it?She looks like she would be on BLACKED
>>84863738Ratings in general are fucked. This is pure autism but...Ten point rating systems have been a disaster across a diverse set of interests. For dating in particular, 9-10 seems to be the minimum for women without the understanding that its a rarity. Again, this applies universally, but ratings that high start to approach idealistic representations, near perfects that are either overwhelming accepted or highly subjective.We all know the internet filters people into hive minds, so you must get universal approval if you dare post online. In other words, if its not a 9-10, you risk being devalued in your online community. Women, to their own determent, chase these hyper unicorns because the alternative is to dating a "mid 6" man. Never mind that she might find him attractive and available (availability simultaneously being a huge negative at the < 8 level and a rarity multiplier at >=8).
>>84866579That blonde is the archetypal Stacy. You are completely delusional.
>>84866553My point, which made you shit your pants, was that you were picking and choosing pics where she was looking up, such as >>84866200. One can't trust them. You clearly understand the point, you instinctively don't want to trust the picture I posted, so I really don't know why you keep seething.And btw, nasolabial folds in literally every pic, at least you jumped off that hill. She's mediocre.
>>84866598if she wasnt blonde, you would quite literally rate her as a 6.
>>84866182>AS CURRENTLY DEPICTED IN THE PICTUREI didn't see the movie
>>84866610you responded to me when i posted a picture of two women with minimal UEE and major UEE arguing against THAT picture.
>>84866615>if she was less attractive she would be less attractiveI don't think japanese women with blonde hair look good either.
>>84866615>from white stacy to latina isabellai remember when trolling was an art
>>84866610also retard, >>84866147shes not looking up in this picture. like how stupid are you.
>>84866629probably because japs naturally dont have blonde hair so it looks off. thank you for proving the point lmfao
>>84866579She mogs every palecel blonde piggy posted ITT by a mile. Not only in facial structure, but in coloring as well. Her skin is perfect and it's precisely because she's darker if anything, so you can stop screeching about browns worshipping their opposite.>>84866615Still stacy. Great work.
>>84866643You have no point. You are just a delusional seething autist.
>>84866654>Still stacy. Great work.lmfao you're ironically the actual problem for the inflated sexual market, enjoy moid. >Her skin is perfect aka she's wearing concealer>browns worshipping their oppositeit's worse that you're not. you're white and you think the middest white women are 8+/10
>>84866663shes prettier in this picture, again not stacy. literally cannot exceed a 7. although she does look potentially prettier than amanda here, hard to tell with the retarded face she keeps pulling though
>>84866677You will be hard pressed to find someone who is more universally rated at least an 8/10. That's Stacy. The fact that you can't perceive that means you are delusional.
>>84866623I responded to that picture because the head is tilted in both pics, one down, one up, and you thought and still think that you were making a great point (btw I'm pretty sure it's literally the same woman in both pics, you being a facially blind autist would be the cherry on top and it would invalidate your entire presence ITT).>>84866147You really are a moron, her face is clearly leaning down slightly yet she's looking at the camera lens, that's the same effect as looking up.
>>84866688she looks like a troon in this screenshot
>>84866696pure mental illness here hopefully this pic will cleanse your spirit
>>84866703It cleansed my spirit alright
>>84866703pigs>>84866693just stfu for a second, do you think amanda has UEE or not?
>>84866664Guess she's wearing concealer on her breasts as well, since it's the same perfect tone. Or her entire body for that matter, looking at the other pics now.inb4 tanningThe other palecel blondes could never look like this. They would just burn under the sun. Maybe with a fake spray tan.
>>84866718>Guess she's wearing concealer on her breasts as well, since it's the same perfect tone.man discovers that women tone match their makeup
I googled the pic to confirm and yes, it's mila kunis in both pictures LMAO. FACIALLY BLIND AUTIST. WHY DO YOU EVEN TRY TO TALK ABOUT THESE THINGS? Fuck off immediately.
>>84866725holy shit is there no end to your cope
>thread devolves to seethin flat chested loser being mad about stacies and big breasted womenWho could have seen this coming
>>84866732i literally just chose a picture off google comparing UEE in like 5 seconds and you had to google to double check, you probably looked at the image more than i did
>>84866725Yep, whole body makeup, great cope.
>>84866739the thread was never about boobs you simpleton, it's purely about face. >>84866737it's not cope, women literally match their foundation to their chest, that is the rule.
>>84866742You're obviously a frumpy sub-becky and literally autistic to top it off. Great fucking thread.
>>84866744thats... not what i said... gosh why do i even try to talk about this with moids
>>84866748OPs picture never mentioned purely face, just looks and the holy trinity of looks for women is face, body and height
>>84866751im a sub becky because im calling an attractive woman attractive lmfao, every single feature ive called ugly in this thread (the ones of the alleged stacies youve sent) applies to myself.
>>84863738That's a 3 or 4Most people are less than 3
>>84866132Not a single point mentioned le sigh
>>84866762Amanda Seyfried is above average she's just absolutely not an 8.5
To close off the thread; the main points made were that the actress is like a 6.5/10 and that op's picture (here: >>84866421 ) she is just a normal 5 / 10 looking low tier Becky. Also breast envy is on the mind's of women 24/7 which is why they seethe at Sweeney even though there are waaaaaaaaay more racist and retarded famous MAGA women out there.
>>84866793i agree. i think she's a 7. i dont think any of the women posted here exceed a 7 apart from adriana lima.
>>84866754Then what else did you try to imply? We can see her hands and part of her belly in the other pics. It's the same skin tone. Obviously she would match it on her face to conceal any imperfections. Your concealer cope came completely out of left field.
>>84866819women match their foundation to their chest. im not saying they wear makeup on their chest, im saying thats literally how you tone match your foundation, you go off of the colour of your neck and chest. so no shit her concealer/foundation matches her chest. itd be weird if it didnt
>>84866793The only thing that puts her above the average woman is the fact that she's thin.
>>84863738It's basically a beaten to death horse at this point that men view women much more favorably than women, and women do the same by simply lie, as they need to parse their opinions through a consensus filter to avoid persecution of the group, which means they'll always overestimate themselves and the others. That's why all women think they are 10s is a feedback loop of women constantly gassing each other up and becoming two faced bitches behind closed doors.
>>84866147>seyfriedLmao what an ugly kike
>>84866836Right, her tone is her tone, that was the point.
>>84866887no, anon's point was that her face skin was perfect, hence why i mentioned concealer. then some retard claimed it couldnt be concealer because it matches her chest perfectly.
>>84866541I didn't know that was her. She looked so unattractive in the thumbnail I didn't even bother clicking on it. This is her worst photo in the thread by far.
>>84866893I'm anon and my point was about her skin color/tone>She mogs...not only in facial structure, but in coloring as well>Her skin is perfect and it's precisely because she's darker
10 doesnt biologically exist yet, in theory would cause death on sight due to dopamine overload9 Giga Stacy so aesthetic that everyone turns i to a zombie around her even non lesbian women or faggots8 Stacy face causes instant hypnosis7 Attractive Face causes elevated mood6 Above Average Face causes some arousal e.g Most White females5 Average Face causes no disgust or arousal(this dont mean men cant jerk off to it)in men e.g Most Middle Eastern females4 Bad Looking Face causes slight disgust e.g Most black females, most indian females3 Ugly Face causes reflexive gagging on sight e.g Aboriginal females2 Very Ugly the face is so aesthetic repulsive that people get chills down their spine rather than feel disgust1 Unimaginable Ugly Imagine a face so awful it causes you to get a heart attack, like 10 this has yet to exist as even deform fuckers are 2 rating
>>84866921well then i misunderstood what you meant by perfect, my mistake. thats just personal preference though.
>>84866924the only average faces that cause disgust to me are aboriginals
>>84863738Just seen this chopped foid make a meme video like >boohoo there's too few 6'2 guys in the bar compared to 5'4 ones
>>84866443Unioronically based and true.Also dunno what this says about Brittany Venti but I gender swapped a bunch of females and she is the only one who came out as a dude who could pick up a girl.Not Chad, just a just who needed to put in effort and could probably get a 5
>>84866953And I am not exaggerating about this.... Pokemaine gender swapped is horrifying
>>84866961That asian guy is supposed to be ugly?
>>84866971are you the one (1) who thought Elliot Rodger was hot?
>>84866971Pokemaine is Moroccan.>Here is an Asian gender swap
>>84866977Eliot Rodgers as a female was very pretty.He honestly wasn't that ugly, he was just an insufferable asshole
>>84866443this post was a psyop to make me feel a little gay after genderswapping my gf
>>84866421attractive, i like looking at her>>84866399>>84866203very little attraction
>>84866443Unfortunately this is true as I have seen the results of a guy with chad-like genes breed with an unfortunate looking woman: unfortunate looking children. The reason why they started a family together was because they met at uni and have stayed together this whole time (and were probably each other's firsts). Nice people and I wish them the best but yeah, really unfortunate looking children.
>>84866320her breasts are a halo
this is the subhuman that recently pretended to need a bodyguard after celebrating Kirk's death, right? she is a 0
